![]() |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
|
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
|
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
Since they started paying in the NHS and medical research have concentrated on extehding life. That comes at a cost. One of the costs is work for more years like it or not. |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
I said 'wholesale reforms to redistribute wealth'- one or two measures wouldn't adequately resolve the problem. We have one generation who sold off all the state assets for a low tax economy, who have accumulated wealth as a result and we have the other end of the spectrum paying for their own further education (unlikely to ever pay this debt off, so in effect an additional tax throughout their lifetime), struggling to get on the housing ladder, and who is having to pay taxes covering the interest for huge deficits and debts built up by previous generations. It's not going to be sustainable to tell the second group that they are going to get punished again to cover the excesses of those who went before them. A first step would be to break the triple lock on State Pension increases and link it to the CPI only - the triple lock is essentially a bribe to that part of the electorate anyway. |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
So because i’m Doing the right thing you want to distribute my work? That’s what you’re saying... |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
|
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
Regarding the triple lock, it's the first time that a government has recognised the reduced ability of pensioners to stay abreast of inflation. True that many continue working into their seventies and beyond, but they pay tax on that which is obviously fair, and they'll pay tax on their pension increases if they are taking the pension. On "redistribution of wealth", this usually needs a sledgehammer (of the Corbyn proposition) to bring into effect. That will result in a flight of capital and have the opposite effect of redistributing wealth. It would drain wealth and start a process of levelling everyone into penury. We are a cog in the World's movement and farting around with the economic model/engine can be counterproductive. ---------- Post added at 08:11 ---------- Previous post was at 08:04 ---------- Oh - as regards the NHS: It was fine until about 13 years ago when Gordon Brown got his hands on it. It was fine in the "Emergency Ward 10" days (Pre-Thatcher), when Matron ran the nurses and a Consultant ran the doctors. Now that it's full of managers, accountants and other "Yes Minister" apparatchiks, it is in a spiral of decline. The NHS needs taking back to its original operating model. The guvmin needs to make a hypothecated contribution model (NI) that is graduated according to your highest tax rate. |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Flight of capital only applies if that’s easy to do. In a post Brexit world if people want to make profits in this country then it will be easier to tax.
The triple lock is a bribe. Nothing less and nothing more. |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
One thing these figures also miss is the £10 billion or so that is not claimed in the first place. Whatever system there is creating hoops for the claimants to jump through, the fraudulent claimers will not be the ones affected. After all, they have put a lot of time and effort into making sure their income continues. The people affected are those who are told they are fit to work, whilst being hooked up to machines to keep them going through their latest cancer treatment. Those who are vulnerable and bewildered by the whole system who end up abused by sharks and the likes of Atos. The obsession with nit picking over a tiny percentage of benefit claimants, is a distraction from the real problem of a tax system so convoluted that the wealthy can pay a smaller percentage of their income in tax than the poorest. Meanwhile the other beneficiaries are private companies being paid for gash assessments, which long term cause so much misery. Tax evasion is a far bigger loss to government finances than fraudulent benefit claims. |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
In the 1970’s (pre-Thatcher), premature births before 27 weeks had a 80% mortality rate, now it’s 89% survival rate (unfortunately, often with ongoing medical needs). Cancer survival rates has greatly increased, but with the associated costs. Survival from serious accidents has greatly increased (the "golden hour"), but again, at increased costs and often ongoing medical care. Comparing the NHS in the 70s and now is like comparing a motor car factory in the 70s and now - different needs, progress has happened, more complex and and highly technical support is often required, and things are done differently because it’s a different world. In 1970, the U.K. child mortality rate was 21.8 per 100,00 births, now it’s 3.7. Cancer survival rates (10 year) have doubled since 1970, and in the 70s, most premature births of under 25 weeks were left to die, nowadays most survive. Trying to retrofit what one worked under different circumstances very rarely works. |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
Quote:
It's the way the NHS is run, particularly at hospital level, front line, that I am criticising. Sure technical specialists are required in addition to clinical staff but in my dealings with the NHS, I sense too high an administrative burden which reduces the money available for midwives, district nurses and all the services we enjoyed in that way 20 years ag,. |
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
|
Re: Crisis in the NHS
How can we fill these nursing vacancies?
Quote:
|
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
|
Re: Crisis in the NHS
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum