Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35954815)

Because the numbers don't add up, Den. You czn see that, right?

That's why governments work best when they have a good majority.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35954816)

Breaking: Vote Leave heavily fined and referred to Police for breaking the law. The organisation's lack of co-operation suggests it was not an honest mistake.

https://news.sky.com/story/vote-leav...l-law-11439218

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35954825)

Hypocrisy by sore losers
what about this bit of spending ,article is written just before the referendum .

Nearly £10million pounds of taxpayers’ money is to be spent sending a leaflet to every UK home warning about the dangers of a “Brexit”, prompting a Cabinet row over the use of public money.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-home-warning/

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 35954830)

One of these was legal and the other one wasn't

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35954817)

Which was better before she called a general election which she stated on many many occasions that there would never be one so there is only one person to blame for that is there not OB?..

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a7688471.html

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35954836)

Could this possibly make the referendum invalid ? ;). Some one will test it in court for sure.

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 35954830)

One of these was legal and the other one wasn't

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35954843)

Whether it was legal or not is irrelevant. It shouldn’t have happened. Neither should a U.S President Obama, interfering doing the Remain camps bidding.

This is just another futile attempt to thwart the legitimate Democratic leave result by Remainers.

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35954841)

As previously stated, she wanted a bigger majority to get Brexit through while riding high in the polls before fouling up in the campaign. The motive for calling the election was good, though.

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35954844)

so if a party break electoral law and win that you don't like that be ok too right

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35954847)

If the accusations are to be believed which I don’t, it’s conveniently took two years to drop this revelation, this can be seen right through for what is.

It does not invalidate the result.We are leaving the EU!

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35954847)

If the accusations are to be believed which I don’t, it’s conveniently took two years to drop this revelation, this can be seen right through for what is.

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35954850)

But we're going to follow their rules anyway, so why bother? It just leaves us without a say on them.

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 35954867)

Then I am sure they will appeal if the charge isn't true

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35954870)

Didn't you get the Memo?

Brexiteer MPs forced May's hands yesterday and 4 ERG Amendments were made.

---------- Post added at 13:33 ---------- Previous post was at 13:28 ----------



I do not give a shit either way - my vote and I am sure all 17.4 Million people who voted leave did so because they are actually pissed off with the corrupt EU, not because their vote was bought.

Let's not the forget Remain camp spent way more and also got the government leaflet, on top of that, whether it was legal is irrelevant, it should NOT have been, tax payer money funding a campaign, that is taking the piss. All the money spent, all the scheming and blackmail being done by the Remain side and it still loses - the sentiment is clear - more Brits want to leave and not stay in a corrupt union.