![]() |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
|
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
At least it was genuine as opposed to Labour's newly discovered interest in electoral reform. Labour are quite simply desperate to stay in power. The Lib Dems (unofficially) seem to disagree with you, a source describing it as interesting and worth considering, not to mention that Cameron has never ruled out a PR referendum and the devil is in the detail and the negotiation. To give the Lib Dems everything straight away would be bad negotiation and the kind of desperation that Labour are reeking of right now. It seemed to me to be a measured opening gambit in a weekend of negotiation, nothing more. http://order-order.com/2010/05/07/th...tion-part-iii/ is interesting and a very nice thought actually, if it can take the best bits out of both parties :) |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
How predictable we all are certain partys didn't win therefore it's "blame the system" rather then accept your party whichever one didn't do enough to win torys made the biggest mistake here this election was there for the taking but i wasn't convinced enough by their campaign i thought it was a little too positive and needed a little more of the passion of attack.
But on the plus side as i voted tory i am now a toff :p: despite the fact i live in a housing association owned house am on state benefits didn't go to private school damn i did well out of this election. As for the nauseating horse trading that is to come i can see this going either way for the lib dems they may get some of what they want though no where near all or anywhere near all of it or the public may view them as blackmailing the country while they attempt to get what they want risky game methinks for mr clegg. Personally i would just prefer to go back to the polls for a run off but won't happen so guess were all going to have to get used to huge amounts of insincere liking between people idealogically opposed while they try and come up with something to keep\gain power not very gratifying to see for any of us. |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
Otherwise there is no incentive for the Liberal Democrats to partner with the Tories. If they get nothing then why vote with the Tories. They are under no obligation too. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 16:04 ---------- Previous post was at 16:02 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
|
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
Liberal Democrates. 23% = 57 seats Labour 29% = 258 seats. That is not a fair system. At all. |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
I did see some offers there - mention of changes in taxation to follow the Lib Dem's ideas more closely, changing priorities in some policy areas to more closely match those of the Lib Dems, it certainly wasn't 'nothing' and what wasn't said is every bit as informative as what was said. Fear not, it was a negotiating position not the final offer. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
|
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
LibDems 23% spread across fewer constituencies = 57 seats. Seems easy to understand to me. If the LibDems were better at it they'd get more votes across the nation. Interesting how despite the landslide against them in 97, the Tories didn't whinge about the voting system. To quote Russ, the LDs need to "man up" and do better with the voting public. |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
If electoral reform was the massive issue many would like us to believe rather then a topic to get excited about when it comes time to negotiate a coalition why didn't more people vote for the lib dems and labour the two partys that made a big point of it. Fact is at a time like this when this country has so many other real problems to deal with and get sorted out electoral reform is an indulgence that we simply cannot afford. Sure those who are passionate about it will claim it is a big issue but the rest of the public i think are more bothered by the other multiple more pressing issues and want them dealt with for all our futures.
Also havn't labour done a lot of tinkering with boudaries and stuff that has made it very hard for anyone to unseat them hence this election in the last thirteen years might be wrong but i am sure i have heard on the tele someone saying they had set things up to benefit them more then any other party. |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
Anyway I am not saying it wasn't "easy to understand", I am saying that only 7% more people voted Labour yet the seat distribution is unevenly favors them. It may be fine if you voted for the winner, but it's pretty demoralizing if your voted for the Liberal Democrats and your vote just never bloody matters.- Quote:
|
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
My biggest concern about all of this is, after hearing Alex Salmond talking about the 'mighty hand' he and PC have been dealt, is that if Tories and Lib Dems can't come to some kind of arrangement Labour will happily sell a large part of England down the river in order to remain in power and keep the public money flowing to their heartlands.
The idea, given cuts are inevitable, of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland either seeing no spending cuts or even spending increases while England picks up the tab is totally distasteful but is certainly something that I wouldn't put past Labour at all. |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
News just in from Sky:
William Hague has told Sky News that Nick Clegg and David Cameron have spoken on the phone... last half hour. |
Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum