Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Reform UK's chronicles (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713145)

1andrew1 03-05-2025 09:07

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
By snipping my words mid-sentence you've entirely changed its meaning. My sentence was about the impact of adult social care costs on councils.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36195917)
If you understood the smallest thing about the impact of adult social care costs on councils and the tough funding choices they make, you would be somewhat less generous in your 'praise'.

Obviously, I'm very sorry about your mother in law.

Councils principally went bankrupt due to a 50% reduction in funding since 2010, the aforementioned hike in adult social care costs and punts on property designed to replace lost central government funding.

I don't pretend all the councils who went bankrupt were perfectly run (eg Woking with its property punts), but there simply isn't any fat left to cut. Reform UK will discover this when they take control of councils but most of Farage's words were more rhetoric and PR than anything else. They're not going to start adding to the real estate to ensure everyone is in five days a week, for example, as this would be too costly.

GrimUpNorth 03-05-2025 14:34

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36195933)
By snipping my words mid-sentence you've entirely changed its meaning. My sentence was about the impact of adult social care costs on councils.



Obviously, I'm very sorry about your mother in law.

Councils principally went bankrupt due to a 50% reduction in funding since 2010, the aforementioned hike in adult social care costs and punts on property designed to replace lost central government funding.

I don't pretend all the councils who went bankrupt were perfectly run (eg Woking with its property punts), but there simply isn't any fat left to cut. Reform UK will discover this when they take control of councils but most of Farage's words were more rhetoric and PR than anything else. They're not going to start adding to the real estate to ensure everyone is in five days a week, for example, as this would be too costly.

One of the few threats the unions have left is to get all the staff turning up at the office, it works and it scares most local councils silly. My employer has cut office space dramatically and used the savings to balance the books for the last few years.

1andrew1 03-05-2025 23:19

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36195942)
One of the few threats the unions have left is to get all the staff turning up at the office, it works and it scares most local councils silly. My employer has cut office space dramatically and used the savings to balance the books for the last few years.

An anti-strike! :D

GrimUpNorth 04-05-2025 09:47

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36195952)
An anti-strike! :D

Yeah, they can't dock your pay for turning up for work!

OLD BOY 04-05-2025 16:25

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
From what I have seen, most councils have not made any savings as a result of working from home and the desks of the homers are still there, sitting empty most of the time.

Some have, however, but Reform’s redundancy programme should see to that.

RichardCoulter 04-05-2025 17:56

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36195942)
One of the few threats the unions have left is to get all the staff turning up at the office, it works and it scares most local councils silly. My employer has cut office space dramatically and used the savings to balance the books for the last few years.

Our local authority has done the same, WFH saves the cost of accommodation, heating, lighting, cleaning, insurance etc. The effects of covid enlightened them of the savings to be made.

Anyone who needs to now has to book a desk.

OLD BOY 04-05-2025 18:49

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36195981)
Our local authority has done the same, WFH saves the cost of accommodation, heating, lighting, cleaning, insurance etc. The effects of covid enlightened them of the savings to be made.

Anyone who needs to now has to book a desk.

That's how it should work.

Mr K 04-05-2025 20:03

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36195985)
That's how it should work.

And if there are more staff than desks? That is the reality of offices now. They saw an opportunity to save money on office space and grabbed it. You can't put Willy where Willy has nowhere to sit, think there was a song along those lines....

---------- Post added at 20:03 ---------- Previous post was at 20:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36195976)
From what I have seen, most councils have not made any savings as a result of working from home and the desks of the homers are still there, sitting empty most of the time.

Do tell us when you were last working in an Office OB. 1988?

Paul 04-05-2025 21:46

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36195990)
And if there are more staff than desks?

You counted wrong when you decided how many desks. ;)

1andrew1 04-05-2025 21:56

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36195976)
From what I have seen, most councils have not made any savings as a result of working from home and the desks of the homers are still there, sitting empty most of the time.

Some have, however, but Reform’s redundancy programme should see to that.

Have you analysed most councils in the UK to reach this conclusion? And I doubt Reform has a redundancy programme, just some rhetoric aimed at their supporters.

Hugh 04-05-2025 23:14

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36195976)
From what I have seen, most councils have not made any savings as a result of working from home and the desks of the homers are still there, sitting empty most of the time.

Some have, however, but Reform’s redundancy programme should see to that.

What have you seen, and can you provide this info to the rest of the forum, please?

(Bearing in mind there are 317 Councils in England, including district, county, metropolitan and unitary authorities along with London boroughs and the City of London Corporation, so "most of" is greatest amount, so at least half+1 - 159 Councils).

Russ 05-05-2025 08:07

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
1 Attachment(s)
Reform. The gift that keeps on giving

papa smurf 05-05-2025 08:42

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196008)
Reform. The gift that keeps on giving

Quite right too the lazy gits

Sephiroth 05-05-2025 09:20

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Papa is right. Unless the councils have a sophisticated team working method, there is no substitute for being in the office in terms of work outcomes.

papa smurf 05-05-2025 09:29

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196013)
Papa is right. Unless the councils have a sophisticated team working method, there is no substitute for being in the office in terms of work outcomes.

Lets not forget we pay for these people through our taxes, you get naff all out of councils as it is

Russ 05-05-2025 09:32

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
The company I work for has become much more productive since bringing in hybrid working. Keep them at home if it suits them.

papa smurf 05-05-2025 09:37

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196015)
The company I work for has become much more productive since bringing in hybrid working. Keep them at home if it suits them.

The private sector can do as it pleases but i expect my council workers to be in the office, if they aren't happy with that they can always look elsewhere for employment

Sirius 05-05-2025 09:59

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I have been hybrid working for 2 years now. Monday and Thursday in the office the rest at home. The reality is i can work just as well from home as i can in the office.

Russ 05-05-2025 10:20

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196017)
The private sector can do as it pleases but i expect my council workers to be in the office, if they aren't happy with that they can always look elsewhere for employment

If they’re not public-facing they don’t need to be in the office.

Hugh 05-05-2025 10:26

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Meanwhile...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj9ekx3mz4yo

Quote:

David Wimble, who was elected councillor for Romney Marsh with 64% of the vote, said: "We need to be realistic about what we can and can't do."

Appearing on Politics South East, he said: "I think the biggest worry is that they will expect to go in and make changes straight away and all of the panel here today know that's just not possible."

He added: "Somebody stopped me today and said 'when are you going to stop the boats then?'. This is the county council."

Some Reform UK leaflets delivered in Kent did feature national party messaging, including a pledge to "stop the boats".

When challenged about this promise, Mr Wimble said he focused his campaign purely on local issues and on "the things that we can do".

1andrew1 05-05-2025 10:34

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196017)
The private sector can do as it pleases but i expect my council workers to be in the office, if they aren't happy with that they can always look elsewhere for employment

Surely, we want government and council staff to operate as efficiently as the private sector? Requiring staff to be in all the time who don't need to, just adds to the real estate costs and acts as a deterrent to good employees working there.

---------- Post added at 10:34 ---------- Previous post was at 10:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36196025)

Being in power at the moment is somewhat of a poisoned chalice, be it at local or national level. It's easier to change things when you have money to do so.

Russ 05-05-2025 10:41

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196027)
Surely, we want government and council staff to operate as efficiently as the private sector? Requiring staff to be in all the time who don't need to, just adds to the real estate costs and acts as a deterrent to good employees working there.

---------- Post added at 10:34 ---------- Previous post was at 10:31 ----------



Being in power at the moment is somewhat of a poisoned chalice, be it at local or national level. It's easier to change things when you have money to do so.

Or the lawful authority and ability.

1andrew1 05-05-2025 11:10

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196024)
If they’re not public-facing they don’t need to be in the office.

An observation: Those against hybrid working on this forum seem not to be working.

Russ 05-05-2025 11:13

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196031)
An observation: Those against hybrid working on this forum seem not to be working.

:rofl:

Sephiroth 05-05-2025 11:21

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196031)
An observation: Those against hybrid working on this forum seem not to be working.

I work from home because my work is sedentary and my head office is in Brussels. All interactions with customers are done online, like Teams and GoogleWhatsit.

But I still believe that the ability to interact from minute to minute with people in the office, with managers, etc, leads to better outcomes. For example, you need a recommendation or decision from one or two people. But they're out at a garden centre, or Waitrose or summat and you have to await the opportunity for speaking to them (and maybe not in the same timeframe as you need it). Bleedin' obvious, really.

Russ 05-05-2025 11:42

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
In which case if they’re in Waitrose they’re not working are they? It’s like wanting the opinion of a colleague but they’re currently on a different floor. Daft example.

papa smurf 05-05-2025 11:56

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196038)
In which case if they’re in Waitrose they’re not working are they? It’s like wanting the opinion of a colleague but they’re currently on a different floor. Daft example.

Skiving probably

Russ 05-05-2025 12:16

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196039)
Skiving probably

For those of us who work from home we have software that monitors our productivity to ensure we don’t “skive to Waitrose*.

Unless public-facing there are few if any reasons to not work from home if required.

mrmistoffelees 05-05-2025 12:54

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196036)
I work from home because my work is sedentary and my head office is in Brussels. All interactions with customers are done online, like Teams and GoogleWhatsit.

But I still believe that the ability to interact from minute to minute with people in the office, with managers, etc, leads to better outcomes. For example, you need a recommendation or decision from one or two people. But they're out at a garden centre, or Waitrose or summat and you have to await the opportunity for speaking to them (and maybe not in the same timeframe as you need it). Bleedin' obvious, really.

You can believe what you want , however many studies on both sides of the pond show that remote working doesn’t inhibit collaboration or productivity in any degree whatsoever.

If a role can be done remotely and companies are insisting that it needs to be done in office then you have one of two issues

1.legacy real estate costs
2. Trust between leadership and teams

My team (of over sixty) are all fully remote apart from five staff whose specific role requires them to be in an office. Those that are remote have the option to go to an office should they wish.

There is no loss of collaboration or productivity

I don’t care what hours they work so long the work is delivered to the required standard and on time. I don’t care if they need to take their dog to the vet or go and take their car to the garage. I know if the shit hits the fan the team are there to engage and support however needed.

TL:DR it’s the quality of the work and its delivery on time , regardless of if that’s internal to the business or to my external customers that counts, not having a bum on a seat in an office working core hours.

Sephiroth 05-05-2025 14:32

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
All this WFH theory is spouting pure ignorance.

Let's say I'm sitting in the office on a three desk pod arrangement. My neighbour is on a call with his colleagues and I overhear something that impinges on my project, I can immediately react (as appropriate) rather than either be out of the loop entirely, or find out somewhat later (if at all).

As I said, bleedin' obvious.

Russ 05-05-2025 14:51

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Well as long as it works for you, who cares eh?

Never mind the people who do a great job WFH.

mrmistoffelees 05-05-2025 14:54

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196049)
All this WFH theory is spouting pure ignorance.

Let's say I'm sitting in the office on a three desk pod arrangement. My neighbour is on a call with his colleagues and I overhear something that impinges on my project, I can immediately react (as appropriate) rather than either be out of the loop entirely, or find out somewhat later (if at all).

As I said, bleedin' obvious.

And I can say possessing significantly more leadership experience than you that you’re completely and utterly wrong.

Sephiroth 05-05-2025 15:02

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36196054)
And I can say possessing significantly more leadership experience than you that you’re completely and utterly wrong.

Er - maybe if we met and had a curry together we could compare notes on that.

mrmistoffelees 05-05-2025 15:08

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196055)
Er - maybe if we met and had a curry together we could compare notes on that.

Thank you for the offer but I’ll pass .

Anyhoo, RTO mandates and the WFH argument digress away from this threads intended purpose. Start one if you want to continue this ?

papa smurf 05-05-2025 15:23

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36196054)
And I can say possessing significantly more leadership experience than you that you’re completely and utterly wrong.

You're Donald Trump i claim my $5

1andrew1 05-05-2025 16:10

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196049)
All this WFH theory is spouting pure ignorance.

Let's say I'm sitting in the office on a three desk pod arrangement. My neighbour is on a call with his colleagues and I overhear something that impinges on my project, I can immediately react (as appropriate) rather than either be out of the loop entirely, or find out somewhat later (if at all).

As I said, bleedin' obvious.

I think if you believed that 100% you would either join a company where you could work in their office or relocate to the office of your Brussels overlords.

---------- Post added at 16:10 ---------- Previous post was at 16:07 ----------

Back to Reform. I see that they are implementing Putin's request to remove Ukranian flags from council buildings, under the guise of removing all non-British flags.

OLD BOY 05-05-2025 16:23

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196036)
I But they're out at a garden centre, or Waitrose or summat and you have to await the opportunity for speaking to them (and maybe not in the same timeframe as you need it). Bleedin' obvious, really.

Does any employer actually allow that, Seph?

When I worked from home, I put in more hours than I did when in the office as there was no travelling time, and what’s more there were no interruptions from colleagues unless it was about work.

I was always available when needed as my telephone extension number would put callers straight through to me just as if I was at work in the office. I could attend meetings via Zoom or Teams or attend the office as required. It worked very well.

Once booked in at the start of the day, I was expected to be available until clocking off for lunch, etc. If I even dared to nip off to the shop, I would have been disciplined because I was being paid to work. There were tough performance measures and targets in place. Monthly staff meetings would be held to ensure everyone was on track and not falling behind with their targets. Any work overlaps you mentioned would be picked up at those meetings as everyone in the team related what they had been doing and what they were planning to do.

The way WFH works in some local authorities results in staff rarely being available, so we must ask ourselves what is going wrong in those councils. This is why Reform UK are focussing on this.

That’s how it should work, and office space should be reduced as a result, saving on cost. Hot desks were available if employees were required to come in for specific reasons. If organisations actually bothered to manage these schemes properly they could both save money and increase efficiency.

---------- Post added at 16:19 ---------- Previous post was at 16:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196015)
The company I work for has become much more productive since bringing in hybrid working. Keep them at home if it suits them.

Sounds like your company has got it right, Russ.

---------- Post added at 16:23 ---------- Previous post was at 16:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196027)
Surely, we want government and council staff to operate as efficiently as the private sector? Requiring staff to be in all the time who don't need to, just adds to the real estate costs and acts as a deterrent to good employees working there

Yes, agreed, as long as all the checks and balances are in place.

Sephiroth 05-05-2025 16:37

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Some companies might be relieved that some workers don't come into the office!

Reform UK need to tread carefully with this one.

papa smurf 05-05-2025 16:48

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196066)
Some companies might be relieved that some workers don't come into the office!

Reform UK need to tread carefully with this one.

it's not companies it's councils, reform didn't take over any companies.

Russ 05-05-2025 17:00

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196066)
Some companies might be relieved that some workers don't come into the office!

Reform UK need to tread carefully with this one.

Yes they need to treated carefully considering it would be a pointless move at best and silly “gesture politics’ at worse.

Pierre 05-05-2025 18:24

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196027)
Surely, we want government and council staff to operate as efficiently as the private sector? Requiring staff to be in all the time who don't need to, just adds to the real estate costs and acts as a deterrent to good employees working there.

I’ve worked from home for well over a decade.

Private or public, doesn’t matter to me. I don’t get a refund for the heat, power, broadband I use at home for work, and have never asked for or expected one.

And as long as that is the same in the public sector, and tax payers realise the savings made by council workers working from home, then it’s a win win. Even Smurf Daddy must agree on that !

---------- Post added at 18:21 ---------- Previous post was at 18:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196042)
For those of us who work from home we have software that monitors our productivity.

I don’t have that, and would reject it.

I have set objectives, bau tasks and regular catch ups with my managers ( once a fortnight). If I was micro-managed by software or management I’d sack it off.

---------- Post added at 18:24 ---------- Previous post was at 18:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196049)
All this WFH theory is spouting pure ignorance.

Let's say I'm sitting in the office on a three desk pod arrangement. My neighbour is on a call with his colleagues and I overhear something that impinges on my project, I can immediately react (as appropriate) rather than either be out of the loop entirely, or find out somewhat later (if at all).

As I said, bleedin' obvious.

Or you’ve gone to the toilet and don’t hear it.

RichardCoulter 05-05-2025 19:03

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Apparently, Reform suspended one of their new councillors yesterday, pending an investigation.

papa smurf 05-05-2025 19:06

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36196079)
Apparently, Reform suspended one of their new councillors yesterday, pending an investigation.

link

OLD BOY 05-05-2025 19:19

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36196079)
Apparently, Reform suspended one of their new councillors yesterday, pending an investigation.

Yes, they act promptly on such matters. That’s novel, isn’t it?

Russ 05-05-2025 19:24

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36196082)
Yes, they act promptly on such matters. That’s novel, isn’t it?

Not novel at all, more routine. They removed 100 candidates last year.

OLD BOY 05-05-2025 19:28

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196084)
Not novel at all, more routine. They removed 100 candidates last year.

They are ridding themselves of the old cohort. They are now vetting all their candidates, far more thoroughly than the other parties, who are not free of scandals themselves.

1andrew1 05-05-2025 19:48

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
A bit hypocritical
Quote:

Reform UK is offering staff the chance to work from home despite vowing to scrap remote working when it takes over councils, it has emerged.

A job advert for Reform’s south central regional director promises “home working with occasional travel within the region”.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2744956.html

Those looking for savings on EDI are set to be disappointed in Lincolnshire. ;)

Quote:

New Reform mayor Andrea Jenkyns vows to sack county council’s diversity officers - except there aren’t any

Dame Andrea Jenkyns has doubled down on Farage’s pledge to sack diversity officers in Lincolnshire but the county council has revealed it does not employ any

Ms Jenkyns said: “We are going to have a Lincolnshire Doge. We are going to ensure that we get rid of diversity officers because amazingly Lincolnshire County Council is now Reform controlled. That is a historic moment.”

However, The Independent has seen a freedom of information answer from Lincolnshire County Council, where Reform now has a majority, stating: “Lincolnshire County Council does not employ any diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) officers.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2744308.html

Russ 05-05-2025 19:50

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36196085)
They are ridding themselves of the old cohort. They are now vetting all their candidates, far more thoroughly than the other parties, who are not free of scandals themselves.

Oh they’re doing it now? Rather than when they joined? I get it.

Hugh 05-05-2025 20:00

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36196079)
Apparently, Reform suspended one of their new councillors yesterday, pending an investigation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196080)
link

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2745187.html

Quote:

A newly elected councillor has quit Reform UK after she was suspended over a social media post just days after being elected.

Donna Edmunds, who was elected in Hodnet in Shropshire, was suspended for writing on X, formerly Twitter, that she was planning to defect from the party after the local elections.

Ms Edmunds on Sunday had written on the platform that she had been suspended from the party “pending an investigation”.

She had previously posted about waiting for the party’s ousted MP Rupert Lowe to set up a challenger party “and then I will defect”.

But she launched a tirade against Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, declaring that he “must never be prime minister” and is a “terrible leader”.

She said: “A good leader knows that you bring your team with you, that you champion their successes as the team’s successes.

“A bad leader claims personal credit for every win and stabs people in the back.”

Ms Edmunds also said she no longer has to “watch what I say” and so called for the jailed far right activist Tommy Robinson to be freed from jail, describing him as a “political prisoner”..

papa smurf 05-05-2025 20:11

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36196089)

Quick action by reform immediate suspension

Hugh 05-05-2025 20:41

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196090)
Quick action by reform immediate suspension


"immediate"??

https://archive.ph/e8e3W

Quote:

06 April 2025 3:51pm BST

A Reform UK local election candidate called for a statue of Tommy Robinson “in every town square”.

Donna Edmunds, who is standing for election to Shropshire council on May 1, praised the imprisoned far-Right activist in a series of social media posts earlier this year.

She also criticised Nigel Farage for distancing himself from Robinson, who was jailed in October for contempt of court after repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee….

… Mr Farage fell out with Elon Musk in January when the billionaire Tesla boss declared his support for Robinson, calling him a “political prisoner”.

Mr Musk then called for Mr Farage to be replaced as the head of Reform, claiming he “doesn’t have what it takes”.

At the height of the row, Ms Edmunds, a freelance journalist and former Ukip councillor, responded to a social media post that claimed Robinson was in prison “for speaking truth about the problems his government refused to solve”.

She said: “Not only did the Government refuse to solve [the problems], they gave cover to the perpetrators.

“In decades to come there will be a statue of Tommy Robinson in every town square in Britain.”

Three days later, Ms Edmunds echoed Mr Musk’s calls for Mr Farage to be replaced as the leader of Reform.

“It’s no coincidence that ‘without Farage, Reform can’t survive’... Farage has engineered it that way, just as he did with Ukip,” she said.

“Tommy Robinson isn’t the only person he’s thrown under a bus – he does it to everyone who looks like they might be a viable leader, to keep his party running as the Farage show.”

She added: “Elon is right to attempt to force him to step aside. Rupert Lowe would make a great leader, so would Ben Habib, but they’ll never get to shine while Farage has his claws dug in.”

Mr K 05-05-2025 21:26

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
They've got the people's priorities right anyway. What flags we fly on buildings is the publics no 1 priority atm. Tear down those Ukranian flags for a start.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ncil-buildings
#putinlovingamateurs

1andrew1 05-05-2025 22:15

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36196093)
They've got the people's priorities right anyway. What flags we fly on buildings is the publics no 1 priority atm. Tear down those Ukranian flags for a start.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ncil-buildings
#putinlovingamateurs

:tu: V Putin likes this

Paul 06-05-2025 04:05

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196013)
Papa is right. Unless the councils have a sophisticated team working method, there is no substitute for being in the office in terms of work outcomes.

I see your ability to spout complete nonsense has not been dulled by your long sulk from the site. :dozey:

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196017)
The private sector can do as it pleases but i expect my council workers to be in the office

Why do you care where they sit ? You would not even know.
I have worked from home part time since 2010, full time since 2020.
My work is entirely computer based and it makes zero difference where I'm located, as long as I have internet access.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196042)
For those of us who work from home we have software that monitors our productivity

I (and my team) have no such software.
All that matters is that our work gets done, the company encourages breaks from our computers.

Hugh 06-05-2025 08:35

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Reform supporters - "Councils need to cut costs and use efficient methods of working, like Private Industry!"

Councils - "OK, we’ll use hybrid working, like Private Industry, and sell off Capital Assets like buildings that aren’t needed to because of hybrid working, and reduce our ongoing Operational Costs by not having Utility bills and Maintenance Costs of the sold-off buildings, and reduce recruitment costs by increased retention due to hybrid working"

Reform supporters - "Not like that!"

Russ 06-05-2025 08:53

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36196108)
.

I (and my team) have no such software.
All that matters is that our work gets done, the company encourages breaks from our computers.

As does mine. We’ve always had this software (pre-hybrid working), it can be used to ensure work is done but was brought in to help us gauge how close we are to our targets and bonuses - we still use it that way. We’ve long since been trusted to do our jobs. The company is one of the most “holistic” I’ve ever encountered.

Sephiroth 06-05-2025 09:25

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36196108)
I see your ability to spout complete nonsense has not been dulled by your long sulk from the site. :dozey:

<SNIP>

Too kind. Nice and friendly as ever.

papa smurf 06-05-2025 09:25

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
on the subject of council workers WFH there's no I in team, and as i am paying the wages out of my taxes i want my workforce in the office.

Mr K 06-05-2025 09:54

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196116)
on the subject of council workers WFH there's no I in team, and as i am paying the wages out of my taxes i want my workforce in the office.

Are you happy to pay increased taxes to pay for the offices?

papa smurf 06-05-2025 10:05

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36196117)
Are you happy to pay increased taxes to pay for the offices?

our council has adequate office space which was opened in 1941,it hasn't gone anywhere

Sephiroth 06-05-2025 10:10

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36196117)
Are you happy to pay increased taxes to pay for the offices?

You have a point there.

Most WFH employers, offer allowances to offset home energy costs and will provide ergonomic seating etc.

For this to work to everyone's benefit:

1. Employer needs to find a way of increasing productivity;

2. Sound thinking needs to be applied to collaboration and activities of the moment;

3. Employer needs to decide on an HQ strategy. Downsize? What happens when/if the WFH fad passes?

Public services are an important case. HMRC doesn't provide telephone contact across the summer. That's because of WFH. How can that be justified?

Also, what about the current young people? WFH would stunt their social skills.

It needs careful thought.

1andrew1 06-05-2025 10:13

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196118)
our council has adequate office space which was opened in 1941,it hasn't gone anywhere

There will be increased maintenance and utility costs if all that space is re-used again.

Would you be prepared to pay for this?

Sephiroth 06-05-2025 10:15

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196118)
our council has adequate office space which was opened in 1941,it hasn't gone anywhere

My council (Wokingham) is about to downsize and take over the previous Waitrose/M&S/Armed Forces Charity premises and rebuild them.
Seems financially risky to me because although they'll make a nett capital receipt, the project will go well over budget as all such projects do.

Then what about people who don't wish to WFH? Fired if they refuse?

1andrew1 06-05-2025 11:08

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196121)
My council (Wokingham) is about to downsize and take over the previous Waitrose/M&S/Armed Forces Charity premises and rebuild them.
Seems financially risky to me because although they'll make a nett capital receipt, the project will go well over budget as all such projects do.

Then what about people who don't wish to WFH? Fired if they refuse?

They should take all steps possible to ensure it does not go over budget. Not all do, we just tend to hear of the ones that go significantly over budget.

I assume they've worked out who wants to work remotely and who wants/has to work on site and this is included in their calculations. It's not possible for everyone to work from home as they may not be fortunate enough to have appropriate space to do so.

---------- Post added at 11:08 ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)

Public services are an important case. HMRC doesn't provide telephone contact across the summer. That's because of WFH. How can that be justified?

That's because of poor management or underfunding. Plenty of telephone contact services overseas or managed by people from their homes in the UK that operate in all seasons.

Russ 06-05-2025 11:18

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196116)
on the subject of council workers WFH there's no I in team, and as i am paying the wages out of my taxes i want my workforce in the office.

And if it makes no difference to the service you get, but increases worker happiness and productivity are you still going to stick to that mindset?

papa smurf 06-05-2025 11:32

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196121)
My council (Wokingham) is about to downsize and take over the previous Waitrose/M&S/Armed Forces Charity premises and rebuild them.
Seems financially risky to me because although they'll make a nett capital receipt, the project will go well over budget as all such projects do.

Then what about people who don't wish to WFH? Fired if they refuse?

a person should always be able to distance home life from work life you can't do that if your home is your place of work

Russ 06-05-2025 11:44

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196128)
a person should always be able to distance home life from work life you can't do that if your home is your place of work

Would I be right in assuming you have never ever worked from home?

papa smurf 06-05-2025 11:46

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196130)
Would I be right in assuming you have never ever worked from home?

Are you "working" at this time?

Russ 06-05-2025 11:51

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196131)
Are you "working" at this time?

Im off yesterday and today.

Would I be right in assuming you have never ever worked from home?

Hugh 06-05-2025 12:05

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)
You have a point there.

Most WFH employers, offer allowances to offset home energy costs and will provide ergonomic seating etc.

For this to work to everyone's benefit:

1. Employer needs to find a way of increasing productivity;

2. Sound thinking needs to be applied to collaboration and activities of the moment;

3. Employer needs to decide on an HQ strategy. Downsize? What happens when/if the WFH fad passes?

Public services are an important case. HMRC doesn't provide telephone contact across the summer. That's because of WFH. How can that be justified?

Also, what about the current young people? WFH would stunt their social skills.

It needs careful thought.

A) No evidence that this was because of WFH
B) Spring/Summer self-assessment telephone support closedown never happened, as it was cancelled

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68616330

papa smurf 06-05-2025 12:10

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196132)
Im off yesterday and today.

Would I be right in assuming you have never ever worked from home?

i started work life as a heavy plate fabricator/welder, then spent 10 years as a BT Cable jointer-then 10 years as a contract cable jointer/fibre splicer all over the UK, worked for Eriksson ,then NTL/virgin media for 17 years as a network engineer
you can't do any of that from home.
it's not about me working from home it's about council workers not being in the office that i object to, and as an old manager once told me at VM "you don't come to work to be happy"

1andrew1 06-05-2025 12:16

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196135)
i started work life as a heavy plate fabricator/welder, then spent 10 years as a BT Cable jointer-then 10 years as a contract cable jointer/fibre splicer all over the UK, worked for Eriksson ,then NTL/virgin media for 17 years as a network engineer
you can't do any of that from home.
it's not about me working from home it's about council workers not being in the office that i object to, and as an old manager once told me at VM "you don't come to work to be happy"

Why do you want one rule for the public sector and another for the private sector?

Chris 06-05-2025 12:16

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196135)
i started work life as a heavy plate fabricator/welder, then spent 10 years as a BT Cable jointer-then 10 years as a contract cable jointer/fibre splicer all over the UK, worked for Eriksson ,then NTL/virgin media for 17 years as a network engineer
you can't do any of that from home.
it's not about me working from home it's about council workers not being in the office that i object to, and as an old manager once told me at VM "you don't come to work to be happy"

Sounds Scottish. :D

That said, arguing that people who could effectively work from home shouldn’t be allowed to do so just because you couldn’t, is a bit churlish.

I could work from the office at my church but it would cost my employer money as the space would need heated and lit just for me to be there. It’s the same issue on a grander scale for large employers. There are costs associated with having people in an office. If they’re happier and at least as productive working from home, and the employer is saving money on facilities maintenance, everybody wins.

Russ 06-05-2025 12:17

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196135)
i started work life as a heavy plate fabricator/welder, then spent 10 years as a BT Cable jointer-then 10 years as a contract cable jointer/fibre splicer all over the UK, worked for Eriksson ,then NTL/virgin media for 17 years as a network engineer
you can't do any of that from home.
it's not about me working from home it's about council workers not being in the office that i object to, and as an old manager once told me at VM "you don't come to work to be happy"

Thank you.

So you have zero basis for asserting…

Quote:

a person should always be able to distance home life from work life you can't do that if your home is your place of work
Funnily enough i manage it and have done for 5 years. Once my shift is over i leave my work laptop in another room.

papa smurf 06-05-2025 12:24

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36196137)
Sounds Scottish. :D

That said, arguing that people who could effectively work from home shouldn’t be allowed to do so just because you couldn’t, is a bit churlish.

I could work from the office at my church but it would cost my employer money as the space would need heated and lit just for me to be there. It’s the same issue on a grander scale for large employers. There are costs associated with having people in an office. If they’re happier and at least as productive working from home, and the employer is saving money on facilities maintenance, everybody wins.

That's not what i said.

---------- Post added at 12:24 ---------- Previous post was at 12:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196138)
Thank you.

So you have zero basis for asserting…



Funnily enough i manage it and have done for 5 years. Once my shift is over i leave my work laptop in another room.

Actually i spent 25 years of my working life on call so i know what it's like not to be able to have a home life, callout was not optional

Russ 06-05-2025 12:40

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196139)
That's not what i said.

---------- Post added at 12:24 ---------- Previous post was at 12:20 ----------



Actually i spent 25 years of my working life on call so i know what it's like not to be able to have a home life, callout was not optional

So you’ve never worked from home then. You should have just said that in the first place. At 5pm I switch off and my employer wouldn’t expect anything less unless I agreed to optional overtime.

1andrew1 06-05-2025 12:48

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196139)
That's not what i said.

So what is your argument? Is it that you don't trust council workers to work from home, but you're happy for everyone else to work flexibly as you're more inclined to trust them? Or something else?

papa smurf 06-05-2025 13:00

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196143)
So what is your argument? Is it that you don't trust council workers to work from home, but you're happy for everyone else to work flexibly as you're more inclined to trust them? Or something else?

I pay for council workers through my taxes and i expect them to turn up at the office for work, i don't pay Russ's wages so i don't care what his boss gets back in return

1andrew1 06-05-2025 13:14

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196144)
I pay for council workers through my taxes and i expect them to turn up at the office for work, i don't pay Russ's wages so i don't care what his boss gets back in return

You pay your ISP's wages, do you expect them to be based in an office?

papa smurf 06-05-2025 13:28

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196147)
You pay your ISP's wages, do you expect them to be based in an office?

Are they running my local council?

1andrew1 06-05-2025 13:48

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196148)
Are they running my local council?

You're in a better position to answer that question than me. ;)

Why do you want one rule for council workers and another for everyone else?

Sephiroth 06-05-2025 14:48

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36196123)
They should take all steps possible to ensure it does not go over budget. Not all do, we just tend to hear of the ones that go significantly over budget.

I assume they've worked out who wants to work remotely and who wants/has to work on site and this is included in their calculations. It's not possible for everyone to work from home as they may not be fortunate enough to have appropriate space to do so.

---------- Post added at 11:08 ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 ----------


That's because of poor management or underfunding. Plenty of telephone contact services overseas or managed by people from their homes in the UK that operate in all seasons.

Government institutions such as HMRC need to maintain data security. So, for example, the theft of the corporate PC/Laptop would be a data breach. In local government too, confidential data needs to be protected and I doubt that many councils have that properly in hand.


---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:46 ----------

@Andrew
You also mentioned about people who want to work from home. What happens if/when they change their mind?


Hugh 06-05-2025 15:09

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196155)
Government institutions such as HMRC need to maintain data security. So, for example, the theft of the corporate PC/Laptop would be a data breach. In local government too, confidential data needs to be protected and I doubt that many councils have that properly in hand.


---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:46 ----------

@Andrew
You also mentioned about people who want to work from home. What happens if/when they change their mind?




Your doubt may be misplaced - I know people in Private Industry, Local Government, and the University Sector who are hybrid working, and they all seem to follow the same methodology and technology - they use the same laptop (with an encrypted drive) in both places (home and office), and the same security standards, except they use a work-supplied VPN to access a Virtual Desktop to enable them to work from home.

Sephiroth 06-05-2025 15:16

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36196159)
Your doubt may be misplaced - I know people in Private Industry, Local Government, and the University Sector who are hybrid working, and they all seem to follow the same methodology and technology - they use the same laptop (with an encrypted drive) in both places (home and office), and the same security standards, except they use a work-supplied VPN to access a Virtual Desktop to enable them to work from home.

I don't disagree. But the "properly in hand" includes, for example tying access to an IP address, or multi-factor authentication using a corporate mobile device. It's confidential information that concerns me.

Chris 06-05-2025 15:16

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196144)
I pay for council workers through my taxes and i expect them to turn up at the office for work, i don't pay Russ's wages so i don't care what his boss gets back in return

1. Your council’s entire council tax income is between one quarter and one half of its total income. Your personal contribution to your council’s income is in the region of 0.0006%. So no, you do not pay the wages of any officer of your council in any meaningful way.

2. Even if you were paying the piper and in a position to call the tune, you’ve still given no reason why you think they should be in an office particularly.

Any chance of a straight answer, or is glib one-liners as far as you can go?

papa smurf 06-05-2025 16:17

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36196161)
1. Your council’s entire council tax income is between one quarter and one half of its total income. Your personal contribution to your council’s income is in the region of 0.0006%. So no, you do not pay the wages of any officer of your council in any meaningful way.

2. Even if you were paying the piper and in a position to call the tune, you’ve still given no reason why you think they should be in an office particularly.

Any chance of a straight answer, or is glib one-liners as far as you can go?

I've answered many times you're not listening

1andrew1 06-05-2025 16:32

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196155)
[COLOR="Blue"]
@Andrew
You also mentioned about people who want to work from home. What happens if/when they change their mind?

Then you have an individual conversation with them as they would be requesting a change to their employment contract. This would require the agreement of both parties via a new contract.

If a few staff moved from 100% remote to 100% in person, I'm sure most organisations could accommodate it. Good employers are always keen to hold onto good staff. If everyone decided en masse to then I think for many organisations, that could be problematical but it's very unlikely to happen.

---------- Post added at 16:32 ---------- Previous post was at 16:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196155)
Government institutions such as HMRC need to maintain data security. So, for example, the theft of the corporate PC/Laptop would be a data breach. In local government too, confidential data needs to be protected and I doubt that many councils have that properly in hand.

"I doubt that" is doing a lot of heavy lifting for you.

Russ 06-05-2025 16:35

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I’m on a hybrid contract as are the 2000 other employees. It gives us the flexibility to work from home or the office as needed. I have to go in twice a week but if I wanted to go in each day I could.

It’s very straightforward and done by the overwhelming number of employers who offer hybrid working.

---------- Post added at 16:35 ---------- Previous post was at 16:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196155)
Government institutions such as HMRC need to maintain data security. So, for example, the theft of the corporate PC/Laptop would be a data breach. In local government too, confidential data needs to be protected and I doubt that many councils have that properly in hand.

I work for a Law firm. I deal with highly sensitive legal and court papers each day. I have this data on my work laptop that I keep at home whilst working here and when I take it in to the office.

The HD is highly encrypted. It’s no big issue. We’ve never had a data breach.

Chris 06-05-2025 17:15

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
I spent about 18 months as a government contractor in the late noughties. I had a civil service laptop and remote access to the civil service extranet. Nobody ever thought it was a problem (and in fact the second contract I was on, was for a department that lacked desk space and actively discouraged me from being in the office unless it was absolutely necessary, which was usually around once a month).

mrmistoffelees 06-05-2025 19:12

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196160)
I don't disagree. But the "properly in hand" includes, for example tying access to an IP address, or multi-factor authentication using a corporate mobile device. It's confidential information that concerns me.

Encryption & MFA are two small components. device trust/posture and conditional access are even more important. Steal a laptop ? Check. Got the password ? Check. Got the MFA device ? Check. Coming from an unknown or unapproved IP? Denied.

There’s so much going on behind the scenes you’re not even aware of.

I did some work for Selby council many years ago and they had all of that in place then…… as did many other councils in yorkshire /Lancashire

Paul 06-05-2025 19:22

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)

Most WFH employers, offer allowances to offset home energy costs and will provide ergonomic seating etc.

Says who ? I dont get any "allowances".

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)

1. Employer needs to find a way of increasing productivity;

Why ? Are you suggesting they should be less "productive" in an office.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)

2. Sound thinking needs to be applied to collaboration and activities of the moment;

(Microsoft) Teams.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)

Public services are an important case. HMRC doesn't provide telephone contact across the summer. That's because of WFH.

Who says it has anything to do with WFH ?
Telephone systems are perfectly capable of providing your "office" phone at home.
We run a whole helpdesk system using such systems.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)

Also, what about the current young people? WFH would stunt their social skills.

Huh ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196119)

It needs careful thought.

In some cases it may require some thought by employers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36196155)
So, for example, the theft of the corporate PC/Laptop would be a data breach.

Good luck getting past my BitLocker password (which encrypts the entire drive).


Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196144)
I pay for council workers through my taxes and i expect them to turn up at the office for work

They do, as do I. My contract states my "office" is my home address.

Pierre 06-05-2025 22:37

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36196159)
Your doubt may be misplaced - I know people in Private Industry, Local Government, and the University Sector who are hybrid working, and they all seem to follow the same methodology and technology - they use the same laptop (with an encrypted drive) in both places (home and office), and the same security standards, except they use a work-supplied VPN to access a Virtual Desktop to enable them to work from home.

Correct. That’s what I do.

papa smurf 07-05-2025 18:17

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Dame Andrea Jenkyns has been sworn in as the first ever mayor of Greater Lincolnshire

Following the election on Thursday, May 1, Ms Jenkyns won in every area of the county except North Lincolnshire, securing 104,133 votes.

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/n...int_source=nba

Hugh 07-05-2025 18:35

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196226)
Dame Andrea Jenkyns has been sworn in as the first ever mayor of Greater Lincolnshire

Following the election on Thursday, May 1, Ms Jenkyns won in every area of the county except North Lincolnshire, securing 104,133 votes.

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/n...int_source=nba

There’s been a lot of "High Sixes" in Lincolnshire today…

papa smurf 07-05-2025 18:38

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36196230)
There’s been a lot of "High Sixes" in Lincolnshire today…

we make great guitar players thou

Hugh 07-05-2025 18:39

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36196231)
we make great guitar players thou

Well, it is where the first 12 string guitars were made…

Russ 07-05-2025 19:14

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
An interesting take on Farage’s obsession with immigration:

https://writesbright.substack.com/p/...bz69_IsShzTqAA

OLD BOY 07-05-2025 23:23

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196236)
An interesting take on Farage’s obsession with immigration:

https://writesbright.substack.com/p/...bz69_IsShzTqAA

People talk about £3bn as if it’s peanuts. Think about what we could do with that sum of money - to eradicate homelessness, for our own people for example. It is a scandalous waste of money and this stupid and irresponsible level of spending has to stop.

Russ 08-05-2025 08:19

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Just think about what £32b could have done for homelessness, including the written-off £5bn of fraud.

papa smurf 08-05-2025 08:30

Re: Reform UK's chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36196257)
Just think about what £32b could have done for homelessness, including the written-off £5bn of fraud.

What has that got to do with reform?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum