Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Capital punishment (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=22939)

Earl of Bronze 21-01-2005 17:09

Re: Capital punishment
 
I vote yes (option 2).

I also believe that corporal punishment should be reinstated.

Dumpty 21-01-2005 17:23

Re: Capital punishment
 
I have voted for option 2. My only concern would be this, the courts would have to be 100% certain that the person that they would be condemning to death, is the guilty party.
Certain crimes such as murder, rape, paedaphilia and the such like would in my opinion have to be included.

AndrewJ 21-01-2005 18:05

Re: Capital punishment
 
Everyones entitled to there own views here, remember peeps. Curious though to how this would be done, because not many people now would be happy giving the injection or throwing the eleccy switch to the chair, as in a sence that means you took the persons life.. this could disturb some people..:dozey:

STONEISLAND 21-01-2005 18:11

Re: Capital punishment
 
You simply get the 'in mates to do the dirty work' easy

AndrewJ 21-01-2005 18:16

Re: Capital punishment
 
Serial Killers killing Serial Killers... :erm: okay this worlds not a full shilling anymore.

I know that we cannot make them behave and understand our rules and laws, some of these people are twisted behond repair, but I just dont think its right to kill them.

Graham 21-01-2005 18:50

Re: Capital punishment
 
I think most people would guess correctly that my vote is "No, never".

Tezcatlipoca 21-01-2005 19:56

Re: Capital punishment
 
I've voted "No, never".


I do not believe it is right for the state to take someone's life as punishment. Keep murderers locked up for life, but don't kill them.


There is also the miscarriage of justice issue, as others have pointed out. People have been executed before, only for it to later have been found that they were wrongfully convicted. Also has happened (& still happens) in the US. IIRC, there was one state a few years ago, which imposed a moratorium on the use of the death penalty after it was found that large numbers of its death row prisoners should never have been convicted.

thorne1j 21-01-2005 20:19

Re: Capital punishment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumpty
I have voted for option 2. My only concern would be this, the courts would have to be 100% certain that the person that they would be condemning to death, is the guilty party.
Certain crimes such as murder, rape, paedaphilia and the such like would in my opinion have to be included.

Whats 100% sure? A jury convicts on the basis of beyond reasonable doubt. If there is doubt a not guilty verdict is returned. All people found guilty were, I think, what you would call 100%. Unless of course you're trying to introduce into british law varying degrees of guilt. A bit guilty, quite guilty, guilty and definately guilty. It's a novel idea!
____________

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndrewJames
Serial Killers killing Serial Killers... :erm: okay this worlds not a full shilling anymore.

I know that we cannot make them behave and understand our rules and laws, some of these people are twisted behond repair, but I just dont think its right to kill them.

sally clark & angela canning were found guilty of "serial killings". You would like both to have been executed? Nice one!

Raistlin 21-01-2005 20:21

Re: Capital punishment
 
Umm, would I be right in thinking that the descriptions of the things that we are voting for have changed?

Considering that I voted right at the very start, and that my vote is now being counted against a category / description that I wouldn't have voted for, doesn't that make a complete mockery of having a vote in the first place?

I know I could just vote again but doesn't that sort of defeat the point?

thorne1j 21-01-2005 20:22

Re: Capital punishment
 
sally clark & angela canning were found guilty of "serial killings". You would like both to have been executed? Nice one![/QUOTE]

Sorry Andrew, please accept my apology, I was off on one and didn't read your post properly.

AndrewJ 21-01-2005 21:46

Re: Capital punishment
 
No worries. respect to you for apologising and being mature enough to do so. :tu:

Tezcatlipoca 22-01-2005 13:59

Re: Capital punishment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raistlin
Umm, would I be right in thinking that the descriptions of the things that we are voting for have changed?

Considering that I voted right at the very start, and that my vote is now being counted against a category / description that I wouldn't have voted for, doesn't that make a complete mockery of having a vote in the first place?

I know I could just vote again but doesn't that sort of defeat the point?


From page two:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris T
I'll take that as an invitation to edit then. :)

Everybody please note, I have re-set the poll scores to zero as I have changed the options available.

If the poll won't let you vote a second time, 'quote' me in the thread with your preference and I can alter the score for you manually.


Raistlin 22-01-2005 14:33

Re: Capital punishment
 
:dunce:

Doh!!

Nice one Raist :clap:

AndrewJ 22-01-2005 14:50

Re: Capital punishment
 
LOL

:beer:

Chris 22-01-2005 20:16

Re: Capital punishment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dezzo
Can you pop me down as a murder only for this one.

Done. Sorry for the delay!


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum