![]() |
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4483663.stm Quote:
|
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
Remember at the time the AA were running their own campain showing that tax at the time made up 85% of the cost of fuel. Much as they would have liked to, the AA however couldn't come out with actual support for the blockades. Many petrol stations in london closed down and refused to sell fuel in support of the protest, because with fuel prices so high, the number of fill and runs has skyrocketted, costing them a fortune. The stations that have gone out of business from the fuel crisis are mainly those who started charging obscene amounts for fuel, as soon as the blockade stopped, people boycotted those stations. Despite Tony Bliar trying to make the picketers out as the bad guys, people saw the truth, that us motorists were being screwed. |
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
This is just like when people who provide a service to the public go on strike - it's as if inconveniencing the public directly will gain them sympathy and support. About 10 years ago I was out of work and there was a postal strike. My giro arrived 6 days late. OK I was living with my parents at the time and didn't need the money as much as some, but if I'd had children to support, what would the Royal Mail have expected me to say? "The kids will go without food, the house won't have any heating, but good on you fellas, you stand up to your bosses!"??? |
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
__________________ Quote:
As public support begin to ebb away, they agreed to stand down until the budget and review it then....and that's the last we ever heard of them til now. |
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
Unlike with postal strikes, or other public service strikes (anyone noticed an increase in them since labour got back in?) where the strikers don't react to the effects on the public, the fuel protesters did, it was looking like the blockades were going to affect deliveries of essentials etc, and they called them off, despite a large portion of the public wishing them to continue until labour reversed the recent tax hikes. I remember when it started, and I first saw Bliar trying to make them out as the bad guys, thinking "he's going to do something that will help the truckers and farmers slightly, but do nothing to help the majority of motorists who back the campain", and I believe he did. The protesters were doing something that the ordinary motorist couldn't really do, taking a stand against the disgustingly high taxes levied on Britain's motoring community! |
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
Quote:
Methinks you and I were watching two different versions of the story..... The Mirror's poll was indicative of many at the time, including one commissioned by the BBC which was put to Brynle Williams (if that was his name, I can't quite remember it now) when he took part in Question Time. It was worth the license fee alone just to watch him squirm. |
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
|
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
|
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
Seriously though, the AA was badly affected by the fuel shortage, not a good financial thing to have happen when they were trying to make themselves look attractive to British Gas, if they weren't professional and interested in skewing their findings, they would have shown to have been against the blockade, as they always said they were against them from the start (despite being in agreement of the reason behind the blockades) |
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
A poll in a newspaper who's reader demographic contains a majority of labour supporters is more likely to be in line with labour's view on the matter, that of protesters being bad, goverment good. Just as a poll in an anti labour paper is likely to show the opposite (assuming it has been reporting on the situation with an anti labour/pro protester bias) A motoring organisation is going to have members from all of the political spectrum, but most importantly, all members are going to be affected by the situation, therefore most likely to give an informed result. There's no point asking if non-motorists support a protest or not because such a protest didn't affect them directly. |
Re: Is it time to fill up
It's a mystery to me too - however I remember the majority (if not all) the polls I saw around the time suggested the public were getting very weary of the protesters' actions. I'd consider the BBC to be as neutral as possible on the matter and each survey they undertook had the truckers as being VERY unpopular.
|
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
it's like asking a group of tall people if they'd support a protest against a tax on short people, then comparing he result with what short people said. You also have the issue of what questions were asked, ie did they say "do you support the current action of the protesters?" or "would you support the protesters if it caused hospitals to turn away patients and if food could not get to the shops?" Lies, damn lies and statistics |
Re: Is it time to fill up
I can't quite see non-motorist being interested in such a poll really.
|
Re: Is it time to fill up
Quote:
Many popularist papers were talking about scenarios which the protesters had said from the beginining would never happen, ie food not getting to shops, no fuel for ambulances etc. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum