Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

Carth 28-12-2021 20:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
New trade deal with Alpha Centauri system coming soon, early reports indicate Orion not happy with possible undercutting sales of dark matter ;)

daveeb 28-12-2021 20:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107276)
Warning, Brexit joke ahead! Those with a sensitive disposition, please look away now


:D Yes, It's a very sophisticated bit of kit, but unfortunately can only find stuff that's actually there. :)

Carth 28-12-2021 20:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The EU are now strongly denying a report that Mars will join the European Union before Belarus ever will

1andrew1 28-12-2021 21:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107268)

You have no idea whether or not the 4% reduction in GDP is permanent. I'd say that the UK will eventually sail past this - with better government, of course and that's not certain.

It's the OBR's own modelling that GDP will be permanently 4% lower than if we had remained in the EU. Even if we had a different Prime Minister, the factors that combine to make up the decrease in GDP like trade friction with the EU will still be there.

OLD BOY 29-12-2021 10:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107293)
It's the OBR's own modelling that GDP will be permanently 4% lower than if we had remained in the EU. Even if we had a different Prime Minister, the factors that combine to make up the decrease in GDP like trade friction with the EU will still be there.

The OBR can't have factored in the anticipated new trading opportunities, then. How could they? It's a bit hard to anticipate exactly how businesses will seek to maximise these opportunities. We will only know that when it happens.

heero_yuy 29-12-2021 10:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Quote from The Sun: Britain's economy will outstrip all other G7 countries next year as it bounces back after Covid, experts reckon.

Economists predict a booming 2022 - in part down to the UK's lightening fast booster vaccine roll-out.

A Goldman Sachs report predicted UK growth of 4.7 per cent over the next 12 months - well above the estimated 3.8 per cent for the US.

France, Germany and Japan also have relatively measly projections of 3.9 per cent, 3.5 per cent and 2.2 per cent respectively.

The remaining two G7 countries - Canada and Italy - will also have a more modest growth of 4.3 per cent, The Telegraph reports.

HSBC has forecast a similar increase for the UK in 2022, building on this year's output expansion of almost 7 per cent after an almost 10 per cent shrinkage in 2020 when the virus first hit.
Telegraph link above for those with access.

Hugh 29-12-2021 11:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
So, 4.7% is booming, 4.3% modest?

Sephiroth 29-12-2021 11:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
But ianch99 is utterly convinced that Brexit is a disaster. They can’t both be right - the experts or Ian?



---------- Post added at 10:13 ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107311)
So, 4.7% is booming, 4.3% modest?

No, just “more modest”.

BenMcr 29-12-2021 11:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36107309)
Telegraph link above for those with access.

however it's also worth knowing where the starting point is.

This is where we were at the start of the year.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-...an-2021-04-25/

Quote:

Britain's economy shrank by nearly 10% last year as it was hit by longer coronavirus lockdowns than many of its peers. By comparison, the U.S. economy shrank by an estimated 3.5%, according to the IMF.

1andrew1 29-12-2021 11:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107308)
The OBR can't have factored in the anticipated new trading opportunities, then. How could they? It's a bit hard to anticipate exactly how businesses will seek to maximise these opportunities. We will only know that when it happens.

They have factored in future trading opportunities.

1andrew1 29-12-2021 11:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107312)
But ianch99 is utterly convinced that Brexit is a disaster. They can’t both be right - the experts or Ian?



---------- Post added at 10:13 ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 ----------



No, just “more modest”.

Why not take a look at the data and decide?

Chris 29-12-2021 12:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107319)
Why not take a look at the data and decide?

I've decided that there's just, barely, enough context in that graph (from 2014-2016) to show that UK/EU/US GDP growth actually do not normally mirror each other identically as they were doing immediately before and after the referendum, and that most of the graph relates to the pandemic period in which, frankly, all bets are off. While the UK presently sits lower than the EU there is some indication in the graph that the UK is recovering more quickly.

All in all, the FT's choice of headline here should raise an eyebrow or two because it appears to be stretching credulity just a tad.

ianch99 29-12-2021 13:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107308)
The OBR can't have factored in the anticipated new trading opportunities, then. How could they? It's a bit hard to anticipate exactly how businesses will seek to maximise these opportunities. We will only know that when it happens.

The OBR has not factored in the sunlit upland "opportunities" because they don't exist (except in your imagination).

How the UK-Australia free trade agreement is worth 200 times less than EU membership

Quote:

The government’s own estimates suggest that the Australia deal will only boost GDP by 0.02 per cent, compared to a 4 per cent loss from Brexit.


---------- Post added at 12:33 ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 ----------

For those who wold like some background information on why Brexit is never going to be a success economically:



Remember, if all you can do is to champion the ability to mitigate the losses then you have already lost the argument.

1andrew1 29-12-2021 13:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107326)
Remember, if all you can do is to champion the ability to mitigate the losses then you have already lost the argument.

I thought we were going to have a bonfire of red tape when we left the EU to try and mitigate the GDP reduction. It seems like all that regulation was in fact needed afterall. :confused:

OLD BOY 29-12-2021 14:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107318)
They have factored in future trading opportunities.

And how have they come up with a figure if we are still waiting for those opportunities to be seized?

Think of a number, halve it….

---------- Post added at 13:39 ---------- Previous post was at 13:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107319)
Why not take a look at the data and decide?

Because it’s far too early. We are only in our first post Brexit year.

Chris 29-12-2021 14:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107328)
I thought we were going to have a bonfire of red tape when we left the EU to try and mitigate the GDP reduction. It seems like all that regulation was in fact needed afterall. :confused:

You do realise that all these “hasn’t happened” arguments have all the credibility of a child asking if we’re there yet when the car’s barely off the drive?

OLD BOY 29-12-2021 14:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107328)
I thought we were going to have a bonfire of red tape when we left the EU to try and mitigate the GDP reduction. It seems like all that regulation was in fact needed afterall. :confused:

I don’t know how you make that out. We are behind in the timetable because of that little disrupter called Covid.

Hugh 29-12-2021 14:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107335)
And how have they come up with a figure if we are still waiting for those opportunities to be seized?

Think of a number, halve it….

---------- Post added at 13:39 ---------- Previous post was at 13:38 ----------



Because it’s far too early. We are only in our first post Brexit year.

Oh, the irony…

What do you do - think of a number, then double it?

Pierre 29-12-2021 15:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Can’t vouch for the accuracy of this below, but it’s taken from a Linked In post, and Linked In “tends” to be a bit more sensible than other SM platforms.

But if true, the end isn’t nigh…….

This is just big headline stuff, not including all the other Investments in U.K. plc.

Quote:

▪️ Cadbury announced plans to transfer production of its Dairy Milk bars from Germany and other sites across Europe to the UK.
▪️ The future of Vauxhall's Ellesmere Port plant was secured with a £100m investment. The site will become Stellantis' first factory dedicated to electric vehicle production for the Vauxhall, Opel, Peugeot and Citroën brands.
▪️ British supercar manufacturer Gordon Murray Group announced plans to invest £300m expanding its manufacturing and design operations in the UK.
▪️ Airbus officially opened its new £40m Aerospace Integrated Research and Test Centre (AIRTeC) in Filton.
▪️ Nissan announced plans to build a new electric vehicle at its Sunderland plant and, in partnership with Envision AESC, open a £450m gigafactory as part of a £1bn investment programme. The expansion will create more than 6,000 British jobs.
▪️ Ford announced plans to invest £230m converting its Halewood transmission plant to build power units.
▪️ British Steel unveiled a £100m investment programme.
▪️ Under construction in Goole, Siemens' new £200m train factory is expected to create 700 direct jobs.
▪️ The Hitachi Rail/Alstom joint venture was awarded a £2bn contract to design, build and maintain HS2’s new fleet of trains. The order will create and sustain 2,500 British jobs.
▪️ Rolls-Royce officially opened its new £90m Testbed 80 in Derby - the largest facility of its type in the world.
▪️ Kraft Heinz announced plans to invest £140m at its Kitt Green plant and start making tomato ketchup and other sauces in the UK for the first time since 1999.
▪️ Babcock unveiled its new £31.5m assembly hall at Rosyth and announced plans to create 500 jobs to support its £1.25bn Royal Navy Type 31 frigate programme.
▪️ BAE Systems announced it intended to hire 1.250 apprentices and graduates in 2021 – the highest number it has ever recruited in a single year.
▪️ Rolls-Royce's small modular reactor (SMR) programme - expected to create 40,000 British jobs - secured almost £500m in funding.
▪️ Norton opened its new multi-million factory and global HQ in Solihull.
▪️ Aston Martin broke ground on its new £200m F1 factory in Northamptonshire.
▪️The £130m UK Battery Industrialisation Centre (UKBIC) opened in Coventry.
▪️ Siemens Gamesa announced plans to invest £186m expanding its wind turbine blade plant in Hull. The investment will more than double the size of the site and create hundreds of new jobs.
▪️ Britishvolt secured planning permission for a new £2.6bn gigafactory in Northumberland.
▪️ Lotus invested £100m in its UK sites and created hundreds of new jobs.
▪️ JCB built a record number of machines, created over 1,350 new jobs, secured a host of major orders and invested £100m developing its award-winning hydrogen engine.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stuar...710531584-XiMM

Mad Max 29-12-2021 15:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36107344)
Can’t vouch for the accuracy of this below, but it’s taken from a Linked In post, and Linked In “tends” to be a bit more sensible than other SM platforms.

But if true, the end isn’t nigh…….

This is just big headline stuff, not including all the other Investments in U.K. plc.



https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stuar...710531584-XiMM

Aye, but....;)

OLD BOY 29-12-2021 18:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107341)
Oh, the irony…

What do you do - think of a number, then double it?

What irony? It’s not me who’s banding about ‘finger in the air’ figures.

What economists know is that when you create opportunities for business, businesses will seize them. But you cannot put a figure on it until you know in what way these opportunities will be exercised.

1andrew1 29-12-2021 18:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107370)
What irony? It’s not me who’s banding about ‘finger in the air’ figures.

What economists know is that when you create opportunities for business, businesses will seize them. But you cannot put a figure on it until you know in what way these opportunities will be exercised.

The OBR does not bandy around finger-in-the-air figures, Old Boy. They know that macro is not a cash and carry. ;)

What economists do know is that when you increase costs and red tape in one country, you put that country at a competitive disadvantage. That's where your minus 4% comes from. At the moment, the opportunities we're creating are for overseas businesses and not UK ones.

Take the latest farce - from January, our steel and aluminium producers will continue to face hefty 25% tariffs from the US whilst our EU competitors will face none.
Quote:

The UK steel industry is braced for an immediate slump in trade from New Year’s Day when European Union rivals will gain a 25% price advantage selling to the giant US market.

The EU and the US reached a Halloween agreement to remove tariffs on a quota of steel and aluminium imported from the bloc into the US from 1 January, but tariffs will remain on all UK steel and aluminium exports after government talks failed to secure a matching breakthrough.

The international trade secretary, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, earlier this month invited the US commerce secretary for further discussions in London, which are understood to be scheduled for January. However, an industry source said they were not optimistic that a deal would be reached quickly.

The tariffs were first introduced by former president Donald Trump in 2018 under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act on national security grounds. Imports supposedly undermined the US’s ability to produce its own steel.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...iffs-abolished

Hugh 29-12-2021 19:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107370)
What irony? It’s not me who’s banding about ‘finger in the air’ figures.

What economists know is that when you create opportunities for business, businesses will seize them. But you cannot put a figure on it until you know in what way these opportunities will be exercised.

And the opportunities have to be real, and achievable.

If you were in a bar at the same time as Gal Gadot, you would have the opportunity to try and seize that opportunity, but the likelyhood of success is, at best, unlikely...

ianch99 29-12-2021 19:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36107344)
Can’t vouch for the accuracy of this below, but it’s taken from a Linked In post, and Linked In “tends” to be a bit more sensible than other SM platforms.

But if true, the end isn’t nigh…….]

No one said the end is nigh. The issue is that we are/will not be as successful as we would have been has we stayed as we were.

Stating a list of events without context is meaningless. These events could represent an over achievement relative to pre-2016 or an under achievement. You provide no means of assessing this.

Classic Leave messaging ..

---------- Post added at 18:27 ---------- Previous post was at 18:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107376)
And the opportunities have to be real, and achievable.

If you were in a bar at the same time as Gal Gadot, you would have the opportunity to try and seize that opportunity, but the likelyhood of success is, at best, unlikely...

Which bar and when? :)

Mad Max 29-12-2021 19:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107377)
No one said the end is nigh. The issue is that we are/will not be as successful as we would have been has we stayed as we were.

Stating a list of events without context is meaningless. These events could represent an over achievement relative to pre-2016 or an under achievement. You provide no means of assessing this.

Classic Leave messaging ..

---------- Post added at 18:27 ---------- Previous post was at 18:26 ----------



Which bar and when? :)


You don't know that, it's surely too early to predict such an outcome as we have only been out of the EU for a short time.

ianch99 29-12-2021 19:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36107379)
You don't know that, it's surely too early to predict such an outcome as we have only been out of the EU for a short time.

Long term 4% GBP loss is a starter as supported by the macro economic "Gravity" model:

https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/gl...of_trade.html/

OLD BOY 29-12-2021 20:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107380)
Long term 4% GBP loss is a starter as supported by the macro economic "Gravity" model:

https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/gl...of_trade.html/

It’s only a model. You know, like the ones the over-predict Covid hospitalisations.

---------- Post added at 19:14 ---------- Previous post was at 19:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107374)
The OBR does not bandy around finger-in-the-air figures, Old Boy. They know that macro is not a cash and carry. ;)

What economists do know is that when you increase costs and red tape in one country, you put that country at a competitive disadvantage. That's where your minus 4% comes from. At the moment, the opportunities we're creating are for overseas businesses and not UK ones.

Take the latest farce - from January, our steel and aluminium producers will continue to face hefty 25% tariffs from the US whilst our EU competitors will face none.

https://www.theguardian.com/business...iffs-abolished

You are looking only at the EU, as usual. We will be thinking more globally in the future. That’s where our opportunities lie.

Sephiroth 29-12-2021 20:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107380)
Long term 4% GBP loss is a starter as supported by the macro economic "Gravity" model:

https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/gl...of_trade.html/

So what? Sovereignty is the reason for Brexit and the 4% is priced in by the 52%.

1andrew1 29-12-2021 21:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107382)
You are looking only at the EU, as usual. We will be thinking more globally in the future. That’s where our opportunities lie.

I think you misread my post. We're talking about the UK facing tariffs when selling steel and aluminium to the US whereas the EU has been able to get these removed.

The EU will continue to increase its deals globally as well so we're unlikely to get any deals from other countries that we wouldn't have got with them. Maybe a bit quicker and maybe on inferior terms.

I know some may take a more socialist attitude when businesses complain and they're entitled to their opinions. But if you still believe there's unconquered territories just waiting for British exports, the experience of the Cheshire Cheese Company may be eye-opening.
Quote:

Spurrell [company's co-founder] said he had pursued new business in Norway and Canada but post-Brexit trade deals sealed by the government had put barriers in place.

“We no longer have any ability to deal with the EU as our three distributors in Germany, France and Italy have said we have become too expensive because of the new checks and paperwork.

“And now we’ve also lost Norway since the trade deal, as duty for wholesale is 273%. Then we tried Canada but what the government didn’t tell us is that duty of 244% is applied on any consignment over $20 [£15].”

That meant Canadian customers who ordered a gift pack worth £50, including transport fees, were asked to pay £178 extra in duty when the courier arrived at their door, Spurrell said. “As you can imagine, customers were saying: ‘You can take that back, we don’t want it anymore’.”

Norwegian duty on a £30 cheese pack amounted to £190 extra, he said.

Spurrell is now pursuing the domestic market with greater vigour but says the cost of marketing has gone “through the roof” because all his competitors are having to do the same.

“Before we could sell across the EU, now we are all fishing in the same pond. We used to be the biggest online sellers but now we are absolutely bombarded with attacks by all our cheese rivals because they are buying all the ads on Google to try to beat us. These are competitors who would never have bothered us before,” he said.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...ver-negotiated

GrimUpNorth 29-12-2021 21:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36107337)
You do realise that all these “hasn’t happened” arguments have all the credibility of a child asking if we’re there yet when the car’s barely off the drive?

Think you aimed that one at Andrew by mistake, you should be pulling Old Boy up on his 'how do you know as it hasn't happened yet' arguements he does it quite often (for example, see his post immediately before the one of yours I've quoted).

To be honest though, Old Boy is nothing but consistent - his claims of the benefits still to come from Brexit are just like a rehash of his claims of the (impendingish) end of TV as we know in the next cough cough number of years.

1andrew1 29-12-2021 21:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107385)
So what? Sovereignty is the reason for Brexit and the 4% is priced in by the 52%.

It might be by you and Chris but there's plenty of Leavers I know who still believe the spin that we won't be worse off. Ask them who's paying for the customs checks and paperwork and it gets interesting! ;)

---------- Post added at 20:47 ---------- Previous post was at 20:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36107337)
You do realise that all these “hasn’t happened” arguments have all the credibility of a child asking if we’re there yet when the car’s barely off the drive?

I expect the Brexit process to be defended in this thread but this is not its strongest defence. If one of the cited selling points of the Referendum 6.5 years ago was to remove red tape, then surely we at least knew what the red tape was that we were going to get rid of? If this was impeding the economy then it would seem sensible to remove it at the same time as we were busy erecting more red tape for exporters? Or at the very least, given Covid, to have a timetable for its removal?

---------- Post added at 20:52 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36107394)
Think you aimed that one at Andrew by mistake, you should be pulling Old Boy up on his 'how do you know as it hasn't happened yet' arguements he does it quite often (for example, see his post immediately before the one of yours I've quoted).

To be honest though, Old Boy is nothing but consistent - his claims of the benefits still to come from Brexit are just like a rehash of his claims of the (impendingish) end of TV as we know in the next cough cough number of years.

Yup. Optimism is a likable personality trait, but you can't base a business or economy on it.

Hugh 29-12-2021 22:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107400)
It might be by you and Chris but there's plenty of Leavers I know who still believe the spin that we won't be worse off. Ask them who's paying for the customs checks and paperwork and it gets interesting! ;)

---------- Post added at 20:47 ---------- Previous post was at 20:34 ----------


I expect the Brexit process to be defended in this thread but this is not its strongest defence. If one of the cited selling points of the Referendum 6.5 years ago was to remove red tape, then surely we at least knew what the red tape was that we were going to get rid of? If this was impeding the economy then it would seem sensible to remove it at the same time as we were busy erecting more red tape for exporters? Or at the very least, given Covid, to have a timetable for its removal?

---------- Post added at 20:52 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------


Yup. Optimism is a likable personality trait, but you can't base a business or economy on it.

Yup. It’s like having ‘hope’ in a plan - if it’s in your plan, you’re likely to fail…

Pierre 29-12-2021 22:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107400)
If one of the cited selling points of the Referendum 6.5 years ago was to remove red tape, then surely we at least knew what the red tape was that we were going to get rid of?

I don’t recall “red tape” being a major deal maker/breaker in the debate……such as it was.

Also if you think Jimmy Davis, from Peterlee was basing his decision on that, you have learnt nothing in the last 5 years.

Chris 29-12-2021 22:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107400)
I expect the Brexit process to be defended in this thread but this is not its strongest defence. If one of the cited selling points of the Referendum 6.5 years ago was to remove red tape, then surely we at least knew what the red tape was that we were going to get rid of? If this was impeding the economy then it would seem sensible to remove it at the same time as we were busy erecting more red tape for exporters? Or at the very least, given Covid, to have a timetable for its removal?

Your appeal to the date of the referendum is a deliberate obfuscation.

Regulatory change is something that couldn’t be planned in any serious way while the degree or ongoing alignment with the EU was unresolved. Don’t forget (I’m sure you haven’t really) that for 3 years the government was led by Theresa May who clearly wanted to retain as much alignment with the EU as she could get away with.

As for covid, well most politicians seem to accept that these are highly unusual times. Even the SNP accepts its own constitutional project must wait until some semblance of normality has returned. And once we get do get to it, it would be very tricky to deal with “regulations” in a single act of parliament. There are lots of different rules affecting lots of different things. Regulatory divergence from the EU is a project that will unfold organically over many, many years.

ianch99 30-12-2021 12:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36107405)
Also if you think Jimmy Davis, from Peterlee was basing his decision on that, you have learnt nothing in the last 5 years.

You are right. If it is the Jimmy Davis from Peterlee that I know of, it was all about getting rid of foreigners.

---------- Post added at 11:48 ---------- Previous post was at 11:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107404)
Yup. It’s like having ‘hope’ in a plan - if it’s in your plan, you’re likely to fail…

Slight correction: hope was the Plan. Oh, and "opportunities"

---------- Post added at 11:56 ---------- Previous post was at 11:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107385)
So what? Sovereignty is the reason for Brexit and the 4% is priced in by the 52%.

Now we are getting to the crux of things. You and others were happy to pay* any price to get this project over the line. However, the majority of those voting Leave were not. In fact, they were expecting little or no downside because that is what they were told.

If the self-evident risks were clearly acknowledged by Leave at the time, they would not have won. This is why this is and was the Big Con.

*more accurately, for others to pay

Sephiroth 30-12-2021 14:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107451)
<SNIP>

Now we are getting to the crux of things. You and others were happy to pay* any price to get this project over the line. However, the majority of those voting Leave were not. In fact, they were expecting little or no downside because that is what they were told.

If the self-evident risks were clearly acknowledged by Leave at the time, they would not have won. This is why this is and was the Big Con.

*more accurately, for others to pay

I only went as far as the 4% you have claimed. I don't think you have any evidence that the bulk of the 52% bought the sunlit uplands guff nor that there would be no downsides.

It appears that you have hung your Remainer credentials on the fall in GDP whereas that is recoverable.

You are a very bitter Remainer.

ianch99 30-12-2021 14:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107461)
I only went as far as the 4% you have claimed. I don't think you have any evidence that the bulk of the 52% bought the sunlit uplands guff nor that there would be no downsides

I quoted a reference to exactly this earlier in this thread, I guess it was not in blue so you missed it.

---------- Post added at 13:22 ---------- Previous post was at 13:20 ----------

It seems the French have taken back control:

https://twitter.com/LeShuttle/status...45791027179524

Quote:

URGENT UPDATE FOR BRITISH RESIDENTS IN EU: Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered 3rd country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU.

papa smurf 30-12-2021 14:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I feel that someone is still bitter and twisted about losing the referendum. this time next year we'll be millionaires:)

pip08456 30-12-2021 15:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107462)
I quoted a reference to exactly this earlier in this thread, I guess it was not in blue so you missed it.

---------- Post added at 13:22 ---------- Previous post was at 13:20 ----------

It seems the French have taken back control:

https://twitter.com/LeShuttle/status...45791027179524

I think you'll find that is incorrect. Don't believe everything you see on social media.

Julian 30-12-2021 15:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Even an article in the eu loving guanriad refers to the ban as a COVID decision.

So nothing at all to do with this thread as I'm sure the poster knew. :dunce:

Link

Hugh 30-12-2021 15:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36107468)
Even an article in the eu loving guanriad refers to the ban as a COVID decision.

So nothing at all to do with this thread as I'm sure the poster knew. :dunce:

Link

Surely the French "taking control of their borders" is relevant to Brexit thread, as that was one of the main drivers for Leave voters?

https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/0...endum-and-why/

Quote:

One third (33%) said the main reason was that leaving “offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.”

jfman 30-12-2021 15:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I think third country status enables France to do this to us. I doubt their paymasters in Berlin would allow it to happen to ze Germans.

I know the forum loves binary but being Brexit or Covid aren’t mutually exclusive positions for this one.

papa smurf 30-12-2021 16:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107469)
Surely the French "taking control of their borders" is relevant to Brexit thread, as that was one of the main drivers for Leave voters?

https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/0...endum-and-why/

On what planet?

ianch99 30-12-2021 16:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36107466)
I think you'll find that is incorrect. Don't believe everything you see on social media.

Here's the details on the Eurotunnel web site:

https://www.eurotunnel.com/uk/travel...covid-19/#foca and the French Consulate site: https://uk.ambafrance.org/FAQ-Travel...nce-and-the-UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36107468)
Even an article in the eu loving guanriad refers to the ban as a COVID decision.

So nothing at all to do with this thread as I'm sure the poster knew. :dunce:

Link

You really haven't being paying attention have you? Brexit is all about sovereignty (as Seph will attest) and taking control of your borders .. which the French have done.

---------- Post added at 15:08 ---------- Previous post was at 15:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107470)
I think third country status enables France to do this to us. I doubt their paymasters in Berlin would allow it to happen to ze Germans.

I know the forum loves binary but being Brexit or Covid aren’t mutually exclusive positions for this one.

I think this degree of nuance may be a bridge too far

Sephiroth 30-12-2021 16:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107462)
I quoted a reference to exactly this earlier in this thread, I guess it was not in blue so you missed it.

---------- Post added at 13:22 ---------- Previous post was at 13:20 ----------

It seems the French have taken back control:

https://twitter.com/LeShuttle/status...45791027179524

The spitefulness of Macron is one good reason for not wanting to be in the EU which he will now try to dominate.

Hugh 30-12-2021 17:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36107471)
On what planet?

For the hard of understanding - one of the main drivers for Brexit, according to Ashcroft’s poll, was "taking back control" of the U.K. borders, and we supposedly couldn’t do that whilst within the EU.

The French have just "taken back control" of their borders, whilst still being in the EU.

BenMcr 30-12-2021 17:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107474)
The spitefulness of Macron is one good reason for not wanting to be in the EU which he will now try to dominate.

Every country in the world is going to make decisions that favour their own citizens and country over the UK.

That's not being 'spiteful' or 'punishing' any more than our own government is when similar decisions are made here.

It's the real world affect of us being the 'sovereign country' the Brexit vote resulted in.

Mick 30-12-2021 18:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36107479)
Every country in the world is going to make decisions that favour their own citizens and country over the UK.

That's not being 'spiteful' or 'punishing' any more than our own government is when similar decisions are made here.

It's the real world affect of us being the 'sovereign country' the Brexit vote resulted in.

Typical Remainer nonsense - Macron is being a spiteful imbecile.

Our government has not unilaterally blocked foreign citizens from traveling across the UK by road, so wtf is this "making similar decisions" rubbish on about?

Those without the EU rose tinted glasses can see plainly what is going on, France is playing political games, the childish prick, aka Macron, isn't getting his own way when it comes to fishing licenses and France has been on record for wanting to "punish" the UK for daring to leave a corrupt organisation, such as the corrupted EU.

https://fullfact.org/europe/french-p...shment-letter/

---------- Post added at 17:53 ---------- Previous post was at 17:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107478)
For the hard of understanding - one of the main drivers for Brexit, according to Ashcroft’s poll, was "taking back control" of the U.K. borders, and we supposedly couldn’t do that whilst within the EU.

The French have just "taken back control" of their borders, whilst still being in the EU.

More Remainer bollocks - see above. :rolleyes:

jfman 30-12-2021 18:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I’m not sure an EU member state asking the EU to act in it’s interest is an entirely unpredictable or unreasonable position to be fair. That’s the point of the EU.

Mick 30-12-2021 19:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107493)
That’s the point of the EU.

:rolleyes: Another one from the EU rose tinted glasses wearing brigade, those without can see & know it is an undemocratic and corrupt institution.

jfman 30-12-2021 19:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36107494)
:rolleyes: Another one from the EU rose tinted glasses wearing brigade, those without can see & know it is an undemocratic and corrupt institution.

It’s not being rose tinted, Mick. It’s simply observing the reality. How I voted six years ago is irrelevant to that.

It’s a big bad capitalist world out there, with everyone out for their own interests. We wanted out - we are out. Naturally at some point our interests will conflict with that of France, Spain, Germany, etc.

They’ve signed up (to a greater or lesser extent) to look out for their collective interests to increase their own power relative to the United States, China, India, Russia, etc.

To believe the EU won’t act in it’s own interests is to be completely irrational.

Mick 30-12-2021 19:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107496)
It’s not being rose tinted, Mick. It’s simply observing the reality. How I voted six years ago is irrelevant to that.

It’s a big bad capitalist world out there, with everyone out for their own interests. We wanted out - we are out. Naturally at some point our interests will conflict with that of France, Spain, Germany, etc.

They’ve signed up (to a greater or lesser extent) to look out for their collective interests to increase their own power relative to the United States, China, India, Russia, etc.

To believe the EU won’t act in it’s own interests is to be completely irrational.

Their collective interest is to punish us for ever daring to leave, that's their main goal. Britain cannot be allowed to succeed outside EU's corrupt empire because if another member country was to see Britain succeed outside the EU, this would be the end of their power hungry empire. Their aim to make an example, humiliate us at every turn so we regret our decision to leave, only, I never will.

BenMcr 30-12-2021 19:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36107491)
Our government has not unilaterally blocked foreign citizens from traveling across the UK by road, so wtf is this "making similar decisions" rubbish on about?

The whole immigration argument for Brexit was to allow the UK to do that if they so wished and is what the UK government can now do

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/i...-december-2020
Quote:

For the first time in a generation, the UK will be able to decide who comes into the country, based on the skills they have to offer - not where they are from.
Quote:

This time last year the government promised to end free movement, take back control of our borders and introduce a new points-based immigration system.
If the UK can increase migration from a specific country like India:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/u...migration-deal
Quote:

In a first of its kind between the two countries, both governments have agreed enhanced mobility provisions for young professional Indian and British citizens which will allow people to live and work in the two countries for up to two years.
Then they can decide to block migration from other countries.

---------- Post added at 18:49 ---------- Previous post was at 18:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36107500)
Their collective interest is to punish us for ever daring to leave, that's their main goal. Britain cannot be allowed to succeed outside EU's corrupt empire because if another member country was to see Britain succeed outside the EU, this would be the end of their power hungry empire. Their aim to make an example, humiliate us at every turn so we regret our decision to leave, only, I never will.

Their collective interest is to make their collective interest succeed at the expense of the rest of the world.

We are now part of the 'rest of the world' so there is no obligation for the EU or the countries in it to treat us in any other way, and I don't expect them to either.

jfman 30-12-2021 19:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36107500)
Their collective interest is to punish us for ever daring to leave, that's their main goal. Britain cannot be allowed to succeed outside EU's corrupt empire because if another member country was to see Britain succeed outside the EU, this would be the end of their power hungry empire. Their aim to make an example, humiliate us at every turn so we regret our decision to leave, only, I never will.

I agree that it’s not in their interests for Brexit to be a success, but that’s not in and of itself unreasonable.

This very forum would be frothing at the mouth about how to make Scottish independence as difficult as possible if the people there voted for it. Unfortunately, it’s a natural part of identity politics.

There’s no fairytale ending of “fair doos, lads. All the best”.

spiderplant 30-12-2021 21:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
"UK nationals will be allowed to travel through France if they are going to their home in an EU country during the festive period.

France suspended its Covid restriction after UK travellers faced difficulties reaching their country of residence."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59832076

Odd sort of punishment

jonbxx 30-12-2021 21:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I am assuming that, like the 4% GDP drop, the reaction of our friends across the channel was costed in and to be expected when the referendum was performed? If yes, why so angry, it was to be expected...

Damien 30-12-2021 21:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Ironically it was probably the EU who told them to knock this off as it probably breaks the point of Schengen. It's not up to France to police who drives into Spain for example and the point of Schengen is they can go via France.

It should be noted that this was them extending their COVID restrictions rather than a new rule for now. This (now revoked) change is a bit of a red herring because it was a massive loophole in that existing restriction which was probably causing them headaches. Those COVID restrictions are almost certainly about politics though. It doesn't make sense that Americans can visit without a compelling reason (so long as they're vaccinated) and we can't.

They should just ditch that pointless rule.

And we should ditch the isolate + Day 2 PCR to come here.

Mick 30-12-2021 22:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36107502)
The whole immigration argument for Brexit was to allow the UK to do that if they so wished and is what the UK government can now do

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/i...-december-2020

If the UK can increase migration from a specific country like India:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/u...migration-deal

Then they can decide to block migration from other countries.

---------- Post added at 18:49 ---------- Previous post was at 18:32 ----------

Their collective interest is to make their collective interest succeed at the expense of the rest of the world.

We are now part of the 'rest of the world' so there is no obligation for the EU or the countries in it to treat us in any other way, and I don't expect them to either.

We’re not talking about immigration here, we’re talking about a petty country, France, blocking Brits travelling on the road trying to get home. They have since undone their idiotic and foolish political posturing, which is what this was, nothing else.

Julian 30-12-2021 22:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Just a thought but if Boris had behaved like the French have there would be loads of people screaming "embarrassing u-turn!!"
I wonder where they all are........

Chris 30-12-2021 22:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36107528)
Just a thought but if Boris had behaved like the French have there would be loads of people screaming "embarrassing u-turn!!"
I wonder where they all are........

In France?

Hugh 30-12-2021 23:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36107528)
Just a thought but if Boris had behaved like the French have there would be loads of people screaming "embarrassing u-turn!!"
I wonder where they all are........

Nah, it was just Macron being spiteful by letting the Brits travel through…

And to be fair, where would people from the Continent be driving to if they were driving through the U.K. to get there?

nffc 30-12-2021 23:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36107522)
And we should ditch the isolate + Day 2 PCR to come here.

Agree with the rest of what you said but not that.


If you're coming from outside you are at higher risk of bringing in a newer variant than those circulating. So all arrivals should isolate and PCR test negative after the usual incubation has passed to ensure this hasn't happened.


It isn't watertight but it would help.

jfman 30-12-2021 23:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc (Post 36107540)
Agree with the rest of what you said but not that.

If you're coming from outside you are at higher risk of bringing in a newer variant than those circulating. So all arrivals should isolate and PCR test negative after the usual incubation has passed to ensure this hasn't happened.

It isn't watertight but it would help.

Are you more at risk of generating a new variant overseas than you are here?

spiderplant 30-12-2021 23:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107539)
And to be fair, where would people from the Continent be driving to if they were driving through the U.K. to get there?

Ireland? :shrug:

nffc 31-12-2021 00:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107542)
Are you more at risk of generating a new variant overseas than you are here?

Probably...

ianch99 31-12-2021 01:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36107518)
"UK nationals will be allowed to travel through France if they are going to their home in an EU country during the festive period.

France suspended its Covid restriction after UK travellers faced difficulties reaching their country of residence."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59832076

Odd sort of punishment

It is a victim mentality to see this as punishment. France is in the midst of a tsunami of daily Covid case, like we are, and are aiming to mitigate risk, like we should be doing.

Damien 31-12-2021 08:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
It's probably more to do with the election coming up in the spring and Macron needing to show strength against us over fishing and also the virus itself. If France was really simply worried about the COVID cases they would ban travelling from America as well.

Sephiroth 31-12-2021 10:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36107551)
It is a victim mentality to see this as punishment. France is in the midst of a tsunami of daily Covid case, like we are, and are aiming to mitigate risk, like we should be doing.

You are so way out on this. Wasn't it Macron who personally trashed the AZ/Oxford vaccine with no scientific basis for doing this, setting the EU back in it's Covid recovery measures? Why did he do this?

Wasn't it Macron who allowed his minions to threaten the UK/Jersey with cutting off the power inter-connect if we didn't provide fishing licences outwith the legal rules?

Wasn't it Macron who tried to prevent cross-France transit for Brits who were legal residents of other EU countries? Stopped only because it broke EU law.

He hates us and probably would love you.

Hugh 31-12-2021 11:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Your obsession is getting a little concerning…

Sephiroth 31-12-2021 11:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107587)
Your obsession is getting a little concerning…


Quote:

You are so way out on this. Wasn't it Macron who personally trashed the AZ/Oxford vaccine with no scientific basis for doing this, setting the EU back in it's Covid recovery measures? Why did he do this?

Wasn't it Macron who allowed his minions to threaten the UK/Jersey with cutting off the power inter-connect if we didn't provide fishing licences outwith the legal rules?

Wasn't it Macron who tried to prevent cross-France transit for Brits who were legal residents of other EU countries? Stopped only because it broke EU law.

He hates us and probably would love you.
Where's the error in what I wrote?


Hugh 31-12-2021 11:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Your attribution to a person actions carried out by a Government.

Sephiroth 31-12-2021 12:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107592)
Your attribution to a person actions carried out by a Government.

Macron didn't trash the vaccine, for example?


---------- Post added at 11:10 ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107319)
Why not take a look at the data and decide?

Nothing alarming in the data. Just differences.

But, we are free from the EU's shackles.

1andrew1 31-12-2021 12:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107474)
The spitefulness of Macron is one good reason for not wanting to be in the EU which he will now try to dominate.

The EU will long outlast Macron.

Sephiroth 31-12-2021 12:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107596)
The EU will long outlast Macron.

More's the pity. And another Napoleon will likely succeed him.

BenMcr 31-12-2021 13:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36107597)
More's the pity. And another Napoleon will likely succeed him.

I get the feeling that's it's not just the EU that you don't like about Europe.

Sephiroth 31-12-2021 13:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36107600)
I get the feeling that's it's not just the EU that you don't like about Europe.

I like Europe and am a frequent, respectful visitor. There are two things in particular about the EU that I don't like in relation to the UK:

1/
The Commission's creeping drive towards federalisation. We are free from that now and there will be no rules dictation by Brussels (or Berlin/Paris) any more.

2/
The power broking stuff that goes on in the EU. Hitherto, it had been led by Germany with France as its running dog (the governments, that would be rather than the people). With Merkel gone, Macron is sticking his chest out. Anything the French government does in terms of bashing the UK, is with Macrons blessing if not instigation. The vaccine business in particular has entrenched my total dislike of Macron and his anti-UK actions.

FYI, I would have been quite happy to remain in the EU but for its "ever closer union" mantra. I was in favour of freedom of movement. I thought we'd been stitched up on fishing and to a certain extent on agriculture, which is totally skewed in France's favour. But overall, as an association of trading states with harmonisation of standards, I would have been content.

I think you misunderstand me.



ianch99 31-12-2021 14:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36107575)
It's probably more to do with the election coming up in the spring and Macron needing to show strength against us over fishing and also the virus itself. If France was really simply worried about the COVID cases they would ban travelling from America as well.

Fair point although do the numbers compare: UK v. US?

Mick 31-12-2021 16:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107587)
Your obsession is getting a little concerning…

And your obsessions isn’t? :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 15:06 ---------- Previous post was at 15:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36107575)
It's probably more to do with the election coming up in the spring and Macron needing to show strength against us over fishing and also the virus itself. If France was really simply worried about the COVID cases they would ban travelling from America as well.

Bang on. :tu:

jfman 02-01-2022 11:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Random question.

The Mail on Sunday have a question in the poll they published today.

“Do you trust Boris to get Brexit done?”
Yes 43. No 48.

When is Brexit considered “done”?

papa smurf 02-01-2022 12:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107740)
Random question.

The Mail on Sunday have a question in the poll they published today.

“Do you trust Boris to get Brexit done?”
Yes 43. No 48.

When is Brexit considered “done”?

It'll be on a Tuesday.

OLD BOY 02-01-2022 13:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107740)
Random question.

The Mail on Sunday have a question in the poll they published today.

“Do you trust Boris to get Brexit done?”
Yes 43. No 48.

When is Brexit considered “done”?

I guess Brexit will be done when we have dealt with all the transitional problems we are experiencing and we’ve cleared away all those bureaucratic EU laws which threaten to stifle our economy.

BenMcr 02-01-2022 13:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107748)
I guess Brexit will be done when we have dealt with all the transitional problems we are experiencing and we’ve cleared away all those bureaucratic EU laws which threaten to stifle our economy.

Which laws in particular are you referring to? If you class them as 'stifling' then you must be aware of what specifically they 'stifle'?

1andrew1 02-01-2022 14:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107740)
Random question.

The Mail on Sunday have a question in the poll they published today.

“Do you trust Boris to get Brexit done?”
Yes 43. No 48.

When is Brexit considered “done”?

Negotiations with the EU will always happen though at some stage people will stop calling it Brexit.

The last bit of added Brexit bureaucracy seems to be on 1 November so perhaps after that, the term will reduce in use? [Graphic: FT.com]

jfman 02-01-2022 14:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36107750)
Negotiations with the EU will always happen though at some stage people will stop calling it Brexit.

The last bit of added Brexit bureaucracy seems to be on 1 November so perhaps after that, the term will reduce in use? [Graphic: FT.com]

I’m not really worried about the terminology. It just strikes me as somewhat odd (and perhaps dangerous) to have a seemingly ethereal concept hanging over the Prime Minister, his successor and presumably subsequent holders of the post. What do these 48% (plus presumably a subset of the 43% who don’t think the PM has delivered but trust him to do so) of people want/need to see?

I’m not convinced the added paperwork of export health certificates is the answer. OB has alluded to a transitionary period - something I don’t consider unreasonable in and of itself - but what event heralds the end of the transition and acceptance that this is no longer a transition it is indeed the post-Brexit present? Or in the absence of a definition does it become a get out of free card for this and subsequent Governments that the big bad European bogeyman won’t let us deliver.

Pierre 02-01-2022 15:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107748)
I guess Brexit will be done when we have dealt with all the transitional problems we are experiencing and we’ve cleared away all those bureaucratic EU laws which threaten to stifle our economy.

Not in our lifetime then.

OLD BOY 02-01-2022 17:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107751)
I’m not really worried about the terminology. It just strikes me as somewhat odd (and perhaps dangerous) to have a seemingly ethereal concept hanging over the Prime Minister, his successor and presumably subsequent holders of the post. What do these 48% (plus presumably a subset of the 43% who don’t think the PM has delivered but trust him to do so) of people want/need to see?

I’m not convinced the added paperwork of export health certificates is the answer. OB has alluded to a transitionary period - something I don’t consider unreasonable in and of itself - but what event heralds the end of the transition and acceptance that this is no longer a transition it is indeed the post-Brexit present? Or in the absence of a definition does it become a get out of free card for this and subsequent Governments that the big bad European bogeyman won’t let us deliver.

I don’t see the value in defining it by date or a particular event. We will know we have all our ducks in a row - current issues such as the NI border and fishing resolved, EU laws replaced, new-style trade deals in place with services an integral part of them, and businesses taking advantage of the new environment to make up for and exceed the initial losses incurred with separation.

We will know it when we see it.

---------- Post added at 16:26 ---------- Previous post was at 16:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36107749)
Which laws in particular are you referring to? If you class them as 'stifling' then you must be aware of what specifically they 'stifle'?

How can you doubt it? You want to try reading some EU Directives and ask yourself how you would comply with them all if you were running a business.

We were faced with having to take an extra lawyers where I worked before to negotiate our way through very complicated EU legislation, and there was a lack of certainty about the conclusion reached on whether or not actions we took were ‘safe’ legally because the ECJ often went beyond what was actually required by law when making its judgements. The Acquired Rights Directive was a nightmare to apply when staff were transferring from one company to another.

There is a piece in today’s Telegraph about how much better the City will be able to operate as it frees itself from EU rules.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...roker-finncap/

[EXTRACT]

The head of the City broker FinnCap has said Brexit has been a boost to the Square Mile as it has allowed regulators to ditch EU red tape.

Sam Smith, chief executive of the London-listed business, said more money is going into UK growth companies than ever before and the City is working “very well”, despite warnings that it would lose business and jobs to the Continent following Britain’s break with Brussels.

“To me, Brexit has not been anything other than quite positive ... we are seeing signs that actually the regulatory regime could be changed in a positive way post-Brexit to really make this ecosystem fly,” she said.

The comments came as new research from EY found that fears of a mass exodus of City workers failed to materialise as the flow of bankers and traders moving to the EU went into reverse this year.

Hundreds of thousands of jobs were said to be at risk if the UK voted to leave. However, the exodus has been far lower than expected with fewer than 10,000 workers thought to have relocated.

Separately, the City watchdog implemented a set of sweeping reforms of London’s listing rules in December as regulators seek to make the City more attractive to fast-growing firms.

As part of the overhaul, the Financial Conduct Authority slashed free float requirements for listed companies in a bid to lure a new generation of start-ups to the London Stock Exchange.

It also permitted firms with dual-class share structures to claim places in the leading share indices and draw on a wider pool of investors including tracker funds.

Ms Smith said: “We have had a great funding environment, there is lots of investment coming into the UK, there is money to back startups and scale up businesses. And that’s continued to come from overseas, which has gotten much better since Brexit.”

jfman 02-01-2022 17:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107769)
I don’t see the value in defining it by date or a particular event.

So for decades, election after election, PM after PM, governments could blame Brexit for their own inadequacies?

Come on OB you know that’s a preposterous position. Is there a list of laws to be replaced, a list of trade deals by which success or failure is gauged? Would the 48%+ even agree on what that looks like?

OLD BOY 02-01-2022 18:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107772)
So for decades, election after election, PM after PM, governments could blame Brexit for their own inadequacies?

Come on OB you know that’s a preposterous position. Is there a list of laws to be replaced, a list of trade deals by which success or failure is gauged? Would the 48%+ even agree on what that looks like?

Why would it take decades? That’s the view of pessimistic remainers.

I doubt we will still be talking about Brexit in five years’ time, as long as the PM is not diverted from his mission.

jfman 02-01-2022 18:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107773)
Why would it take decades? That’s the view of pessimistic remainers.

I doubt we will still be talking about Brexit in five years’ time, as long as the PM is not diverted from his mission.

It was you who said you saw little value in defining a timeframe, not me.

Hugh 02-01-2022 18:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107769)
I don’t see the value in defining it by date or a particular event. We will know we have all our ducks in a row - current issues such as the NI border and fishing resolved, EU laws replaced, new-style trade deals in place with services an integral part of them, and businesses taking advantage of the new environment to make up for and exceed the initial losses incurred with separation.

We will know it when we see it.

---------- Post added at 16:26 ---------- Previous post was at 16:17 ----------



How can you doubt it? You want to try reading some EU Directives and ask yourself how you would comply with them all if you were running a business.

We were faced with having to take an extra lawyers where I worked before to negotiate our way through very complicated EU legislation, and there was a lack of certainty about the conclusion reached on whether or not actions we took were ‘safe’ legally because the ECJ often went beyond what was actually required by law when making its judgements. The Acquired Rights Directive was a nightmare to apply when staff were transferring from one company to another.

There is a piece in today’s Telegraph about how much better the City will be able to operate as it frees itself from EU rules.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...roker-finncap/

[EXTRACT]

The head of the City broker FinnCap has said Brexit has been a boost to the Square Mile as it has allowed regulators to ditch EU red tape.

Sam Smith, chief executive of the London-listed business, said more money is going into UK growth companies than ever before and the City is working “very well”, despite warnings that it would lose business and jobs to the Continent following Britain’s break with Brussels.

“To me, Brexit has not been anything other than quite positive ... we are seeing signs that actually the regulatory regime could be changed in a positive way post-Brexit to really make this ecosystem fly,” she said.

The comments came as new research from EY found that fears of a mass exodus of City workers failed to materialise as the flow of bankers and traders moving to the EU went into reverse this year.

Hundreds of thousands of jobs were said to be at risk if the UK voted to leave. However, the exodus has been far lower than expected with fewer than 10,000 workers thought to have relocated.

Separately, the City watchdog implemented a set of sweeping reforms of London’s listing rules in December as regulators seek to make the City more attractive to fast-growing firms.

As part of the overhaul, the Financial Conduct Authority slashed free float requirements for listed companies in a bid to lure a new generation of start-ups to the London Stock Exchange.

It also permitted firms with dual-class share structures to claim places in the leading share indices and draw on a wider pool of investors including tracker funds.

Ms Smith said: “We have had a great funding environment, there is lots of investment coming into the UK, there is money to back startups and scale up businesses. And that’s continued to come from overseas, which has gotten much better since Brexit.”

Wow, that takes us back 40 years…

From the employees viewpoint, the Acquired Rights Directive (Inc. TUPE) was a very good thing.

nffc 02-01-2022 18:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107740)
Random question.

The Mail on Sunday have a question in the poll they published today.

“Do you trust Boris to get Brexit done?”
Yes 43. No 48.

When is Brexit considered “done”?

When all the remoaners finish going on about it probably :erm::D

OLD BOY 02-01-2022 19:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36107775)
It was you who said you saw little value in defining a timeframe, not me.

Just trying to be helpful...:erm:

I was not putting a timeframe on when Brexit would be done, just when I thought people would stop going on about it.

---------- Post added at 18:06 ---------- Previous post was at 17:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107780)
Wow, that takes us back 40 years…

From the employees viewpoint, the Acquired Rights Directive (Inc. TUPE) was a very good thing.

There are less bureaucratic and less complicated ways of going about it. Like the Working Time Directive, the headline benefits are clear, but you need to look at the detail and the impact.

Carth 02-01-2022 19:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Brexit may possibly become 'history' when the EU itself finally implodes with all the infighting . . .


. . one can dream ;)

Hugh 02-01-2022 19:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107782)
Just trying to be helpful...:erm:

I was not putting a timeframe on when Brexit would be done, just when I thought people would stop going on about it.

---------- Post added at 18:06 ---------- Previous post was at 17:56 ----------



There are less bureaucratic and less complicated ways of going about it. Like the Working Time Directive, the headline benefits are clear, but you need to look at the detail and the impact.

For example?

OLD BOY 02-01-2022 20:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36107786)
For example?

I think you need to read it, Hugh, and you will see for yourself.

By the way, have you tried reading the GDPR? It makes riveting reading, and ALL organisations with people records, even simply names and addresses of members or customers, have to comply with this.

If you think that’s reasonable, then I guess nothing will persuade you. But these Directives are a drag on business.

Pierre 02-01-2022 20:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
For the the European project to work, the national identity of the countries participating in it need to be secondary.

Not sure that will work out.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ightwing-anger

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...feud-with-bloc

https://euobserver.com/democracy/153889

But hey, at least we can watch from the sidelines

BenMcr 02-01-2022 20:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107790)
I think you need to read it, Hugh, and you will see for yourself.

You're the one that's argued there is a different way of doing it, so you must have an example?

Quote:

By the way, have you tried reading the GDPR? It makes riveting reading, and ALL organisations with people records, even simply names and addresses of members or customers, have to comply with this.
Again, what's an example part of GDPR that you'd now change?

Quote:

If you think that’s reasonable, then I guess nothing will persuade you. But these Directives are a drag on business.
All rules and obligation to business could be considered a 'drag' depending on what position you're stood in and who you want to benefit.

Why bother giving employees any rights? That's just a 'drag' on a business making profit for their owners or shareholders.

What about accounting laws? They're just a 'drag' as businesses need to employ people to create, maintain and audit the books.

Carth 02-01-2022 20:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36107784)
Brexit may possibly become 'history' when the EU itself finally implodes with all the infighting . . .


. . one can dream ;)


Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36107794)
For the the European project to work, the national identity of the countries participating in it need to be secondary.

Not sure that will work out.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ightwing-anger

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...feud-with-bloc

https://euobserver.com/democracy/153889

But hey, at least we can watch from the sidelines


Yep, seen all those (and more), it certainly hasn't looked all fine and dandy in the land of European Contentment for a while :D

Hugh 02-01-2022 22:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36107790)
I think you need to read it, Hugh, and you will see for yourself.

By the way, have you tried reading the GDPR? It makes riveting reading, and ALL organisations with people records, even simply names and addresses of members or customers, have to comply with this.

If you think that’s reasonable, then I guess nothing will persuade you. But these Directives are a drag on business.

At length, as I was an IT Director when it was coming in, and had to ensure we were compliant.

And as for TUPE, I was involved/affected both as an employer and an employee, and I think it’s a good thing…

You’re very good at sweeping statements/complaints, but never actually detailed alternatives, just "make it simpler", and "drag on business" - you don’t seem to recognise the benefits/protections they gave employees.

1andrew1 02-01-2022 22:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
This is not going doing well with Mail online readers, judging by the comments.

Quote:

Ministers plan to relax immigration rules to make it easier for thousands of Indians to live and work in UK as government seeks closer ties with India to counter China influence
  • Indian citizens could more freely live and work in the UK under new mooted rules
  • Immigration curbs are a key point that could dominate UK-India 2022 trade talks
  • Cabinet is said to be split over possibility of loosening border controls for India

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-work-UK.html

Some of the more recent comments include:
Quote:

  • I thought Brexit meant we would take back control of our borders? Seems we've been scammed!
  • Absolutely despicable.
  • This government needs to go and go fast! What the hell are they thinking?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:39.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum