![]() |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
On the specific point about 'level playing field', which is the term you used to rebut my argument, I'm not wrong. The term 'level playing field' as applied to CETA doesn't have the same meaning as what the EU wishes to apply to the UK. I quote the EU synopsis in full. Bold text is as per original. Coloured text is my highlight. APPLICATION IN CETA https://ec.europa.eu/commission/pres...en/MEMO_16_445 Quote:
By significant contrast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/51180282 Quote:
You will see that the EU is demanding considerably more from the UK by way of 'level playing field' provisions than they have agreed with Canada. Their reasoning is that we are on their doorstep - so we can't have a Canada style agreement, which is what the UK Guvmin wants. In other words, the EU wants our cake to eat. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
The deal with Canada is more than just intellectual property rights, as my extract demonstrates and I think you accept this now so our views are now not so far apart. It also shows that you and I agree that the UK would need to build on the enhanced playing field with firmer support due to the UK's EU proximity and size. That's all part of the gravity of trade which I have tried to explain to people but never seems to sink in before they start talking up Mexico, India etc. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
I can't remember being sold any dreams :shrug:
I do remember some EU people trying to sell me some though :D ;) |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
I'd get your memory checked then... there was dream selling from both camps |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
I wasn't swayed by the offers, didn't buy any :p:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-53427262 Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
On your 2nd paragraph, I believe their proximity argument to be spurious grounds for tight level playing field. My perception is that they want to punish us. Our disagreement is fundamental on principle except, I hope, that the Canadian model is fine. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Bit of a waste isn't it? Considering many think we'll have no trade anyway :p: |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
You’re doing a "Donald" - saying "many think" or "many say" without providing any evidence of who the many are or what they actually said... ;) ---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 14:58 ---------- Quote:
Seems legit... :D |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
And no, they're not really punishing us. They're protecting the Single Market which is everything to the EU. Even German car manufacturers are prepared to see the UK suffer adverse economic consequences if it keeps the Single Market intact. I really don't get this playing-the-victim stance. We're a 65-milion-person country so of course bigger blocs like the EU, US and China will try and boss us around. This was all known before the referendum. These complaints sound increasingly more and more like unconscious buyers' remorse. But let's see how the negotiations go. I believe David Frost had a bit of a wake-up call when business recently convinced him they were serious about the bad effects of no-deal, and the negative impacts of even the best Brexit deal. BoJo's heart is not really in it, he wants an easy life with his new family and Brexit was just about handing him the keys to No. 10. And Cummings has moved onto his dream of using British tax-payers' money to compete with Eton Musk and Amazon through OneWeb. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
We agree to differ.
It is a pity that you come across as a justifier/apologist for the EU instead of supporting the UK's negotiating position. You have conceded in your post that the EU, US & China will try to boss us around. Of course we must resist that with vigour. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
1. You've given more or less the same explanation for months. We get it. 2. Being pragmatic is one thing. Caving in to EU bullying is not tolerable imo. All we want is the Canada deal. What's wrong with that? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
The UK and Japan are currently set to sign a deal which Liz Truss is getting awfully excited about. However, Japan has made clear that it cannot be as ambitious as the one signed with the EU as the UK is a far smaller market. I call that one party in the negotiations having more power in strictly neutral language. You might prefer the use of more emotive language like bullying which is your choice. 3. I've explained to you why the EU has its red lines. It doesn't mean that I wish it didn't but it's only what was called Project Fear or Easiest Trade Deal Ever depending on who you chose to believe at the time. ---------- Post added at 23:56 ---------- Previous post was at 23:52 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Japan can pee off too, do we actually buy anything useful from them that nobody else can supply?
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
---------- Post added at 01:17 ---------- Previous post was at 01:11 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
A UK Japan Economic Partnership Agreement is an interesting one for two reasons;
This is really a three way deal between the UK, Japan and the EU. The supply chains for Japanese companies based in the UK (Nissan and Honda re the elephants on the room here) are predominantly EU based. The value and success of a UK-Japan agreement is very dependent on the success of a UK-EU agreement. The second issue is the EU-Japan agreement has 'Most Favoured Nation' clauses which state that any concessions offered to a third country, the UK in this case, must also automatically be offered to the EU. The best possible deal the UK can get from Japan would match what the EU can get (whether the EU would necessarily accept/implement a MFN concession is a different thing of course) This article explains this well - https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/202...mental-issues/ |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Please Google "UK and Japan rush to secure post-Brexit trade deal" and you will see the FT article concerned. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
I've not bothered with either of the above links . . . if I did, I'd only end up counting all of the 'if, maybe, could, possibly, upto, may, subject to' etc etc that are sure to be in there ;)
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Sadly, Andrew is mired in Remainerism and I told you so-ism.
I am astounded that someone should be so apologetic (for want of a more appropriate word) on behalf of the EU's unwillingness to recognise our sovereignty and also to describe the UK as "junior". I understand his point about other parties holding certain cards to their advantage but he links this to "cake and eat it" when the only party wanting that is the EU. I'm sure that we will have to give some ground on our desires vis-a-vis Japan, but once a trade deal is agreed, we'll all settle into its terms and move forward. But the ground that the bullying EWU wants us to give is beyond the pale - supremacy of the ECJ? Andrew - what's wrong with you? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Andrew completely ignores the very clear view of the majority of voters, which is one of the fundamental pillars of our democracy. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Andrew is, was, and always will be a remainer. I accept that and don't hold it against him. Just as I hope he dosen't hold the fact that we are leavers against us.
All his post are from a remainers narrative so what do you expect? I don't hold it against him. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Has Andrew got no advice to give on how we might attain such a deal? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
When it comes to the EU and its constituent willy-waving countries in the hands of idiot (doesn't best describe them) politicians coupled (in the UK case) with entrenched voters, don't expect the logical sentiments you have expressed to be fully applicable. Quite the contrary, in the case of the EU, their 27 willies are a huge distraction. In the case of Japan, it's rather more like the way you describe it and even our idiot politicians will most likely reach a sensible deal this side of January. Other countries will likely fit your scenario in terms of trade negotiations. Just not the EU who are bullies, want their cake and eat it. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Reminder
Using language that invokes the Site "swear filter" is against Site T&Cs, Repetition of this behaviour will invoke the Infraction System. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
There is so much latitude on "swearing" that it is difficult to know when the words will be deleted. In this case, plenty of synonyms are allowed and I wouldn't intentionally wish to invoke the filter.
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Without a 'no tariffs' deal, there will be major economic disadvantages for certain EU industries such as car manufacturing because tariffs will put up the price of exported goods to this country, rendering them less competitive. The EU does not hold all the cards, not by a long chalk. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
The asterisks in place of the offending word shows the filter has been applied - you can go back into your post to remove those words, or replace with words that do not activate the "swear filter". |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
We can continue with our market of 65m people and wonder why other countries are more prosperous than us. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
It really is pathetic to see, as the forecast negative consequences of Brexit start to materialise, we have the die-hards bleating about being "bullied". It is as if they are in the playground again and they are running to teacher complaining "Miss, Miss, the big boys are bullying me again".
Of course, that is the only recourse they have left and that is to try and save face. Pretend that they are a victim when, ironically, all the things they are complaining about are on them. They just need to man up and own them. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
On the other hand, you and your less reasonable cohorts avoid committing yourselves to protection of our sovereignty. If I ask people like you whether you are content to remain under the ECJ after January 2021, the sort of answer that is returned is 'we were warned what would happen before we were committed to leaving the EU' or words to that effect. Why can't you answer the direct question about sovereignty and whether we should keep surrendering it to the EU? We won't have to surrender sovereignty to Japan. Comon - you surely can do better than you are doing. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
If they ris by tuppence in price so that we don't come under ECJ jurisdiction, it'll be worth it. Any much more, then sod 'em - I'll sour my own cucumbers. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:09 ---------- Previous post was at 17:08 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Reflection doesn’t always have to involve a mirror, you know... :D |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
e.g: Don't give in to EU bullying. (Aka Don't accede to the EU's red lines). Vert clear. The Remainers don't say "Do give in to EU bullying". They don't say "Do accept the EU's red lines". They don't say anything that points to a direction they think we should be taking. "Invest more energy in solving it ..." means nothing. It's rhetoric. Useless. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Remainers devising solutions won't cut the mustard. They will end up with similar smears as those attached to Theresa May's government. I would suggest you bend Redwood's ear and remind him what he and his colleagues promised you at the time of the referendum. However, I understand that he is currently embroiled in a big NIMBY dispute with Wokingham Borough Council which says "We're outraged and disgusted at these government proposals which would see the amount of new housing more than double across the Wokingham Borough to 1,635 per year." ---------- Post added at 18:48 ---------- Previous post was at 18:43 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
I'll ask you again: In your view, should the UK give way on the EU's red lines? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eeh3eVrU...jpg&name=small |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
What ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
But pleading with a third country to try and prevent migrants coming to the UK whilst simultaneously trying to withdraw that country's fishing rights is not the brightest of ideas. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
What ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
We will deal with others on those terms. Chose the path we want affirms that. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
I confess not to remember you saying that my question was impossible to answer. There's no way I'm asking you to 'bail me out'. That you should resort to such a crass remark is only worthy of another contributor whom I mustn't troll in this thread. It really is a simple question: In your opinion, what ground should the UK give in negotiating with the EU? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Furthermore they may yet be accurate, they may be wrong.,.........we’ll find out in due course. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
. . . and now we go over to our Current Affairs reporter from Cable Forum.
Well it's another day of madness here, the usual gangs have been busily sniping at each other from the cover of their keyboards, and exchanging sly winks and slaps on the back for any minor points scored. There was a moment earlier in the session when a senior board member called for clarification on some of the language used, but all in all it's just been the same arguments on the same merry go round. The scores are still tied at 168 each, maybe tomorrow will see a breakthrough. Back to the studio for the weather . . |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
My objectives, as you know are to put the economy first as a strong economy enables services like our armed forces and nursing homes to be properly funded and it's beneficial for people's health and in keeping crime rates low. This necessitates as close a deal with the EU as possible so we should elect for a deal like the EFTA countries have without the Schengen area. I'm happy to sacrifice notional elements of sovereignty to join NATO, to join the United Nations, to join EFTA and to join Five Eyes. ---------- Post added at 00:28 ---------- Previous post was at 00:27 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
NATO is a common defence originally against Soviet Russia and also includes the US and Canada. It could do nothing about the Russian annexation of part of the Ukraine as they weren't a member state. The UN, again we are a founding member and along with the others have the power of veto over whatever any other country would like to do along with China, France, Russia, and the United States. So anyhing that may impinge on our sovereignty could just be vetoed. 5 Eyes is is an intelligence alliance that has nothing to do with the rest of Europe it is made up of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. So no notional surrender or otherwise of sovereignty there. They are agreements that can be ended at any time with no penalty, not that I would wish it. EFTA was started by the 7 nations that the EEC (then) did not accept into their agreement back in 1960 including the UK (gotta love Charles de Gaul), it now consists only of 4. However I digress. 1960 The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) is founded by Austria, Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, to promote closer economic cooperation and free trade in Europe.. 1961 Finland becomes an associate member of EFTA. The EFTA Consultative Committee is established (representatives of trade unions and employers' organisations). 1966 Full free trade in industrial products is achieved between the EFTA States. 1970 Iceland becomes a member of EFTA. Then it starts going pear shaped 1972 Denmark and the United Kingdom leave EFTA to join the European Economic Community (EEC). The remaining EFTA States sign bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) with the EEC during the 1970s. 1977 The EFTA Parliamentary Committee is established. Tariffs on industrial goods in trade are eliminated between the EEC and the EFTA States. 1979 EFTA's first FTA is signed with Spain. 1984 (here we go) The Luxembourg Declaration on broader cooperation between the EEC and EFTA is signed. 1985 Portugal leaves EFTA to become a member of the EEC. (why?). 1986 Finland becomes a full member of EFTA. 1989 Negotiations start on a European Economic Space, later to become the European Economic Area (EEA). An agreement on free trade in fish between the EFTA States is signed. (oh look, FISH!) 1991 Liechtenstein becomes a member of EFTA. An FTA is signed with Turkey, EFTA's oldest agreement still in force. A further 12 FTAs are signed in the 1990s, of which three are still in force (Israel, Morocco and the Palestinian Authority). The others, all of which are with Central and Eastern European countries, lapse when those countries join the European Union (EU). (Oh bugger!) 1992 The Agreement on the European Economic Area is signed in Oporto, Portugal. Switzerland rejects participation in the EEA by referendum. 1994 The EEA Agreement enters into force between the EU and five EFTA States. An EEA Financial Mechanism for the reduction of economic and social disparities in the EEA is established for the period 1994 to 1998. (EFTA no longer an independant trading area). 1995 Austria, Finland and Sweden leave EFTA to join the EU. Liechtenstein becomes a full participant in the EEA Agreement together with Iceland and Norway. (EFTA's shrinking). 2001 The updated EFTA Convention is signed in Vaduz, Liechtenstein, entering into force a year later. (There's only a few countries left). There's a few thing inbetween relating to the EEA but. 2010 Iceland begins accessions negotiations with the EU. The EEA EFTA Forum of Elected Representatives of Local and Regional Authorities is established. And that is the effective end of EFTA as an independant trade alliance. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Post contents deleted by Seph.
---------- Post added at 09:18 ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 ---------- Quote:
Which of these concessions should we make to the EU in order to achieve the best possible economic outcome: 1. ECJ jurisdiction over the trade deal? 2. Level playing field that goes beyond Canada, Japan ? 3. Sovereignty over UK territorial waters including fishing rights? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
https://www.efta.int/About-EFTA/EFTA-through-years-747 |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
And no, agreeing to the entry rules are not concessions Seph, that's a highly defeatist way of framing the argument. We should obviously try and negotiate these in our favour as much as possible. Of the above criteria, the one which I would aim to negotiate hardest on is No. 1. Only a socialist or a pessimist that thinks we can only survive as a low cost manufacturer (a la the recent sweatshop issues in Leicester) would have a genuine issue with No. 2 and we need to be careful with No. 3 as the fish we catch is largely sold to the EU, it's typically not species consumed in the UK. I hope this helps. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Quote:
On#2 - "we need to be careful"? What's that about? Should we agree to the EU tying our hands more than they've done with Japan & Canada? On#3 - So what? I understand that if we don't have a trade deal, the fish caught in our waters will finder their market harder to sell to. But on the other hand, the EU countries will want that fish. A trade deal would settle that without agreeing to the fishing rights status quo operating ibn perpetuity. You seem to be careful to avoid answers that carry any emotion. Fine. But I still can't see on the three questions what you think we should agree to? The Forum is waiting with baited breath. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
You, however, think that we should, so Seph's question to you is a reasonable one. What ground do you think we should give? ---------- Post added at 19:23 ---------- Previous post was at 19:22 ---------- Quote:
:rolleyes: |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
The migrants trying to come to the UK are in breach of EU law which requires them to register for asylum in the first EU landing point. The UK is not withdrawing France's fishing rights. The EU and UK have signed a WA and the UK is withdrawing from the EU. With that comes legal sovereignty over all our waters. If we traded fishing rights for no migrants, do you think that would work? No, of course not. So why bother. I'm disappointed at the degeneration of your argument quality. Earlier you claimed that the Canada TA with the EU instituted a level playing field; on closer examination that was specifically for IPR. The truth is simple: you were content to remain in the EU and the majority of voters disagreed with you and, as late as last December, still did. When you are asked for your preferred approach, at last you came up with an answer: the EFTA model. Quote:
I'm sorry that you're cornered here (you'll deny it) but there's no way out except rational and realistic argument. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ultimately, your arguments boil down to what I believe is a flawed definition of sovereignty. If you're a member of the United Nations then you're a sovereign nation. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_state Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
And if you think in today’s global interconnected world, that any country is not dependent or influenced by any other country, I’ve got a bridge you might want to buy... :D
For example Priti Patel has just said we are dependent on the French to help us return migrants, as our "sovereignty" in this matter depends on their support... Quote:
Sovereignty 2020: Why aren’t the bloody French controlling our borders?! |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
And you know it. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
The ECJ can only rule over areas where EU directives and regulations are in force so, if we want to have access to EU (and some non-EU) agencies, there is a case for 'sucking it up' and taking ECJ jurisdiction to get access.
My wish list would include; EASA - aviation regulation including safety and the European Common Aviation Area ECHA - chemical regulation and safety including REACH (huge impact to my business right now!) EMA - European Medicines Agency EUIPO - intellectual property EFSA - food safety EMSA - maritime safety ECDC - disease control and epidemiology Leaving these agencies due to ECJ jurisdiction in a quest for sovereignty seems to be the aim. It's each persons own value judgement to what cost is worth the degree of sovereignty we will gain. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Why, for the love of god, would we leave the EU and then still want to be subject to the rulings of the ECJ? We will not be a member of the EU anymore.
Does the ECJ run its sticky fingers over the dealings with Canada, Japan, Russia? . . . in fact any Country that is not part of the EU. Are you trying to say that, whether we are in or out, any dealings we have with any EU Country have to be ratified and 'passed' by a court consisting of EU members, dealing with EU members, which presides over ensuring one EU member isn't being 'ripped off' by another EU member? If that's the case, what is the equivalent UK court that ensures this Country isn't overwhelmed by cheap foreign imports that decimate our own manufacturing & industry . . . oh hang on, we're 40 years too late :mad: |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Sovereignty is all well and good but feeling good doesn't put shoes on my kids feet... |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
What those voters will be quite happy with is a Canada style trade deal which keeps business simple and does not subject us to the ECJ. What's wrong with that? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Eg If there are unaccompanied minors, then the responsibility for them lies with the French, or any of the multitude of other countries they've supposedly passed through unaccompanied. Just as any other unaccompanied minor, who is found on the streets, is taken into care in that country. Rather perverse that the only country deemed responsible for their care is the UK. Also perverse that the European Convention on Human Rights hasn't come down heavily on France and all the other countries. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
What elements of EU law are not covered by the ECJ in the case of the Canada and Japan deals? |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
In the Canada case, here is an important piece of judicial interpretation (my red highlight): https://www.jurist.org/news/2019/05/...llows-eu-laws/ Quote:
|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:01 ---------- Quote:
In this instance, I imagine two things determine this: - There's very little time left to strike a deal. Adopting an existing mechanism is easier than devising a new one. - Scale of trade. This is far more significant between the UK and EU than between the EU and Canada or Japan. Hence more disputes are likely. Having an existing infrastructure in place can move more rapidly than having to rope in 15 judges from elsewhere. |
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Btw, I was reading up on the EFTA dispute mechanism (as per Norway). EFTA.int Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum