![]() |
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
I'm in Coventry NW 263Kbs Down 367Kbs Up. **** Poor for download upload spot on.
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
They can shape ssl if they want. :( |
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Yah I'm aware of that and how high will those ratios go as a result of traffic shaping? They'll think they can get away with higher ratios. Which is what has happened in E17. They 'upgraded' recently because of too many users (per CS) and it's worse than it was before
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Yah but it's about practicality, they can shape freakin HTTP if they want but they're not gonna. It'd be using a knife when you need a scalpel. That's why I'm looking forward to webbased usenet accesses too
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
Edit: also might be worth blanking out what you are downloading :-p |
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
They can still shape based on the destination. I agree with your earlier comment on ISPs traffic shaping rather than actually implementing their network properly but at the end of the day, any attempt to circumvent the intention of the traffic shaping is going to be caught up with and make things worse for other services. |
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Why of course!
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Haha it actually is. Thought it might be something else disguised.
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
Quote:
|
Re: Traffic Shaping (again)
some more info, from another thread confirming the newshosting side of things:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum