Cable Forum
Page 36 of 96 « First 2632333435 36 373839404686 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Online Safety Bill Etc (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711643)

heero_yuy 14-04-2024 07:39
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36173496)
I feel I should point out this is not unique to iPhones, I have it activated on my Android phones, and can log into my google account to locate them.
You can even get one for your dog: pit pat;)

mrmistoffelees 14-04-2024 08:27
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36173483)
Must be very lucky travelled more times than I recall ( must be well over a hundred times) trans Atlantic and across the States never lost any luggage. Unlike a trip to Belgium case went to India :shocked:
You’re lucky then, every time I’ve flown to either MSP or SFO from AMS my luggage has been lost for 2-3 days to the point I now put three days worth of clothing into my carry on.

Itshim 14-04-2024 11:35
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36173506)
You’re lucky then, every time I’ve flown to either MSP or SFO from AMS my luggage has been lost for 2-3 days to the point I now put three days worth of clothing into my carry on.
Haven't any idea if this is the reason but I always went business class . Belgium wasn't, never risked it again:D

RichardCoulter 14-04-2024 16:26
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36173503)
How much are what ? Phones ?
Air tag trackers.

Paul 14-04-2024 19:31
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36173519)
Air tag trackers.
£20+ each.



Nonsense posts also removed, seriously ...

spiderplant 14-04-2024 19:43
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36173525)
£20+ each
Non-Apple alternatives are also available for around half that from the usual online stores (and are arguably better as they have a hole so you can thread them on a keyring)

RichardCoulter 14-04-2024 20:57
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Interesting, thanks guys :)

RichardCoulter 16-04-2024 11:26
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Under the Online Safety Act, which was passed last year, the sharing of deepfakes was made illegal.

The new law will make it an offence for someone to create a sexually explicit deepfake - even if they have no intention to share it but "purely want to cause alarm, humiliation, or distress to the victim", the MoJ said.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-688230...e%20MoJ%20said.

Paul 16-04-2024 12:35
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
If they have no intention to share it then how is it going to "cause alarm, humiliation, or distress to the victim" (or anyone). :confused:

You would have to share it to do that.

Chris 16-04-2024 14:41
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36173592)
If they have no intention to share it then how is it going to "cause alarm, humiliation, or distress to the victim" (or anyone). :confused:

You would have to share it to do that.
I suspect there is some attempt here to differentiate between pictures made privately between consenting adults, as opposed to non-consenting. You could presumably make something on your computer and show the screen to someone by way of a threat without actually ‘sharing’ it in legal terms.

Itshim 16-04-2024 16:09
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36173591)
From reports I heard ,only half listening, lawyers think that proving this would be very hard . More window dressing perhaps :erm:

RichardCoulter 16-04-2024 17:29
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36173597)
I suspect there is some attempt here to differentiate between pictures made privately between consenting adults, as opposed to non-consenting. You could presumably make something on your computer and show the screen to someone by way of a threat without actually ‘sharing’ it in legal terms.
Maybe it's also designed to deal with situations where someone creates material and then goes on to threaten to share it or show it to somebody.

Chris 16-04-2024 17:47
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36173605)
Maybe it's also designed to deal with situations where someone creates material and then goes on to threaten to share it or show it to somebody.
It’s definitely designed to criminalise the threatening to share, yes. It seems also designed not to criminalise the making-of for consensual purposes.

Paul 16-04-2024 19:36
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Sharing explicit pictures without consent is surely already illegal anyway ?

jonbxx 17-04-2024 11:05
Re: Online Safety Bill
 
Digital image creation is a surprisingly broad definition. If you download a digital image, in the eyes of the law, once it is viewed, it has been ‘created’ by converting ones and zeroes into the image. This is how people with currently illegal content on their hard drives are convicted, even if they did not create the content themselves in the traditional sense.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:39.
Page 36 of 96 « First 2632333435 36 373839404686 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum