![]() |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Perhaps I am going about this the wrong way. If Eurosport itself (not Eurosport UK) funded by Discovery won PL rights, surely it would allow them to show the matches throughout the 50+ countries they operate in? If it does, charging advertizers extra in each of those countries for PL games and PL games only, will soon cover the cost of each game. If they do get the rights to games, and can only show them in the UK, then no, I agree ad revenues alone wont cover it. If I am wrong about the rights issue throughout Europe, I will happily eat humble pie. Until then, I stand by the idea that a European wide broadcaster showing PL games in 50+ countries can easily make their money back through increased advertizing revenue. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Final decision expected by Wednesday
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footba...n-goes-5121379 |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
l expect Sky to win the most packages but whatever happens its the customer who will be paying for it through their bills.
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Quote:
I have to admit to be being a little worried about a third and possibly fourth bidder being involved , those wanting to watch all games would face a massive hike should three broadcasters pick up rights. Complete fantasyland but I suppose a dream scenario would be if someone like Bein Sport picked up the lions share this way it would be in there interest to offer every platform equal access on similar charges , not going to happen but we can wish. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
I know everyone is entitled to a good moan on here, and I agree it is wrong that it happens the way it does. I also know people choose to spend their hard earned money on paying for the sports channels. I have no problem with any of those things. However, whilst people choose to pay the prices, you simply have to deal with the fact you are going to continue to get your pants pulled down each month. Moaning about it on here (as cathartic as it may be) is not going to change anything. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
As I said in a previous post though, it is a very unlikely scenario. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
I wouldn't rule beIN Sports out they have a lot more money than sky and could win easily if they are serious about showing the premier league
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Whilst there will always be some small overseas sports rights available, the key rights that draw subscribers have all been sewn up. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Main points According to media analysis firm Ampere Research, with the outcome of the Premier League rights auction unknown, there’s no doubt that Sky is facing the greatest competitive challenge in the tournament’s 23-year history. “Based on analysis of past inflation rates, a three-season deal could hit the £5 billion mark for the first time as BT goes in hard against its main rival. If Sky and BT buy the same packages, and bear the same level of costs relative to one another as they do with the current contract, Sky would need to spend £1.24 billion a year, £3.7 billion for a total three-season contract. BT would need to spend £402m a year, £1.2 billion for the total three-season contract. Based on its calculations, Ampere believes Sky will want to spend around or slightly below £3 billion for its share, leading to a disconnect in price to value. BT will be need to be looking around the £1 billion mark, assuming the pair retain the same packages they have now. Ampere’s analysis suggests that Sky can spend £3 billion on the Premier League three-season deal without increasing the spend per TV customer over current levels, but, based on its inflation predictions, it may well need to dig deeper. While these numbers look high, the pot of £3 billion created by future customer growth leaves it just 24 per cent short of the implied inflationary cost. Adding in inflation over the three years means the stretch cost of £3.7 billion does not look completely unrealistic, suggests Ampere. Ampere believes that entry of a new party to the bidding process could reduce these costs by around 10 per cent for each party, based on the assumption that a new entrant would risk only one of the seven packages available. How a three-way split would work for football fans is unclear. ---------- Post added at 13:46 ---------- Previous post was at 12:55 ---------- Quote:
http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2015/...ights-package/ Four broadcasters are expected to be in the frame when bidding for the Premier League rights for 2016/19 closes Friday. The existing rights holders Sky and BT will be joined by Eurosport owners Discovery Communications and the Qatar-based beIN Sport. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
All these reports are simply guess work. They know nothing more than we do. I wouldn't listen to a single one of them. No one predicted bt's entry last year, not one of them, everyone expected All-Jazeera and look what happened!
These articles aren't worth the paper they're printed on or worth the time reading. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum