Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

OLD BOY 11-01-2022 19:48

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36108932)
I'm at a loss to understand why you set your self up for the fall like this. It's past the point of any belief in his exoneration if it occurs. The investigation will become discredited if a witness or two come forward to say he was there and the investigation says he wasn't.

Quite simply, his word is not trusted and that's fatal in politics.

Oh, ye of little faith. They are digging in…

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...olation-email/

Boris Johnson will not resign, a minister insisted on Tuesday, as pressure continued to grow over an email inviting more than 100 people to drinks at Downing Street at the height of the first lockdown.

The email was sent by Martin Reynolds, Mr Johnson's Principal Private Secretary, and emerged on Monday night.

It asked staff to attend a "bring your own booze" party in the Downing Street garden on May 20, 2020 from 6pm onwards, and urged them to "make the most of the lovely weather" at a "socially distanced drinks reception".

Asked if Mr Johnson would resign if he broke the law, Michael Ellis, the paymaster general, told MPs: "The Prime Minister is going nowhere.

"He seeks to draw me into making a supposition about the result of any inquiry, but the Prime Minister retains the confidence of the people of this country and he did so two years ago with the biggest majority in decades."

Mr Reynolds will stay in his role as principal private secretary and has the "full confidence" of Mr Johnson, No 10 has said.

It came as Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, accused Boris Johnson of "lying to the British public" and urged him to "come clean" on what had happened at Downing Street.

Sephiroth 11-01-2022 19:52

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108934)
Oh, ye of little faith. They are digging in…

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...olation-email/

Boris Johnson will not resign, a minister insisted on Tuesday, as pressure continued to grow over an email inviting more than 100 people to drinks at Downing Street at the height of the first lockdown.

The email was sent by Martin Reynolds, Mr Johnson's Principal Private Secretary, and emerged on Monday night.

It asked staff to attend a "bring your own booze" party in the Downing Street garden on May 20, 2020 from 6pm onwards, and urged them to "make the most of the lovely weather" at a "socially distanced drinks reception".

Asked if Mr Johnson would resign if he broke the law, Michael Ellis, the paymaster general, told MPs: "The Prime Minister is going nowhere.

"He seeks to draw me into making a supposition about the result of any inquiry, but the Prime Minister retains the confidence of the people of this country and he did so two years ago with the biggest majority in decades."

Mr Reynolds will stay in his role as principal private secretary and has the "full confidence" of Mr Johnson, No 10 has said.

It came as Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, accused Boris Johnson of "lying to the British public" and urged him to "come clean" on what had happened at Downing Street.

If Boris was on the invite list, why doesn't he publish his reply instructing the PPS to cancel the party?

jfman 11-01-2022 19:57

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
The fact Boris won’t resign is of negligible impact on the longevity of his political career at this point.

OLD BOY 11-01-2022 20:01

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36108935)
If Boris was on the invite list, why doesn't he publish his reply instructing the PPS to cancel the party?

Because he has passed it to the inquiry, presumably. Anyway, why should he indulge the arguments of his opponents?

Mad Max 11-01-2022 20:02

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36108876)
They wouldn’t advise a client to not say "not guilty" if they were not guilty…

On the day Boris won’t say if he was, or wasn’t , at the booze-fest, we were standing outside my mother-in-law’s care home window, trying to communicate with a very elderly lady with Alzheimer’s & Senile Dementia; we were doing this, rather than face to face, because it was illegal for us to be with her.

Excuse me if I don’t have a lot of patience with someone who is defending Johnson allegedly breaking the law by stating it’s not very important and no one cares…

Are you Michael Fabricant?


Now there's a knob if ever you've seen one, wig of the year contender.:D

Mick 11-01-2022 20:11

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36108916)
Now ? No.
Atm, its an allegation, nothing more.

Last I checked, we are still innocent until proven guilty in the UK.

True - but I think he should go not just because of these persistent party allegations, because he's got a very large seat majority and he's squandered chances to do vital stuff and also done stuff that I do not agree with like vaccine mandates for carers and now NHS staff.

jfman 11-01-2022 20:26

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Here’s a thought. Does Boris still think he’s a net positive? And worse for the party what if he’s right?

He’s killed off UKIP to the right, yet gained ground to the left. He’s “delivered Brexit” ending the great schism in the party. Can anyone else do that? Or do they rip open old wounds.

Damien 11-01-2022 21:17

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
I don't think Johnson takes Government seriously. I think he likes the idea of being Prime Minister more than the job itself and so is more likely to be willing to resign if it all gets too much.

1andrew1 11-01-2022 21:24

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108923)
The inquiry will clear him.

Your name is Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf and I claim my ten Pounds! :D

Hugh 11-01-2022 21:40

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1641937202

Hugh 11-01-2022 21:42

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108940)
Because he has passed it to the inquiry, presumably. Anyway, why should he indulge the arguments of his opponents?

Because he’s an elected politician, not a God-Emperor - he’s answerable to the public and the House of Commons.

BenMcr 11-01-2022 21:49

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
And he's now bring asked to answer it directly by his own party

https://news.sky.com/story/just-answ...rinks-12513756

Quote:

A "furious" Douglas Ross tells Sky News the prime minister should "settle this right now" as to whether he was present at a Number 10 drinks event during lockdown. And the Scottish Tory leader says Boris Johnson should resign if he has breached COVID rules or misled MPs.

Sephiroth 11-01-2022 23:03

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108940)
Because he has passed it to the inquiry, presumably. Anyway, why should he indulge the arguments of his opponents?


He needs to shut his opponents down. Labour is in the lift going up, right now.

Think about it - absolution by the investigator, presumably on technical grounds like No. 10 is a place of work, will simply not be credible with the public.

That buffoon seems not to know how the public works. Do you?

GrimUpNorth 11-01-2022 23:28

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108923)
The inquiry will clear him. Just as the inquiry about his expenses cleared him.

If he said he wasn’t at that party, would you believe him? It would only lead to further questions.

As I said before, why give these blowhards the oxygen they crave? It will be satisfying enough to see their deflated looks when the inquiry exonerates him. Assuming it does, of course. If it doesn’t, he will have to consider his position before others do it for him.

One of you best goalpost moving posts of all time. The first line has exoneration as certain as certain can be. Then less than 4 dozen words later in the same post you're covering your ass by advocating he should resign!!! Classic Old Boy at its best.

OLD BOY 11-01-2022 23:33

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36108953)
Because he’s an elected politician, not a God-Emperor - he’s answerable to the public and the House of Commons.

But if he answers the question and says he was not there, they still wouldn’t believe him. That’s why he’s set up the inquiry.

The Opposition would love him to be found wanting - he's a huge barrier for them to overcome.

This whole issue has a distinct whiff of the mischievous Cummings.

1andrew1 11-01-2022 23:41

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36108961)

He needs to shut his opponents down. Labour is in the lift going up, right now.

Think about it - absolution by the investigator, presumably on technical grounds like No. 10 is a place of work, will simply not be credible with the public.

That buffoon seems not to know how the public works. Do you?

If Johnson admitted he attended now, his position as Prime Minister would be untenable. Delaying matters with an enquiry may marginally increase his chances of survival, but I doubt even Johnson can wriggle out of this mess.

---------- Post added at 23:41 ---------- Previous post was at 23:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108964)
But if he answers the question and says he was not there, they still wouldn’t believe him. That’s why he’s set up the inquiry.

The Opposition would love him to be found wanting - he's a huge barrier for them to overcome.

This whole issue has a distinct whiff of the mischievous Cummings.

Johnson is more of an asset to the Labour Party now. He's not a barrier to be overcome by any stretch of the imagination. You are behind the curve by about a year on Johnson's popularity.

64% of the public think he's incompetent and 69% think he's untrustworthy.
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...ntent=trackers

Carth 11-01-2022 23:42

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36108932)
I'm at a loss to understand why you set your self up for the fall like this. It's past the point of any belief in his exoneration if it occurs. The investigation will become discredited if a witness or two come forward to say he was there and the investigation says he wasn't.

Quite simply, his word is not trusted and that's fatal in politics.

oh, and here's me been thinking for years that they all tell porkies :rolleyes:

anyway, if Bojo goes then everyone at the knees up must go also, seeing as they all broke the rules . . that'll really shake things up :D

Julian 11-01-2022 23:46

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Where’s a successful Guy Fawkes when you need him…….

Pierre 11-01-2022 23:46

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Love that this is an “issue” v’s all the other shit going on ……… some one’s winning!

Paul 11-01-2022 23:50

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108923)
The inquiry will clear him.

I doubt it will, but I love your optimism. ;)

Carth 11-01-2022 23:57

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36108971)
Love that this is an “issue” v’s all the other shit going on ……… some one’s winning!

Fully agree, a targeted campaign carried to ridiculous levels by (yet again) the media frenzy. Probably that nice Mr Cummings has the reach of friends in places where damage can be done, he's a sore loser if ever I saw one :D

BenMcr 12-01-2022 00:06

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36108971)
Love that this is an “issue” v’s all the other shit going on ……… some one’s winning!

As we need someone to deal with all the other stuff going on then we need to trust their judgement and not lie or cover up.

Carth 12-01-2022 00:12

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36108975)
As we need someone to deal with all the other stuff going on then we need to trust their judgement and not lie or cover up.

It may have escaped you notice, but this forum, along with much of the internet, seem to have a problem with their judgment when it comes to things like Covid, Brexit, Global Warming etc etc :D

or were you meaning the 'enquiry'?

1andrew1 12-01-2022 00:14

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
A career-threatening situation demands another distraction!

Does Johnson know anyone with contacts in Russia who can persuade Putin to ramp up the pressure in Ukraine? Failing that, perhaps pick a fight with the EU and trigger Article 16?

In the midst of either situation, the investigation may report back but won't get so much attention. And he could then argue that now is not the time to disrupt government by steeping down whilst such a situation is happening, and make a vague, waffly promise to seriously consider stepping down in the autumn which he has no intention of doing.

Carth 12-01-2022 00:26

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36108978)
A career-threatening situation demands another distraction!

Does Johnson know anyone with contacts in Russia who can persuade Putin to ramp up the pressure in Ukraine? Failing that, perhaps pick a fight with the EU and trigger Article 16?

In the midst of either situation, the investigation may report back but won't get so much attention. And he could then argue that now is not the time to disrupt government by steeping down whilst such a situation is happening, and make a vague, waffly promise to seriously consider stepping down in the autumn which he has no intention of doing.

Maybe we're due another shortage of something . . is it too soon for Easter eggs & Daffodils?

Perhaps a Nuclear Power station going critical would help eh . . or a plane crash in the Andes, a cruise ship hitting a rogue iceberg, . . no wait, I've got it . . it's perfect . . another 'possibly' dangerous Covid variant :D

Paul 12-01-2022 06:05

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36108979)
another 'possibly' dangerous Covid variant :D

The 'bojo' variant ?


:angel:

jfman 12-01-2022 07:13

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36108982)
The 'bojo' variant ?

:angel:

Wasn’t that Kent/Alpha?

BenMcr 12-01-2022 08:25

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36108977)
It may have escaped you notice, but this forum, along with much of the internet, seem to have a problem with their judgment when it comes to things like Covid, Brexit, Global Warming etc etc :D

or were you meaning the 'enquiry'?

The general statement is still true, even if it's difficult to apply without severe irony at times (the same is true whichever party is in power unfortunately)

Sephiroth 12-01-2022 08:30

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36108964)
But if he answers the question and says he was not there, they still wouldn’t believe him. That’s why he’s set up the inquiry.

The Opposition would love him to be found wanting - he's a huge barrier for them to overcome.

This whole issue has a distinct whiff of the mischievous Cummings.


You only have to watch Boris to know what he's like as a weasel worded bombast.

bigsinky 12-01-2022 09:27

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
only just saw this thread, he needs a good boot in the ballix. lying toad.

papa smurf 12-01-2022 09:40

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
looks like kier starmer will be at PMQ'S to grill boris about the team meeting in the garden.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 09:53

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36108995)
looks like kier starmer will be at PMQ'S to grill boris about the team meeting in the garden.

Best for Starmer to grill him about team meetings and not the parties. Johnson is Starmer's useful idiot, so he wants him in power as long as possible. ;)

Damien 12-01-2022 09:54

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Johnson is making a statement before the session so see what he says. Starmer is probably going to have different sets of questions depending on what that statement is.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 10:15

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36108998)
Johnson is making a statement before the session so see what he says. Starmer is probably going to have different sets of questions depending on what that statement is.

Maybe some kind of apology for the party being allowed to take place under his watch and the enquiry will report back soon?

Chris 12-01-2022 10:24

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36108997)
Best for Starmer to grill him about team meetings and not the parties. Johnson is Starmer's useful idiot, so he wants him in power as long as possible. ;)

I think you’re crediting Starmer with a lot more strategic nous than he deserves. There’s no doubt his poll lead depends entirely on BoJo remaining in power, but the idea that he’s sufficiently in control of events to ‘use’ him is fanciful.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 10:48

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36109003)
I think you’re crediting Starmer with a lot more strategic nous than he deserves. There’s no doubt his poll lead depends entirely on BoJo remaining in power, but the idea that he’s sufficiently in control of events to ‘use’ him is fanciful.

I suspect Starmer would love to be the person who takes him down but he would also love to be strategic and keep him limping on.

But as much as he might love to be strategic, I doubt the Labour rank-and-file would tolerate him going easy on Johnson.

But if papa is right in his assertion that Starmer will instead be grilling him about team meetings, then it shows he's playing strategically. I don't know if papa is being sarcastic or not.

How Starmer fares in the polls against another Conservative leader presumably depends on how clean they come out of the 12 alleged rule-breaking events. (See 10.36am here.) If they'e strongly implicated then he should benefit.

Damien 12-01-2022 11:02

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36109003)
I think you’re crediting Starmer with a lot more strategic nous than he deserves. There’s no doubt his poll lead depends entirely on BoJo remaining in power, but the idea that he’s sufficiently in control of events to ‘use’ him is fanciful.

I think Starmer's strategy is pretty obvious. Detoxify the party from Corbyn and then seem like a safe and competent alternative to the Tories to capitalise on their mistakes.

You look at Labour's messaging from the summer and it clearly focused on two things with Johnson: 1) He isn't serious 2) he can't be trusted. Clearly, the right messaging for them.

It's a strategy based on the idea that oppositions don't win elections, Governments lose them. Might not be the smartest political plan even calculated but not stupid either.

GrimUpNorth 12-01-2022 11:09

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36109001)
Maybe some kind of apology for the party being allowed to take place under his watch and the enquiry will report back soon?

What he says and when he says it will no doubt be influenced by if and when he manages to line up some rich supporter to pick up any fines that may be coming his way and to chip in towards the removal costs and the decoration of his new digs.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 11:13

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36109010)
What he says and when he says it will no doubt be influenced by if and when he manages to line up some rich supporter to pick up any fines that may be coming his way and to chip in towards the removal costs and the decoration of his new digs.

No sponsor has time for yesterday's man.

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:09

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
He attended it for 20/25* minutes, but didn’t realise it was a party?

Quote:

The prime minister says he went into the garden of Downing Street on 20 May 2020 to thank staff before going back into his office 20 minutes later.

He says in hindsight he should have sent everyone back inside.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-5...ost_type=share


He’ll have difficulty using the "Captain Hindsight" jibe any more…

*he’s mentioned both

papa smurf 12-01-2022 12:15

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
The garden was an extension of the office space due to the requirement for ventilation, and all there were in a work bubble.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:15

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109016)
He attended it for 20 minutes, but didn’t realise it was a party?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-5...ost_type=share


He’ll have difficulty using the "Captain Hindsight" jibe any more…

He probably won't need to if his Party secures his resignation.

Then kids in the future will see pictures of Johnson and ask "What is a BYOB party, daddy? It must be a bad thing."

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:17

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109018)
The garden was an extension of the office space due to the requirement for ventilation, and all there were in a work bubble.

Absolute rubbish - it was against the law for people to socialise.

papa smurf 12-01-2022 12:22

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109020)
Absolute rubbish - it was against the law for people to socialise.

A workplace meeting was within the rules.

Damien 12-01-2022 12:27

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
That was awful, he must be gone surely?

---------- Post added at 12:27 ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 ----------

I think the worst thing in all this is he let OLD_BOY down. :( ;)

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:28

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36109025)
That was awful, he must be gone surely?

Never seen anything this bad before.

OLD BOY 12-01-2022 12:31

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

Damien 12-01-2022 12:32

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

Haha come on. You must be on a wind up at this point surely?

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:33

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

It wasn’t a work meeting, it was people meeting after work to socialise, relax, and have drinks.

Quote:

"Hi all,

"After what has been an incredibly busy period we thought it would be nice to make the most of the lovely weather and have some socially distanced drinks in the No10 garden this evening.

"Please join us from 6pm and bring your own booze!"

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:33

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

It's too late for technicalities, Old Boy.

Perceptions count and the public and his Party have found him guilty and want his head.

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:37

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?


Do you two take it in turns, or can you both fit up there at the same time?

OLD BOY 12-01-2022 12:38

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36109033)
Haha come on. You must be on a wind up at this point surely?

Just sayin’…. :D

I still want to see the result of the inquiry before passing judgement, but I agree it’s not a good look.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:43

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109037)
Do you two take it in turns, or can you both fit up there at the same time?

Damien's right, they're both in a gentle wind-up mode!

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:44

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1641991417

https://twitter.com/garius/status/14...860695041?s=21

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:47

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109038)
Just sayin’…. :D

I still want to see the result of the inquiry before passing judgement, but I agree it’s not a good look.

Are you disappointed that he has now admitted to being at the party?

Pierre 12-01-2022 13:07

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109034)
It wasn’t a work meeting, it was people meeting after work to socialise, relax, and have drinks.

Much like the family Pierre did with friends and neighbours at the same time.

Damien 12-01-2022 13:09

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109046)
Much like the family Pierre did with friends and neighbours at the same time.

You aren't the ones who made it illegal to do so.

Pierre 12-01-2022 13:18

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36109048)
You aren't the ones who made it illegal to do so.

I know, and that's the reason he'll probably not get out of this but I wouldn't criticise as that would make me a hypocrite.

Along, I'm sure, with millions of others that also ignored the rules that are currently putting the boot in.

Halcyon 12-01-2022 13:31

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Send him packing immediately!


The fact he dismissed the idea of telling the truth for so long shows how much he contemplates lying to us all.


This is not how a leader of a country should be.

---------- Post added at 13:31 ---------- Previous post was at 13:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.




Are you one of the people he has obviously brain washed?
It was a party to reward his staff. You don't have alcohol in a business meeting!

BenMcr 12-01-2022 13:35

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109050)
I know, and that's the reason he'll probably not get out of this but I wouldn't criticise as that would make me a hypocrite.

Along, I'm sure, with millions of others that also ignored the rules that are currently putting the boot in.

I'm sure the majority of the UK did follow the rules, and have the ability to rightly outraged that those in charge didn't.

---------- Post added at 13:35 ---------- Previous post was at 13:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halcyon (Post 36109051)
Are you one of the people he has obviously brain washed?
It was a party to reward his staff. You don't have alcohol in a business meeting!

Indeed. My work had literally everyone they could working from home including lots of people that previously didn't have the option.

https://www.virginmedia.com/corporat...work-from-home

All office gatherings were banned unless it was essential and a 40+ meeting would not have met that criteria. Anything that needed a 40+ attendance would have been a video conference.

Chris 12-01-2022 13:40

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

Frame this and put it on your office wall alongside “there are no tanks in Baghdad”.

Hugh 12-01-2022 13:45

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109046)
Much like the family Pierre did with friends and neighbours at the same time.

Pretty sure you didn’t think it was a work meeting when you turned up and they were all there…

Anyway, I wonder if the 60-70 staff members who didn’t turn up for Johnson’s "work meeting" were disciplined for non-attendance.

OLD BOY 12-01-2022 13:57

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36109044)
Are you disappointed that he has now admitted to being at the party?

He has admitted that he was there, but not that it was a party, which is the essential issue here.

Why would I be disappointed that the PM has answered the question?

Let’s now see what the inquiry concludes so we have all the facts and then we can make a sensible judgement.

We need answers to questions about that invitation to the event, whether there was any retraction and clarification of that, and what actually happened at the event.

I’m sure you can hold it together for another few days so you can speak on this with some credibility. Making judgements based on allegations without having the submission from the other side is never a wise move.

BenMcr 12-01-2022 13:58

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109063)
He has admitted that he was there, but not that it was a party, which is the essential issue here.

It's not whether it was a party, it said he didn't think it was a party.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...08b14fee0b27d0

Quote:

When I went into that garden just after six on 20 May 2020, to thank groups of staff before going back into my office 25 minutes later to continue working, I believed implicitly that this was a work event.

With hindsight I should have sent everyone back inside. I should have found some other way to thank them.

I should have recognised that even if it could be said technically to fall within the guidance, there are millions and millions of people who simply would not see it that way, people who have suffered terribly, people who were forbidden from meeting loved ones at all inside or outside, and to them and to this house I offer my heartfelt apologies.

ianch99 12-01-2022 14:07

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
I am turning up here just for OB's posts :) Solid gold ...

jfman 12-01-2022 14:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36109065)
I am turning up here just for OB's posts :) Solid gold ...

As a last stand it’s magnificent.

---------- Post added at 14:21 ---------- Previous post was at 14:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109046)
Much like the family Pierre did with friends and neighbours at the same time.

When your behaviour becomes the barometer for acceptability rather than sociopathy we are all done for.

BenMcr 12-01-2022 14:32

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36109064)
It's not whether it was a party, it said he didn't think it was a party.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...08b14fee0b27d0

And Carrie obviously did think it was a party

https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1481248235670974465

Quote:

Robert Peston
@Peston
Of course @BorisJohnson could have asked his wife, Carrie Johnson, who was with him and drinking (gin, I’m told), whether they were at a party, if he wasn’t sure

papa smurf 12-01-2022 14:50

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

No music no dancing no vol-au-vent's, nope it's not a party.

---------- Post added at 14:50 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109060)
Pretty sure you didn’t think it was a work meeting when you turned up and they were all there…

Anyway, I wonder if the 60-70 staff members who didn’t turn up for Johnson’s "work meeting" were disciplined for non-attendance.

Did the email say it was mandatory to attend the meeting that wasn't organised by Johnson ?

GrimUpNorth 12-01-2022 14:53

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109063)
He has admitted that he was there, but not that it was a party, which is the essential issue here.

Why would I be disappointed that the PM has answered the question?

Let’s now see what the inquiry concludes so we have all the facts and then we can make a sensible judgement.

We need answers to questions about that invitation to the event, whether there was any retraction and clarification of that, and what actually happened at the event.

I’m sure you can hold it together for another few days so you can speak on this with some credibility. Making judgements based on allegations without having the submission from the other side is never a wise move.

You're on good form today.

If the bloke running the show can't tell the difference between a work meeting and an after work drinks session then it really does look like the Conservative's need an injection of some new genes in what looks like a pretty small and getting smaller pool (pun intended).

Surely you're disappointed he answered the question because only yesterday you were telling us he wasn't answering because he was tacking the piss out of and pulling the pud of the opposition to sucker them in to the trap he had set.

So if our opinion is contrary to yours we need to wait for the facts before we express our disgust in the actions of the lying snake oil salesman while you don't need to wait for the facts to shout his innocence from the rooftops.

daveeb 12-01-2022 15:02

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109074)
No music no dancing no vol-au-vent's, nope it's not a party.

---------- Post added at 14:50 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------



Did the email say it was mandatory to attend the meeting that wasn't organised by Johnson ?

"I'm going to have to rethink a lot of the "safe working" events I attended in the 80's and 90's mistakenly assuming they were parties.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 15:05

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36109076)
Surely you're disappointed he answered the question because only yesterday you were telling us he wasn't answering because he was tacking the piss out of and pulling the pud of the opposition to sucker them in to the trap he had set.

Agreed, Old Boy is tripping himself up in as many contradictions as Johnson. No mean achievement.

I leave it to Seph to speak for me:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36108932)
I'm at a loss to understand why you set your self up for the fall like this.


Damien 12-01-2022 15:08

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109050)
I know, and that's the reason he'll probably not get out of this but I wouldn't criticise as that would make me a hypocrite.

Along, I'm sure, with millions of others that also ignored the rules that are currently putting the boot in.

Depends on what you criticise him for. If you criticise him for meeting up because it could increase the transmissibility of the virus then yeah that would make you a bit hypocritical.

However, if you were to criticise him for putting you under the threat of committing a criminal offence for something he was doing then I don't think you would be.

That he broke lockdown rules is small fry compared to the charge of hypocrisy and outright lying that is making these stories so toxic for them.

It's the same as the expenses row. The actual money taken by MPs is rather small all things considered. What outraged people was the abuse of their position and the contempt they had for the public in so flagrantly taking advantage of the system for their own selfish ends.

Sephiroth 12-01-2022 15:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 

It's so dead simple for me.

1. You can't bring booze to work. So they couldn't have been at work.

2. They were invited to bring a bottle/booze. So it was a party.

3. A party would have been illegal at that time.

4. If the investigation finds otherwise all political hell will break loose.


1andrew1 12-01-2022 15:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1642001732

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36109084)

It's so dead simple for me.

1. You can't bring booze to work. So they couldn't have been at work.

2. They were invited to bring a bottle/booze. So it was a party.

3. A party would have been illegal at that time.

4. If the investigation finds otherwise all political hell will break loose.


Will be interesting to see which of you is right out of you and Old Boy. My money's on you.

Sephiroth 12-01-2022 15:43

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36109086)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1642001732



Will be interesting to see which of you is right out of you and Old Boy. My money's on you.


OB's lost it, much to my disappointment. Boris's statement was so weasel worded, avoiding the legal point that everyone wants him to acknowledge.

mrmistoffelees 12-01-2022 15:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36109084)

It's so dead simple for me.

1. You can't bring booze to work. So they couldn't have been at work.

2. They were invited to bring a bottle/booze. So it was a party.

3. A party would have been illegal at that time.

4. If the investigation finds otherwise all political hell will break loose.


Not technically true, many a Friday afternoon office meeting has been spent with beers & spirits. the joys of working for a startup. Ah, how i miss them

---------- Post added at 15:59 ---------- Previous post was at 15:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36109065)
I am turning up here just for OB's posts :) Solid gold ...


Also, it pretty much destroys any credibility he has on any other subject.

Reminds me of the Python's argument sketch.

Sephiroth 12-01-2022 16:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36109088)
Not technically true, many a Friday afternoon office meeting has been spent with beers & spirits. the joys of working for a startup. Ah, how i miss them

---------- Post added at 15:59 ---------- Previous post was at 15:57 ----------




Also, it pretty much destroys any credibility he has on any other subject.

Reminds me of the Python's argument sketch.


No, it doesn't destroy all his views on Brexit.

ianch99 12-01-2022 16:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Can we take the nuclear codes off him .. just to be sure? :)

Pierre 12-01-2022 16:49

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Teflon Boris will ride this out. Labour aren’t really making any ground, and there isn’t anybody in the Tory party making any ground on him either.

Regardless of anything the Tories want to win the next election, Boris will only be challenged if it looks like he can’t win and/or someone with better prospects magically appears.

Mad Max 12-01-2022 16:58

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109095)
Teflon Boris will ride this out. Labour aren’t really making any ground, and there isn’t anybody in the Tory party making any ground on him either.

Regardless of anything the Tories want to win the next election, Boris will only be challenged if it looks like he can’t win and/or someone with better prospects magically appears.

I think that you are right.

Damien 12-01-2022 17:10

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109095)
Teflon Boris will ride this out. Labour aren’t really making any ground, and there isn’t anybody in the Tory party making any ground on him either.

Regardless of anything the Tories want to win the next election, Boris will only be challenged if it looks like he can’t win and/or someone with better prospects magically appears.

Labour have taken the lead for a sustained few weeks in the polling now. I don't think the idea Johnson is a vote winner for the Tories holds true anymore. The party's polling has gone down, his own ratings have tanked and most people want him to resign it seems.

Paul 12-01-2022 17:34

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36109065)
I am turning up here just for OB's posts :) Solid gold ...

Its not often I read your posts and smile, but that one did the job. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36109084)
1. You can't bring booze to work. So they couldn't have been at work.

Thats not entirely true, Ive attended work meetings where its been provided by the company (or byo if you preferred). ;)

1andrew1 12-01-2022 17:38

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109095)
Teflon Boris will ride this out. Labour aren’t really making any ground, and there isn’t anybody in the Tory party making any ground on him either.

Regardless of anything the Tories want to win the next election, Boris will only be challenged if it looks like he can’t win and/or someone with better prospects magically appears.

Have you had a chance to look at the various polls over the last few months? If not, then pour yourself a good strong drink before doing so!
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...pproval-rating
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/boris-jo...ys-off-1357719
https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-...nited-kingdom/
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/tw...candal-1395002

jfman 12-01-2022 17:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36109106)
Have you had a chance to look at the various polls over the last few months? If not, then pour yourself a good strong drink before doing so!
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...pproval-rating
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/boris-jo...ys-off-1357719
https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-...nited-kingdom/
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/tw...candal-1395002

Lies, damned lies and statistics. ;)

Mr K 12-01-2022 18:34

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109095)
Teflon Boris will ride this out. Labour aren’t really making any ground, and there isn’t anybody in the Tory party making any ground on him either.

Regardless of anything the Tories want to win the next election, Boris will only be challenged if it looks like he can’t win and/or someone with better prospects magically appears.

I think the Labour party are secretly hoping he does survive this. Atm he's their best vote winner.
Anyway, wonder what's next on Cummings leak list ....

1andrew1 12-01-2022 18:40

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36109111)
I think the Labour party are secretly hoping he does survive this. Atm he's their best vote winner.
Anyway, wonder what's next on Cummings leak list ....

Crikey, you and Chris are in total agreement.

This truly is the thread that keeps on giving. ;)

---------- Post added at 18:40 ---------- Previous post was at 18:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36109107)
Lies, damned lies and statistics. ;)

They never asked me. :D

Mr K 12-01-2022 18:41

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36109090)

No, it doesn't destroy all his views on Brexit.

What views? He took ages to decide which side he was on and wrote a pro remain article for the Times https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sta...296.html%3famp
He then saw the power opportunity for himself and grabbed it just like the latest bit of skirt.
He has no belief in anything.

Hugh 12-01-2022 18:59

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
So, in summary, Johnson has gone from -

1) Denying there were parties
2) Saying that even if parties happened, all COVID rules were followed
3) Saying he personally didn’t break rules
4) Denied he attended a party
5) Denying knowledge the party he attended was a party.

And as for his "apology" - it was basically "I hope you don’t realise that I am apologising for people misunderstanding what was happening, and if they thought I had done something wrong, i’m sorry they felt that way"…

papa smurf 12-01-2022 19:04

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109117)
So, in summary, Johnson has gone from -

1) Denying there were parties
2) Saying that even if parties happened, all COVID rules were followed
3) Saying he personally didn’t break rules
4) Denied he attended a party
5) Denying knowledge the party he attended was a party.

And as for his "apology" - it was basically "I hope you don’t realise that I am apologising for people misunderstanding what was happening, and if they thought I had done something wrong, i’m sorry they felt that way"…

So what your saying is it was a workplace meeting.

Mad Max 12-01-2022 19:05

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36109106)
Have you had a chance to look at the various polls over the last few months? If not, then pour yourself a good strong drink before doing so!
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...pproval-rating
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/boris-jo...ys-off-1357719
https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-...nited-kingdom/
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/tw...candal-1395002


Polls, polls, and more polls, we'll see what happens when the election comes up.;)

Maggy 12-01-2022 19:06

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Just watched Boris doing a party political broadcast on the BBC. Came across as very self congratulatory and smug.

Hugh 12-01-2022 19:20

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109118)
So what your saying is it was a workplace meeting.

No

Pierre 12-01-2022 19:26

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36109107)
Lies, damned lies and statistics. ;)

Believe me, if it went to the polls in a week Labour would lose again, convincingly.

Yes, people are pissed off on this particular non-issue, but if it came to a GE and everybody weighed it all up. The Tory’s still win, easily.

peanut 12-01-2022 19:39

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109125)
Believe me, if it went to the polls in a week Labour would lose again, convincingly.

Yes, people are pissed off on this particular non-issue, but if it came to a GE and everybody weighed it all up. The Tory’s still win, easily.

That'll be doubtful with Bozo at the helm. The longer he stays the worse it'll be for the Tories. He's now too much of a liability so he'll be gone soon enough.

mrmistoffelees 12-01-2022 19:44

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36109120)
Just watched Boris doing a party political broadcast on the BBC. Came across as very self congratulatory and smug.

A legitimate work gathering political broadcast surely ?

---------- Post added at 19:44 ---------- Previous post was at 19:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109125)
Believe me, if it went to the polls in a week Labour would lose again, convincingly.

Yes, people are pissed off on this particular non-issue, but if it came to a GE and everybody weighed it all up. The Tory’s still win, easily.

Speculation, conjecture and no supporting evidence.

jfman 12-01-2022 19:55

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109125)
Believe me

The only person I’m less likely to believe on this forum is Old Boy.

---------- Post added at 19:55 ---------- Previous post was at 19:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36109129)
Speculation, conjecture and no supporting evidence.

All friends Pierre had at his garden party.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 20:33

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36109129)
A legitimate work gathering political broadcast surely ?

:D:D:D

---------- Post added at 20:29 ---------- Previous post was at 20:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36109129)
Speculation, conjecture and no supporting evidence.

Agreed. It's based on little more than wishful thinking.

---------- Post added at 20:29 ---------- Previous post was at 20:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36109131)
All friends Pierre had at his garden party.

:D

---------- Post added at 20:33 ---------- Previous post was at 20:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36109119)
Polls, polls, and more polls, we'll see what happens when the election comes up.;)

The leadership election? Bring it on. July isn't it? Who do you reckon I should put my money on? Truss? Sunak?

Pierre 12-01-2022 20:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
Speculation, conjecture and no supporting evidence.

Duh…. Of course it is…..it’s called an opinion. Do you have one?

Hugh 12-01-2022 20:54

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1642020550

Very unfair - forgot to include his mistresses/ex-mistresses…

Pierre 12-01-2022 21:00

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36109131)
The only person I’m less likely to believe on this forum is Old Boy

Now, now, Don’t be like that.

Quote:

All friends Pierre had at his garden party.
Indeed, joined by …Fun, happiness, inconsequence, brevity.

We had a great discussion, and got pissed. Everybody had a great time.

Were you inside your bedsit, drinking a tennents super, in your underpants on your tablet? You should’ve given me a shout, you could have come round.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:14.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum