![]() |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I want out of that disgusting corrupted club, that has financially constrained us for years!!! We put more in than we get out, All these Remainers who say, we will lose the grants and EU rebates - it's our fecking Money we're putting in there in the first place FFS!!! So we put more in, than get out - One of 10 out of 28 who do, so that's 18 other Member States getting more out than they put in and I am being asked what's corrupt about the EU? Gimme a break. Asking questions like that, takes the fecking piss it does. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I assume the ten net contributors are democratic countries making a conscious choice that the access to these markets and stability that this ensures is worth the money? I presume as well you support Scottish independence, as the Barnett formula causes larger amounts of spending per capita there, so England would be better off without? |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I stand by what I say and the EU is CORRUPT as hell!!! https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8553731.html Scottish Independence has nothing to do with Brexit, but nice try - Do keep on topic. |
Re: Brexit
I’m just trying to establish if this is British nationalism or English nationalism driving your thought processes. It doesn’t appear to be a coherent economic or social rationale for a better future.
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
I really don’t think I’ve said anything in this thread that isn’t true or is verifiably fraudulent.
I think we make a net contribution of about £6bn a year for access to a free trade area into which we export around £274bn of goods, a net fiscal contribution of £20bn by EU migrants to the Treasury and on average contributing £2300 more per year than a UK born adult. It’s all a big merry go round that everyone benefits from in different ways. The £6bn also acts as a means of compensating some counties where we are taking parts of their skilled workforce, who have desirable qualities critical to our economy in areas such as healthcare. For reference projected UK Central government spending in 2016-17 was £772bn. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I’d certainly prefer all politicians, at UK and EU level to simply have flat rate allowances deemed “reasonable” and pay anything else from their salaries. When you see the ridiculous claims put in by our MPs, for example, wallpaper you know if it came out a flat rate allowance they’d have found something cheaper. I’m expected to commute to work on my own dime so I don’t see why they can’t they factor this into the salary of further afield MEPs. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Another medical supply company has cut staff and still needs to employ people from the EU out of necessity. The other manufacturer is timber frame buildings, which ironically does not get used in local buildings due to a fixation on "the vernacular" by the council. The town used to be a hive of industry, from car parts to hat making, machine tools to blankets. Now it is basically a commuter town for London & Oxford. Now the local industry is care homes and care villages, where yet again overseas staff are recruited. |
Re: Brexit
Not in the sector I work in.
Either way, that is a recruitment issue that is nothing at all to do with Brexit. Benefit scroungers and work shy folk or cheap migrant Labour, is a separate topic. |
Re: Brexit
But isn’t cheap migrant labour coming in, because locals don’t want to do the jobs, one of the reasons people voted for Brexit?
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
You could say I work in an industry that could be effected greatly by requlation.
I work in Aviation, and the number of authorised we answer to is a pain. CAA, EASA, CASA, FAA etc. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum