![]() |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Good. Between the Combetta farce and Clinton, the whole FBI investigation was a farce, immunity deals that were a joke that then crippled any further chance of a proper investigation when revealed Paul Combetta attempted to tamper with emails whilst under federal investigation, a federal offence applying to both Combetta and the person ordering it, suspected to be Clinton. Despite reopening the investigation, unless they reverse Combetta's immunity they cannot pursue that avenue. So this new lead has to be be really massive otherwise it'll wither away.
Also don't put it past the FBI to botch it again. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
The FBI are going to have to come out and give more information here.
|
Re: US Election 2016
I read that it was a Republican who advised the FBI of these emails found on a server in the basement of her home after a search
This whole basis is making me sick. This should have been dealt with well before the elections started. Or even when she was at the White House before. It wouldn't surprise me if that crook Trump, has 'bought' someone to to this this as he knows the election is slipping away from him. It seems strange to me that this has come up with only nine days to go. Someone is putting a major stone in the works here |
Re: US Election 2016
MSNBC:
- The case was never closed. So it's technically not been reopened. - The e-mails were found on another device (not withheld) during another investigation. - The FBI doesn't know if it's relevant. - Not Wikileaks or the Russian hack of the DNC - The E-Mails are not from Clinton. - Won't be resolved in 11 days. ---------- Post added at 19:57 ---------- Previous post was at 19:55 ---------- https://twitter.com/AP/status/792076790676283392 Quote:
---------- Post added at 20:15 ---------- Previous post was at 19:57 ---------- https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/statu...79872311132160 Quote:
We can't have Clinton facing criminal charges which only come to light after the election. We also can't have this revealed to be nothing only after the election. ---------- Post added at 20:19 ---------- Previous post was at 20:15 ---------- Haha! What a pathetic election this is: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us...imes&smtyp=cur Quote:
Just some context. Weiner is under investigation for sexting random women. He sent pictures of him in his underwear to these women, then had to resign. He then ran for Mayor of New York and it emerged he had done it since. Then it emerged he had done whilst running for Mayor of New York so he lost that election. Then he did it again. ---------- Post added at 20:44 ---------- Previous post was at 20:19 ---------- The FBI might be facing more questions than Clinton if this is true: Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
** He doesn't know if it's slipping away from him, nobody does, Election day has not occurred yet. Infact, he has come out in last day or so and said he thinks he's winning, although that could just mean Florida. But winning Florida is key State to winning the Election. |
Re: US Election 2016
This is now confusing me. IF, the emails are NOT directly involving HC. Why is it going to effect her.
And even if it is on her server. Surely this is not a problem is it. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
HC campaign team are seething. Obama is apparently on his way to campaign in Florida, are they scared she will lose that vital state ? |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
Quote:
Like so: http://image.prntscr.com/image/e4920...8ecd6d904b.png But try doing a map for Trump winning without Florida. |
Re: US Election 2016
There is more to the email issue and the FBI have continued their investigations involving their cyber crimes department and rumour is the NSA has been aiding as well something is clearly going on and it isn't just about a sexually deviant acquaintance. For them to announce this while the campaign is still running says to me that they do have something relating to clinton and it's enough for them to put their neck on the line. Most top posts in federal agencies are very political they rarely annoy the senior politicians without a damn good reason and especially if that senior politician is heading for the white house.
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum