Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Coronavirus (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709417)

heero_yuy 29-01-2021 15:11

Re: Coronavirus
 
The shambolic EU compounds its incompetence:

Quote:

Quote from The Sun Live blog: THE EU has been dealt another massive vaccine blow after failing to secure a deal for the new Novavax vaccine.

Eurocrats are already under huge pressure over their painfully-slow vaccine roll-out which one German newspaper branded a "perfect advert for Brexit".

And it emerged today that the bloc still hasn't signed any deals for the 90% effective Novavax jab, which the UK secured 60 million doses of back in August and which will be manufactured in Stockton-on-Tees.
They'll probably try and steal ours. :rolleyes:

1andrew1 29-01-2021 15:25

Re: Coronavirus
 
AstraZeneca vaccine approved by EMA for all adults
Quote:

EU drug regulators have announced AstraZeneca's coronavirus vaccine can be given to all adults in the bloc.

The advice from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) comes after questions were raised in Germany over how effective the jab, developed with Oxford University, is in protecting older people.

Only 12% of those who took part in the trials were over 55 and they were enrolled later, so there has not been enough time to collate the results.
On Thursday, a draft recommendation from Germany's vaccination advisory committee said the AstraZeneca vaccine should currently only be given to people aged 18-64.
But the EU regulators said in a statement: "There are not yet enough results in older participants (over 55 years old) to provide a figure for how well the vaccine will work in this group.

"However, protection is expected, given that an immune response is seen in this age group and based on experience with other vaccines."
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...dults-12202449

papa smurf 29-01-2021 15:41

Re: Coronavirus
 
Hungary becomes the first country in the EU to approve a COVID-19 vaccine from China

https://www.euronews.com/2021/01/29/...ine-from-china

---------- Post added at 15:41 ---------- Previous post was at 15:28 ----------

EU vaccine row: Bitter Brussels BANS export of vaccines to UK putting NHS supplies at risk


The European Commission announced new controls on drug makers that want to send doses of Covid jabs abroad. Manufacturers will have to provide detailed information to eurocrats if they plan to sell abroad. Bitter eurocrats refused to include Britain on a 92-strong list of countries that European pharmaceutical firms will still be allowed to ship Covid jabs to.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...vaccine-latest


https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-b...zeneca-pfizer/

Damien 29-01-2021 16:00

Re: Coronavirus
 
At the moment the EU has put controls in place to allow the ban but it doesn't appear they are yet.

We have to retaliate if they do. Pfizer depends on some chemicals produced here for fabrication of the vaccine, that needs to stop. We also stop any other exports around the vaccines.

Sephiroth 29-01-2021 16:09

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36068634)
At the moment the EU has put controls in place to allow the ban but it doesn't appear they are yet.

We have to retaliate if they do. Pfizer depends on some chemicals produced here for fabrication of the vaccine, that needs to stop. We also stop any other exports around the vaccines.

I would limit any retaliation to the AZ produced vaccine.
I would want the UK Guvmin to be "bigger" than the shit EU Commission and limit the retaliation to the one that gives us the best protection.

I would want to find a reason under national emergency or security reasons for making the embargo explicit to the EU (who are threatening us) whilst making the point by exporting the AZ vaccine in sensible numbers to poorer countries under our various aid schemes.

Above all, I want my Guvmin to stop calling the EU "our friends in Europe". The term "EU" would do. It's gloves off and they have shown themselves up for what they are.

1andrew1 29-01-2021 16:20

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36068634)
At the moment the EU has put controls in place to allow the ban but it doesn't appear they are yet.

We have to retaliate if they do. Pfizer depends on some chemicals produced here for fabrication of the vaccine, that needs to stop. We also stop any other exports around the vaccines.

I doubt any country would go through with this but they can't threaten such action unless the EU sanctions it, which it has.

Paul 29-01-2021 17:11

Re: Coronavirus
 
The UK has yet another choice coming soon (if approved, which seems highly likely).

Quote:

A single-dose coronavirus vaccine developed by Janssen is 66% effective, the Belgian company has announced.

Crucially, no one needed hospital treatment or died from Covid after the jab took effect in the international trial.

Health secretary Matt Hancock said if the jab was approved by the UK's regulator it could "significantly bolster" the vaccine programme.

The UK has ordered 30 million doses of Johnson & Johnson's Janssen jab.

Sephiroth 29-01-2021 17:40

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quoted from the APA:

Quote:

18.4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Belgium.
So, the EU is not a sovereign body and we are right not to accord them Ambassadorial diplomatic status!

I noticed that the APA was made with the Swedish AZ entity. I wouldn't be surprised if some EU nastiness occurs here and the Swedish government's reaction will be interesting. Unlike the UK, they can't look after themselves even if they had a production site.


joglynne 29-01-2021 17:57

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

EU triggers Brexit clause after just 29 days as Commission panics over vaccine chaos
THE European Union has triggered a Brexit clause less than a month after the UK left the bloc as Brussels panics over the coronavirus vaccine chaos.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...aZeneca-supply

Damien 29-01-2021 18:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36068635)
[COLOR="Blue"]I would limit any retaliation to the AZ produced vaccine.
I would want the UK Guvmin to be "bigger" than the shit EU Commission and limit the retaliation to the one that gives us the best protection.

Nah. If they want to pull the nuclear option so do we.

If they block the Pfizer entirely and even the AZ produced ones as well then we block the stuff they need to make the Pfizer vaccine too. Make it clear we either cooperate for the benefit of all of us or we engage in a tit for tat fight over vaccines in which we're in a better position.

We can then strike individual deals with other European nations if they want.

Of course we only do this if the EU dare to actually stop the shipment of vaccines and until then we cool the temperature if we can. This might just be sabre rattling from the EU which we can largely ignore apart from making it clear we will take action if needed.

Pierre 29-01-2021 18:33

Re: Coronavirus
 
Breakng News Tony Soprano confirmed as new EU Commission President.

RichardCoulter 29-01-2021 18:59

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36068644)
The UK has yet another choice coming soon (if approved, which seems highly likely).

As there are now a few vaccines on the market, perhaps they should start to tailor the best one for the circumstances of each individual eg one/some might be better for older people.

jfman 29-01-2021 19:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36068653)
As there are now a few vaccines on the market, perhaps they should start to tailor the best one for the circumstances of each individual eg one/some might be better for older people.

Heaven forbid we do that Germany suggested it and it was vaccine nationalism.

Pierre 29-01-2021 19:05

Re: Coronavirus
 
Ah yes the EU, weren’t they the ones that didn’t want a hard border on the island of Ireland? The staunch defenders of the Good Friday Agreement?

http://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-e...eland-12202656

jfman 29-01-2021 19:14

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36068655)
Ah yes the EU, weren’t they the ones that didn’t want a hard border on the island of Ireland? The staunch defenders of the Good Friday Agreement?

http://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-e...eland-12202656

It's why the protocol is there, just nobody expected them to invoke it first. The UK partition of the island of Ireland represents the gaping hole in the Single Market in both directions.

Pierre 29-01-2021 19:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
It’s being discussed in the EU thread too, mods can decide best place for it.


If I was BoJo I would now absolutely and immediately send a million or so doses of the AZ vaccine by lorry across from N.I. To R.o.I for the express use of the Irish, and make sure the lorries were photographed crossing the border.

jfman 29-01-2021 19:19

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36068661)
It’s being discussed in the EU thread too, mods can decide best place for it.

If I was BoJo I would now absolutely and immediately send a million or so doses of the AZ vaccine by lorry across from N.I. To R.o.I for the express use of the Irish, and make sure the lorries were photographed crossing the border.

I'm sure we've got people who could use those vaccines first.

Sephiroth 29-01-2021 19:24

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36068662)
I'm sure we've got people who could use those vaccines first.

The EU needs a kicking and to put the Republic into a difficult position is a bonus.

jfman 29-01-2021 19:24

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36068664)
The EU needs a kicking and to put the Republic into a difficult position is a bonus.

Not to the point we should delay vaccinating 2% of our own population, they don't. It's not a difficult position for the Republic - vaccinate 12% of your population (two doses). No brainer. The folk in the North might feel a bit left out of such generosity.

Pierre 29-01-2021 19:35

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36068665)
Not to the point we should delay vaccinating 2% of our own population, they don't. It's not a difficult position for the Republic - vaccinate 12% of your population (two doses). No brainer. The folk in the North might feel a bit left out of such generosity.

It’s the equivalent of a political tap in, within the 6yd box in the cup final. An opportunity too good to miss.

jfman 29-01-2021 19:41

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36068669)
It’s the equivalent of a political tap in, within the 6yd box in the cup final. An opportunity too good to miss.

It's arguably good PR, and good for the Republic of Ireland.

But once the headlines die down it doesn't change very much on the ground. The EU have a contract dispute with Astrazenica until there is a risk to supply of EU vaccines to the UK (which isn't yet the case) we should leave them to it.

It may have been Damien but apologies if it wasn't but someone did raise the prospect of the UK supplying vaccines to the Republic at some point if EU supplies continued to be flagging. I think there's a reasonable justification for this in the interests of Northern Ireland and the Common Travel Area once our vaccine programme has been successful.

nomadking 29-01-2021 19:43

Re: Coronavirus
 
The EU are not even close to following article 16.1 of the NI Protocol.
Quote:

1. If the application of this Protocol leads to serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties that are liable to persist, or to diversion of trade, the Union or the United Kingdom may unilaterally take appropriate safeguard measures. Such safeguard measures shall be restricted with regard to their scope and duration to what is strictly necessary in order to remedy the situation. Priority shall be given to such measures as will least disturb the functioning of this Protocol.
Nothing has actually happened, so how can the EU that it has led to anything?:confused: These "serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties" have to be actually occurring right now and before, for them to be able to invoke this. They also have to give a month's notice.

Sephiroth 29-01-2021 20:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36068672)
It's arguably good PR, and good for the Republic of Ireland.

But once the headlines die down it doesn't change very much on the ground. The EU have a contract dispute with Astrazenica until there is a risk to supply of EU vaccines to the UK (which isn't yet the case) we should leave them to it.

It may have been Damien but apologies if it wasn't but someone did raise the prospect of the UK supplying vaccines to the Republic at some point if EU supplies continued to be flagging. I think there's a reasonable justification for this in the interests of Northern Ireland and the Common Travel Area once our vaccine programme has been successful.

Ah, but if the UK bars export of the AZ vaccine (save to those countries in humanitarian need) on some emergency grounds, then AZ can plead force majeure. We owe that much help to AZ, surely.

jfman 29-01-2021 20:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36068679)
Ah, but if the UK bars export of the AZ vaccine (save to those countries in humanitarian need) on some emergency grounds, then AZ can plead force majeure. We owe that much help to AZ, surely.

If we've a sound contract we owe them nothing but the financial settlement agreed for purchase of the product offered.

Our political capital shouldn't be wasted on their incompetence if, as I suspect, they've got themselves into two contracts they cannot fulfill.

Pierre 29-01-2021 20:08

Re: Coronavirus
 
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-ema-expensive

Great isn’t it! ?

I can hear Lord Percy of Percy behind me saying, we don’t like gloaters here..........

But I can’t help myself.

Another Brexit scare story expunged.

Chris 29-01-2021 20:15

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36068681)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-ema-expensive

Great isn’t it! ?

I can hear Lord Percy of Percy behind me saying, we don’t like gloaters here..........

But I can’t help myself.

Another Brexit scare story expunged.

Grauniad be like:

Quote:

This means (the UK) will no longer be part of the EU’s regulatory regime, which allows for “accelerated assessment” of products developed by drugs companies during a pandemic.
ACCELERATED :rofl:

jfman 29-01-2021 20:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36068681)
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-ema-expensive

Great isn’t it! ?

I can hear Lord Percy of Percy behind me saying, we don’t like gloaters here..........

But I can’t help myself.

Another Brexit scare story expunged.

US election threads have been closed for less out of date commentary but I think in fairness you should provide some context.

We pay more for the Pfizer vaccine than the EU and do have a slower delivery schedule. We are off label prescribing, for emergency use only, the AstraZeneca vaccine developed here, at a dosage that I'm still unsure of the efficacy level is 62%, 70% or 90% based on the data available. (And that was against the old variants.)

As someone desperately keen to get the economy going and the end of lockdown restrictions I'd not yet be counting those chickens.

Sephiroth 29-01-2021 20:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36068680)
If we've a sound contract we owe them nothing but the financial settlement agreed for purchase of the product offered.

Our political capital shouldn't be wasted on their incompetence if, as I suspect, they've got themselves into two contracts they cannot fulfill.

You're just being argumentative for the sake of it.

It's not about protecting AZ from the EU - that's a by-product of the retribution I'm proposing.

But retribution is necessary. We must not lie down with our legs in the air while the EU craps on us.

jfman 29-01-2021 20:37

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36068687)
You're just being argumentative for the sake of it.

It's not about protecting AZ from the EU - that's a by-product of the retribution I'm proposing.

But retribution is necessary. We must not lie down with our legs in the air while the EU craps on us.

I'm not being argumentative for the sake of it. I've always tried to frame it in my head without flags. While the UK obviously has an interest in the outcome - the race to vaccination is obviously the new Operation Moonshot - however contract law is contract law. And while few (none?) of us are experts in contract law it doesn't appear that the EU were told that UK supplies came first and theirs second. The UK contract is indicated to suggest to that effect, however that's irrelevant if as the EU are suggesting that AZ are in breach of contract with them.

It looks like AZ will have to breach a contract somewhere as the terms of neither contract can be fulfilled in the context of sub-optimal production performance.

Chris 29-01-2021 20:38

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36068686)
US election threads have been closed for less out of date commentary but I think in fairness you should provide some context.

We pay more for the Pfizer vaccine than the EU and do have a slower delivery schedule. We are off label prescribing, for emergency use only, the AstraZeneca vaccine developed here, at a dosage that I'm still unsure of the efficacy level is 62%, 70% or 90% based on the data available.

As someone desperately keen to get the economy going and the end of lockdown restrictions I'd not yet be counting those chickens.

My but you’ve been awfully quiet these past 2 days while the EU vaccine procurement programme has unravelled so spectacularly. And now here you are desperately trying to argue that black is white, day is night and that we are are somehow, contrary to the opinion of almost everyone, messing things up.

A couple of things that have been lost in the noise over the last day or two that are worth picking out here:

First, in the La Repubblica interview with Pascal Soirot, he was extremely supportive of the long-gap dose strategy presently being followed in the UK - for both the Pfizer and the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines. He believes that the data shows that the first dose of either vaccine eliminates serious disease in virtually 100% of cases. Let’s say that again: a near-100% elimination of serious disease. That is a prize worth having. He also states that with the AstraZeneca vaccine there is reason to believe the longer gap actually improves the rate at which it prevents any disease at all, though obviously there isn’t conclusive data for that yet.

Second, there is a suggestion the UK has paid more for vaccines. And so what if we have? We have a pretty significant problem with spread of the virus in this country, not all of which can be put down to government policy. If we can’t force people to stop infecting each other by social means, then the vaccine is our only major weapon. Every serious disease prevented is tens of thousands of £££s saved in intensive care costs. I bet, eventually, paying even double per vaccine dose that in the case of Oxford-AstraZeneca is maybe £3 per person, will be proven to have been a canny investment indeed.

Related to the second point, we are now seeing in the UK the establishment and improvement of some of the world’s leading life sciences capability, paid for by that up-front government investment and higher per-shot vaccine price, and as covid is not going away any time soon, that is a very good place for British science and industry to be.

The facts on the ground are that we are light years ahead of almost every country on earth with our vaccination programme, and particularly light years ahead of any European nation, because they all put their faith in a slow, bureaucratic process that was more interested in saving pennies than lives. There, but for the grace of Brexit, might have gone us.

Mick 29-01-2021 20:39

Re: Coronavirus
 
LOL - just seen this said:-

Quote:

There are Remainers on here who could walk in on the EU shagging their wife and they'd offer to fetch it a beer and light its cigarette.
:rofl:

jfman 29-01-2021 20:48

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36068689)
My but you’ve been awfully quiet these past 2 days while the EU vaccine procurement programme has unravelled so spectacularly. And now here you are desperately trying to argue that black is white, day is night and that we are are somehow, contrary to the opinion of almost everyone, messing things up.

Far from.

Quote:

A couple of things that have been lost in the noise over the last day or two that are worth picking out here:

First, in the La Repubblica interview with Pascal Soirot, he was extremely supportive of the long-gap dose strategy presently being followed in the UK - for both the Pfizer and the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines. He believes that the data shows that the first dose of either vaccine eliminates serious disease in virtually 100% of cases. Let’s say that again: a near-100% elimination of severe disease. That is a prize worth having. He also states that with the AstraZeneca vaccine there is reason to believe the longer gap actually improves the rate at which it prevents any disease at all, though obviously there isn’t conclusive data for that yet.
Pascal Soirot says this but does the peer-reviewed scientific data say it? If it does, fantastic. If it proves to be true, fantastic.

However, as I indicated previously a CEO batting for their product isn't new or necessarily representative of real world performance. Statements around evidence can often be selectively framed.

Quote:

Second, there is a suggestion the UK has paid more for vaccines. And so what if we have? We have a pretty significant problem with spread of the virus in this country, not all of which can be put down to government policy. If we can’t force people to stop infecting each other by social means, then the vaccine is our only major weapon. Every serious disease prevented is tens of thousands of £££s saved in intensive care costs. I bet, eventually, paying even double per vaccine dose that in the case of Oxford-AstraZeneca is maybe £3 per person, will be proven to have been a canny investment indeed.
I didn't say there was a problem with paying more I was simply framing the discussion around the article posted by Pierre. As Israel are trying to demonstrate paying a hefty price premium for the top product in the marketplace and getting it out there ASAP reaps should yield significant rewards.

As you rightly say the costs per vaccine, for any vaccine, are tiny compared to the ongoing economic costs in any case.

Quote:

Related to the second point, we are now at the centre of some of the world’s leading life sciences capability, paid for by that up-front government investment and higher per-shot vaccine, and as covid is not going away any time soon, that is a very good place for British science and industry to be.

The facts on the ground are that we are light years ahead of almost every country on earth with our vaccination programme, and particularly light years ahead of any European nation, because they all put their faith in a slow, bureaucratic process that was more interested in saving pennies than lives. There, but for the grace of Brexit, might have been us.
As I say the race to herd immunity is a marathon, not a sprint. There's a lot we don't know about vaccine effectiveness in known mutations, let alone those unknown or still to happen.

Mr K 29-01-2021 20:50

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068690)
LOL - just seen this said:-



:rofl:

All this nationalism crap again. Humanity is on one side, the virus on the other. Together we win, divided we lose.Our choice.

jfman 29-01-2021 20:52

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36068692)
All this nationalism crap again. Humanity is on one side, the virus on the other. Together we win, divided we lose.Our choice.

Ach it's just Mick stuck in 2016. One decision you made in 2016 makes every future opinion absolutely irrelevant. God save the queen. :confused:

Chris 29-01-2021 20:53

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36068692)
All this nationalism crap again. Humanity is on one side, the virus on the other. Together we win, divided we lose.Our choice.

I think the EU missed that email. Maybe phone them and ask them to check their spam folder.

Mick 29-01-2021 20:56

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36068692)
All this nationalism crap again. Humanity is on one side, the virus on the other. Together we win, divided we lose.Our choice.

Bark up the corrupted EU tree - not mine, I am glad I live in a country that can maximise vaccination rollout while the corrupted EU stamps it's feet because it doesn't like UK Success. :dozey:

Mr K 29-01-2021 21:06

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068696)
Bark up the corrupted EU tree - not mine, I am glad I live in a country that can maximise vaccination rollout while the corrupted EU stamps it's feet because it doesn't like UK Success. :dozey:

Success= the highest no of deaths in Europe, not really...

We really are in this together, as some pratt called Cameron said. Doesn't matter in which country you live.

Mick 29-01-2021 21:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
EU has managed to unite the DUP and Sinn Fein. Both parties now feel EU's initiation in implementing Article 16 of the Northern Ireland Protocol that has now seen after just 29 days since the end of the Brexit transition period, a hard border on the Island of Ireland, and it is a grave error that is dealing with people's lives.

---------- Post added at 21:07 ---------- Previous post was at 21:06 ----------

Anyone asked what U.S President Joe Biden has said on the EU's stance on potentially wrecking the Good Friday Agreement, asking for a friend... ???

pip08456 29-01-2021 21:09

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36068686)
US election threads have been closed for less out of date commentary but I think in fairness you should provide some context.

We pay more for the Pfizer vaccine than the EU and do have a slower delivery schedule. We are off label prescribing, for emergency use only, the AstraZeneca vaccine developed here, at a dosage that I'm still unsure of the efficacy level is 62%, 70% or 90% based on the data available. (And that was against the old variants.)

As someone desperately keen to get the economy going and the end of lockdown restrictions I'd not yet be counting those chickens.

Of course we have a slower delivery schedule.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1611954553

jfman 29-01-2021 21:16

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36068702)
Of course we have a slower delivery schedule.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...7&d=1611954553

I specifically said the Pfizer vaccine., not all vaccines. The fact we've invested in the AZ one and produce it here removes this from the equation, but that wasn't the point of the article - although the article (perhaps selectively) omitted this possibility.

pip08456 29-01-2021 21:22

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36068705)
I specifically said the Pfizer vaccine., not all vaccines. The fact we've invested in the AZ one and produce it here removes this from the equation, but that wasn't the point of the article - although the article (perhaps selectively) omitted this possibility.

We didn't start rolling out the AZ vaccine until Jan 4th and were already ahead of all but Denmark with the Pfitzer vaccine.

Try again.

Mick 29-01-2021 21:22

Re: Coronavirus
 
It's becoming very clear tonight - The European Commission blindsided the British AND Irish govts on Article 16. So much for their "Respect Dublin" approach.

Mr K 29-01-2021 21:30

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068709)
It's becoming very clear tonight - The European Commission blindsided the British AND Irish govts on Article 16. So much for their "Respect Dublin" approach.

The EU and the UK need to behave like grown ups. We've dragged them down to our level, which means we all lose.

pip08456 29-01-2021 21:37

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068709)
It's becoming very clear tonight - The European Commission blindsided the British AND Irish govts on Article 16. So much for their "Respect Dublin" approach.

You could be right.

Quote:

A Government source said the Taoiseach had not being given any advance warning of the EU decision to invoke the article in the protocol. The source said the article may have been inadvertently triggered by “someone who did not understand the political implications” of the decision.
https://www.independent.ie/news/taoi...-40028406.html

Chris 29-01-2021 21:43

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36068714)
The EU and the UK need to behave like grown ups. We've dragged them down to our level, which means we all lose.

The UK government has done absolutely nothing, except make the bare minimum responses to specific questions about UK vaccine supply that have arisen purely because the EU is desperately trying to deflect attention from the mess it’s made.

It’s a stretch, even for you, to identify British mischief behind the yields of Pfizer and AstraZeneca factories in Europe, the time it took the EU to sign any vaccine deals, who the EU signed deals with and how much it bought.

Mick 29-01-2021 22:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
BREAKING: EU back peddle reasoning behind action to invoke Article 16 of N. Ireland Protocol, an EU source says decision has been an oversight.

---------- Post added at 22:03 ---------- Previous post was at 22:02 ----------

A No10 spokesman said: ‘The Prime Minister spoke to EU Commission president Ursula Von Der Leyen this evening.’

‘He expressed his grave concerns about the potential impact which the steps the EU has taken today on vaccine exports could have.’

Damien 29-01-2021 22:05

Re: Coronavirus
 
Looks like Dublin hit the roof about it. Some others within the EU - especially Barnier - seem to have been angry as well.

Mick 29-01-2021 22:05

Re: Coronavirus
 
BREAKING: Article 16 has been WITHDRAWN by the EU. Statement shortly

nomadking 29-01-2021 22:21

Re: Coronavirus
 
Still should be borne in mind that the EU was all too prepared to take this illegal action.

Pierre 29-01-2021 22:35

Re: Coronavirus
 
http://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-e...urces-12202835

U-Turn if you want to....

nomadking 29-01-2021 22:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Link
Quote:

Third countries/Global dimension
What if a third country has an APA with a manufacturer in the EU?
The Commission is mindful of APAs contracted by third countries, and will endeavour to ensure that the expectations of these countries to obtain their deliveries will be met.
We call on companies with APAs to meet their obligations to deliver on their commitments.
And yet the EU is trying to block that for the UK.

jfman 29-01-2021 23:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36068726)
Looks like Dublin hit the roof about it. Some others within the EU - especially Barnier - seem to have been angry as well.

Now, now. The forum standard is to credit Britain for any such change.

Chris 29-01-2021 23:24

Re: Coronavirus
 
Give the EU some credit. For about 2 hours this evening the DUP and Sinn Feinn were in complete agreement on something.

1andrew1 30-01-2021 00:14

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36068603)
[/COLOR]Pro tip by the way, if you're trying to search the PDF, the only mention of the UK is on one of only three pages in the document that are photocopy images rather than searchable electronic text. If I was a cynical person I might even find that a bit suspicious.

If I can borrow a spare Cable Forum tin hat for a minute, I would suggest that the EU has been infiltrated by Ultra Brexiters who are doing an amazing job in distracting the British public from seeing the genuine difficulties that many in British business are facing in trading with the EU post Brexit.

The EU's actions are gold dust for EU detractors. You couldn't make this situation up for Yes Minister, it wouldn't leave the cutting room floor.

Mick 30-01-2021 00:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
Still sucking up to the EU, my god, you’re so pathetic Andrew.

1andrew1 30-01-2021 00:43

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068747)
Still sucking up to the EU, my god, you’re so pathetic Andrew.

You fail to see the humour in my post and to ignore my track record on this issue. I am not a disgrace.

Mick 30-01-2021 01:01

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36068749)
You fail to see the humour in my post and to ignore my track record on this issue. I am not a disgrace.

Oh I’m sorry. I must have forgot to laugh at an entity, the corrupted EU, who scorned us for wanting to put an hard border on the Island of Ireland, were the ones to do just that tonight and then realise their feckup when Dublin just had to remind them they’re still there. :rolleyes:

jfman 30-01-2021 01:20

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068751)
Oh I’m sorry. I must have forgot to laugh at an entity, the corrupted EU, who scorned us for wanting to put an hard border on the Island of Ireland, were the ones to do just that tonight and then realise their feckup when Dublin just had to remind them they’re still there. :rolleyes:

The British desperation for the EU to fail is my main reason for scepticism on the 62/70/90% effective AstraZeneca vaccine.

If you'd a product, even 30% effective, you'd punt it out the door quickly under emergency use authorisation and see what happened after. It's almost as if we are the big 65+ test the world is waiting on. If it doesn't work blame mutant strains.

Mick 30-01-2021 01:44

Re: Coronavirus
 
I can’t be desperate for something to fail when it is already a failing entity.

Paul 30-01-2021 02:06

Re: Coronavirus
 
The EU have made themselves look fools, even to their own members.

Quote:

Brussels was already under fire from a growing number of EU countries for having been slow to sign vaccine contracts with pharmaceutical companies.

This "mishap" over the Irish Protocol as Spain's Foreign Minister called it, hasn't exactly helped the Commission's reputation.
You can bet that 'mishap' is not the word used privately. ;)

Mr K 30-01-2021 07:31

Re: Coronavirus
 
Another pointless post removed.

Maggy 30-01-2021 09:09

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36068743)
Give the EU some credit. For about 2 hours this evening the DUP and Sinn Feinn were in complete agreement on something.

:D

Chris 30-01-2021 11:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Back in July, Boris Johnson turned down an invitation for Britain to join the EU's Covid vaccine scheme, taking the view that we'd be better off sourcing our own.

Cue the most almighty stink, with Opposition politicians falling over one another to score cheap points.

Catherine West, Labour's shadow minister for Europe, dubbed the decision 'dumb and dumber'. Her colleague, Bell Ribeiro-Addy, accused the Government of 'yet again putting ideology before saving lives'.

...

James Felton, a comedy writer for The Guardian and BBC, accused the evil PM of 'killing your own citizens to own the EU'.

Six months on and we can all see exactly how these fanciful predictions panned out.

For in reality, the Government's decision to forgo the EU's hapless procurement vaccine scheme was neither stupid, nor evil. Instead, it has proven to be little short of a triumph. Britain now leads not just Europe but almost the entire developed world in inoculating its citizens.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...i-EU-plot.html

A story that really needs re-telling, repeatedly.

nomadking 30-01-2021 12:07

Re: Coronavirus
 
The EU is guilty of judging the UK based on their own standards. The UK is far too honourable to want to hijack vaccine meant for the EU or anybody else.

Sephiroth 30-01-2021 16:59

Re: Coronavirus
 
It's always worth digging into what the European press are saying.
This one is excellent. It definitively shows the degree of dither on the EC's part. I hope all of Europe has read this.

https://www.bild.de/politik/ausland/...6986.bild.html

Quote:

A letter proves that the German Minister of Health, Jens Spahn (40, CDU) and his counterparts in France, Italy, and the Netherlands had to hand over the procurement of the life-saving vaccine to the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen (62). They had to humbly apologize for their efforts to obtain the vaccine. This letter is exclusively available to BILD.
:
:
The letter says: “Unfortunately, the parallel approach of the Alliance caused concerns. Therefore we believe that it is of utmost importance to have a common single and joint approach towards the various pharmaceutical companies (…) We also agree that speed is of the essence in this case. So we deem it very useful if the COM [Commission] takes the lead in this process. Of course, we are more than willing to continue our further support and expertise.”
The letter is date "June 2020"; no idea why there isn't a day given. I hate that - people often do that in documentation and Guvmin certainly does that.


Mad Max 30-01-2021 20:38

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36068777)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...i-EU-plot.html

A story that really needs re-telling, repeatedly.


This.........^ ^

1andrew1 30-01-2021 22:08

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068751)
Oh I’m sorry.

Apology accepted. ;)

Sephiroth 30-01-2021 22:25

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36068813)
Apology accepted. ;)

You wish!

I suppose we can be just a little kinder to Remainers than Mick might be (he didn't mince his words telling you what the EU is like - and they've proved him right).

The small kindness I can offer is that the Remainers on this thread never saw anything like this coming. Now that it has happened, perhaps you could have the grace to admit that there was a strong case for leaving the EU.

The UK will rebuild its economy. I will be interesting to see how the failed Commission will facilitate the EU's revival. A total pox on the EC.




Chris 31-01-2021 00:11

Re: Coronavirus
 
The BBC’s chief regime apologist for the EU, Katya Adler, has twisted the knife in the European Commission’s twitching body today, after trying, and failing, to get any of her usual friendly rent-une-quote contacts to say anything remotely nice about it. That’s how bad this was.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-55872763

nomadking 31-01-2021 02:46

Re: Coronavirus
 
For all the arguing over the end of the peace process, if a hard border had been put in place, I wonder which side(UK or Irish) the IRA would've attacked, if the EU regulation had actually been carried out.

1andrew1 31-01-2021 08:33

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36068818)
You wish!

My joke was that the EU's behaviour was so bad that a tin foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist might suggest that it had been infiltrated by Brexiters determined to bring it down as the EU couldn't have played it any worse.

Anyway, moving on, there's a good article in Sky News today about the government's procurement of vaccinations. Worth reading in full but one snippet here on how and why Matt Hancock over-ruled his officials on the Oxford vaccine. Spoiler: Matt Hancock seems to have called it right!
Quote:

During March and April 2020, the University of Oxford negotiated a deal which would allow Merck to manufacture and distribute the vaccine it was in the process of developing.

The arrangement made sense. Unlike British-Swedish AstraZeneca, Merck had experience in making vaccines. Its senior executives had links to Oxford scientist and government adviser Sir John Bell.

Yet when the contract reached Matt Hancock's desk, the former adviser said, the health secretary refused to approve it, because it didn't include provisions specifically committing to supply the UK first.

The fear was export controls - not from the EU, but from the US. Mr Hancock was worried that president Trump would stop vaccines from Merck leaving the country.

With the university and Merck "as close to signing on the dotted line as they could be", he stopped it going ahead, because he didn't want to risk the intellectual property rights for the Oxford vaccine ending up in the hands of a single American company.

"He was just meant to confirm he was happy, and then it would have happened immediately," said the former adviser. "But he wasn't, and overruled officials to block the deal."

Reports have suggested that the Oxford scientists were unsure whether the deal with Merck had strong enough provisions for supplying poorer countries with vaccines. Mr Hancock's objection was more local and political. He wanted to make sure there was enough for UK citizens. The rest of the world could come later.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...upply-12204044

papa smurf 31-01-2021 08:48

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36068828)
My joke was that the EU's behaviour was so bad that a tin foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist might suggest that it had been infiltrated by Brexiters determined to bring it down as the EU couldn't have played it any worse.

Anyway, moving on, there's a good article in Sky News today about the government's procurement of vaccinations. Worth reading in full but one snippet here on how and why Nick Hancock over-ruled his officials on the Oxford vaccine. Spoiler: Nick Hancock seems to have called it right!

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...upply-12204044

who's nick Hancock

1andrew1 31-01-2021 09:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36068830)
who's nick Hancock

:D They Think it's all over. Thanks, duly corrected.

papa smurf 31-01-2021 09:20

Re: Coronavirus
 
Andrew Marr reporting that Boris rang von der lying and told her she was endangering the lives of millions of British pensioners who need a second dose of vaccine, that seems to have opened her eyes to what she was doing.

Mick 31-01-2021 11:17

Re: Coronavirus
 
This will put the cat amongst the pigeons. What the EU did with the vaccine rollout and triggering Article 16, was a move no different to something out of a Nazi German hand book.

papa smurf 31-01-2021 11:32

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068839)
This will put the cat amongst the pigeons. What the EU did with the vaccine rollout and triggering Article 16, was a move no different to something out of a Nazi German hand book.

Imagine what von der loony would have done with an Eu army at her disposal.

Sephiroth 31-01-2021 11:58

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068839)
This will put the cat amongst the pigeons. What the EU did with the vaccine rollout and triggering Article 16, was a move no different to something out of a Nazi German hand book.

... or a Trump handbook.

Mick 31-01-2021 12:35

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36068841)
... or a Trump handbook.

No argument from me. Lots of commentary about EU’s move being very Trumpian.

Mick 31-01-2021 17:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
BREAKING: Captain Sir Tom Moore in hospital with Coronavirus. :(

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...virus-12204729

Chris 31-01-2021 17:42

Re: Coronavirus
 
Not yet vaccinated, because he has been undergoing treatment for pneumonia :(

Mad Max 31-01-2021 19:11

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068874)
BREAKING: Captain Sir Tom Moore in hospital with Coronavirus. :(

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...virus-12204729


That's not good, I hope the old fella can fight it off.

Sirius 31-01-2021 19:21

Re: Coronavirus
 
Get well soon Sir Tom

Mr K 31-01-2021 21:06

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068839)
This will put the cat amongst the pigeons. What the EU did with the vaccine rollout and triggering Article 16, was a move no different to something out of a Nazi German hand book.

'Godwin's Law' proved right again? ;)

Mick 31-01-2021 21:19

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36068902)
'Godwin's Law' proved right again? ;)

Not necessarily.

Godwin's law itself can be applied mistakenly, a fallacy by miscasting an opponent's argument as hyperbole when the comparisons made by my argument are actually appropriate, which in this case - against the EU, they are. Godwin's law also precludes that a thread or topic is coming to an abrupt end, this one most certainly isn't. So your claim is false.

Paul 31-01-2021 22:10

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36068878)
Not yet vaccinated, because he has been undergoing treatment for pneumonia :(

So you cant be vaccinated if your being treated for pneumonia ?

Mick 31-01-2021 22:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36068911)
So you cant be vaccinated if your being treated for pneumonia ?

For Pneumonia, Sir Tom will be on strong Antibiotics. So taking both the vaccine and certain Antibiotics, may clash and the patient may be at more harm. It’s classed in the medical world as Contraindications.

nomadking 01-02-2021 00:27

Re: Coronavirus
 
Vaccines are effectively fake infections. If the immune system is being currently stressed by a real infection, you can't stress it even more with a vaccine.

RichardCoulter 01-02-2021 19:38

Re: Coronavirus
 
Someone predicted earlier that fake vaccine documents would be created if people can't fly etc without proof of having had the vaccine.

According to this evening's BBC news, these are now available online.

Paul 01-02-2021 20:37

Re: Coronavirus
 
Pity we dont live on the Isle of Man, they have scrapped all lockdown and distancing today.

Pierre 01-02-2021 23:10

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36069031)
Pity we dont live on the Isle of Man, they have scrapped all lockdown and distancing today.

We wouldn’t all fit.

Paul 01-02-2021 23:23

Re: Coronavirus
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36069039)
We wouldn’t all fit.

:D

The cases graph is looking better;

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...chmentid=28892

Pierre 01-02-2021 23:56

Re: Coronavirus
 
I’m an eternal optimist.

We’ll be done by June, and Covid, and all it’s variants, will be wrapped up into the annual flu jab and that’ll be it.

I know over 100,000 people have died, and that is terrible

But the reality is that is 99.2%of people, in the U.K., survive this, and that with vaccines and natural immunity, this will become just part of the annual flu vaccine.

Angua 02-02-2021 07:16

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36068915)
For Pneumonia, Sir Tom will be on strong Antibiotics. So taking both the vaccine and certain Antibiotics, may clash and the patient may be at more harm. It’s classed in the medical world as Contraindications.

What strikes me as odd, is that Sir Tom would appear not to have had the pneumonia vaccine. A friend had theirs not long after getting their flu jab.

Pierre 02-02-2021 08:45

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36069052)
What strikes me as odd, is that Sir Tom would appear not to have had the pneumonia vaccine. A friend had theirs not long after getting their flu jab.

depends what has caused the pneumonia, if it has been caused by a bacterial infection as opposed to viral infection then a vaccine wouldn't help.

Chris 02-02-2021 08:51

Re: Coronavirus
 
A scathing summary of last week’s Euro-shenanigans, from the BBC of all places.


Sephiroth 02-02-2021 09:02

Re: Coronavirus
 
Priceless, Chris.

jonbxx 02-02-2021 09:03

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36069052)
What strikes me as odd, is that Sir Tom would appear not to have had the pneumonia vaccine. A friend had theirs not long after getting their flu jab.

Pneumonia is a disease symptom rather than a disease in itself. Most cases of pneumonia are bacterial and half of those cases are caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. It's that bacterium that the vaccine is for but even then, it's only 41% effective so you're kind of riding the odds here.

There's lots of other causes of pneumonia including virus, fungi, combinations of infectious agents and non-infectious causes. Check photos of Tom Moore, he either is or was a smoker by the look of his teeth.

1andrew1 02-02-2021 10:20

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Scientists warned only mandatory hotel quarantine for all travellers to the UK would come close to fully preventing the import of new COVID variants, it has emerged.

The government last week announced plans for UK nationals and residents returning from "red list" countries to be placed in quarantine in government-provided accommodation - such as hotels - for 10 days.

However, this action will stop short of a full closure of the UK's border, or mandatory hotel quarantine for all arrivals, as some had called for.

It has now been revealed that on 21 January, almost a week before the government announced their plans, the government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) warned that "reactive, geographically targeted" travel bans "cannot be relied upon to stop importation of new variants".
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...rning-12206114

spiderplant 02-02-2021 10:36

Re: Coronavirus
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36069039)
We wouldn’t all fit.

They'd certainly have to build a bigger jail
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-eur...f-man-55758764
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-eur...f-man-54360825

tweetiepooh 02-02-2021 10:41

Re: Coronavirus
 
It's a bit harder for us to quarantine everyone else close borders as New Zealand did (does) because we have so much freight arriving by road/ferry.
Do we have some scheme of driver handover or just bring over the trailer and hook up to UK unit this side? (Would have advantage of no left hand units here but really hard to implement.)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum