Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35982436)

Then you get sites even like this one where you can't really say what you want. Can't mention Trump, can't mention guns.

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35982499)

If you feel you need someone to “filter” your posts can you honestly say that makes you a good judge of whether they’re successful?

If you genuinely need an explanation then I’d say it’s pretty likely you’ll never understand. Some people (not myself) would be insulted and offended at what you posted. Perhaps they’d be able to use this new legislation against you for it?

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35982500)

RichardCoulter - Hence my Oh dear. Yet you can't see it can you.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35982507)

I don't use a third party to filter my posts. I deem them to be successful because of the cases where I have have taken matters further, I have been succeeded in getting things changed.

If you aren't prepared to explain what you're talking about and why a particular post could be construed as insulting/offensive then I am unable to help you with this any further.

The legislation will be open to you as well as everyone else, but you will obviously be expected to state exactly what the issue is

---------- Post added at 19:01 ---------- Previous post was at 19:00 ----------



See what? Are you able to explain exactly what "it" is?

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35982481)

It's okay Mick. Everyone is aware your decision is final.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35982507)

I don't use a third party to filter my posts. I deem them to be successful because of the cases where I have have taken matters further, I have been succeeded in getting things changed.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35982507)

If you aren't prepared to explain what you're talking about and why a particular post could be construed as insulting/offensive then I am unable to help you with this any further.

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35982510)

Really ?
To quote a recently well used phrase here "that's a new one on me" :sleep:

Originally Posted by Mythica (Post 35982503)

Actually I didn't take it as resolved. You personally accused me of something I didn't do and threatened legal action because I was asking you for evidence which you wouldn't provide (it didn't exist). I decided to leave the matter to the mods to deal with because I couldn't be bothered with the routine as I had other important matters to deal with. The point being, it's just not vulnerable people that need protecting and the case above which was my example proves this. I personally did nothing wrong and was threatened with legal action.

---------- Post added at 18:57 ---------- Previous post was at 18:55 ----------



:tu:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35982510)

Really ?
To quote a recently well used phrase here "that's a new one on me" :sleep:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35982514)

Details of said comment have been kept on file...

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35982509)

Okay, because you have an disability which makes you incapable of understanding certain things. I'll treat you really special like no other because you deserve it. - Does that sound offending to you or even slightly condescending in any way? What if the person wants to be treated like anyone else. Those that aren't defined by their disabilities and want to be well, just 'normal'. What you said was in fact bang out of order.

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35982515)

It's really got me confuddled.com all this talk of pandering me*, you*, us*, (*delete as appropriate) in fact, we're so pandered so much, we didn't feel the need to introduce the timeouts recently for persistent infighting members.... ;)

Oh wait... :cool:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35982511)

Yeah if that is indeed true I think you’ll find it’s likely you got your own way for other reasons.

Please don’t allow there to be any confusion in this so pay particular attention: it will be a cold day in Hell before I’d want, need or seek any help from you :tu:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35982518)

Just you Mick. Everyone else is cool.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35982517)

People have a moral and certain legal duties to make adjustments when dealing with disabled people and their vastly varying conditions

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35982520)

Aww dang, we're really doing this playground stuff - I miss being coolest kid on the block. Not. :rolleyes:

And just checking - nope, my question has still not been answered, pandered not so much then. :rolleyes: