![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:21 ---------- Previous post was at 22:20 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
There have been no restrictions that have impacted me to any degree, I have a very privileged situation ( which i have worked for btw). But I have suffered very little during these past 18 months. But that doesn’t mean I think lockdowns or other government actions have been correct and I’ll oppose anything I think is wrong even if I am unaffected by it, I presume you wouldn’t........................not good. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
So from your privileged position you want to put more people at risk? Classy. Vaccinating 2 million people a week but Pierre the Privileged thinks the young and partially vaccinated should be put at risk anyway for a couple of per cent on GDP for 4 weeks. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
I’m happy to pay tax for that but I’m guessing Pierre the Privileged isn’t? For 4 weeks. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
I’ll remind you that the question arose from your statement: Quote:
However you’re disappointed that June 21st isn’t happening so if that’s really the straw you wish to clutch to I’ll leave you to make peace with it. Anyone can see my track record from my posts and I’m happy to stand by it. Your ideological opposition has been noted throughout - as you say easing restrictions further won’t make a difference to you in any case. At least the decision makers give wider consideration to public health than what bores privileged Pierre. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Well fortunately, many aren’t as as selfish and self centered as yourself. You appear to care for no others as long you’re comfortable. You try to divert your self centered attitude by latching on to my statement that I was privileged/lucky to be in the position I found myself. That was a state of circumstance not a state of mind. Your state if mind is evident, as long as you’re ok, you’re happy to let every one else struggle.........not your concern. |
Re: Coronavirus
You had me worried there until you said apparent view at which point it became clear that the whole post was palpably subjective nonsense.
Part of me prefers when you do your Mystic Meg and make Covid predictions. It's no more accurate but infinitely funnier. Throw away your shackles Pierre. It's really not worth getting hung up on debating me which, as far as I can tell, is the only inconvenience Covid has on your privileged position. Incidentally.... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-boris-johnson |
Re: Coronavirus
If only I was debating somebody that understood English, and knew that the word “apparent” was not a subjective proposition.
Quote:
Your failure to provide any credible rebuttal for any of it, also stands. Bon soir. |
Re: Coronavirus
If only words has a single definition:
seeming real or true, but not necessarily so. Not like you to view things in this thread far too simplistically. I’ve no real reason to provide a detailed rebuttal to someone consistently wrong. Your record stands for itself and anyone can consider if your position is credible. Get out and enjoy freedom tomorrow. There’s a brave world out there of minimal restrictions to enjoy. It might improve your perspective on things. |
Re: Coronavirus
Get back to the subject.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Anyone would think we didn't have a vaccine that had been offered to all vulnerable groups. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum