![]() |
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
Why on Earth would ITV have wanted to drag it out, it had been dragged out for 18 months already. The argument that their content was more compelling than ever is surely a reason to encourage VM to play ball and it obviously worked. |
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
All things considered, I really don't think that ITV will have suddenly said, ok, you win, forget about the retransmission fees! ---------- Post added at 12:13 ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 ---------- Quote:
ITV gave VM an ultimatum to resolve the outstanding issues or they would switch off their feeds as early as the weekend. It can be no coincidence that this was done at this particular time. Up until that point, VM had intended to broadcast an unauthorised feed from the Astra satellite intended for Freesat and Sky DTH customers. ---------- Post added at 12:19 ---------- Previous post was at 12:13 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
You think the call centre is busy and discounts on the go just now are a lot, they’d be totally dwarfed by the complaints if ITV went off air. |
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
Oh yes, absolutely. The loss of the ITV channels would certainly have dwarfed the complaints about the loss of the UKTV channels, to the point where I think that it might have even threatened the continuing viability of the platform. |
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Richard it seems to me like you are actually bothered whether or not Virgin has paid re-transmission fees. It's probably not going to have an effect on customers whether or not they have because they have to remain competitive in terms of pricing as otherwise people will just vote with their wallet and leave. The deal covers the entire ITV suite of channels and yes maybe there are details about re-transmission in the terms but this will have probably been on the proviso that Virgin receive 4K etc that they have managed to come to an agreement on (I will highlight this is my subjective opinion before anyone comments with 'were you at the negotiation table?' or similar). In terms of the other PSBs asking for re-transmission fees, the BBC probably won't because of the license fee. Channel 4 and Viacom both have commercial agreements for other channels so it might be brought to the table when negotiating for them but who knows.
With regards to the UKTV channels yes people will leave because they've gone if they don't come back. UKTV saying on Twitter that it's unlikely that the channels will return and pointing people in the direction of other providers could just be to put pressure on Virgin to reach a deal. I don't think Virgin are in that much of a weak position though given not everyone watches UKTV and the fact that they've just signed a multi year deal for BT Sport. Let's face it are sports fans who are Virgin Media customers going to want to spend £27.99 a month and upwards on top of a Sky package? |
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
Sky was a different ball game, because it was a more important issue than the UKTV issue is. This will blow over, and we will get more channels over the coming months to make up for the loss. ---------- Post added at 14:23 ---------- Previous post was at 14:20 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 14:28 ---------- Previous post was at 14:23 ---------- Quote:
Such a fuss for channels showing almost endless repeats. ---------- Post added at 14:33 ---------- Previous post was at 14:28 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
I've already explained why I think that the Sky issue and the response by the previous owners was totally different. If you think that a dispute that had been going on for so long in deadlock and had resulted in an ultimatum by ITV to threaten to weaken the platform even more within days resulted in a satisfactory outcome for ITV within 24 hours was simply a coincidence you must be extremely gullible. Obviously, VM would want as much value from these retransmission fees as possible and negotiated these extras as part of the deal. VM claim to know how many people watch various channels, yet I was arrogantly told that I never watched them, which didn't go down well with me! Also, this would not be accurate as people often leave their STB switched on for various reasons and, when the STB is switched off, it doesn't actually switch it off, it only kills the video & audio. In the sense that 43% is a minority and that the cancellation lines are impossible to get through to, attention from Ofcom, legal bods challenging the legalities of their contract, negative attention across the media, many disgruntled customers, the loss of any goodwill built up over the years both now and into the future think I think it realistic to say that VM management totally misjudged the whole situation and, if they could have foreseen everything that's happened, would have (hopefully) handled things totally differently. Again, I do not believe that they were ready to sign a deal. ITV saw that VM had put themselves in a weak position and fully exploited it. This news is a double edged sword for VM, but they simply had no other option as ITV will have been well aware. This will not have gone unnoticed by the likes of Sky etc. ---------- Post added at 18:48 ---------- Previous post was at 18:45 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:01 ---------- Previous post was at 18:48 ---------- Quote:
These increased costs, coupled with the other expenses incurred by the UKTV issue, the loss of projected revenue from downgrades/cancellations/loss of future customers is bound to leave a hole in VM finances now and for years to come. I predict that a deal will eventually be done with UKTV for at least a partial return of the channels, so they can't even offset UKTV carriage costs from this. I think it likely that customers who remain will be expected to plug the gap, which will further weaken the platform as some people will resist these price increases, though it's true to say that companies do tend to rely on inertia or forgetfulness from customers with regards to price increases. Putting BT Sport into XL/Full House is certainly a plus for many customers in VM's favour, however, the whole business model relies on many people, whether sports fans or not, paying a little each month within the XL/Full House packs. If enough people downgrade, leave or fail to join, the BT Sport arrangement may become unsustainable. If VM decided to keep it as a customer attraction tool, it would have to be subsidised, causing a further loss of revenue or price increases. If they decided to get rid of it, I think that would have a further detrimental effect on subscriber numbers as many people only pay for the top package (or are with VM at all) because of this perk. |
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
The issue now is UKTV, and my take on that is that unless UKTV back down, we’ve kissed their asses goodbye. New channels coming soon! |
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media & UKTV+ITV Channels
Quote:
https://twitter.com/Ofcom/status/1022136683104481282 Yes, there are new channels coming; Food Network +1 and Travel Channel +1. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum