![]() |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
SKy TV may work, but as for the broadband, I've seen plenty of complaints that you can't always get it. Remember the ADSL broadband that Sky can provide, will be dependent on distance from BT exchange. Thus, for many it will not be anywhere near as good, potentially, as NTL:Telewest's potential offerings.
|
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
NTL has all the ingredients to provide a great service but fails time after time. :td: |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
Often took ntl's side against critics. I hope you never endure the journey they took me on this year. I shan't ever be on that side of the fence again. Incidentally, when I was sorting the latest problem out with them (which still didn't get anywhere near fixing the original problem which all the others stemmed from) the girl said, "so, let me just check; you're on 4mb cable...." "No" I said, "I was originally on 1Mb which was upgraded to 2Mb". "Oh, someone's entered your service down as 4mb on the system. Are you paying for 4Mb?". "Try it. See how much you get." Phone goes to BT on Friday. Next step; Sky cable. Final step; Trying to get this story to an even wider audience. |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Yes you have had a bad experience with NTL. So yes leaving is the best bet for you. But the majority on NTL have a good experience. I for one. Never had much trouble with them. I did have some bad bb for 2 months from September through October this year. But been sorted now. I get 2mb through a 250 modem. That is anytime of day or night. And tv is working okay also. And no trouble with phone either.:)
|
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
I'm not being nasty here, because if ntl:telewest was that bad right across the board more people like you would have left & this forum would be swarmed with angry people. |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
But, looking through the threads on this forum, the problem seems to be more widespread than you portray it. In any case, if I was the only person who'd had to go through this, would that make it more acceptable? I have never said every ntl customer goes through this whereas I have said that I used to be quite satisfied and even took the position, which you've adopted, of defending them against critics who were describing what I've since experienced. I'm letting people know what happened to me when I did encounter a problem. With correct information people will make their own informed decisions, hopefully in time, should a similar problem even think about raising it's ugly head in their own situation. Ideally I would like everyone to know these problems DO exist, people DO have to deal with them at their own expense, and think twice before even signing up with ntl in the first place. In my business good service is all. ntl isn't. Quote:
:) |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
Read all about it here, 19 pages of it NTL made his life miserable, let him vent his spleen. |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quite.
TY Lobby. :) |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
lolol Poor Branson. He's going to have his work cut out trying to keep the Virgin name out of the mire with this deal. |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
|
Re: 12hours? Pffft
My commiserations to those who have had bad/unacceptable levels of service, but it is my belief you are in the minority (doesn't help you much, I know).
If you look at a lot of the latest forums (traffic shaping, speed problems), quite a few of the issues have been resolved by helpful posters re proxy changes (big up to BillC) and stuff like ZA firewalls causing issues. It doesn't appear to be as black/white as sometimes is posted. In the words of the late, great Robert Heinlein - "TANSTAAFL" - there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. I've got an idea - why don't we do price based service levels (only meant as a joke, but you never know, someone might take it up). Level 1a - paying standard prices - standard level of services Level 1b - paying reduced price for a period of time, due to issues/problems - standard level of services Level 2 - paying reduced prices due to threat of leaving - reduced level of service (your problem gets fixed after Level 1a & 1b) - this should be made clear to the customer at time of retention/haggling. You get a better deal, less responsiveness (with swings come roundabouts). Basic economics - look after your full paying customers first ;) btw, I pay £52 pm for 4mb, Family Pack, and Talk Evenings and Weekends - I think this is a fair price. Others may not; they have options. ---------- Post added at 12:57 ---------- Previous post was at 12:25 ---------- Quote:
Why do advertisers get away this this? It is either free or it isn't - just like someone can't be 'dead' - they are just dead. Anyway, market economics - if people don't like the price, use other options. I have had reliable service at what I consider to be a fair price - why would I risk that for a couple of pounds per month? |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
|
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
|
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
Sniff sniff yep the bull**** artist Gary Parsons is about again . |
Re: 12hours? Pffft
Quote:
Or do you have problems with your TV/Telephone as well? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 00:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum