Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   UK & EU Agree Post-Brexit Trade Deal (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708171)

Sephiroth 05-08-2020 09:42

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045666)
Seph, I'm afaid that link slips below your usual standards. I can only attribute this to be shock at Iain Duncan Smith feigning ignorance of a withdrawal agreement he was praising to the high horses before! He showed contempt for voters and he has rightly been called out on this.

My previous link to the original document demonstrates the Canadian deal was more than IP. This is a pertinent extract: https://twitter.com/DavidHenigUK/sta...454401/photo/1
I think it's logical that the EU wouldn't want a heavily subsidised socialist state on its doorstep with easy entry into the single market or a highly de-regulated one with very low standards. Thanks to such tight negotiating deadlines, the EU can afford to push for an even stronger level playing field. You may recall that the Canadian deal took some seven years to arrange.

I'm more interested in the now and what you think about Iain Duncan Smith's apparent change of heart or memory loss?

Andrew, Just so you know, IDS is of no importance to me.

On the specific point about 'level playing field', which is the term you used to rebut my argument, I'm not wrong. The term 'level playing field' as applied to CETA doesn't have the same meaning as what the EU wishes to apply to the UK. I quote the EU synopsis in full. Bold text is as per original. Coloured text is my highlight.

APPLICATION IN CETA https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pres...en/MEMO_16_445

Quote:

Factsheet: Main elements of CETA
Brussels, 29 February 2016
European Commission - Fact Sheet
The EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade agreement (CETA) will significantly improve business opportunities for European companies in Canada. With CETA, European companies will receive the best treatment that Canada has ever offered to any trading partner, thus levelling the playing field on the Canadian market for EU companies.

By opening markets, CETA should support growth and jobs in the EU and bring further benefits for European consumers. It has the potential to keep prices down and provide consumers with greater choice of quality products. CETA will not change EU standards. Standards and regulations related
to food safety, product safety, consumer protection, health, environment, social or labour standards etc. will remain untouched. All imports from Canada will have to satisfy all EU product rules and regulations – without exception.

More specifically CETA will offer:

- Savings on customs duties
CETA will bring tangible benefits to European consumers and companies by eliminating or cutting customs duties – some of the most far reaching achieved by the EU in a trade agreement. This will provide important market opportunities for European companies including SMEs and could save
European exporters around €470 million a year for industrial goods and €42 million a year for agricultural goods. Importantly, most customs duties will disappear as soon as CETA comes into effect. Cutting customs duties will not lower or change EU standards. Canadian imports will have to respect
EU regulations.

- Opportunities for service suppliers and transparent and effective investment protection and dispute settlement mechanisms

CETA is by far the most far reaching agreement ever concluded by the EU in the area of services and investment. European firms will have more opportunities to provide specialised maritime services like dredging, moving empty containers, and shipping certain cargo within Canada. European firms will also have new advantages when it comes to getting investment projects approved in Canada, protecting their investments and enforcing their rights in case of unfair treatment through a balanced and effective dispute settlement system. In other services sectors, such as environmental services, telecommunications and finance, market access is ensured, both at federal level and - for the first time – provincial level. In CETA – as in all its trade agreements – the EU protects public services. Operating in the EU, Canadian investors and service providers will have to respect applicable EU regulations, and will not be subject to discrimination vis-à-vis European investors and service providers.

- Mutual recognition of professional qualifications
The agreement provides a framework to facilitate the mutual recognition of qualifications in regulated professions such as architects, accountants and engineers. The relevant professional organisations in the EU and Canada now have a framework that sets out the conditions for the negotiation of mutual
recognition agreements for their respective professions. These will then have to be negotiated and agreed by the EU and Canada.

- Easier transfers of company staff and other professionals between the EU and Canada
CETA will make it easier for firms to move staff temporarily between the EU and Canada. This will facilitate European companies' operations in Canada. It will be also easier for other professionals to temporarily supply legal, accounting, architectural or similar services.

- Improve ability of European companies to provide after sales services
CETA will make it easier for EU firms to export equipment, machinery and software by allowing firms to send maintenance engineers and other specialists to provide after-sales and related services.

- Access to Canadian public tenders
Canada has opened up its government tenders to EU companies to a greater extent than with any of its other trading partners. EU firms will be able to bid to provide goods and services not only at federal level but also to Canadian provinces and municipalities, the first non-Canadian firms to be able to do so. Canada’s provincial procurement market is estimated to be double the size of its federal equivalent.

- Avoiding costs related to double testing
The EU and Canada have agreed to accept each other’s conformity assessment certificates in areas such as electrical goods, electronic and radio equipment, toys, machinery or measuring equipment. This means that a conformity assessment body in the EU can test EU products for export to Canada according to Canadian rules and vice versa. This will avoid both sides doing the same test and could greatly reduce costs for companies and consumers alike. This is of particular benefit to smaller companies for whom paying twice for the same test can be prohibitive.

- Better protection for EU innovation and creative works
CETA will create a more level playing field between Canada and the EU on intellectual property rights. For example, it will improve how Canada’s IPR system protects patents for EU pharmaceutical
products. It will also strengthen the protection of copyrights (alignment with EU rules on protection of technological measures and digital rights management as well as on the liability of internet service providers) and enforcement (namely by foreseeing the possibility of provisional measures and injunctions for intermediaries involved in infringing activities). Canada also agreed to strengthen its border measures against counterfeit trademark goods, pirated copyright goods and counterfeit geographical indication goods.

- Market advantage for producers of traditional European products
Many medium-sized and smaller businesses trading in agricultural products will benefit from Canada agreeing to protect 145 geographical indications for high-quality European products, such as Roquefort cheese, balsamic vinegar from Modena or Dutch Gouda cheese and many others.

- Commitment to Sustainable Development
In CETA,the EU and Canada affirm their commitment to sustainable development. Both agree that more trade and investment should further environmental protection and labour rights – and not be at
their expense.
The EU and Canada are committed to CETA helping to ensure that economic growth, social development, and environmental protection are mutually supportive. CETA integrates the EU’s and Canada's obligations to international rules on workers’ rights and environmental protection, and gives a strong role to EU and Canadian civil society in participating in the implementation of the commitments in these areas in CETA. CETA also sets up a process for settling disputes, including government consultations and a panel of experts.




By significant contrast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/51180282

Quote:

"Without a level playing field on environment, labour, taxation and state aid, you cannot have the highest quality access to the world's largest single market," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a speech at the London School of Economics.

She was talking about what kind of access the United Kingdom could have to the European single market after Brexit.
:
:
Part of a trade negotiation is working out how widespread level playing field provisions should be.

But the areas in which the EU is most insistent they must be maintained are:

- workers' rights
- environmental protection
- taxation
- state aid (or subsidies for business)


You will see that the EU is demanding considerably more from the UK by way of 'level playing field' provisions than they have agreed with Canada. Their reasoning is that we are on their doorstep - so we can't have a Canada style agreement, which is what the UK Guvmin wants.

In other words, the EU wants our cake to eat.


1andrew1 05-08-2020 11:31

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045695)
Andrew, Just so you know, IDS is of no importance to me.

On the specific point about 'level playing field', which is the term you used to rebut my argument, I'm not wrong. The term 'level playing field' as applied to CETA doesn't have the same meaning as what the EU wishes to apply to the UK. I quote the EU synopsis in full. Bold text is as per original. Coloured text is my highlight.

APPLICATION IN CETA https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pres...en/MEMO_16_445

[/SIZE]

By significant contrast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/51180282

You will see that the EU is demanding considerably more from the UK by way of 'level playing field' provisions than they have agreed with Canada. Their reasoning is that we are on their doorstep - so we can't have a Canada style agreement, which is what the UK Guvmin wants.

In other words, the EU wants our cake to eat.


The EU set out at the start of the negotiations what was required of the UK if it wanted a certain level of access so it's four years too late for people to start whingeing that these do not match the dreams they were sold by Vote Leave and Leave EU. We all need to move on and accept the new reality.

The deal with Canada is more than just intellectual property rights, as my extract demonstrates and I think you accept this now so our views are now not so far apart. It also shows that you and I agree that the UK would need to build on the enhanced playing field with firmer support due to the UK's EU proximity and size. That's all part of the gravity of trade which I have tried to explain to people but never seems to sink in before they start talking up Mexico, India etc.

Carth 05-08-2020 11:55

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
I can't remember being sold any dreams :shrug:

I do remember some EU people trying to sell me some though :D

;)

mrmistoffelees 05-08-2020 12:00

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36045714)
I can't remember being sold any dreams :shrug:

I do remember some EU people trying to sell me some though :D

;)


I'd get your memory checked then... there was dream selling from both camps

Carth 05-08-2020 12:07

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
I wasn't swayed by the offers, didn't buy any :p:

papa smurf 05-08-2020 12:14

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36045714)
I can't remember being sold any dreams :shrug:

I do remember some EU people trying to sell me some though :D

;)

All i remember was being told that vote leave didn't stand a chance of winning,someone got that wrong.

1andrew1 05-08-2020 12:45

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36045715)
I'd get your memory checked then... there was dream selling from both camps

Agreed although looking at the plans for Kent, Project Reality is resembling Project Fear a little too closely for my liking!

Carth 05-08-2020 12:58

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045726)
Agreed although looking at the plans for Kent, Project Reality is resembling Project Fear a little too closely for my liking!

oh . . what's happening in Kent then . . .. more migrants? :D

Hugh 05-08-2020 13:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36045732)
oh . . what's happening in Kent then . . .. more migrants? :D

Government buys Ashford 'Brexit lorry park' site

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-53427262

Quote:

A 27-acre site in Kent which opponents fear could be used for a post-Brexit "lorry park" has been bought by the government.

In a letter to residents living near the site off the M20 in Ashford, the Department for Transport (DfT) said it was planning "two primary uses".

Transport Minister Rachel Maclean said the site could be used as a border control post or temporary lorry park.

Ashford MP Damian Green said the site was in the wrong place.

In her letter to residents, Ms Maclean wrote: "Government departments envisage using it as a permanent site for facilities related to future border processes.

"The site may also be used as a contingency lorry holding area for the particular, foreseeable risk of significant disruption at the end of the transition period."

Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove previously said it was not the intention to create a massive concrete lorry park.
Hope this helps... :)

1andrew1 05-08-2020 13:42

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36045732)
oh . . what's happening in Kent then . . .. more migrants? :D

The Farage Garage with lots of lorries parked up with enhanced access to people smugglers.

Sephiroth 05-08-2020 13:50

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045709)
The EU set out at the start of the negotiations what was required of the UK if it wanted a certain level of access so it's four years too late for people to start whingeing that these do not match the dreams they were sold by Vote Leave and Leave EU. We all need to move on and accept the new reality.

The deal with Canada is more than just intellectual property rights, as my extract demonstrates and I think you accept this now so our views are now not so far apart. It also shows that you and I agree that the UK would need to build on the enhanced playing field with firmer support due to the UK's EU proximity and size. That's all part of the gravity of trade which I have tried to explain to people but never seems to sink in before they start talking up Mexico, India etc.

on your first paragraph, you’ve sort of nailed it. “The EU set out ....”. In other words their terms, cake and all. That’s my point.

On your 2nd paragraph, I believe their proximity argument to be spurious grounds for tight level playing field. My perception is that they want to punish us.

Our disagreement is fundamental on principle except, I hope, that the Canadian model is fine.

Carth 05-08-2020 13:59

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045748)
Government buys Ashford 'Brexit lorry park' site

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-53427262

Hope this helps... :)


Bit of a waste isn't it? Considering many think we'll have no trade anyway :p:

papa smurf 05-08-2020 14:14

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36045755)
Bit of a waste isn't it? Considering many think we'll have no trade anyway :p:

It's just somewhere for the four horsemen of the apocalypse to rest their horses :)

Hugh 05-08-2020 14:59

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36045755)
Bit of a waste isn't it? Considering many think we'll have no trade anyway :p:

No one’s ever said that - they’ve said it will more expensive and involve more red tape and delays...

You’re doing a "Donald" - saying "many think" or "many say" without providing any evidence of who the many are or what they actually said... ;)

---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 14:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36045757)
It's just somewhere for the four horsemen of the apocalypse to rest their horses :)

Farage, Cummings, Gove, and Banks?

Seems legit... :D

papa smurf 05-08-2020 15:03

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045760)
No one’s ever said that - they’ve said it will more expensive and involve more red tape and delays...

You’re doing a "Donald" - saying "many think" or "many say" without providing any evidence of who the many are or what they actually said... ;)

---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 14:58 ----------

Farage, Cummings, Gove, and Banks?

Seems legit... :D

Yea but Donald got the worlds top job on the back of it;)

denphone 05-08-2020 15:04

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36045762)
Yea but Donald got the worlds top job on the back of it;)

There is no accounting for taste l suppose..;)

1andrew1 05-08-2020 20:45

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045753)
on your first paragraph, you’ve sort of nailed it. “The EU set out ....”. In other words their terms, cake and all. That’s my point.

On your 2nd paragraph, I believe their proximity argument to be spurious grounds for tight level playing field. My perception is that they want to punish us.

Our disagreement is fundamental on principle except, I hope, that the Canadian model is fine.

Not really cake and eat it. We left the EU and they offered us a priced-up Smörgåsbord to choose from. We're the third party now so can't expect to have the benefits of the single market without paying for it. Anything else reeks of pure entitlement.

And no, they're not really punishing us. They're protecting the Single Market which is everything to the EU. Even German car manufacturers are prepared to see the UK suffer adverse economic consequences if it keeps the Single Market intact. I really don't get this playing-the-victim stance. We're a 65-milion-person country so of course bigger blocs like the EU, US and China will try and boss us around. This was all known before the referendum. These complaints sound increasingly more and more like unconscious buyers' remorse.

But let's see how the negotiations go. I believe David Frost had a bit of a wake-up call when business recently convinced him they were serious about the bad effects of no-deal, and the negative impacts of even the best Brexit deal. BoJo's heart is not really in it, he wants an easy life with his new family and Brexit was just about handing him the keys to No. 10. And Cummings has moved onto his dream of using British tax-payers' money to compete with Eton Musk and Amazon through OneWeb.

Sephiroth 05-08-2020 21:02

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
We agree to differ.

It is a pity that you come across as a justifier/apologist for the EU instead of supporting the UK's negotiating position.

You have conceded in your post that the EU, US & China will try to boss us around. Of course we must resist that with vigour.



1andrew1 05-08-2020 21:15

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045791)
We agree to differ.

It is a pity that you come across as a justifier/apologist for the EU instead of supporting the UK's negotiating position.

You have conceded in your post that the EU, US & China will try to boss us around. Of course we must resist that with vigour.


My wish is that I come across as explaining the situation. I've said many times that I hope we get the best deal possible. As a smaller country, we sometimes have to be pragmatic, as we've seen with us yielding to US pressure on Huawei.

Sephiroth 05-08-2020 21:26

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045793)
My wish is that I come across as explaining the situation. I've said many times that I hope we get the best deal possible. As a smaller country, we sometimes have to be pragmatic, as we've seen with us yielding to US pressure on Huawei.


1. You've given more or less the same explanation for months. We get it.

2. Being pragmatic is one thing. Caving in to EU bullying is not tolerable imo.

All we want is the Canada deal. What's wrong with that?



pip08456 05-08-2020 22:37

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045793)
My wish is that I come across as explaining the situation. I've said many times that I hope we get the best deal possible. As a smaller country, we sometimes have to be pragmatic, as we've seen with us yielding to US pressure on Huawei.

I suppose we will be losing our G7 membership because we are such a small country then.

Hugh 05-08-2020 23:38

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36045801)
I suppose we will be losing our G7 membership because we are such a small country then.

I’m sure you know that’s not how it works, as we were a founding member...

1andrew1 05-08-2020 23:56

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045797)

1. You've given more or less the same explanation for months. We get it.

2. Being pragmatic is one thing. Caving in to EU bullying is not tolerable imo.

All we want is the Canada deal. What's wrong with that?



2. In all deals where there is a junior party, one party will potentially cave in. We saw that with BoJo and the withdrawal agrement where he caved into the EU although managed to fool quite a few people until the penny dropped.

The UK and Japan are currently set to sign a deal which Liz Truss is getting awfully excited about. However, Japan has made clear that it cannot be as ambitious as the one signed with the EU as the UK is a far smaller market. I call that one party in the negotiations having more power in strictly neutral language. You might prefer the use of more emotive language like bullying which is your choice.

3. I've explained to you why the EU has its red lines. It doesn't mean that I wish it didn't but it's only what was called Project Fear or Easiest Trade Deal Ever depending on who you chose to believe at the time.

---------- Post added at 23:56 ---------- Previous post was at 23:52 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045802)
I’m sure you know that’s not how it works, as we were a founding member...

Exactly. Today's learning is that not everyone knows the difference between small and smaller.

Carth 06-08-2020 00:05

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Japan can pee off too, do we actually buy anything useful from them that nobody else can supply?

jfman 06-08-2020 00:45

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36045806)
Japan can pee off too, do we actually buy anything useful from them that nobody else can supply?

The stuff we won’t be able to get from China in Cold War 2. PlayStation 5.

pip08456 06-08-2020 01:17

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045802)
I’m sure you know that’s not how it works, as we were a founding member...

Oh wow so it doesn't matter how our economy is doing (covid considered) we are still a member?

---------- Post added at 01:17 ---------- Previous post was at 01:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045804)
2. In all deals where there is a junior party, one party will potentially cave in. We saw that with BoJo and the withdrawal agrement where he caved into the EU although managed to fool quite a few people until the penny dropped.

The UK and Japan are currently set to sign a deal which Liz Truss is getting awfully excited about. However, Japan has made clear that it cannot be as ambitious as the one signed with the EU as the UK is a far smaller market. I call that one party in the negotiations having more power in strictly neutral language. You might prefer the use of more emotive language like bullying which is your choice.

3. I've explained to you why the EU has its red lines. It doesn't mean that I wish it didn't but it's only what was called Project Fear or Easiest Trade Deal Ever depending on who you chose to believe at the time.

---------- Post added at 23:56 ---------- Previous post was at 23:52 ----------


Exactly. Today's learning is that not everyone knows the difference between small and smaller.

As you should know by now, link please.

jonbxx 06-08-2020 09:49

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
A UK Japan Economic Partnership Agreement is an interesting one for two reasons;

This is really a three way deal between the UK, Japan and the EU. The supply chains for Japanese companies based in the UK (Nissan and Honda re the elephants on the room here) are predominantly EU based. The value and success of a UK-Japan agreement is very dependent on the success of a UK-EU agreement.

The second issue is the EU-Japan agreement has 'Most Favoured Nation' clauses which state that any concessions offered to a third country, the UK in this case, must also automatically be offered to the EU. The best possible deal the UK can get from Japan would match what the EU can get (whether the EU would necessarily accept/implement a MFN concession is a different thing of course)

This article explains this well - https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/202...mental-issues/

Sephiroth 06-08-2020 10:03

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045804)
2. In all deals where there is a junior party, one party will potentially cave in. We saw that with BoJo and the withdrawal agrement where he caved into the EU although managed to fool quite a few people until the penny dropped.

The UK and Japan are currently set to sign a deal which Liz Truss is getting awfully excited about. However, Japan has made clear that it cannot be as ambitious as the one signed with the EU as the UK is a far smaller market. I call that one party in the negotiations having more power in strictly neutral language. You might prefer the use of more emotive language like bullying which is your choice.

3. I've explained to you why the EU has its red lines. It doesn't mean that I wish it didn't but it's only what was called Project Fear or Easiest Trade Deal Ever depending on who you chose to believe at the time.

---------- Post added at 23:56 ---------- Previous post was at 23:52 ----------


Exactly. Today's learning is that not everyone knows the difference between small and smaller.


Quote:

2. In all deals where there is a junior party, one party will potentially cave in. We saw that with BoJo and the withdrawal agrement where he caved into the EU although managed to fool quite a few people until the penny dropped.
What I was hoping to read was your agreement that bullying by the other party is not acceptable. That is a normal attitude to take. Instead, you come at it from the other side even going so far as to call us a "junior partner". You might think that the reality, but the majority of UK people do not like being bullied. Only Remainers come up with this "I told you so" crap instead of standing up for the UK as matters stand.

Quote:

3. I've explained to you why the EU has its red lines. It doesn't mean that I wish it didn't but it's only what was called Project Fear or Easiest Trade Deal Ever depending on who you chose to believe at the time.
You walked into that answer. My question was : "All we want is the Canada deal. What's wrong with that?". You dodged the answer. What is wrong with the Canada deal? You've only provided an answer from the EU perspective - and that is what is so wrong with many Remainers - still complaining that we've left the EU and its plans for integration.

Quote:

The UK and Japan are currently set to sign a deal which Liz Truss is getting awfully excited about. However, Japan has made clear that it cannot be as ambitious as the one signed with the EU as the UK is a far smaller market. I call that one party in the negotiations having more power in strictly neutral language. You might prefer the use of more emotive language like bullying which is your choice.
I can accept that a trade deal with Japan won't be as ambitious as the one they have with the EU - for the reasons you have given. But that is not the same situation as between the EU and the UK where we already have equivalence and they want to punish us; I rightly call that bullying. Japan doesn't want to punish us.



1andrew1 06-08-2020 13:41

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36045808)
As you should know by now, link please.

I'm surprised you've not come across this in your research already.
Please Google "UK and Japan rush to secure post-Brexit trade deal" and you will see the FT article concerned.

Sephiroth 06-08-2020 14:02

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Plus this link for the UK Guvmin's position:

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...tegic-approach

Carth 06-08-2020 14:29

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
I've not bothered with either of the above links . . . if I did, I'd only end up counting all of the 'if, maybe, could, possibly, upto, may, subject to' etc etc that are sure to be in there ;)

pip08456 06-08-2020 15:23

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045838)
I'm surprised you've not come across this in your research already.
Please Google "UK and Japan rush to secure post-Brexit trade deal" and you will see the FT article concerned.

Why should I do research for you and end up at a paywall?

Sephiroth 06-08-2020 15:38

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Sadly, Andrew is mired in Remainerism and I told you so-ism.

I am astounded that someone should be so apologetic (for want of a more appropriate word) on behalf of the EU's unwillingness to recognise our sovereignty and also to describe the UK as "junior".

I understand his point about other parties holding certain cards to their advantage but he links this to "cake and eat it" when the only party wanting that is the EU.

I'm sure that we will have to give some ground on our desires vis-a-vis Japan, but once a trade deal is agreed, we'll all settle into its terms and move forward.

But the ground that the bullying EWU wants us to give is beyond the pale - supremacy of the ECJ? Andrew - what's wrong with you?



pip08456 06-08-2020 15:44

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045854)
Sadly, Andrew is mired in Remainerism and I told you so-ism.

I am astounded that someone should be so apologetic (for want of a more appropriate word) on behalf of the EU's unwillingness to recognise our sovereignty and also to describe the UK as "junior".

I understand his point about other parties holding certain cards to their advantage but he links this to "cake and eat it" when the only party wanting that is the EU.

I'm sure that we will have to give some ground on our desires vis-a-vis Japan, but once a trade deal is agreed, we'll all settle into its terms and move forward.

But the ground that the bullying EWU wants us to give is beyond the pale - supremacy of the ECJ? Andrew - what's wrong with you?



I can't see any sensible person agreeing to that!

Sephiroth 06-08-2020 15:53

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36045856)
I can't see any sensible person agreeing to that!

You'll have noticed that Andrew doesn't say he agrees to ECJ supremacy. He merely wants to point out that we were warned about this before signing the Withdrawal Agreement.

Andrew completely ignores the very clear view of the majority of voters, which is one of the fundamental pillars of our democracy.


pip08456 06-08-2020 16:15

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Andrew is, was, and always will be a remainer. I accept that and don't hold it against him. Just as I hope he dosen't hold the fact that we are leavers against us.

All his post are from a remainers narrative so what do you expect? I don't hold it against him.

Sephiroth 06-08-2020 16:23

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36045861)
Andrew is, was, and always will be a remainer. I accept that and don't hold it against him. Just as I hope he dosen't hold the fact that we are leavers against us.

All his post are from a remainers narrative so what do you expect? I don't hold it against him.

I echo that. But when I ask him directly "What's wrong with the UK wanting a Canada type deal, I get the Remainer's obfuscation but no answer.

Has Andrew got no advice to give on how we might attain such a deal?

1andrew1 06-08-2020 17:36

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36045847)
Why should I do research for you and end up at a paywall?

If you follow my instructions, you won't encounter a paywall. They're not for my benefit as I've already read the article.

pip08456 06-08-2020 18:15

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045865)
If you follow my instructions, you won't encounter a paywall. They're not for my benefit as I've already read the article.

So I now have to follow your instructions! Dream on!

1andrew1 06-08-2020 18:29

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36045869)
So I now have to follow your instructions! Dream on!

You asked me how to get the article and I responded. Your previous enthusiasm for the article seems to have wilted with the knowledge that multiple key strokes are required.

pip08456 06-08-2020 18:47

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045871)
You asked me how to get the article and I responded. Your previous enthusiasm for the article seems to have wilted with the knowledge that multiple key strokes are required.

Show me and everyone else where I asked you how to get the article.

1andrew1 08-08-2020 13:04

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045854)
Sadly, Andrew is mired in Remainerism and I told you so-ism.

I am astounded that someone should be so apologetic (for want of a more appropriate word) on behalf of the EU's unwillingness to recognise our sovereignty and also to describe the UK as "junior".

I understand his point about other parties holding certain cards to their advantage but he links this to "cake and eat it" when the only party wanting that is the EU.

I'm sure that we will have to give some ground on our desires vis-a-vis Japan, but once a trade deal is agreed, we'll all settle into its terms and move forward.

But the ground that the bullying EWU wants us to give is beyond the pale - supremacy of the ECJ? Andrew - what's wrong with you?

I'm used to doing deals both in a big business and as a smaller or junior one. As a larger business, you can get a great deal and compel the other party to accept your TsandCs. As a smaller party, you're a bit of a deal-taker. I don't apply emotive language to describe the balance of power, I just get on and strike the best deal I can being aware of deadlines for sales reps' targets, competitors' offerings and taking my time to get the best possible deal so I never get bounced into a bad deal.

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 13:26

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046009)
I'm used to doing deals both in a big business and as a smaller or junior one. As a larger business, you can get a great deal and compel the other party to accept your TsandCs. As a smaller party, you're a bit of a deal-taker. I don't apply emotive language to describe the balance of power, I just get on and strike the best deal I can being aware of deadlines for sales reps' targets, competitors' offerings and taking my time to get the best possible deal so I never get bounced into a bad deal.

We're getting somewhere now. Btw, like you I'm experienced at doing deals from both sides of the 'bigness' fence. Of course I have blended the other side's suggestions with my needs and their desire for my product - and vice versa. It usually works out well as you've implied.

When it comes to the EU and its constituent willy-waving countries in the hands of idiot (doesn't best describe them) politicians coupled (in the UK case) with entrenched voters, don't expect the logical sentiments you have expressed to be fully applicable. Quite the contrary, in the case of the EU, their 27 willies are a huge distraction.

In the case of Japan, it's rather more like the way you describe it and even our idiot politicians will most likely reach a sensible deal this side of January.

Other countries will likely fit your scenario in terms of trade negotiations.

Just not the EU who are bullies, want their cake and eat it.



Hugh 08-08-2020 13:46

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Reminder

Using language that invokes the Site "swear filter" is against Site T&Cs,

Repetition of this behaviour will invoke the Infraction System.


Sephiroth 08-08-2020 13:54

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
There is so much latitude on "swearing" that it is difficult to know when the words will be deleted. In this case, plenty of synonyms are allowed and I wouldn't intentionally wish to invoke the filter.

OLD BOY 08-08-2020 14:05

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046009)
I'm used to doing deals both in a big business and as a smaller or junior one. As a larger business, you can get a great deal and compel the other party to accept your TsandCs. As a smaller party, you're a bit of a deal-taker. I don't apply emotive language to describe the balance of power, I just get on and strike the best deal I can being aware of deadlines for sales reps' targets, competitors' offerings and taking my time to get the best possible deal so I never get bounced into a bad deal.

Exactly, and the UK is not going to be bounced into accepting a bad deal either.

Without a 'no tariffs' deal, there will be major economic disadvantages for certain EU industries such as car manufacturing because tariffs will put up the price of exported goods to this country, rendering them less competitive. The EU does not hold all the cards, not by a long chalk.

Hugh 08-08-2020 14:24

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046013)
There is so much latitude on "swearing" that it is difficult to know when the words will be deleted. In this case, plenty of synonyms are allowed and I wouldn't intentionally wish to invoke the filter.


The asterisks in place of the offending word shows the filter has been applied - you can go back into your post to remove those words, or replace with words that do not activate the "swear filter".


jfman 08-08-2020 14:56

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046015)
Exactly, and the UK is not going to be bounced into accepting a bad deal either.

Without a 'no tariffs' deal, there will be major economic disadvantages for certain EU industries such as car manufacturing because tariffs will put up the price of exported goods to this country, rendering them less competitive. The EU does not hold all the cards, not by a long chalk.

Ah it’s been a while since we had the German car manufacturers line.

1andrew1 08-08-2020 15:08

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046015)
Exactly, and the UK is not going to be bounced into accepting a bad deal either.

Without a 'no tariffs' deal, there will be major economic disadvantages for certain EU industries such as car manufacturing because tariffs will put up the price of exported goods to this country, rendering them less competitive. The EU does not hold all the cards, not by a long chalk.

Worse-case scenario, the EU can carry on trading with its 500m-person market and the millions more via the largest number free trade deals with most of the developed world.
We can continue with our market of 65m people and wonder why other countries are more prosperous than us.

ianch99 08-08-2020 15:18

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
It really is pathetic to see, as the forecast negative consequences of Brexit start to materialise, we have the die-hards bleating about being "bullied". It is as if they are in the playground again and they are running to teacher complaining "Miss, Miss, the big boys are bullying me again".

Of course, that is the only recourse they have left and that is to try and save face. Pretend that they are a victim when, ironically, all the things they are complaining about are on them. They just need to man up and own them.

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 15:33

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36046022)
It really is pathetic to see, as the forecast negative consequences of Brexit start to materialise, we have the die-hards bleating about being "bullied". It is as if they are in the playground again and they are running to teacher complaining "Miss, Miss, the big boys are bullying me again".

Of course, that is the only recourse they have left and that is to try and save face. Pretend that they are a victim when, ironically, all the things they are complaining about are on them. They just need to man up and own them.

... and then what?

1andrew1 08-08-2020 15:47

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046024)
... and then what?

Invest more energy in solving it and less in looking for excuses and scapegoats.

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 16:02

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046025)
Invest more energy in solving it and less in looking for excuses and scapegoats.

Unfortunately that is not a helpful reply. Most of us who reply in my vein are explaining why little progress is being made at the current negotiating stage. We go on to say that the EU's position is unacceptable because (inter alia) it keeps us under the ECJ in key areas.

On the other hand, you and your less reasonable cohorts avoid committing yourselves to protection of our sovereignty. If I ask people like you whether you are content to remain under the ECJ after January 2021, the sort of answer that is returned is 'we were warned what would happen before we were committed to leaving the EU' or words to that effect.

Why can't you answer the direct question about sovereignty and whether we should keep surrendering it to the EU? We won't have to surrender sovereignty to Japan.

Comon - you surely can do better than you are doing.

Pierre 08-08-2020 16:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36046020)
Ah it’s been a while since we had the German car manufacturers line.

Don’t forget wine, champagne and blessed are the cheesemakers.

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 16:43

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046032)
Don’t forget wine, champagne and blessed are the cheesemakers.

Also not forgetting sour cucumbers and Polish mustard.

If they ris by tuppence in price so that we don't come under ECJ jurisdiction, it'll be worth it. Any much more, then sod 'em - I'll sour my own cucumbers.

ianch99 08-08-2020 16:50

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046025)
Invest more energy in solving it and less in looking for excuses and scapegoats.

Thank you Andrew. Your answer is succinct and to the point. Sort of obvious really.

Dave42 08-08-2020 17:00

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046015)
Exactly, and the UK is not going to be bounced into accepting a bad deal either.

Without a 'no tariffs' deal, there will be major economic disadvantages for certain EU industries such as car manufacturing because tariffs will put up the price of exported goods to this country, rendering them less competitive. The EU does not hold all the cards, not by a long chalk.

didn't you like rest of the leavers say the lie that uk hold all the cards OB

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 17:09

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36046036)
Thank you Andrew. Your answer is succinct and to the point. Sort of obvious really.

Quote:

Sephiroth: Unfortunately that is not a helpful reply. Most of us who reply in my vein are explaining why little progress is being made at the current negotiating stage. We go on to say that the EU's position is unacceptable because (inter alia) it keeps us under the ECJ in key areas.

On the other hand, you and your less reasonable cohorts avoid committing yourselves to protection of our sovereignty. If I ask people like you whether you are content to remain under the ECJ after January 2021, the sort of answer that is returned is 'we were warned what would happen before we were committed to leaving the EU' or words to that effect.
Andrew's answer is far from to the point. It is nothing but rhetoric.

---------- Post added at 17:09 ---------- Previous post was at 17:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36046038)
didn't you like rest of the leavers say the lie that uk hold all the cards OB

Never me, Squire.

Hugh 08-08-2020 17:15

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046040)
Andrew's answer is far from to the point. It is nothing but rhetoric.

Amusing from someone who, in the last few pages of this thread, posted the phrases "bullying", "you come across as a justifier/apologist for the EU", "bossing us around", "astounded that someone should be so apologetic", "cake and eat it", "willy-waving’, etc... ;)

Reflection doesn’t always have to involve a mirror, you know... :D

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 17:26

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046044)
Amusing from someone who, in the last few pages of this thread, posted the phrases "bullying", "you come across as a justifier/apologist for the EU", "bossing us around", "astounded that someone should be so apologetic", "cake and eat it", "willy-waving’, etc... ;)

Reflection doesn’t always have to involve a mirror, you know... :D

What on earth are you on about? My points are very clear.
e.g: Don't give in to EU bullying. (Aka Don't accede to the EU's red lines). Vert clear.

The Remainers don't say "Do give in to EU bullying". They don't say "Do accept the EU's red lines". They don't say anything that points to a direction they think we should be taking.

"Invest more energy in solving it ..." means nothing. It's rhetoric. Useless.

1andrew1 08-08-2020 18:48

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046045)
What on earth are you on about? My points are very clear.
e.g: Don't give in to EU bullying. (Aka Don't accede to the EU's red lines). Vert clear.

The Remainers don't say "Do give in to EU bullying". They don't say "Do accept the EU's red lines". They don't say anything that points to a direction they think we should be taking.

"Invest more energy in solving it ..." means nothing. It's rhetoric. Useless.

Leavers created this situation and should be capable of getting us out from it. They knew what they were voing for and hence had a solution. Hopefully, that solution was more constructive than just blaming the other side!

Remainers devising solutions won't cut the mustard. They will end up with similar smears as those attached to Theresa May's government.

I would suggest you bend Redwood's ear and remind him what he and his colleagues promised you at the time of the referendum. However, I understand that he is currently embroiled in a big NIMBY dispute with Wokingham Borough Council which says "We're outraged and disgusted at these government proposals which would see the amount of new housing more than double across the Wokingham Borough to 1,635 per year."

---------- Post added at 18:48 ---------- Previous post was at 18:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36046038)
didn't you like rest of the leavers say the lie that uk hold all the cards OB

Noted: That pack of cards has gone from being held totally by the UK to "not being totally held by the EU".

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 18:53

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046049)
Leavers created this situation and should be capable of getting us out from it. They knew what they were voing for and hence had a solution. Hopefully, that solution was more constructive than just blaming the other side!

Remainers devising solutions won't cut the mustard. They will end up with similar smears as those attached to Theresa May's government.

I would suggest you bend Redwood's ear and remind him what he and his colleagues promised you at the time of the referendum. However, I understand that he is currently embroiled in a big NIMBY dispute with Wokingham Borough Council which says "We're outraged and disgusted at these government proposals which would see the amount of new housing more than double across the Wokingham Borough to 1,635 per year."

---------- Post added at 18:48 ---------- Previous post was at 18:43 ----------


Noted: That pack of cards has gone from being held totally by the UK to "not being totally held by the EU".

You're doing it again. Nothing to say other than equivalent of "I told you so".

I'll ask you again: In your view, should the UK give way on the EU's red lines?



ianch99 08-08-2020 18:53

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046049)
Leavers created this situation and should be capable of getting us out from it. They knew what they were voing for and hence had a solution. Hopefully, that solution was more constructive than just blaming the other side!

Remainers devising solutions won't cut the mustard. They will end up with similar smears as those attached to Theresa May's government.

I would suggest you bend Redwood's ear and remind him what he and his colleagues promised you at the time of the referendum. However, I understand that he is currently embroiled in a big NIMBY dispute with Wokingham Borough Council which says "We're outraged and disgusted at these government proposals which would see the amount of new housing more than double across the Wokingham Borough to 1,635 per year."

---------- Post added at 18:48 ---------- Previous post was at 18:43 ----------


Noted: That pack of cards has gone from being held totally by the UK to "not being totally held by the EU".

Let's remind ourselves what these con artists said at the time shall we?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eeh3eVrU...jpg&name=small

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 18:55

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046049)
Leavers created this situation and should be capable of getting us out from it. They knew what they were voing for and hence had a solution. Hopefully, that solution was more constructive than just blaming the other side!

Remainers devising solutions won't cut the mustard. They will end up with similar smears as those attached to Theresa May's government.

I would suggest you bend Redwood's ear and remind him what he and his colleagues promised you at the time of the referendum. However, I understand that he is currently embroiled in a big NIMBY dispute with Wokingham Borough Council which says "We're outraged and disgusted at these government proposals which would see the amount of new housing more than double across the Wokingham Borough to 1,635 per year."[
<SNIP>.

Your diversion from the matter at hand in this thread is utterly pointless.

What ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU?

1andrew1 08-08-2020 19:11

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046054)
Your diversion from the matter at hand in this thread is utterly pointless.

What ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU?

Not really as he's the person to take up your buyer's remorse with. And that question on its own is impossible to answer. Leavers need to own a situation of their creation.

But pleading with a third country to try and prevent migrants coming to the UK whilst simultaneously trying to withdraw that country's fishing rights is not the brightest of ideas.

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 19:22

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046056)
Not really as he's the person to take up your buyer's remorse with. And that question on its own is impossible to answer. Leavers need to own a situation of their creation.

But pleading with a third country to try and prevent migrants coming to the UK whilst simultaneously trying to withdraw that country's fishing rights is not the brightest of ideas.

Again I ask:

What ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU?

1andrew1 08-08-2020 19:27

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046060)
Again I ask:

What ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU?

I've answered that it's impossible to answer. And it's not up to Remainers to bail you out as their solutions will not be seen as independent.

Pierre 08-08-2020 19:39

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36046053)
Let's remind ourselves what these con artists said at the time shall we?

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

FFS. It happened it’s over. Stop whinging.

pip08456 08-08-2020 20:29

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

The day after we leave we hold all the cards and we can chose the path we want.
Err... What's changed? Deal or no deal it is our choice. We hold the cards to our future wherever that may lead us. We will be a Sovereign nation who decides its own future.

We will deal with others on those terms. Chose the path we want affirms that.

Sephiroth 08-08-2020 20:35

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046061)
I've answered that it's impossible to answer. And it's not up to Remainers to bail you out as their solutions will not be seen as independent.

Andrew,

I confess not to remember you saying that my question was impossible to answer.

There's no way I'm asking you to 'bail me out'. That you should resort to such a crass remark is only worthy of another contributor whom I mustn't troll in this thread.

It really is a simple question: In your opinion, what ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU?

1andrew1 08-08-2020 20:35

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046062)
FFS. It happened it’s over. Stop whinging.

It might appear that way at a cursory glnce. But it was appropriate in this context as it was citing evidence that the holding-all-the-cards metaphor had originally been ascribed to the UK. We're now hearing that the EU "doesn't hold all the cards".

Pierre 08-08-2020 21:21

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046070)
It might appear that way at a cursory glnce. But it was appropriate in this context as it was citing evidence that the holding-all-the-cards metaphor had originally been ascribed to the UK. We're now hearing that the EU "doesn't hold all the cards".

Nothing in any of those quotes means anything. They were not promises or guarantees. They were opinion.

Furthermore they may yet be accurate, they may be wrong.,.........we’ll find out in due course.

ianch99 08-08-2020 22:48

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046062)
FFS. It happened it’s over. Stop whinging.

Truth hurts doesn't it?

Carth 08-08-2020 23:22

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
. . . and now we go over to our Current Affairs reporter from Cable Forum.

Well it's another day of madness here, the usual gangs have been busily sniping at each other from the cover of their keyboards, and exchanging sly winks and slaps on the back for any minor points scored.
There was a moment earlier in the session when a senior board member called for clarification on some of the language used, but all in all it's just been the same arguments on the same merry go round. The scores are still tied at 168 each, maybe tomorrow will see a breakthrough.

Back to the studio for the weather . .

1andrew1 09-08-2020 00:28

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046069)
Andrew,

I confess not to remember you saying that my question was impossible to answer.

There's no way I'm asking you to 'bail me out'. That you should resort to such a crass remark is only worthy of another contributor whom I mustn't troll in this thread.

It really is a simple question: In your opinion, what ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU?

I reiterate that that is an impossible question as no one outside the negotiating team has sufficient information to know what the UK's true red lines and objectives are.

My objectives, as you know are to put the economy first as a strong economy enables services like our armed forces and nursing homes to be properly funded and it's beneficial for people's health and in keeping crime rates low. This necessitates as close a deal with the EU as possible so we should elect for a deal like the EFTA countries have without the Schengen area. I'm happy to sacrifice notional elements of sovereignty to join NATO, to join the United Nations, to join EFTA and to join Five Eyes.

---------- Post added at 00:28 ---------- Previous post was at 00:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36046082)
. . . and now we go over to our Current Affairs reporter from Cable Forum.

Well it's another day of madness here, the usual gangs have been busily sniping at each other from the cover of their keyboards, and exchanging sly winks and slaps on the back for any minor points scored.
There was a moment earlier in the session when a senior board member called for clarification on some of the language used, but all in all it's just been the same arguments on the same merry go round. The scores are still tied at 168 each, maybe tomorrow will see a breakthrough.

Back to the studio for the weather . .

:D:D:D

pip08456 09-08-2020 01:47

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046085)
I reiterate that that is an impossible question as no one outside the negotiating team has sufficient information to know what the UK's true red lines and objectives are.

My objectives, as you know are to put the economy first as a strong economy enables services like our armed forces and nursing homes to be properly funded and it's beneficial for people's health and in keeping crime rates low. This necessitates as close a deal with the EU as possible so we should elect for a deal like the EFTA countries have without the Schengen area. I'm happy to sacrifice notional elements of sovereignty to join NATO, to join the United Nations, to join EFTA and to join Five Eyes.

---------- Post added at 00:28 ---------- Previous post was at 00:27 ----------


:D:D:D

Of the three highlighted there is no notional sovereignty involved. We not only joined each one as a sovereign nation but helped set them up. Each of which we can if we wish (I wouldn't want to) withdraw from without penalty.

NATO is a common defence originally against Soviet Russia and also includes the US and Canada. It could do nothing about the Russian annexation of part of the Ukraine as they weren't a member state.

The UN, again we are a founding member and along with the others have the power of veto over whatever any other country would like to do along with China, France, Russia, and the United States. So anyhing that may impinge on our sovereignty could just be vetoed.

5 Eyes is is an intelligence alliance that has nothing to do with the rest of Europe it is made up of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States.

So no notional surrender or otherwise of sovereignty there. They are agreements that can be ended at any time with no penalty, not that I would wish it.

EFTA was started by the 7 nations that the EEC (then) did not accept into their agreement back in 1960 including the UK (gotta love Charles de Gaul), it now consists only of 4. However I digress.

1960 The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) is founded by Austria, Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, to promote closer economic cooperation and free trade in Europe..

1961 Finland becomes an associate member of EFTA. The EFTA Consultative Committee is established (representatives of trade unions and employers' organisations).

1966 Full free trade in industrial products is achieved between the EFTA States.

1970 Iceland becomes a member of EFTA.

Then it starts going pear shaped

1972 Denmark and the United Kingdom leave EFTA to join the European Economic Community (EEC). The remaining EFTA States sign bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) with the EEC during the 1970s.

1977 The EFTA Parliamentary Committee is established. Tariffs on industrial goods in trade are eliminated between the EEC and the EFTA States.

1979 EFTA's first FTA is signed with Spain.

1984 (here we go) The Luxembourg Declaration on broader cooperation between the EEC and EFTA is signed.

1985 Portugal leaves EFTA to become a member of the EEC. (why?).

1986 Finland becomes a full member of EFTA.

1989 Negotiations start on a European Economic Space, later to become the European Economic Area (EEA). An agreement on free trade in fish between the EFTA States is signed. (oh look, FISH!)

1991 Liechtenstein becomes a member of EFTA. An FTA is signed with Turkey, EFTA's oldest agreement still in force. A further 12 FTAs are signed in the 1990s, of which three are still in force (Israel, Morocco and the Palestinian Authority). The others, all of which are with Central and Eastern European countries, lapse when those countries join the European Union (EU). (Oh bugger!)

1992 The Agreement on the European Economic Area is signed in Oporto, Portugal. Switzerland rejects participation in the EEA by referendum.


1994 The EEA Agreement enters into force between the EU and five EFTA States. An EEA Financial Mechanism for the reduction of economic and social disparities in the EEA is established for the period 1994 to 1998. (EFTA no longer an independant trading area).

1995 Austria, Finland and Sweden leave EFTA to join the EU. Liechtenstein becomes a full participant in the EEA Agreement together with Iceland and Norway. (EFTA's shrinking).

2001 The updated EFTA Convention is signed in Vaduz, Liechtenstein, entering into force a year later. (There's only a few countries left).

There's a few thing inbetween relating to the EEA but.

2010 Iceland begins accessions negotiations with the EU. The EEA EFTA Forum of Elected Representatives of Local and Regional Authorities is established.

And that is the effective end of EFTA as an independant trade alliance.

Sephiroth 09-08-2020 09:18

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Post contents deleted by Seph.

---------- Post added at 09:18 ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046085)
I reiterate that that is an impossible question as no one outside the negotiating team has sufficient information to know what the UK's true red lines and objectives are.

My objectives, as you know are to put the economy first as a strong economy enables services like our armed forces and nursing homes to be properly funded and it's beneficial for people's health and in keeping crime rates low. This necessitates as close a deal with the EU as possible so we should elect for a deal like the EFTA countries have without the Schengen area. I'm happy to sacrifice notional elements of sovereignty to join NATO, to join the United Nations, to join EFTA and to join Five Eyes.
:D:D:D

If you're happy to give up notional sovereignty as you've described (actually we've given up next to nothing in sovereignty terms by being members of those associations), you should be able to answer the simple question I've posed in relation to the EU. I'll put it another way.

Which of these concessions should we make to the EU in order to achieve the best possible economic outcome:

1. ECJ jurisdiction over the trade deal?
2. Level playing field that goes beyond Canada, Japan ?
3. Sovereignty over UK territorial waters including fishing rights?

Hugh 09-08-2020 10:03

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36046090)
Of the three highlighted there is no notional sovereignty involved. We not only joined each one as a sovereign nation but helped set them up. Each of which we can if we wish (I wouldn't want to) withdraw from without penalty.

NATO is a common defence originally against Soviet Russia and also includes the US and Canada. It could do nothing about the Russian annexation of part of the Ukraine as they weren't a member state.

The UN, again we are a founding member and along with the others have the power of veto over whatever any other country would like to do along with China, France, Russia, and the United States. So anyhing that may impinge on our sovereignty could just be vetoed.

5 Eyes is is an intelligence alliance that has nothing to do with the rest of Europe it is made up of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States.

So no notional surrender or otherwise of sovereignty there. They are agreements that can be ended at any time with no penalty, not that I would wish it.

EFTA was started by the 7 nations that the EEC (then) did not accept into their agreement back in 1960 including the UK (gotta love Charles de Gaul), it now consists only of 4. However I digress.

1960 The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) is founded by Austria, Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, to promote closer economic cooperation and free trade in Europe..

Snip...

There's a few thing inbetween relating to the EEA but.

2010 Iceland begins accessions negotiations with the EU. The EEA EFTA Forum of Elected Representatives of Local and Regional Authorities is established.

And that is the effective end of EFTA as an independant trade alliance.

Link provided (under ”Fair Use” policy)

https://www.efta.int/About-EFTA/EFTA-through-years-747

Pierre 09-08-2020 11:10

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36046080)
Truth hurts doesn't it?

No idea what you’re referring to.

1andrew1 09-08-2020 11:23

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046099)
Post contents deleted by Seph.

---------- Post added at 09:18 ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 ----------



If you're happy to give up notional sovereignty as you've described (actually we've given up next to nothing in sovereignty terms by being members of those associations), you should be able to answer the simple question I've posed in relation to the EU. I'll put it another way.

Which of these concessions should we make to the EU in order to achieve the best possible economic outcome:

1. ECJ jurisdiction over the trade deal?
2. Level playing field that goes beyond Canada, Japan ?
3. Sovereignty over UK territorial waters including fishing rights?

I've explained how participation in Five Eyes (Huawei anyone?), NATO (British army reporting into US superiors and vice versa) impact on our sovereignty. Sovereignty is not a binary situation as has been demonstrated across the EU since the Covid outbreak but I appreciate that some have bought into this perception and uncloaking it is hard.

And no, agreeing to the entry rules are not concessions Seph, that's a highly defeatist way of framing the argument.

We should obviously try and negotiate these in our favour as much as possible. Of the above criteria, the one which I would aim to negotiate hardest on is No. 1. Only a socialist or a pessimist that thinks we can only survive as a low cost manufacturer (a la the recent sweatshop issues in Leicester) would have a genuine issue with No. 2 and we need to be careful with No. 3 as the fish we catch is largely sold to the EU, it's typically not species consumed in the UK.
I hope this helps.

Sephiroth 09-08-2020 11:40

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046106)
I've explained how participation in Five Eyes (Huawei anyone?), NATO (British army reporting into US superiors and vice versa) impact on our sovereignty. Sovereignty is not a binary situation as has been demonstrated across the EU since the Covid outbreak but I appreciate that some have bought into this perception and uncloaking it is hard.

And no, agreeing to the entry rules are not concessions Seph, that's a highly defeatist way of framing the argument.

We should obviously try and negotiate these in our favour as much as possible. Of the above criteria, the one which I would aim to negotiate hardest on is No. 1. Only a socialist or a pessimist that thinks we can only survive as a low cost manufacturer (a la the recent sweatshop issues in Leicester) would have a genuine issue with No. 2 and we need to be careful with No. 3 as the fish we catch is largely sold to the EU, it's typically not species consumed in the UK.
I hope this helps.


Quote:

Posted by Sephiroth:
Which of these concessions should we make to the EU in order to achieve the best possible economic outcome:

1. ECJ jurisdiction over the trade deal?
2. Level playing field that goes beyond Canada, Japan ?
3. Sovereignty over UK territorial waters including fishing rights?
On #1, you haven't said which way you'd swing when you would "negotiate hardest". My question stands (with modified tone): Would you "agree to" ECJ jurisdiction over the trade deal?

On#2 - "we need to be careful"? What's that about? Should we agree to the EU tying our hands more than they've done with Japan & Canada?

On#3 - So what? I understand that if we don't have a trade deal, the fish caught in our waters will finder their market harder to sell to. But on the other hand, the EU countries will want that fish. A trade deal would settle that without agreeing to the fishing rights status quo operating ibn perpetuity.

You seem to be careful to avoid answers that carry any emotion. Fine. But I still can't see on the three questions what you think we should agree to? The Forum is waiting with baited breath.




OLD BOY 09-08-2020 19:23

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046061)
I've answered that it's impossible to answer. And it's not up to Remainers to bail you out as their solutions will not be seen as independent.

Can I respectfully point out that the vast majority of Brexiteers do not want to give ground.

You, however, think that we should, so Seph's question to you is a reasonable one. What ground do you think we should give?

---------- Post added at 19:23 ---------- Previous post was at 19:22 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046056)
Not really as he's the person to take up your buyer's remorse with. And that question on its own is impossible to answer. Leavers need to own a situation of their creation.

But pleading with a third country to try and prevent migrants coming to the UK whilst simultaneously trying to withdraw that country's fishing rights is not the brightest of ideas.

I'm so glad that you are not leading these negotiations!

:rolleyes:

Sephiroth 09-08-2020 19:46

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046056)
Not really as he's the person to take up your buyer's remorse with. And that question on its own is impossible to answer. Leavers need to own a situation of their creation.

But pleading with a third country to try and prevent migrants coming to the UK whilst simultaneously trying to withdraw that country's fishing rights is not the brightest of ideas.

OB has reminded me that the highlighted paragraph should draw comment from me.

The migrants trying to come to the UK are in breach of EU law which requires them to register for asylum in the first EU landing point.

The UK is not withdrawing France's fishing rights. The EU and UK have signed a WA and the UK is withdrawing from the EU. With that comes legal sovereignty over all our waters. If we traded fishing rights for no migrants, do you think that would work? No, of course not. So why bother.

I'm disappointed at the degeneration of your argument quality. Earlier you claimed that the Canada TA with the EU instituted a level playing field; on closer examination that was specifically for IPR.

The truth is simple: you were content to remain in the EU and the majority of voters disagreed with you and, as late as last December, still did. When you are asked for your preferred approach, at last you came up with an answer: the EFTA model.

Quote:

1Andrew1: ... as close a deal with the EU as possible so we should elect for a deal like the EFTA countries have without the Schengen area
Pip ripped that apart. Isn't that embarrassing? And at all costs you don't want to be accused of recommending that we give in to the EU on sovereignty (ECJ jurisdiction) - you prefer the weasel words "agree" because it is a negotiation.

I'm sorry that you're cornered here (you'll deny it) but there's no way out except rational and realistic argument.


1andrew1 09-08-2020 21:04

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046120)
OB has reminded me that the highlighted paragraph should draw comment from me.

The migrants trying to come to the UK are in breach of EU law which requires them to register for asylum in the first EU landing point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046120)
The UK is not withdrawing France's fishing rights. The EU and UK have signed a WA and the UK is withdrawing from the EU. With that comes legal sovereignty over all our waters. If we traded fishing rights for no migrants, do you think that would work? No, of course not. So why bother.

The withdrawal agreement with the EU ends 31/12/2020. You only have to look at the advertising posters from 2016 to realise that immigration was a big issue. That includes support from France on immigration. We already know that Brexit will have negative economic impacts. However, if it increases immigration then it will appear to be an abject failure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046120)
I'm disappointed at the degeneration of your argument quality. Earlier you claimed that the Canada TA with the EU instituted a level playing field; on closer examination that was specifically for IPR.

If by IPR you mean intellectual property rights, the link I supplied was indeed around a broader playing field.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046120)
The truth is simple: you were content to remain in the EU and the majority of voters disagreed with you and, as late as last December, still did. When you are asked for your preferred approach, at last you came up with an answer: the EFTA model.

Pip ripped that apart. Isn't that embarrassing? And at all costs you don't want to be accused of recommending that we give in to the EU on sovereignty (ECJ jurisdiction) - you prefer the weasel words "agree" because it is a negotiation.

I'm sorry that you're cornered here (you'll deny it) but there's no way out except rational and realistic argument.

It appears everyone has been busy in my absence and I'm looking forward to reading it all. Thank you all for your contributions to the debate.

Ultimately, your arguments boil down to what I believe is a flawed definition of sovereignty. If you're a member of the United Nations then you're a sovereign nation.

Sephiroth 09-08-2020 21:53

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046122)
<SNIP>

Ultimately, your arguments boil down to what I believe is a flawed definition of sovereignty. If you're a member of the United Nations then you're a sovereign nation.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_state

Quote:

A sovereign state, in international law, is a political entity that is represented by one centralized government that has sovereignty over a geographic area. International law defines sovereign states as having a permanent population, defined territory, one government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other sovereign states. It is also normally understood that a sovereign state is neither dependent on nor subjected to any other power or state.
Sorry - you are flawed again. Andrew, I beg you - think things through properly.



Hugh 09-08-2020 22:03

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
And if you think in today’s global interconnected world, that any country is not dependent or influenced by any other country, I’ve got a bridge you might want to buy... :D

For example Priti Patel has just said we are dependent on the French to help us return migrants, as our "sovereignty" in this matter depends on their support...

Quote:

The Home Secretary has asked French authorities to intercept and return migrant boats found trying to cross the English Channel.
Sovereignty 2016 - We demand the right to control our borders!!

Sovereignty 2020: Why aren’t the bloody French controlling our borders?!

Sephiroth 09-08-2020 22:11

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046124)
And if you think in today’s global interconnected world, that any country is not dependent or influenced by any other country, I’ve got a bridge you might want to buy... :D

For example Priti Patel has just said we are dependent on the French to help us return migrants, as our "sovereignty" in this matter depends on their support...



Sovereignty 2016 - We demand the right to control our borders!!

Sovereignty 2020: Why aren’t the bloody French controlling our borders?!

Not the same as having ECJ jurisdiction over part of our affairs.

And you know it.

Chris 09-08-2020 22:55

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046124)
And if you think in today’s global interconnected world, that any country is not dependent or influenced by any other country, I’ve got a bridge you might want to buy... :D

For example Priti Patel has just said we are dependent on the French to help us return migrants, as our "sovereignty" in this matter depends on their support...



Sovereignty 2016 - We demand the right to control our borders!!

Sovereignty 2020: Why aren’t the bloody French controlling our borders?!

I’m pretty sure most people understand the difference between submission via treaty to supranational jurisdiction over our affairs, and quid-pro-quo negotiations between states of the sort that have been going on for centuries.

jonbxx 10-08-2020 09:46

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
The ECJ can only rule over areas where EU directives and regulations are in force so, if we want to have access to EU (and some non-EU) agencies, there is a case for 'sucking it up' and taking ECJ jurisdiction to get access.

My wish list would include;

EASA - aviation regulation including safety and the European Common Aviation Area
ECHA - chemical regulation and safety including REACH (huge impact to my business right now!)
EMA - European Medicines Agency
EUIPO - intellectual property
EFSA - food safety
EMSA - maritime safety
ECDC - disease control and epidemiology

Leaving these agencies due to ECJ jurisdiction in a quest for sovereignty seems to be the aim. It's each persons own value judgement to what cost is worth the degree of sovereignty we will gain.

Carth 10-08-2020 10:51

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Why, for the love of god, would we leave the EU and then still want to be subject to the rulings of the ECJ? We will not be a member of the EU anymore.

Does the ECJ run its sticky fingers over the dealings with Canada, Japan, Russia? . . . in fact any Country that is not part of the EU.

Are you trying to say that, whether we are in or out, any dealings we have with any EU Country have to be ratified and 'passed' by a court consisting of EU members, dealing with EU members, which presides over ensuring one EU member isn't being 'ripped off' by another EU member?

If that's the case, what is the equivalent UK court that ensures this Country isn't overwhelmed by cheap foreign imports that decimate our own manufacturing & industry . . . oh hang on, we're 40 years too late :mad:

jonbxx 10-08-2020 10:59

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36046146)
Why, for the love of god, would we leave the EU and then still want to be subject to the rulings of the ECJ? We will not be a member of the EU anymore.

Does the ECJ run its sticky fingers over the dealings with Canada, Japan, Russia? . . . in fact any Country that is not part of the EU.

Are you trying to say that, whether we are in or out, any dealings we have with any EU Country have to be ratified and 'passed' by a court consisting of EU members, dealing with EU members, which presides over ensuring one EU member isn't being 'ripped off' by another EU member?

If that's the case, what is the equivalent UK court that ensures this Country isn't overwhelmed by cheap foreign imports that decimate our own manufacturing & industry . . . oh hang on, we're 40 years too late :mad:

Nothing to do with 'wanting' to be under the jurisdiction of the ECJ, it's about being members of organisations that make business simpler and more efficient. If being members of those organisations includes the ECJ being the final arbitrator, then fine.

Sovereignty is all well and good but feeling good doesn't put shoes on my kids feet...

Sephiroth 10-08-2020 11:07

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36046144)
The ECJ can only rule over areas where EU directives and regulations are in force so, if we want to have access to EU (and some non-EU) agencies, there is a case for 'sucking it up' and taking ECJ jurisdiction to get access.

My wish list would include;

EASA - aviation regulation including safety and the European Common Aviation Area
ECHA - chemical regulation and safety including REACH (huge impact to my business right now!)
EMA - European Medicines Agency
EUIPO - intellectual property
EFSA - food safety
EMSA - maritime safety
ECDC - disease control and epidemiology

Leaving these agencies due to ECJ jurisdiction in a quest for sovereignty seems to be the aim. It's each persons own value judgement to what cost is worth the degree of sovereignty we will gain.

Do you think it is right that that the EU should insist on ECJ jurisdiction over elements over a trade deal when that is not the case with Canada and Japan?

Carth 10-08-2020 11:25

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36046147)
Nothing to do with 'wanting' to be under the jurisdiction of the ECJ, it's about being members of organisations that make business simpler and more efficient. If being members of those organisations includes the ECJ being the final arbitrator, then fine.

Sovereignty is all well and good but feeling good doesn't put shoes on my kids feet...

But wouldn't there be some 'self interest' in that arbitration, with the ECJ being biased towards its own membership? How would/could you know you got a fair hearing?

Sephiroth 10-08-2020 11:45

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36046147)
Nothing to do with 'wanting' to be under the jurisdiction of the ECJ, it's about being members of organisations that make business simpler and more efficient. If being members of those organisations includes the ECJ being the final arbitrator, then fine.

Sovereignty is all well and good but feeling good doesn't put shoes on my kids feet...

The majority of voters wanted to be free of ECJ jurisdiction and took the economic case into account (unless you wasnt to claim that the voters were dumb). The voters also wanted to curb the disporportionate migration that was occurring: everyone's second language is English.

What those voters will be quite happy with is a Canada style trade deal which keeps business simple and does not subject us to the ECJ.

What's wrong with that?

nomadking 10-08-2020 12:05

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046124)
And if you think in today’s global interconnected world, that any country is not dependent or influenced by any other country, I’ve got a bridge you might want to buy... :D

For example Priti Patel has just said we are dependent on the French to help us return migrants, as our "sovereignty" in this matter depends on their support...

Sovereignty 2016 - We demand the right to control our borders!!

Sovereignty 2020: Why aren’t the bloody French controlling our borders?!

The French aren't controlling their own borders. They are in France illegally.



Eg If there are unaccompanied minors, then the responsibility for them lies with the French, or any of the multitude of other countries they've supposedly passed through unaccompanied. Just as any other unaccompanied minor, who is found on the streets, is taken into care in that country. Rather perverse that the only country deemed responsible for their care is the UK. Also perverse that the European Convention on Human Rights hasn't come down heavily on France and all the other countries.

Carth 10-08-2020 12:34

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36046154)
The French aren't controlling their own borders. They are in France illegally.



Eg If there are unaccompanied minors, then the responsibility for them lies with the French, or any of the multitude of other countries they've supposedly passed through unaccompanied. Just as any other unaccompanied minor, who is found on the streets, is taken into care in that country. Rather perverse that the only country deemed responsible for their care is the UK. Also perverse that the European Convention on Human Rights hasn't come down heavily on France and all the other countries.

Could it possibly be because they don't want them? :naughty:

jonbxx 10-08-2020 12:58

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046148)
Do you think it is right that that the EU should insist on ECJ jurisdiction over elements over a trade deal when that is not the case with Canada and Japan?

If the return is good, then I would be OK with it. Cost-benefit analysis really.

What elements of EU law are not covered by the ECJ in the case of the Canada and Japan deals?

Sephiroth 10-08-2020 13:09

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36046159)
If the return is good, then I would be OK with it. Cost-benefit analysis really.

What elements of EU law are not covered by the ECJ in the case of the Canada and Japan deals?

In both of those deals, there is an arbitration mechanism.
In the Canada case, here is an important piece of judicial interpretation (my red highlight):

https://www.jurist.org/news/2019/05/...llows-eu-laws/

Quote:

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on Tuesday that the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the EU follows EU laws. The court decision was requested by Belgium and was focused on the section of CETA that concerns resolution of investment disputes between investors and states.

CETA will establish a Investment Court System (ICS) to handle disputes between investors and states. The system will include a Tribunal, an Appellate Tribunal, and a multilateral investment tribunal. The Tribunal will include 15 members: five from Canada, five from EU member states and five from third countries.

Belgium filed the request for a decision from the ECJ because the ECJ has exclusive jurisdiction over the definitive interpretation of EU law. The ECJ found that CETA did not violate this principle as long as the CETA Tribunals do not attempt to interpret EU laws.
Why shouldn't the EU grant the UK the same arbitration mechanism rather than adherence to the ECJ's domination?

1andrew1 10-08-2020 14:12

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046117)

I'm so glad that you are not leading these negotiations!

:rolleyes:

I, on the other hand, would be very happy if you were leading the British side of these negotiations. ;)

---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046163)


Why shouldn't the EU grant the UK the same arbitration mechanism rather than adherence to the ECJ's domination?

Life's unfair, Seph, you have to get over it. :D

In this instance, I imagine two things determine this:
- There's very little time left to strike a deal. Adopting an existing mechanism is easier than devising a new one.
- Scale of trade. This is far more significant between the UK and EU than between the EU and Canada or Japan. Hence more disputes are likely. Having an existing infrastructure in place can move more rapidly than having to rope in 15 judges from elsewhere.

Sephiroth 10-08-2020 14:44

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046169)
I, on the other hand, would be very happy if you were leading the British side of these negotiations. ;)

---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:01 ----------


Life's unfair, Seph, you have to get over it. :D

In this instance, I imagine two things determine this:
- There's very little time left to strike a deal. Adopting an existing mechanism is easier than devising a new one.
- Scale of trade. This is far more significant between the UK and EU than between the EU and Canada or Japan. Hence more disputes are likely. Having an existing infrastructure in place can move more rapidly than having to rope in 15 judges from elsewhere.

.... but that would be unfair. And that is the key difference between us.

Btw, I was reading up on the EFTA dispute mechanism (as per Norway). EFTA.int

Quote:

The EFTA Court, based in Luxembourg, corresponds to the Court of Justice of the European Union in matters relating to the EEA EFTA States. The Court deals with infringement actions brought by the EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) against an EFTA State with regard to the implementation, application or interpretation of an EEA rule. The Court also handles the settlement of disputes between two or more EEA EFTA States. It hears appeals against decisions taken by ESA and gives advisory opinions to courts in the EEA EFTA States on the interpretation of EEA rules.
The EFTA countries don’t submit to the ECJ either, notwithstanding their proximity.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum