Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Coronavirus (OLD) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708712)

Carth 23-09-2020 14:45

Re: Coronavirus
 
The timing on when to release information has always been critical in throwing a good story out to the media . .

Paul 23-09-2020 15:22

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36051245)
Coronavirus: Whitty and Vallance faced 'herd immunity' backlash, emails show

As the UK introduces fresh restrictions on social contact to curb the spread of coronavirus, controversy continues to rage about whether the government had initially considered trying a very different approach.[/url]

Why is considering a different approach a "controversy".
It would have been remiss of them not to consider all options.
People and companies do that all the time before making a decision.

In the end, it wasnt the option they took, so its irrelevant, just the media trying to turn into something it isnt.

1andrew1 23-09-2020 15:34

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36051259)
The timing on when to release information has always been critical in throwing a good story out to the media . .

Were you a master of the dark arts in an earlier age, Carth?

jfman 23-09-2020 16:12

Re: Coronavirus
 
He was writing headlines fit for the Torygraph the other day ;)

Damien 23-09-2020 16:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
6,178 cases today which is a pretty big leap. Can't have too many days like that or we'll be growing at a faster rate than France/Spain.

1andrew1 23-09-2020 16:35

Re: Coronavirus
 
Free-to-read FT article on how close we are to a vaccine
https://www.ft.com/content/e5012891-...5-182adf3ba0e2

papa smurf 23-09-2020 16:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36051279)
Free-to-read FT article on how close we are to a vaccine
https://www.ft.com/content/e5012891-...5-182adf3ba0e2

Free if you pay :)

1andrew1 23-09-2020 17:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36051283)
Free if you pay :)

The article in question is not paywalled.

Carth 23-09-2020 17:58

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36051270)
Were you a master of the dark arts in an earlier age, Carth?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36051274)
He was writing headlines fit for the Torygraph the other day ;)

I've been around quite a while, done some work here and there . . . you've probably heard about those tablets that Moses found ;)

Paul 23-09-2020 18:05

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36051279)
Free-to-read FT article on how close we are to a vaccine
https://www.ft.com/content/e5012891-...5-182adf3ba0e2

This bit was quite interesting
Quote:

On a per-capita basis, the UK has built the largest and most diversified vaccine portfolio, according to data from Deutsche Bank, having pre-ordered more than five doses per citizen spread across six leading vaccine candidates. The UK is followed closely by the US, Canada and Japan.

Damien 24-09-2020 11:33

Re: Coronavirus
 
The NHS app is out now and looks pretty good.

heero_yuy 24-09-2020 11:38

Re: Coronavirus
 
BBC Breakfast had a car crash interview with Anneliese Dodds (Labour Shadow Chancellor) Apart from completely destroying the economy with reckless spending to try and save every job, she looked like she'd been dragged through a hedge backwards several times.

Epic makeup fail. :D

1andrew1 24-09-2020 11:45

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36051344)
The NHS app is out now and looks pretty good.

Downloaded it, so pleased it's here. Has a very low star rating but I can't see how anyone can judge its performance yet; certainly setting it up took seconds.

Damien 24-09-2020 11:56

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36051349)
Downloaded it, so pleased it's here. Has a very low star rating but I can't see how anyone can judge its performance yet; certainly setting it up took seconds.

The low star rating is because a lot of people downloaded it when it was being tested so they could not sign up so they voted it down because 'it didn't work'. Plus people who just want to slag it off because Government. It's actually pretty decent from what I can see so far.

1andrew1 24-09-2020 12:04

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36051353)
The low star rating is because a lot of people downloaded it when it was being tested so they could not sign up so they voted it down because 'it didn't work'. Plus people who just want to slag it off because Government. It's actually pretty decent from what I can see so far.

It's irresponsible to rate it down for those reasons. Everyone with a smart phone should download it. Takes seconds and only requires you to enter the first part of your post code.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum