![]() |
Re: US Election 2016
I am scared that Trump is going to win.
If he does I have lost all faith in America, and I'm convinced he will start a new Cold War with Russia, if nor far far worse. ---------- Post added at 17:45 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ---------- Hillary may be no angel but sh is the best of two evils. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
Did you see the accusations crooked Hillary laid bare at the Russians, Trump declared he would prefer to remain friends with Russia. So I think if any candidate will lead us in to war with Russia, it will be her. ---------- Post added at 17:52 ---------- Previous post was at 17:51 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:57 ---------- Previous post was at 17:52 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
We're already in a sort of Cold War with Russia. Last thing we need to do though is appease Putin. NATO especially must be protected, its shameful to abandon Eastern Europe.
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
---------- Post added at 18:04 ---------- Previous post was at 18:03 ---------- Quote:
While I said followers and support for Trump on Twitter is greater than Hillary's, it is also the same on Facebook, you cannot ignore these indicators. I got the above posts, comments and feedback from Facebook off Hillary's own Official page. She has about 4 million less people following her than Trump. Whenever there is live broadcasts, Trump attracts huge audiences compared to Hillary. You cannot ignore that Hillary struggles to fill her venues, while Trump's is always bursting to full with people still queuing outside at ALL his rallies and he holds more rallies than she does, because bless her, she needs to rest due to her tiredness levels. And this talk from a Veteran, who says of larger queues than normal on the first early voting day, I strongly doubt this voter enthusiasm is for her. I am telling you, he has this election bagged, he is the protest vote whether he is liked or not and I think Trump will be the 45th President of the United States. |
Re: US Election 2016
I see Trump want to end ObamaCare, thus ending free health care to the needy.
But what the Multi billionaire care. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
Obamacare or (PPACA) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, most certainly is not free. It's not like the NHS is here, where you go to see a doctor, or go to hospital, get treated and don't pay anything. In America, you need health insurance because if you get ill and what not and receive treatment, you have to pay for it, but health insurance normally covers this. In a Nutshell, the Affordable Care Act in America, does the following:-
Source: http://obamacarefacts.com/whatis-obamacare/ Those on the poverty line, still have to pay it but they get help to do so via a range of benefits. If people don't pay it, a fee is still taken by the IRS (US Equivalent to UK's HMRC) So call it a kind of Tax if you want. So when Trump talks about ending Obamacare, he is talking about repealing the act, because the Affordable care Act (but not really), has caused massive hikes in fees and costs for it. People have seen, year on year rise on it and the rises are huge this year, we would see large scale riots if they introduced something like that over here. You talking of four figure type sums and these are monthly upfront costs, you are talking thousands of dollars per month So this is what Trump means when he says he wants to get rid of it. Crooked Hillary wants to reform it, which is just another way of saying, she will continue where Obama left off, if she gets in office. |
Re: US Election 2016
Let's get real here - neither Trump nor Clinton are poor. Far from it. IMHO Trump's appeal is largely due to the loathing of many US citizens for establishment figures like Clinton, Bush etc. who come from the right families and have had the odds stacked up in their favour. It's a bit like the rise of UKIP here. People may see the party's current issues and Farage's departure as terminal but what they fail to see is the huge animosity towards the traditional parties that's been allowed to fester and grow within large sections of society which is what led to UKIP's popularity. Trump, like UKIP/Farage, is a symptom of what's gone wrong over decades and unless things change that anti-establishment sentiment will continue to grow and if Trump doesn't get in this time it'll be someone similar next time.
|
Re: US Election 2016
We'll see what happens in two weeks. The race really has hit a lull two weeks out, not seen this before. Trump is, maybe, slowly gaining some ground. A poll has him up +2 in Florida (although another one had Clinton up +3) and gaining in New Hampshire being +4 ahead. The other polls seem stable. Nothing is changing. Still a number of undecided voters though and if nearly all of them went Trump it's neck-and-neck. Obviously that's very unlikely but if a signifiant number did then we would be within 'Brexit error' margins.
Otherwise boring. I did hear something interesting the other day though. Every 4 years the number of minority voters in America take up 2% more of the electorate as a whole. It's why states like North Carolina went Obama and why it's a toss-up state now. At the same time we're seeing a Brexit like split between those without college-degrees and those with them. Normally there wasn't a big difference in American politics between these two groups (all other factors being the same obviously) but this election those without having 'bigly' to Trump whilst those with them are moving to Clinton. Finally we also have liberals moving down South and changing the demographics of some of those states, it's why Colorado is now a blue state and maybe Arizona soon (although that's also related to the first point). So what would happen in 2020? Let's say Clinton does win. Who do the Republicans get to run and against her? Can they change to deal with the fact the electorate is changing or will their base prevent them from doing so? ---------- Post added at 21:24 ---------- Previous post was at 21:22 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
But if she got in, I doubt she would make it to 2020, let alone any of the rest of us to see 2020, when we potentially go to WW3 with Russia, thanks to her. But even without that to contend with, we have her dodgy track record, I'd say she is looking at being impeached. Quote:
Hold on a second, didn't a Wikileaks revelation this last week or so say the DNC or her campaign (bribed DNC party members) to incite violence at Trump rallies ? http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...violence-trump Crooked Hillary should come under this Impeachment paragraph for sure. She should not even be running for President but this has already been covered. Wikipedia is our friend. (Wikileaks is not hers :rofl: ) |
Re: US Election 2016
'Crooked' Hillary - are you in Primary School, parroting the school bully, aka The Donald?
Why don't you just call her 'such a Nasty woman', as all you seem to do is repeat Trump? |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Latest video from Project Veritas "Exposes Foreign Donations"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUBrZItwVy4 |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
I don't recall people being admonished for using the phrase " Bliar". Or " dubya" not really an issue is it? |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum