![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
The reason for the difference in the share prices I believe is that the last ACTUAL trade was for 1250, but at market close the asking price for phorm shares (those that want to sell) was 1,375.25 and the bid price (those that want to buy) was 1,374.75.
I would imagine that the ask/bid price is probably the more relevant as it represents the buy/sell orders in the market at that time. Regards... T |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
An article on Motley Fool - might have some leverage on how VM/Phorm 'ask the question' regarding the Opt Out.
It appears that the question could be classed as misleading if it doesn't give the full details. Colin |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
When this started to get spam I accused VM of harvesting customer email addresses, which they obviously denied. Well their BB (non cable) service was getting really bad by then so I jumped ship to BT. Just by chance I noticed the 1 MONTH TERMINATION CLAUSE which makes it pretty much impossible to change supplier using your MAC without losing some money (or if it's not then I'd like to hear how). So I waited 2 weeks before using my MAC and BT were really quick so I paid VM a month for doing b_ all. Anyway I guess what I'm trying to say is that the customer data is already in the public domain, even though VM won't admit it. The minute they shipped data oversees (if indeed they did) is the time everything went on the open market. BTW nice post serial referring to churn rate. Must have missed it on Badphorm. Someone should write to OFCOM about this patent and Phorm, and also the Competition Comission. Imagine the potential of being denied access to competitor ISPs websites because you've shown behaviour indicating you're looking around. OUTRAGEOUS. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Which bit were you interested in? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Although I think I have confused the original query. As you say it is possible that the trade was reported late. Reuters update their end of day data twice a day, the second update is a few hours delayed and provides adjusted figures for exactly this sort of thing. T |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I thought the overseas clause in the T&C's was so they could operate their overseas call centres.
Another example of something outwardly reasonable wrapped around a trud. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Their highest share capital in the last 52 weeks has therefore been £454M and today as a result of that last trade it stands at bang on £150M (based on the £12.50 sale at the end of the day) or £167.3M if you don't take that £12.50 sale into account. I expect Kent is more than a little upset that the negative publicity has knocked around £300M off his share capital. Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
anyone progressing on legal action, whats happened with Mr manwairing !!!
or a judicial review |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/news/EkpAuVukuVwRJunjrr.html http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3629297 and confirmed to me by email by Adam Liversage also in the locked Webwise FAQ thread post on beta forums - post by Adam Liversage http://www.beta.bt.com/bta/forums/me...ID=14212#14212 Separate emails to me from Emma Sanderson did not contain this information although it was in the public realm at the time they were sent. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Ad Deal - Would you be opting out?
Quote:
Lots of sites already track your visits, usage and purchases. Further more outside of your computer if you use Tesco Clubcard, Nectar cards etc. then all of your purchases are tracked, and offers come via Royal Mail, (the only difference these offers and vouchers give you money off products you buy in store). |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
If you look at all their communications they are almost too obviously averse to using those two actual words. They say customers can choose to "Opt In" but to opt out customers will select "not to take part". This is marketing at work, PR... It helps obfuscate and complicate not opting in. It's minor and some would say pedantic but but every little helps in their naughty mission on the marketing front! (IMHO) Hank |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
The receipt of spam on an email address is not itself proof that the address has been passed to a third party. Also be aware that anyone you ever emailed using that address, has that address on their machine, and if they get infected by an email harvesting bit of malware, will be responsible for that address getting harvested. (which is why I hate round robin emails that put my address along with a hundred others in the Cc or To fields). From what you have said it is not clear that VM sold your address. ---------- Post added at 22:39 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ---------- Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum