Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   ALL IN LINCOLN AREA (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33603937)

york 24-11-2006 18:17

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
updated ping plotter:

Target Name: www.bbc.co.uk
IP: 212.58.224.86
Date/Time: 24/11/2006 19:15:09

1 12 ms 29 ms 25 ms 56 ms 34 ms 21 ms 23 ms 19 ms 70 ms 20 ms [10.234.92.1]
2 20 ms 43 ms 42 ms 40 ms 26 ms 19 ms 30 ms 26 ms 64 ms 34 ms nott-t2cam2-a-v635.inet.ntl.com [82.13.49.77]
3 61 ms 24 ms 33 ms 25 ms 65 ms 67 ms 212 ms 54 ms 53 ms 19 ms nott-t3core-1a-ge-110-0.inet.ntl.com [195.182.175.129]
4 43 ms 31 ms 36 ms 120 ms 38 ms * 189 ms 35 ms 75 ms 33 ms lee-bb-a-so-020-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.169]
5 36 ms 92 ms 37 ms 101 ms 73 ms 36 ms 162 ms 54 ms 54 ms 48 ms pop-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.238]
6 78 ms 68 ms 57 ms 66 ms 69 ms 70 ms 129 ms 38 ms 27 ms 37 ms gfd-bb-a-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.137]
7 55 ms 37 ms 40 ms 35 ms 25 ms 48 ms 97 ms 31 ms 65 ms 30 ms gfd-bb-b-ge-000-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.6]
8 24 ms 69 ms 36 ms 43 ms 140 ms 24 ms 68 ms 50 ms 39 ms 65 ms tele-ic-1-so-110-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.78]
9 20 ms 45 ms 27 ms 37 ms 113 ms 58 ms 36 ms 26 ms 44 ms 54 ms [212.58.238.189]
10 37 ms 19 ms 29 ms 59 ms 84 ms 37 ms 70 ms 72 ms 94 ms 48 ms [212.58.238.149]
11 82 ms 52 ms 67 ms 84 ms 50 ms 46 ms 41 ms 40 ms * 32 ms [212.58.224.86]

Its not very good right now, as bad as usual :(

york 24-11-2006 22:46

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
I decided to do a continous ping plotter test for about 2 hours, here are the results.

Target Name: www.bbc.co.uk
IP: 212.58.224.86
Date/Time: 24/11/2006 23:42:46

1 39 ms 18 ms 43 ms 30 ms 83 ms 35 ms 49 ms 27 ms 50 ms 23 ms [10.234.92.1]
2 25 ms 21 ms 21 ms * * 34 ms 27 ms 22 ms 58 ms 33 ms nott-t2cam2-a-v635.inet.ntl.com [82.13.49.77]
3 29 ms 33 ms 76 ms 36 ms * 21 ms 68 ms 21 ms * 30 ms nott-t3core-1a-ge-110-0.inet.ntl.com [195.182.175.129]
4 46 ms 26 ms 49 ms * 40 ms 38 ms 44 ms 16 ms 32 ms 27 ms lee-bb-a-so-020-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.169]
5 60 ms 75 ms 50 ms 41 ms 63 ms 31 ms 33 ms 32 ms 64 ms 38 ms pop-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.238]
6 37 ms 46 ms 28 ms * 43 ms 67 ms 86 ms 49 ms 63 ms 30 ms gfd-bb-a-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.137]
7 35 ms 44 ms 26 ms 58 ms 81 ms 39 ms 60 ms 59 ms 79 ms 105 ms gfd-bb-b-ge-000-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.6]
8 120 ms 36 ms 77 ms 34 ms 59 ms 20 ms 30 ms 41 ms * 78 ms tele-ic-1-so-110-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.78]
9 95 ms 29 ms 53 ms 177 ms 46 ms 38 ms 41 ms 40 ms 79 ms 47 ms [212.58.238.189]
10 65 ms 34 ms 82 ms 30 ms 54 ms 44 ms 31 ms 65 ms 55 ms 25 ms [212.58.238.149]
11 32 ms 64 ms 57 ms 30 ms 28 ms 94 ms 123 ms 36 ms 74 ms 37 ms [212.58.224.86]

The one thing that this report doesnt show is the 20% packet loss im getting on the second hop, unfortunatly these issues are getting worse.

Ben Taylor 25-11-2006 03:01

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
20% loss? Jesus..

york 25-11-2006 08:23

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
yeah :( i think the * in the test represent time outs

Ben Taylor 25-11-2006 15:20

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.228.155]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 90 ms 14 ms 40 ms 10.234.92.1
3 64 ms 13 ms 76 ms nott-t2cam2-b-v635.inet.ntl.com [82.13.49.153]
4 74 ms 33 ms 30 ms nott-t3core-1b-ge-110-0.inet.ntl.com [195.182.17
5.141]
5 47 ms 40 ms 37 ms nth-bb-b-so-020-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.173]

6 35 ms 189 ms 60 ms nth-bb-a-so-400-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.193]

7 26 ms 30 ms 22 ms gfd-bb-b-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.98]
8 42 ms 39 ms 62 ms tele-ic-1-so-110-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.78]

9 60 ms 25 ms 25 ms 212.58.238.189
10 28 ms 50 ms 122 ms 212.58.238.133
11 19 ms 69 ms 66 ms 212.58.238.36
12 52 ms 20 ms 29 ms pos6-0.rt1.mh.bbc.co.uk [212.58.239.254]
13 64 ms 40 ms 42 ms virtual0.mh.bbc.co.uk [212.58.228.155]

Trace complete.

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.228.155] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=244
Reply from 212.58.228.155: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 212.58.228.155:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 82ms, Average = 58ms

Still not looking good...

Ben Taylor 25-11-2006 17:39

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2006/11/8.png

Sigh...

york 25-11-2006 18:15

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Ned hasnt got back to me yet, no doubt he hasnt received an email off the techhead :(

york 29-11-2006 10:52

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Well they performed some kind of maintenance last night in nottingham (supposedly) has made no difference to my connection, i still have a crap ping and packet loss. And still havent recieved any reply from Ned.

Think its time to call retentions. :erm:

Ben Taylor 29-11-2006 23:12

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Ive got no speed increase, and im getting worse packet loss that before aswell :x

york 30-11-2006 12:10

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Getting worse here too.

Target Name: www.bbc.co.uk
IP: 212.58.227.79
Date/Time: 30/11/2006 13:08:23

1 59 ms 18 ms 38 ms 71 ms 23 ms 71 ms 30 ms 62 ms 22 ms 48 ms [10.234.92.1]
2 38 ms 91 ms 31 ms 62 ms 61 ms 55 ms 44 ms 64 ms 47 ms 30 ms nott-t2cam2-b-v635.inet.ntl.com [82.13.49.153]
3 66 ms 74 ms 29 ms 24 ms 44 ms 25 ms 27 ms 55 ms 27 ms 75 ms nott-t3core-1b-ge-110-0.inet.ntl.com [195.182.175.141]
4 47 ms 47 ms 100 ms 42 ms 42 ms 25 ms 32 ms 51 ms 42 ms 56 ms nth-bb-b-so-020-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.173]
5 37 ms 26 ms 85 ms 26 ms 65 ms 76 ms 141 ms 44 ms 17 ms 27 ms nth-bb-a-so-400-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.193]
6 91 ms 16 ms 57 ms 56 ms 47 ms 64 ms 111 ms 94 ms 162 ms 32 ms gfd-bb-b-so-010-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.98]
7 70 ms 48 ms 37 ms 40 ms 46 ms 35 ms 81 ms 80 ms 144 ms 28 ms tele-ic-1-so-110-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.78]
8 40 ms 27 ms 28 ms 42 ms 130 ms 32 ms 51 ms 50 ms 113 ms 53 ms [212.58.238.189]
9 26 ms 36 ms 30 ms 52 ms 113 ms 41 ms 28 ms 59 ms 86 ms 45 ms [212.58.238.133]
10 41 ms 62 ms 57 ms 27 ms 83 ms 44 ms 76 ms 75 ms 55 ms 43 ms [212.58.238.145]
11 32 ms 40 ms 30 ms 29 ms 53 ms 78 ms 55 ms 64 ms 39 ms 63 ms www9.rbsov.bbc.co.uk [212.58.227.79]

20% Packet Loss

Sneck 30-11-2006 17:08

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Another day, another slow download speed.

I thought it had stopped but no its just as bad as ever, back to 1.5mb here :(

Nedkelly 30-11-2006 17:28

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
I am still waiting for a reply as some parts of Grimsby suffer from this ;)

stevesco 30-11-2006 21:09

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
can someone (people) else in the Lincoln area do a trace to managethisdomain.com
In the daytime its not to bad, but in the evening I get awful packet loss. The hosting provider has nothing wrong their end, if checked through another ISP @ work I get better results. NTL tech support (india ) also says nothing wrong. Just wondered if other's get this. Seems worse when it hits the easynet network.
Cheers

---------- Post added at 22:09 ---------- Previous post was at 22:07 ----------

Try specifically web29.managethisdomain.com

Ben Taylor 30-11-2006 21:39

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Yeah, getting that aswell, I pinged it 30 times and lost 8.

homealone 30-11-2006 21:39

Re: ALL IN LINCOLN AREA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stevesco (Post 34169828)
can someone (people) else in the Lincoln area do a trace to managethisdomain.com
In the daytime its not to bad, but in the evening I get awful packet loss. The hosting provider has nothing wrong their end, if checked through another ISP @ work I get better results. NTL tech support (india ) also says nothing wrong. Just wondered if other's get this. Seems worse when it hits the easynet network.
Cheers

---------- Post added at 22:09 ---------- Previous post was at 22:07 ----------

Try specifically web29.managethisdomain.com

Code:

11/30/06 22:37:07 Fast traceroute web29.managethisdomain.com
Trace web29.managethisdomain.com (82.110.105.29) ...
 1 192.168.1.1      0ms    0ms    0ms  TTL:  0  (No rDNS)
 2 10.249.136.1      8ms    6ms    6ms  TTL:  0  (No rDNS)
 3 82.13.48.65      12ms  10ms  12ms  TTL:  0  (nott-t2cam2-a-v613.inet.ntl.com ok)
 4 195.182.175.129  11ms  11ms  11ms  TTL:  0  (nott-t3core-1a-ge-110-0.inet.ntl.com ok)
 5 213.105.174.169  20ms  13ms  15ms  TTL:  0  (lee-bb-a-so-020-0.inet.ntl.com ok)
 6 62.253.185.101  15ms  30ms  15ms  TTL:  0  (nth-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com ok)
 7 62.253.184.2    19ms  16ms  19ms  TTL:  0  (tele-ic-1-as0-0.inet.ntl.com ok)
 8 212.250.14.22    26ms    *    24ms  TTL:  0  (tele-ic-2-ge-310-205.inet.ntl.com probable bogus rDNS: No DNS)
 9 217.204.60.97    26ms    *      *    TTL:  0  (ae0.44.br0.thlon.easynet.co.uk probable bogus rDNS: No DNS)
10 195.172.211.137  31ms  31ms  24ms  TTL:  0  (ge1-0-0-0.br0.sabir.uk.easynet.net probable bogus rDNS: No DNS)
11 195.172.211.137  38ms  28ms  27ms  TTL:  0  (ge1-0-0-0.br0.sabir.uk.easynet.net probable bogus rDNS: No DNS)
12 217.205.205.145  37ms  35ms  28ms  TTL:  0  (No rDNS)
13 217.205.205.145  34ms    *    30ms  TTL:  0  (No rDNS)
14 82.110.105.29    32ms  35ms        TTL: 52  (web29.managethisdomain.com ok)



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum