![]() |
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
|
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
|
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
|
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
and i will second that , i must still wonder what you are trying to prove :( |
Re: NTL worse than BT
Ackees - why exactly are you here :confused: All this has been gone over time after time in other threads - you seem to have just appeared with the intent of causing an argumentative thread - is there actually some point to all this ?
|
Re: NTL worse than BT
Maybe he's ......
......... ......... ......... ......... UDT? :D |
Re: NTL worse than BT
As explained before I am not an obsequious sycophant who believes NTL can do no wrong nor an agitator, I am an NTL customer who has seen services get worse and worse, just like the old BT. I thought this was the NTL board, correct me if I am in the wrong place.
Is there another board for NTL or is this it? |
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
regardless , what are you trying to prove :confused: , if you dont like it then ship out , it cannot be more simple , a quick google will provide you with some ntl hate sites , you may have more success on one of them :erm: |
Re: NTL worse than BT
this is not about hate (or love), I do not hate NTL, thats an odd statement.
|
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
it wasnt an odd statement at all , what i was saying was there are some ntl hate , and i do mean hate sites out there , go and have a look :erm: |
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
|
Re: NTL worse than BT
No I am not a troll (I have herd this term , it would be great if you could give a full explanation of a troll †“ I assume it is an impostor sent to cause trouble), and I am serious about the fall in the services that Ntl provide and the way they are raising their prices without improving services accordingly. There has been a steady erosion of the benefits for which I joined Ntl.
Now the issues are greater than hop over to this or that service because they may be a £1 less or they offer sweets with their package. I want to explore these issues and I want to hear what others have to say on it. Actually you are the one behaving oddly instead of exploring the issues and possible ways that ntl could improve the situation you start talking about †˜hate sitesââ‚ÆšÃ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢ and †˜trollsÃƒÆ’Ã†â€™Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â¢ÃƒÆ ’¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€Å ¾Ã‚¢ ( I donââ‚Âà ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢t know about hate sites, and have never been to one, and have no intention of subscribing to one). Can Ntl improve or are things going to get steadily worse as they have been (anyone who has been with ntl any length of time will realise that they have got worse). In a sense it is a wider industry problem (but because I am an Ntl customer I raise the issue here), thatââ‚ ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s why switching may be of no use ultimately. I am beginning to believe the systems set in place that forced the opening up of UK telecoms (and ultimately allowed Ntl to exist) are being abused and may need looking at by the government. |
Re: NTL worse than BT
Quote:
I can only speak for myself when I say this: I joined cable in about 1998 when we still had Cable & Wireless. Cable & Wireless were unprofessional (the engineer came, installed the cable, plugged in the box then sodded off leaving me to clear up the mess he had made and rewire the box so it worked properly) and did not deliver what they promised (to the consumer anyway, the backend stuff is apparently brilliant). NTL came along and within a few months they delivered Broadband and have actually been a whole lot more professional to me than C&W ever were. 1Mbps Broadband is looking a bit overpriced now, but it is still cheaper than a lot of ADSL providers for the same speed. *It may seem a waste of money paying Bondholders higher dividends, but if they don't get what they want, they pull their money out. If this happens, NTL is dead. Quote:
You claim that switching comms providers may be of no use ultimately. If that is the case, why open the network as it would be useless for anyone to switch providers? I think increasing competition on networks has worked to lower prices (I know it has, when I first started using the Internet back in 94, we had 14.4K modems and had to pay £15.99 a month to either Demon or Pipex (plus a few others). This did NOT include phone charges (which could be anywhere up to 60p an hour). Phone charges (if you use one of NTL, Telewest, or BT's schemes) are also lower. My point is that I believe that the market can regulate it's own prices. |
Re: NTL worse than BT
You seem to have a good grasp of what a troll is so no further explanation is needed. I haven't mentioned "hate sites" that was someone else, but I do remain unconvinced of your motives, let's hope my doubts prove to be unfounded. :cool:
|
Re: NTL worse than BT
Iâ₠¬ÃƒÆ’¢â€žÂ¢ve just given ntl 30 days notice bt line 14th May also taking my number with me i have had no problems its easier to change then many people think bt has done everything for me
Mainly because of the 25% increase on dialup its not worth paying £12.50 when you can get broadband for £15 to £18 Iâ₠¬ÃƒÆ’¢â€žÂ¢ve wanted to get broadband for a while 512k not 150k but ntl are uncompetitive on price e.g. 150k 17.99 12moths contract Plus net £15 512k £17.99 UN capped Bulldog 512k £15.99 Also there is more choice on dialup on BT Wise surfer support ntl £7.50pm 80h Naims £9.99 168hpm 3hour cutoff 5 moths for the price of 3 £29.97 Even with the higher speeds ntl 1 Mb £37.99 Bulldog 1 Mb £24.99 2 Mb £37.99 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum