Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36188670)

2008 is after much of it had gone on. Not sure the circular is that relevant, as it seems to revolve around parental care, which is not where the problems were.

---------- Post added at 11:31 ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 ----------

The term "informed choice" is used in the Sexual Offences (Northern Ireland) 2008 Act. It is used in connection with whether somebody has a mental disorder and cannot make an "informed choice". Is that where the confusion comes from?
Link


Find it difficult to believe that dozens of police officers would've lied about it.

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36188668)

I've been having trouble sleeping, but slept like a log last night, your talent is such that it could put a glass eye to sleep, remember facts are our friends :)

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36188678)

But that is the Circular that you insist is the basis for all the points you are making, as that is the Circular Nazir Azfal was allegedly referring to (even though he stated he hadn't actually seen it), and you keep referring to him as the source of your "evidence".

You can't have it both ways...

---------- Post added at 15:25 ---------- Previous post was at 15:18 ----------



Excellent news - glad to have been of service...

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36188663)

Far too many awkward questions to be answered with an inquiry.
Eg Why are they referred as "Asian gangs", when the common factor is Islam(eg groups of Somalis, especially in the Netherlands). How did the gangs form so easily with friends, neighbours, workmates. How did they easily find others wanting to abuse in other town and cities that the girls were trafficked to. IMO they aren't paedophiles as such, it's just girls that happened to be young and could be controlled easily.

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36188670)

2008 is after much of it had gone on. Not sure the circular is that relevant, as it seems to revolve around parental care, which is not where the problems were

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36188687)

I agree, I also don’t like the term “grooming” gangs.

They should be called exactly what they are:

“Islamic child rape gangs”

---------- Post added at 16:53 ---------- Previous post was at 16:49 ----------



I wouldn’t be using the past tense with this issue, I fully expect that it is still going on, somewhere.

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36188681)

I'd be really grateful if you could deliver more drivel about 9 o clock, keep up the good work mate:tu:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36188372)

https://news.sky.com/story/labour-wo...gests-13281099


He’ll be gone by March, with Reeves close behind.

Prime Minister Streeting will see you now.

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36188723)

One can only hope, but unfortunately labour doesn't like changes leaders while they are PM

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36188724)

I think they did with Blair and Brown as the latter was called "the unelected PM" by his critics.

I can't see Starmer resigning either any time soon. I suspect he'll outlast Badenoch as a Party leader and if he learns from his mistakes, he'll have a second term.

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36188738)

Elon likes Tommy Robinson so watch that space :shocked:
and with enough of musk's money behind him who knows

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36188743)

Do you not have a problem with foreign oligarchs interfering with British affairs? I mean sovereignty, nationalism and all that? Swap out Musk with Soros and and the right-wing would be frothing at the mouth.

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36188745)

This guy just has it in the UK, that's all it is. He wants chaos.