Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Sport (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   [Merged] Football talk (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=19379)

Reddevil63 04-05-2005 02:10

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom
What sour grapes from Jose, " the best time lost" as they say in cricket, look in the book.:p:

Happens to the best of them! :D

Welcome to the club Jose! :p:

sir_drinks_alot 04-05-2005 09:13

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yesman
When is the final ?
__________________



The AtatÃÃâ€*’¼rk Olympic stadium in Istanbul, Turkey will stage the 2004/05 UEFA Champions League final on 25 May 2005.

http://www.uefa.com/competitions/ucl...ntroFinal.html

Oh what a final it's going to be :) good luck liverpool :tu:

gary_580 04-05-2005 11:01

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom
Guess that was to difficult ( or boring and couldn't be arsed) for you all.;)

Here are the answers anyway.

1) Nottingham Forest, Boston United, Peterborough United, Macclesfield Town, Southend United, Wycombe Wanderers, Bournemouth.
2) Portsmouth (Lib Dem).
3) Blackburn Rovers (Jack Straw), Norwich City (Charles Clarke).
4) Sheffield Wednesday (David Blunkett), Sheffield United (Richard Caborn)
5) Fulham (Iain and Chris Coleman).
6) Kidderminster Harriers (Independent, Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern).
7) Bradford City (Terry Rooney).
8) Manchester United (1996 - the 1997 final was two weeks after the election).
9) Charles Clarke (Steve, Chelsea 1997), Paul Boateng (George, Aston Villa 2000), Paul Murphy (Danny, Liverpool 2001), Gordon Brown (Wes, Man Utd 2004).
10) Ray Wilson, Ian Callaghan, Mark Chamberlain. To complete the picture, the other non-Labour 'football constituencies' are: Portsmouth, Leicester City, Chesterfield, Colchester United, Torquay United, Cheltenham Town, Yeovil Town (all Lib Dem), Kidderminster Harriers (KHHC), Shrewsbury Town (Labour defected to Lib Dems).


:erm: Peterborough is a Labour seat!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2005/html/456.stm

iadom 04-05-2005 12:00

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gary_580
:erm: Peterborough is a Labour seat!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2005/html/456.stm

Checked on Googlemap but cannot see if the ground is in the Peterborough constituency or Cambridgeshire North West ?

gazzae 04-05-2005 12:01

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Drogba? 24 Million? :confused: :confused:

gary_580 04-05-2005 13:25

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom
Checked on Googlemap but cannot see if the ground is in the Peterborough constituency or Cambridgeshire North West ?

as its south of the river im not sure its in Peterborough so you may be right
__________________

according to the BBC site the post code for the ground PE2 8AL is infact Cambridgeshire North West.

I stand corrected sir!!

BBKing 04-05-2005 13:26

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
What links these years?

1991
1994
1995
1998
1999
2000
2001
2003
2005

gazzae 04-05-2005 14:17

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Good Stuff....

Quote:

Two men have been charged with riotous behaviour following trouble at last month's Linfield/Glentoran football match at the Oval in east Belfast.

Serious crowd trouble marred the top of the table Irish Premier League clash between the two Belfast teams.

Rival fans threw missiles and fought on the pitch. Nine police officers and two fans were injured. A 20-year-old man was convicted of rioting last week.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/4511203.stm

yesman 04-05-2005 19:52

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
What links these years?

1991
1994
1995
1998
1999
2000
2001
2003
2005

Any clues ?

BBKing 04-05-2005 22:32

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Related to last night at Anfield.

sherer 05-05-2005 11:21

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
think we need abit more of a clue on this one

iadom 05-05-2005 11:24

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
I did try to find links but it was late and I was tired. One thing I did turn up, who the hell was Crvena Zvezda ????? I wasn't paying attention when they sneaked in.:)

sherer 05-05-2005 12:39

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by iadom
I did try to find links but it was late and I was tired. One thing I did turn up, who the hell was Crvena Zvezda ????? I wasn't paying attention when they sneaked in.:)

they used to be Red Star Belgrade but have since changed their name.. I have a copy of the team sheet from when Man U played them in 58 and that has Crvena Zvezda written on then so it seems they were always known as that just we called them something different.
__________________

also this is from the UEFA rule book

At the request of the national association concerned, the UEFA Champions
League title-holders may be entered for this competition, as an additional
representative of that association, if they have not qualified for the UEFA
Champions League via the top domestic league championship. If, in such a
case, the title-holders come from an association entitled to enter four teams
for the UEFA Champions League, the fourth-placed club in the top domestic
league championship has to be entered for the UEFA Cup.

BBKing 05-05-2005 15:55

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

think we need abit more of a clue on this one
1991 W
1994 W
1995 L
1998 W
1999 W
2000 L
2001 W
2003 L
2005 ?

Any better?

Nugget 05-05-2005 15:57

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
1991 W
1994 W
1995 L
1998 W
1999 W
2000 L
2001 W
2003 L
2005 ?

Any better?

I'm going to take a punt and say that the winner of the league also won the FA Cup?

gazzae 05-05-2005 16:33

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
1991 W
1994 W
1995 L
1998 W
1999 W
2000 L
2001 W
2003 L
2005 ?

Any better?

Is it that one of the teams in the final of the champions league did not qualify by winning their league?
__________________

Nah its not that, Juve won the league in 2002.

BBKing 06-05-2005 12:09

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Getting closer, but still a way off. gazzae is thinking more in the correct 'continental' direction, there's a clue...

yesman 06-05-2005 13:05

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
How's this for a miss ?

http://www.sunecards.co.uk/greatest_ever_miss.wmv

gazzae 06-05-2005 13:16

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
The FA has said that only the top 4 will get into the Champs league. Contradicts what they said last year..

Quote:

http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/ContactUs...ean_Places.htm

What if?

Should Arsenal or Chelsea win the Champions League, they will automatically qualify for next season's competition but England will not gain an extra Champions League place, even if they finish outside of the top four in the Premiership.

In that scenario the fourth-placed team in the Premiership will play in next season's UEFA Cup.

__________________

The page has been removed by the FA, here is the google cache of it...

http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache...=en&lr=lang_en

sherer 06-05-2005 13:33

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
i posted the rules from the UEFA web site above..

the rules have been in place all season it's not fair to change them now.. blame UEFA for letting more clubs into the cup it should be the winner of the league and cup holders only

yesman 06-05-2005 23:39

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Not a bad bit of business in the end

kronas 07-05-2005 02:22

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
yes not bad at all squeezing more money out of Lazio but its about time those funds were recieved....:erm: 4 years later....

Reddevil63 07-05-2005 16:12

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
So Chelski have picked up the trophy.

Let the 'Jump on the Bandwagon' begin! :p:

Still great to see the trophy engraved the most by one team!!

Marge 07-05-2005 18:42

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Reddevil63
So Chelski have picked up the trophy.

Let the 'Jump on the Bandwagon' begin! :p:

Still great to see the trophy engraved the most by one team!!

I'd rather Chelski won than the Gooners

Anyway

Nice early goal for Utd bu have to feel a bit sorry for WBA, goalie wasn't in any fit state to save it :erm:

Russ 07-05-2005 18:44

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
And the Swans get promoted to Division 1!! :D :clap:

kronas 07-05-2005 20:15

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
oh well a typical lax united finish and yes i didnt like the team selection that ferguson put out.

a draw was a fair result.

paulyoung666 07-05-2005 20:16

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
up the boro , now just to finish 5th :shocked: :D :D

yesman 07-05-2005 21:35

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kronas
i didnt like the team selection that ferguson put out.

a draw was a fair result.

That has been typical of Ferguson all season, we all thought he had learnt and he still does it, the end is nigh.........

Mal 07-05-2005 21:39

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yesman
That has been typical of Ferguson all season, we all thought he had learnt and he still does it, the end is nigh.........

Not all season, he's always done it against the bottom teams, play a weakened side. :mad:

paulyoung666 08-05-2005 17:50

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
now i wouldnt normally shout for arsenal , but , go on you gooners :D :D :D

Marge 08-05-2005 17:52

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by paulyoung666
now i wouldnt normally shout for arsenal , but , go on you gooners :D :D :D

:knock: :knock: :knock: HOW DARE YOU !!!!!! :D :D :D

paulyoung666 08-05-2005 18:07

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Marge
:knock: :knock: :knock: HOW DARE YOU !!!!!! :D :D :D

only for one reason you understand , it gives the boro a chance of 5th in the league on the last game of the season ;) :D :D :D :D

yesman 08-05-2005 18:39

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Dr Who bids to exterminate Glazer

BBKing 08-05-2005 20:06

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

go on you gooners
Right you are mate. 3-1 do you nicely?

Man U now have to beat Chelsea and Southampton while Arsenal lose to Everton and Birmingham to have a chance of finishing second (there's the small matter of a goal difference of twelve, too). Otherwise the 'World's Biggest Club' finish third for the third time in four years. And Arsenal have had their best post-Premiership title season ever, incidentally (the previous two we had 78 points, we have between 80 and 86 this year).

paulyoung666 08-05-2005 20:16

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Right you are mate. 3-1 do you nicely?

Man U now have to beat Chelsea and Southampton while Arsenal lose to Everton and Birmingham to have a chance of finishing second (there's the small matter of a goal difference of twelve, too). Otherwise the 'World's Biggest Club' finish third for the third time in four years. And Arsenal have had their best post-Premiership title season ever, incidentally (the previous two we had 78 points, we have between 80 and 86 this year).


too right , so it is down to the wire for the boro , they can finish anywhere from 5th to 9th , heres hopeing :D :D :D

Russ 08-05-2005 20:25

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Right you are mate. 3-1 do you nicely?

Man U now have to beat Chelsea and Southampton while Arsenal lose to Everton and Birmingham to have a chance of finishing second (there's the small matter of a goal difference of twelve, too). Otherwise the 'World's Biggest Club' finish third for the third time in four years. And Arsenal have had their best post-Premiership title season ever, incidentally (the previous two we had 78 points, we have between 80 and 86 this year).

Plus you've got FA Cup runners up medals to look forward to :)

Marge 08-05-2005 20:54

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
*cough*

Manchester United have won the FA Cup the most times (ten), followed by Arsenal and Tottenham Hotspur (eight).

Manchester United Eight Premiership titles in 12 years

Arsene Wenger claiming three Premiership titles

Nuff said :D :D :D

BBKing 08-05-2005 21:15

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Digging up ancient history won't help you now. The 90s are as passe as Geri Halliwell and Noel Gallagher. You're beginning to sound like all those bitter Liverpool fans we've seen crouched in the corner of pubs for the last fifteen years banging on about Ian Rush, Kenny Dalglish and winning European Cups in the 70s and 80s.

8 in 12 is great, but two years ago it was 8 in 10. Recent history is not on United's side, and digging up the past runs the risk of highlighting exactly how far standards have slipped.

nffc 08-05-2005 22:18

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
And the Swans get promoted to Division 1!! :D :clap:

Nice trip to Trentside for them then :(:Yikes:

Russ 08-05-2005 23:03

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
8 in 12 is great, but two years ago it was 8 in 10. Recent history is not on United's side, and digging up the past runs the risk of highlighting exactly how far standards have slipped.

Standards have NOT slipped. Other teams (noteably Arse and Chelsea) have raised their game, nothing more.

Mal 08-05-2005 23:10

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Anyway, congratulations to Wigan for being promoted to the top flight for the first time :)

sherer 09-05-2005 11:29

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
Standards have NOT slipped. Other teams (noteably Arse and Chelsea) have raised their game, nothing more.

i'd have to say standards have slipped.. our keepers aren't as good as they use to be.. our midfield is now getting too old and can't perform for a full season and players like Phil Neville, Fortune, O'Shea ( faultless in his first season but has got worse with each game since) just aren't good enough to even make our bench let alone start as many games as they do.. let alone starting Phil Neville, Fortune, Kleberson and Ronaldo all at the same time... who in midfield was supposed to keep the ball out of that 4 !!

BBKing 09-05-2005 12:00

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Standards have NOT slipped.
Can you, hand on heart, say that Manchester United 2004/5 is as good a team as Manchester United 1998/9? Howard is as good as Schmeichel? Keane '05 is as good as Keane '99? Not many United fans standing with you on that one, Russ. Also, considering you beat us twice this year and will still almost certainly finish behind us, it's evidently not the Arse raising standards that's the problem but getting beat by people like Portsmouth and Norwich, aka the flotsam at the bottom of the league. Arsenal took 12 points off those two, incidentally.

Quote:

who in midfield was supposed to keep the ball out of that 4 !!
The other team's midfield?

sherer 09-05-2005 15:16

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
1991 W
1994 W
1995 L
1998 W
1999 W
2000 L
2001 W
2003 L
2005 ?

Any better?

so what was the answer to this ?

Russ 09-05-2005 18:58

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Can you, hand on heart, say that Manchester United 2004/5 is as good a team as Manchester United 1998/9?

The teams are different, coupled with different/better opposition.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Howard is as good as Schmeichel?

Van Nistelrooy better than Cole?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Keane '05 is as good as Keane '99?

Naturally players will lose their edge as they get older but you're talking of the team as a whole, not individual players unless you're deliberately trying to move the goalposts (no pun intended!)

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Not many United fans standing with you on that one, Russ.

What, taken a vote have you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Also, considering you beat us twice this year and will still almost certainly finish behind us, it's evidently not the Arse raising standards that's the problem but getting beat by people like Portsmouth and Norwich, aka the flotsam at the bottom of the league. Arsenal took 12 points off those two, incidentally.

You're not seriously trying to make a point there......are you??

So the biggest teams don't slip up to lower ones? Chelsea V Man City anyone?

Reddevil63 09-05-2005 19:12

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Digging up ancient history won't help you now. The 90s are as passe as Geri Halliwell and Noel Gallagher. You're beginning to sound like all those bitter Liverpool fans we've seen crouched in the corner of pubs for the last fifteen years banging on about Ian Rush, Kenny Dalglish and winning European Cups in the 70s and 80s.

8 in 12 is great, but two years ago it was 8 in 10. Recent history is not on United's side, and digging up the past runs the risk of highlighting exactly how far standards have slipped.

At least we won back to back titles and three titles in a row...something the Arse haven't even come close to completing! :D

yesman 10-05-2005 00:03

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Reddevil63
At least we won back to back titles and three titles in a row...something the Arse haven't even come close to completing! :D

I have a feeling Chelsea might though :(
__________________

But lets see how we get on tomorrow night
10 May 2005
Barclays Premiership
Man Utd v Chelsea, 20:00

sir_drinks_alot 10-05-2005 00:18

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yesman
I have a feeling Chelsea might though :(
__________________

But lets see how we get on tomorrow night
10 May 2005
Barclays Premiership
Man Utd v Chelsea, 20:00

Same yesman it's going to take a hell of a lot for other team to take the title
Off tham :)

BBKing 10-05-2005 09:16

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

At least we won back to back titles and three titles in a row...something the Arse haven't even come close to completing!
Ahem. Not quite. Just because you think football started with Sky TV doesn't mean we all do. Arsenal won the league in 1931, 1933, 1934, 1935 and 1938. That includes three in a row.

sherer 10-05-2005 10:51

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
haven't huddersfield done that as well.. i think :erm:

the nited squad we have now isn't as good as 99.. Ronaldo may be able to do loads of tricks but his basic delivery and end product isn't as good as Beckham's.. the midfield are now too old and can't perform over a full season.. the subs beanch and rest of squad also isn't as good would rather play the 99 team than what we have now i'm afraid.. sure one or 2 of the current squad,, Ruud Rooney are better than 99 but overall we are a poorer side.. also no one fears playing us any more thay all raise their game and beat us unlike before when we beat teams just by turning up

orangebird 10-05-2005 10:55

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Ahem. Not quite. Just because you think football started with Sky TV doesn't mean we all do. Arsenal won the league in 1931, 1933, 1934, 1935 and 1938. That includes three in a row.

I thought (to quote you) ' Digging up ancient history won't help you'?

TigaSefi 10-05-2005 11:04

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangebird
I thought (to quote you) ' Digging up ancient history won't help you'?

pWn3D!!one!one!!!!one!!!!! :D ;)

orangebird 10-05-2005 11:15

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TigaSefi
pWn3D!!one!one!!!!one!!!!! :D ;)

:confused:

BBKing 10-05-2005 11:31

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Digging up ancient history won't help you'
The key bit, of course, is 'won't help you'. That was aimed at Marge, who was trying to argue that because United were great six years ago they're great now. There's nothing wrong with digging up ancient history per se, it was merely the use of it that I was pointing out wouldn't help the argument, in this particular instance.

On the other hand, I brought up Arsenal's 1930s record to correct Reddevil who thinks that Arsenal have never won three titles in a row. Since it's fairly undeniable that they did win three titles in a row, it's legitimate to refute that opinion.

Given that none of the 1930s Arsenal side are currently playing, and it was a completely different era, it would be rather odd of me to suggest that purely because Arsenal were great in the 1930s, they're great now (they're great for other reasons, of course). Likewise it's odd for a United fan to suggest that because they won 8 titles in 10 years and had a great team between 1993 and 2000 that proves they have a great team now. That's like saying that because Chelsea hadn't won the league since 1955 they were incapable of doing so.

Club history doesn't affect performance on the pitch, but the facts are there in the books, and there's no excuse to be ignorant of them, or think of them as a substitute for the currently slipping standards up in Manchester.

Russ 10-05-2005 14:26

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Club history doesn't affect performance on the pitch, but the facts are there in the books, and there's no excuse to be ignorant of them, or think of them as a substitute for the currently slipping standards up in Manchester.

You wish! Didn't Arse start off this season with some kind of unbeaten record? (ie We are unbeatable, we are unbeatable etc etc) Then United soundly beat them and Arse's season slowly went in decline (ie around about the time you stopped contributing to this thread). They had a resurgence and now find themselves second. Form comes in bits and pieces, United has been up and down all season just like the Arse's.

Slipping standards? When United drop out of the top 5 THEN you may have something vaguely resembling a point.

nffc 10-05-2005 14:50

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Club history doesn't affect performance on the pitch, but the facts are there in the books, and there's no excuse to be ignorant of them, or think of them as a substitute for the currently slipping standards up in Manchester.

You wish! Didn't Arse start off this season with some kind of unbeaten record? (ie We are unbeatable, we are unbeatable etc etc) Then United soundly beat them and Arse's season slowly went in decline (ie around about the time you stopped contributing to this thread). They had a resurgence and now find themselves second. Form comes in bits and pieces, United has been up and down all season just like the Arse's.

Slipping standards? When United drop out of the top 5 THEN you may have something vaguely resembling a point.

That happens though. In the days when we were good enough to finish 3rd in the Premiership (94-95) and reach the quarter-finals of the UEFA Cup (95-96; Man U lost to Rotor Volgograd on away goals in the first round that year)- a finish which would be champions league now :( we actually managed to set a then-record of 25 PL games unbeaten :( we lost our next game 7-0 at Ewood Park, they beat us 5-1 at the City Ground and we lost 5-0 at Old Trafford at the end of the season (the equivalent fixture the previous season being a 2-1 Forest win; which was their only home reversal for two years).

Point being, normally going on a long unbeaten run seems to get a lot of games you should be losing but you normally draw- and when the luck runs out you do tend to lose a few. That's what's happened to Arsenal, whilst they had the momentum things worked for them but when they didn't have the unbeaten run the luck they were previously getting wasn't quite so forthcoming... I'm not sure about this but I think both Arsenal and Man U have had injury problems for much of the season as well- it's not an excuse but it's a mitigating factor if you can't play your best player for a while!

From a neutral's perspective, as for slipping standards I believe BBking has a point.
92-93 W
93-94 W + FAC
94-95 2nd
95-96 W + FAC
96-97 W
97-98 2nd
98-99 W + FAC + EC
99-00 W + FAC
00-01 W
01-02 3rd
02-03 W
03-04 3rd + FAC
04-05 looks to be 3rd and a chance of the FAC
Three third placed finishes in four years when the previous nine had yielded seven titles and two runners-up finishes.
Maybe not a drastic fall but looking at Chelsea's young side, endless pit of money and investment in the Academy it may be a sign of things to come. Especially as Arsenal will continue to be there or thereabouts whilst Wenger remains at the helm... and Benitez looks like making moves towards success at Anfield.
Will be interesting if nothing else.

sherer 10-05-2005 15:08

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc
From a neutral's perspective, as for slipping standards I believe BBking has a point.
92-93 W
93-94 W + FAC
94-95 2nd
95-96 W + FAC
96-97 W
97-98 2nd
98-99 W + FAC + EC
99-00 W + FAC
00-01 W
01-02 3rd
02-03 W
03-04 3rd + FAC
04-05 looks to be 3rd and a chance of the FAC

we didn't win the cup in 00.. we have never retained the trophy..

i'd have to say standards have slipped.. i was at the Blackburn game this season we it was the worst performance we have ever put in.. and then we followed that up with more dire rubbish.. the 99 Fergie would never have allowed a performance like that.. the team wouldn't have performed like that or they would be sold,, Stam for instance,, and we have a better squad.. finishing 3rd twice in a row isn't good enough and if the other teams had been any better then we would prob finish even lower.. apart from G. Neville, Keono and Heinze no one else has put in any effort this season and that includes Fergie

i can't see it getting any better next season either unless we spend big on the midfield over the summer

Russ 10-05-2005 19:27

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc
Maybe not a drastic fall but looking at Chelsea's young side, endless pit of money and investment in the Academy it may be a sign of things to come. Especially as Arsenal will continue to be there or thereabouts whilst Wenger remains at the helm... and Benitez looks like making moves towards success at Anfield.

Not sure if you meant to do so but you've just backed up my point. Chelsea have an almost unlimited supply of money (and I don't for one moment believe Kenyon when he said the spending stops now) and their team is the best at the momentas will the Chelsea of tomorrow, considering their academy. Arsenal have raised their game and I still think Henry is one of the top 3 strikers in the UK if not europe. So they have improved as have Liverpool, Everton and others. The only top team to not make such advances is United.

So no, our standards have not slipped. Other teams have improved.

Marge 10-05-2005 19:30

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Note to Nemesis, don't forget our small wager about tonights match ;)

Reddevil63 10-05-2005 19:56

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Ahem. Not quite. Just because you think football started with Sky TV doesn't mean we all do. Arsenal won the league in 1931, 1933, 1934, 1935 and 1938. That includes three in a row.

Stand corrected but my comment was aimed at the Premiership years.

Also add to the matter that in those years a fair few FA Cups were also won and a European Cup.

Russ 10-05-2005 22:46

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Aww man this is getting painful :(

BBKing 10-05-2005 22:52

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Stand corrected but my comment was aimed at the Premiership years.
You should have said. How's your unbeaten home run going?

Russ 10-05-2005 22:53

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
You should have said. How's your unbeaten home run going?

It ended tonight :(

yesman 10-05-2005 22:57

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Absolutely abysmal, outplayed in every area of the pitch.

Ferguson has to be twitching surely ?

Russ 10-05-2005 23:00

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Some disgusting finishing. Hope SAF enjoys the 05/06 season seeing as it'll be his last as manager.

TigaSefi 10-05-2005 23:00

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Fergie out any one ? Man Shted still the better team ? I think not!!! Liverpool > Chelsea > Man Shted ;)

yesman 10-05-2005 23:05

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TigaSefi
Fergie out any one ? Man Shted still the better team ? I think not!!! Liverpool > Chelsea > Man Shted ;)

TigaSefi, when do you start school ?

TigaSefi 10-05-2005 23:06

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
they keep rejecting me ;)

yesman 10-05-2005 23:12

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TigaSefi
they keep rejecting me ;)

:D

nffc 11-05-2005 01:22

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc
Maybe not a drastic fall but looking at Chelsea's young side, endless pit of money and investment in the Academy it may be a sign of things to come. Especially as Arsenal will continue to be there or thereabouts whilst Wenger remains at the helm... and Benitez looks like making moves towards success at Anfield.

Not sure if you meant to do so but you've just backed up my point. Chelsea have an almost unlimited supply of money (and I don't for one moment believe Kenyon when he said the spending stops now) and their team is the best at the momentas will the Chelsea of tomorrow, considering their academy. Arsenal have raised their game and I still think Henry is one of the top 3 strikers in the UK if not europe. So they have improved as have Liverpool, Everton and others. The only top team to not make such advances is United.

So no, our standards have not slipped. Other teams have improved.

I suppose it depends how you look at is. From a purely neutral perspective again, and casting my evident disdain for Ms aside, TBH, I feel that ManU have slipped and the other two have improved... well, not Arsenal really, they've not really spent big have they?

The present Man U team is nowhere near fit to lace the boots of their counterparts from 4-5 years ago. Apart from the players who have stayed, I can't see an obvious improvement.
GK is still a problem position, I honestly feel SAF struck lucky with Peter Schmeichel bearing in mind his predecessors and the awful faff he's had replacing him (Taibi, Howard, Carroll, Bosnich, etc etc) and there's no evidence of a young successor (that said, we've released Barry Roche this week lol).
Defence- I still can't see why Stam was sold. Good as he is Rio is a different type of player and not especially what you need. Heinze and the various young DFs you've had, good as they are, aren't the same either. I honestly feel you've missed the physical presence of Stam... and Laurent Blanc... :rolleyes:
As for midfield... Ronaldo's a decent player but again, he's no Beckham- another stupid decision. As for Veron... :rolleyes:
Forward is the only area I'd consider comparability. Rooney, Saha, Smith, van Nistelrooy, is as good a front four as Sheringham (former NFFC player ;)), Solksj*er (grr), Cole and Yorke...

You're definitely not as good as you are... but only now when Arsenal seem to have some self-discipline and some real attacking impetus, and Chelsea have stumbled across an affluent backer, has it become apparent.

And you have a local derby to look forward to with teh Dave Whelan empire next season :LOL:

TigaSefi 11-05-2005 11:15

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
hmm u don't need to spend big money to improve a lot. Look at everton.

gazzae 11-05-2005 11:27

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc
d there's no evidence of a young successor (that said, we've released Barry Roche this week lol

What about Luke Steele?

Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc
Heinze and the various young DFs you've had, good as they are, aren't the same either.

Heinze has been the best left back in the league this season.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nffc
... and Laurent Blanc... :rolleyes:

Blanc was never meant to play the number of games he did. When he was brought Mr Injury Prone was ready for the first team and Blanc was meant to be a kind of mentor, but Mr Injury Prone got injuried and Blanc had to play a lot more games in his place.

Mal 11-05-2005 11:36

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
I'd have to agree with NFFC, we aren't as good as before.

It's like last night, Chelsea were comfortable after we scored. We just did not look like we could score again.

Midfield needs to gutted and rebuilt, as Keane only has a couple of years left and we don't have a replacement in the wings. :(

Ronaldo still has a lot to learn. :(

sir_drinks_alot 11-05-2005 20:07

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Remember today when you watch the football the 56 lives lost at the Bradford stadium fire

Bradford stadium fire 20th Anniversary

BBKing 11-05-2005 20:35

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quite right, sir_d-a-l - except it was 56 people who died. A shameful incident - we've come a long way since then, thankfully.

Quote:

So no, our standards have not slipped. Other teams have improved.
From the MEN:
Quote:

it was a sad so-called "lap of honour" this time as United's disconsolate troops walked around the pitch after the final whistle, embarrassingly saluting a vast expanse of empty red seats.
Sic transit gloria mundi.

Russ 11-05-2005 20:38

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
What did you hope to acheive by posting a report which rightly stated United had a bad game?

yesman 11-05-2005 20:51

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Sic transit gloria mundi.

We will be back.

Nota bene !

(Not sure when though) :p:

nffc 11-05-2005 22:01

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yesman
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Sic transit gloria mundi.

We will be back.

Nota bene !

(Not sure when though) :p:

Probably before us the rate we're going at. :(

BBKing 11-05-2005 22:19

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

What did you hope to acheive by posting a report which rightly stated United had a bad game?
Who me? I merely posted a report stating that large numbers of loyal United fans had snuck out before the lap of honour by the players at the last home game of the season. Frankly, it surprised me and I was wondering if anyone had any comment?

Mal 11-05-2005 22:25

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
Who me? I merely posted a report stating that large numbers of loyal United fans had snuck out before the lap of honour by the players at the last home game of the season. Frankly, it surprised me and I was wondering if anyone had any comment?

Well, okay, this is a rumour from someone who went last night, but apparently it was a protest towards Glazer.

True or not, I don't know :shrug:

BBKing 11-05-2005 22:54

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Ah ok - thought it had been called off, but if it was a protest, no problem. Bit harsh on the players though.

I'm in rather a magnanimous mood. What a way to celebrate the last game in red and white at Highbury.

Russ 11-05-2005 23:06

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Chris Blumer, my co-presenter is NOT happy at the moment.

He's an Everton supporter...

Roy MM 11-05-2005 23:12

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
was it 7-0? just woke up, did Everton not turn up?

sir_drinks_alot 11-05-2005 23:13

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
Chris Blumer, my co-presenter is NOT happy at the moment.

He's an Everton supporter...


I bet he is thay just got beat in to a ground my Arsenal

Arsenal 7-0 Everton

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2005/05/4.gif

paulyoung666 11-05-2005 23:13

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy MM
was it 7-0? just woke up, did Everton not turn up?



was what 7-0 :disturbd: :disturbd: :disturbd: :disturbd:

Janusian 11-05-2005 23:18

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
7-0 flatters Everton to be honest, they were awful. Arsenal, playing that like, without pressure on them, are fantastic to watch. I do hope they give Bergkamp a new contract, he is superb!

Russ 11-05-2005 23:19

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
To be fair, Moyles apprently left out many of his star players.

Charlie_Bubble 11-05-2005 23:28

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
To be fair, Moyles apprently left out many of his star players.

Well, reading their teamsheet, it doesn't appear that he has, apart maybe from Cahill:

Everton: Wright, Hibbert, Weir, Yobo, Pistone, Carsley, McFadden, Watson, Arteta (Ferguson 75), Kilbane, Beattie (Bent 45). Subs Not Used: Stubbs, Plessis, Turner.

BBKing 11-05-2005 23:30

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

To be fair, Moyles apprently left out many of his star player
Everton have star players?

Well, Tim Cahill was out, I suppose.

Russ 11-05-2005 23:31

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Should have known better than to listen to an Everton supporter :D

iadom 12-05-2005 11:33

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
7 -Nil. Not bad, but you know who has a better record in the Premiership. :D

Man U 9 -Ipswich 0 1995
Newcastle 8- Sheff Wed 0 1999
Forest 1-Man U 8 1999
Blackburn 7-Forest 0 1995
Man U 7-Barnsley 0 1997
Arsenal 7-Everton 0 2005

Good to see Forest doing their bit eh.:p:

gazzae 12-05-2005 11:43

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
All credit to Arsenal, that was some amazing football!

What time did Everton kick off at last night?

About every 10 minutes!


Anyone seen my coat?

Nugget 12-05-2005 11:49

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
To be fair, Moyles apprently left out many of his star players.

I'm not surprised they got hammered, letting a DJ pick the team (they'd have been better off with Comedy Dave surely) :p:

Was David Moyes ill or something :disturbd: :D

BBKing 12-05-2005 12:09

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Man U 9 -Ipswich 0 1995
Newcastle 8- Sheff Wed 0 1999
Forest 1-Man U 8 1999
Blackburn 7-Forest 0 1995
Man U 7-Barnsley 0 1997
Arsenal 7-Everton 0 2005
Let's see where those teams ended the season:

Ipswich 1994/95 - Bottom
Sheff Wed 1999/2000 - Second bottom
Forest 1998/99 - Bottom
Forest 1995/96 - 9th
Barnsley 1997/98 - Second bottom
Everton 2004/5 - 4th

So most of them were total pants - only Blackburn's achievement in 1995 (which was on the 18th November against the side finishing third the previous year, and Forest were several places above Blackburn at the time) beats last night to my mind. Sorry for bringing up painful memories, nffc.

Shearer 20,57,68, Bohinen 28,76, Newell 82, La Saux 89 were the scorers.

United fans might enjoy the fact that they won 4-1 at home to Southampton that day, while Arsenal lost 2-1 at Spurs. Bother. Our scorer was a certain D. Bergkamp, though.

United's were Giggsx2, Scholes and Cole.

nffc 12-05-2005 12:57

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
So most of them were total pants - only Blackburn's achievement in 1995 (which was on the 18th November against the side finishing third the previous year, and Forest were several places above Blackburn at the time) beats last night to my mind. Sorry for bringing up painful memories, nffc.

Shearer 20,57,68, Bohinen 28,76, Newell 82, La Saux 89 were the scorers.

And bang went our 25-game unbeaten run. Which IIRC included a 7-1 win at Hillsborough and winning 2-1 at Old Trafford (maybe that was before).

We were in Europe that season as well, QFs against Bayern Munich (the real Munich)...

For a side finishing 9th we got thrashed a lot. 7-0, 5-1 v Blackburn, 5-0 at Old Trafford (we should have won the game at home 1-0 but ref gave a dodgy pen), and 5-1 in the home leg of the UEFA cup QF. Ouch. We were relegated the season after.

That's not painful but seeing as that was only 10 years in the past makes now more unbearable seeing as it's going to be 2 years minimum before we'll be in the top flight if ever. :(

Oh and Sheff W 1-7 Forest should be on there seeing as it's only one off the record away win in the PL. None of them are as bad as Ipswich 6-0 Forest from this season though.

BBKing 12-05-2005 15:09

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
News coming in of Glazer getting 56.9% of Man Utd shares by buying out the Irish gents. U is 0wn3d!!!

Ahem. Back to grown up talk.

This should be fun to watch.

Roy MM 12-05-2005 15:19

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
News coming in of Glazer getting 56.9% of Man Utd shares by buying out the Irish gents. U is 0wn3d!!!

Ahem. Back to grown up talk.

This should be fun to watch.

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...181626,00.html :td:

nffc 12-05-2005 15:31

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy MM
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBKing
News coming in of Glazer getting 56.9% of Man Utd shares by buying out the Irish gents. U is 0wn3d!!!

Ahem. Back to grown up talk.

This should be fun to watch.

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...181626,00.html :td:

:LOL: :tu:

Russ 12-05-2005 15:45

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
What are the chances there'll be a contract on his head before the year is out....

edit: :eek:

Quote:

If he gets 75% plus one share, the club could be delisted from the stock exchange and Mr Glazer could transfer his debt onto the club.

TigaSefi 12-05-2005 16:10

Re: [Merged] Football talk
 
*stifles his laughter at Manchester United*


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:37.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum