![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Sure, in the big scheme of things Phorm is relatively containable. I'd be a liar if I didn't admit that the prospect of mandatory population-wide DNA and biometric acquisition, wholesale data matching, ubiquitous identity demands, comprehensive government profiling, expanded police and security powers and mass pacification of the population weren't occupying my mind somewhat, but that doesn't mean I treat Phorm with any less regard as a privacy issue. Simon |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Glad to hear that. I was a bit concerned by:-
"We certainly don't choose our AB members to suit a small contract involving a tiny part of the global privacy spectrum." |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Simon |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Just out of interest, have PI looked at Phorm in a similar manner to that which they looked at the Google/Doubleclick deal? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Despite all the discussion about Phorm/Webwise and 80/20 Thinking's PIA, the real villains of the whole saga are the ISPs. Just because they have been offered a means of making money by invading customer’s privacy, they don't have to take advantage of that offer.
Shouldn't BT, Virgin Media and Carphone Warehouse each be conducting a PIA in relation to the effect of Phorm/Webwise on their business? Those three ISPs would do well to read the ICO PIA handbook. “Why do a Privacy Impact Assessment? Public trust in its institutions is generally felt to be in decline, with individuals tending to feel distanced, alienated and even disengaged. Government and corporate reputations can be fragile and easily undermined. In order to maintain and enhance their reputations these organisations need to act responsibly in relation to key issues like privacy, and to be seen to be acting responsibly. Experience shows that once an organisation’s reputation is damaged and trust is lost it is then very hard to regain that trust." |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-560974 (Not sure how to post that as a hyperlink - VBulletin doesn't like the [347], so cut'n paste the URL) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
This venture will go absolutely nowhere unless and until the ISP's participate so forget about the tail and aim for the head. Besides, the thread has reached a plateau and we're not moving forwards, all we are doing is chewing the fat. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
We are being asked to feel secure that our privacy is safe in the hands of someone who is not trustworthy using scriptors from a country that does more malicous damage to computers than any other. Then wonder why we question this.
Similar script to what was on the website for the videos about the public meeting comes from Russia, Phorm uses Russian scriptors. Then you wonder why we are shouting we don't want this.. A little more about the Iframe hijack yes it does hijack you strange that phorm uses the same thing. http://www.sophos.com/security/blog/2007/09/580.html link to a larger picture easier to read.. http://www.sophos.com/images/sophosl...7/09/cons2.gif If you look at the image one russian scripter on phorm staff could do that with all the three ISPs customers without anyone knowing just how secure will we be? This type of scripting is cropping up more and all links into russia so why are we forced to use the same in the pretence it is protecting our privacy. Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I sure as hell do not agree with the latests T&C's, but being as virgin have not inphormed me of these changes, could I still dispute them? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
If anyone thinks that phorm (or anyone else) will stop at monitoring http on port 80 then they are living in a different universe filled with fluffy bunnies and honest politicians/businessmen. If phorm/webwise are allowed to continue with this system in the uk it will be the opening of a can of worms that will be impossible to stop. Thats why this phorm puppy MUST be strangled at birth, along with any other ideas the ISP's may come up with that rely on selling OUR private data. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
In the meantime myself, and I wish many others should also do the same, have served Data Protection notices under section 11 of the act on Virgin Media , specifically quoting Phorm/Webwise. If they get hundreds of these now, they get some form of inkling the work involved handling these and hopefully begin to fear the work involved when many more thousands of people do it also (or leave like me) if and when Phorm is implemented. I think it is better to fight on the inside ( up to a point) until I really need to vote with my feet. Applied pressure then mass migration are my feelings! |
A Plan of Action
Write to your MP
Write to your ISP Spread the word on the web Write to your EU representative Sign the Downing Street petition Serve a section 11 Data Protection Notice on your ISP Ask everyone you know to do the same And if you are lurking, sign up and get stuck in! |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:36. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum