Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   UK & EU Agree Post-Brexit Trade Deal (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708171)

Sephiroth 22-07-2020 10:14

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044296)
Not looking good for a July deal according to today's news. But the UK government's approach to date has been to climb down at the last minute (Anyone remember the no borders in the Irish sea?) so I think the news we're reading now based on an anonymous Government briefing to the Telegraph are just a bit of summer spin.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/brexi...rtan-ntp-feeds

The key words in the news report are:

Quote:

Negotiations remained deadlocked this week on fishing rights, the deal’s governance, the role of the European Court of Justice and so-called level playing field guarantees, the report said.
Fishing Rights: They want our cake to eat.

Governance: They want to ECJ to have the say over our courts;

Level Playing Field: They want to tie our hands behind our back.

Of course we should walk away and a total pox on them.


pip08456 22-07-2020 11:04

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044297)
The key words in the news report are:



Fishing Rights: They want our cake to eat.

Governance: They want to ECJ to have the say over our courts;

Level Playing Field: They want to tie our hands behind our back.

Of course we should walk away and a total pox on them.


Looks very fishy to Andrew. (pun intended).

Carth 22-07-2020 11:16

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
If the net is big enough, and you cast it far enough, you'll catch all sorts of odd things :D

tweetiepooh 22-07-2020 11:44

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
The Caribbean hate EU fishing boats. These factory vessels stay in international water and hoover up fish leaving far little for the inshore fishermen on the islands. All perfectly legal.

1andrew1 23-07-2020 00:11

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Another good reason to extend our existing deal with the EU.
Quote:

UK abandons hope of trade deal with US by the end of year
The government has reportedly abandoned hopes of reaching a trade deal with the US by the end of the year, with officials blaming the pandemic for the lack of progress.

The Prime Minister and international trade secretary Liz Truss wanted to agree a deal before November’s American presidential election.

But the Financial Times reports that senior government figures have concluded a deal will not be possible before November as the two sides grapple with issues like allowing US agricultural products into the UK.

“Is it going to happen this year? Basically, no,” one official told the FT.

US trade representative Robert Lighthizer has also played down the idea of any conclusive agreement before November. “That would be a very, very, very quick time. I think it’s unlikely that that happens,” he said at a recent congressional committee.

It is almost impossible unless the members [of Congress] decided they want to do something extraordinary.”

Last September UK officials told the Sun that a deal would be done by July 2020, and even in January remained confident a deal would be wrapped up by the middle of summer.
https://www.cityam.com/uk-abandons-h...e-end-of-year/

ianch99 23-07-2020 10:07

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
This is not unsurprising but worrying for UK sellers on Amazon:

Amazon FBA Brexit Bombshell – EFN and Pan-European FBA ends for UK

Quote:

The Amazon FBA Brexit bombshell has dropped which will significantly impact your Amazon business from the 1st of January 2021. Amazon’s UK FBA operations will be split from the EU with no more EFN (European Fufilment Network) and an end to Pan-European FBA inventory transfers between the UK and EU.
At the end of the transition period, the Amazon marketplace will effectively no longer allow you to continue stocking in the UK and selling into Europe (or vice versa) as you can today.

Some comments from those affected:

Quote:

This was to be expected and is just a logical consequence of Brexit. The people voted for it, now the people can have at it. Smaller companies that rely on exports to the EU (no matter what channel), will be damaged by this. This has been made clear for years. Importing and exporting post Brexit won’t be easy and straight forward as advertised by the “winners”.

I stopped arguing against Brexit after the general election. They won, so they can own it now. My company will suffer as well (we rely on imports, so face huge costs and delays due to customs), but we will be able to cope. In worst case we will need to downsize our workforce and increase pricing.

Customs declarations are a massive PITA and quite complex (and expensive – it’s not as simple as just supplying a few custom codes and country of origin information). So I am not surprised that Amazon has no interest in sorting this for a random British seller who wants to sell a few units to Europe.

Quote:

Not a bombshell, just a logical and legal decision arising from Brexit. AMAZON and all others suppliers will have to take the same decision: creating a restricted market from a large common one.

Brexit means severance from the EU free market, regaining UK’s sovereignty and installing new commerce conditions which will be inferior as UK won’t part of the EU and its customs zone.

The only bombshell: taking four years to discover that.

See the bright side, AMAZON may create a new zone uniting UK, Australia and NZ. It those two countries don’t see that as an infringement of their sovereignty.

Carth 23-07-2020 10:07

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
well that must surely be good news to those harping on about chlorinated chicken :D

ianch99 23-07-2020 10:15

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Another piece of bad news for business:


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EdWYMe0W...jpg&name=small


Some wag on Twitter has worked out why the truck park in Ashford, Kent was so small: No deal = No logistics companies.

denphone 23-07-2020 10:24

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044403)
well that must surely be good news to those harping on about chlorinated chicken :D

l am off to buy one of those oven ready ones.:D

1andrew1 23-07-2020 10:29

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36044406)
Another piece of bad news for business:

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Some wag on Twitter has worked out why the truck park in Ashford, Kent was so small: No deal = No logistics companies.

Hopefully the article in the Telegraph will encourage Boris start to listen to British business but I'm doubtful. he's undone more of Margaret Thatcher's legacy in one year than Labour have in 20 years.

Carth 23-07-2020 10:34

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36044406)
Another piece of bad news for business:


Some wag on Twitter has worked out why the truck park in Ashford, Kent was so small: No deal = No logistics companies.

Probably good news to be honest. Best way to run a transport business is to have goods available for the 'return' journey. Let the foreign companies do it all, they can bring their stuff in then arrange stuff to go out ;)

Our own firms can then concentrate their drivers & vehicles on the booming 'internet shopping' fad :D

ianch99 23-07-2020 11:12

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Another piece of news that slipped under the radar (;)) in March was this:

Industry Troubled as UK Government Confirms EASA Departure

Quote:

The UK will leave the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on December 31, when the transition period ends for the country’s departure from the European Union (EU). The UK Department for Transport (DfT) confirmed the plans over the weekend in a short statement after transport secretary Grant Shapps unexpectedly shared the news with U.S. publication Aviation Week in a March 6 interview.

The abrupt change in policy dashes the hopes of the UK’s aviation industry, which has collectively expressed a strong preference for staying within the EASA's jurisdiction. Industry groups had hoped that the UK would follow the example of Switzerland, which, despite not being an EU member state, is a part of EASA. The decision raises serious questions about the willingness of leading aerospace manufacturers to keep production in the UK due to potentially burdensome requirements to get separate UK type certification and approvals.

Hugh 23-07-2020 12:21

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044410)
Probably good news to be honest. Best way to run a transport business is to have goods available for the 'return' journey. Let the foreign companies do it all, they can bring their stuff in then arrange stuff to go out ;)

Our own firms can then concentrate their drivers & vehicles on the booming 'internet shopping' fad :D

Well, before the COVID-19 hit us, that "fad" was accounting for nearly 20% of retail sales (it's now nearly a third of all retail sales in the UK).

papa smurf 23-07-2020 12:38

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Brexit: UK must 'face possibility' of no deal on future relationship with EU by end of transition

https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk...ition-12034669


OOH by gum n heck :shocked:


Brexit LIVE: Boris Johnson refuses negotiation on fishing – EU to decide if talks continue

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...no-deal-brexit

Pierre 23-07-2020 13:19

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36044421)
Brexit: UK must 'face possibility' of no deal on future relationship with EU by end of transition

https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk...ition-12034669


OOH by gum n heck :shocked:


Brexit LIVE: Boris Johnson refuses negotiation on fishing – EU to decide if talks continue

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...no-deal-brexit

I think they could probably sort the fishing issue out. It's the "level playing field" that's the real issue. A problem that is the EU's making not ours. The unreasonable request that we must meet all of the EU's benchmarks so that we cannot produce things or provide services more efficiently than them and undercut them.

Which is one of the reasons we left. So if we reach no agreement on that, it's no deal - in regards to trade.

I'm sure there will be lots of other side deals around other things.

Carth 23-07-2020 16:37

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36044418)
Well, before the COVID-19 hit us, that "fad" was accounting for nearly 20% of retail sales (it's now nearly a third of all retail sales in the UK).


exactly . . . more delivery drivers required :p:

1andrew1 23-07-2020 19:28

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36044425)
I think they could probably sort the fishing issue out. It's the "level playing field" that's the real issue. A problem that is the EU's making not ours. The unreasonable request that we must meet all of the EU's benchmarks so that we cannot produce things or provide services more efficiently than them and undercut them.

Which is one of the reasons we left. So if we reach no agreement on that, it's no deal - in regards to trade.

I'm sure there will be lots of other side deals around other things.

Trouble is side deals are far, far harder if there is no trade deal in the first place.

The fishing deal should be relatively unimportant to each side (I believe Harrods employs more people and adds more to UK GDP) but the UK does seem keen to want to end the current arrangements.

Carth 23-07-2020 19:42

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044454)
Trouble is side deals are far, far harder if there is no trade deal in the first place.

The fishing deal should be relatively unimportant to each side (I believe Harrods employs more people and adds more to UK GDP) but the UK does seem keen to want to end the current arrangements.

Do you not understand why "Harrods employs more people and adds more to UK GDP" ?

How about we get rid of 99% of civil servants, then we can say the local Tesco employs more people than them :D :D

ianch99 23-07-2020 20:03

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
More Tory hypocrisy. No surprise that Redwood is front & centre ..

https://twitter.com/StevePeers/statu...49623444525063

Quote:

And there it is. Having whined (misleadingly) that Parliament did not get a vote on free trade agreements negotiated by the EU, John Redwood just voted against Parliament getting a vote on FTAs negotiated by the *UK government*:
https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Co...mber=True#noes
Contemptible hypocrisy.

nomadking 23-07-2020 20:04

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
But the main reason Harrods employs more people than the fishing industry is that the other fishing employees are in the EU.

The aim isn't to completely shut out EU fishing boats, but to have UK control over who is or isn't allowed to fish in our waters. The UK fishing industry isn't big enough to pick up the slack, if EU boats were completely banned.

If the EU imposed tariffs on fish caught by UK boats and sold in the EU, wouldn't the UK have to impose some sort of tariffs on EU boats catching fish in UK waters, but selling them in the EU? Otherwise the EU boats would have an unfair advantage, as they would be tariff free.

Sephiroth 23-07-2020 20:21

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044454)
Trouble is side deals are far, far harder if there is no trade deal in the first place.

The fishing deal should be relatively unimportant to each side (I believe Harrods employs more people and adds more to UK GDP) but the UK does seem keen to want to end the current arrangements.

.... and the reason for this is quite simple. Why should the EU dip into our back pockets, so to speak? Surely we have the the over-riding say over who fishes in our waters? It's called sovereignty.

They say the price for a trade deal is that the fishing status quo is maintained; after all, Barnier has said, if the UK regains control of its waters, the livelihoods of the EU's fishing community will be destroyed.

1andrew1 23-07-2020 22:06

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36044456)
More Tory hypocrisy. No surprise that Redwood is front & centre ..

https://twitter.com/StevePeers/statu...49623444525063

That's appalling hypocrisy. At times he posses the rare trait of making Cummings look a credible witness.

---------- Post added at 22:06 ---------- Previous post was at 21:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044459)
.... and the reason for this is quite simple. Why should the EU dip into our back pockets, so to speak? Surely we have the the over-riding say over who fishes in our waters? It's called sovereignty.

They say the price for a trade deal is that the fishing status quo is maintained; after all, Barnier has said, if the UK regains control of its waters, the livelihoods of the EU's fishing community will be destroyed.

Like Pierre, I think fishing is less of an issue than a level playing field and involvement of the European courts in disputes. But I suspect the latter two can be spun in the same manner that a border in the Irish sea was. Deny it and then by the time the facts are known, people have lost interest.

I don't think we'll be going from "easiest deal ever" to "no deal" at the end of the year. I think BoJo will do a lot of huffing and puffing and then quietly roll over in the Autumn and acquiesce. Once again. Not the first politician to adopt this approach in the face of a stronger power and doubtless not the last. When was the last time we heard "They need us more than we need them?". Quite.

We saw BoJo hot foot it up to Scotland. No deal would give the SNP and devolution more support. BoJo doesn't want to go down in history as the PM who presided over the dissolution of the UK. Although I think that's unlikely given our Churchillian level of indebtedness at the moment. In reality, Northern Ireland is a more likely candidate to break away but not under the term of BoJo's Government.

Sephiroth 23-07-2020 22:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044464)
That's appalling hypocrisy. At times he posses the rare trait of making Cummings look a credible witness.

---------- Post added at 22:06 ---------- Previous post was at 21:51 ----------


Like Pierre, I think fishing is less of an issue than a level playing field and involvement of the European courts in disputes. But I suspect the latter two can be spun in the same manner that a border in the Irish sea was. Deny it and then by the time the facts are known, people have lost interest.

I don't think we'll be going from "easiest deal ever" to "no deal" at the end of the year. I think BoJo will do a lot of huffing and puffing and then quietly roll over in the Autumn and acquiesce. Once again. Not the first politician to adopt this approach in the face of a stronger power and doubtless not the last. When was the last time we heard "They need us more than we need them?". Quite.

We saw BoJo hot foot it up to Scotland. No deal would give the SNP and devolution more support. BoJo doesn't want to go down in history as the PM who presided over the dissolution of the UK. Although I think that's unlikely given our Churchillian level of indebtedness at the moment. In reality, Northern Ireland is a more likely candidate to break away but not under the term of BoJo's Government.

We may disagree on some fundamentals on Brexit negotiations, but you're letting yourself down on your assessment on nationalism. For a start, the Scots need to gain a referendum from the Guvmin; why should that be granted? As to NI, can you back up your assertion?

1andrew1 23-07-2020 23:30

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044467)
We may disagree on some fundamentals on Brexit negotiations, but you're letting yourself down on your assessment on nationalism. For a start, the Scots need to gain a referendum from the Guvmin; why should that be granted? As to NI, can you back up your assertion?

Scotland - I don't think it can happen for the reason I stated but there is a big increase in support for independence - now up to 54%. My key point is this will pressure BoJo to get an EU deal. A disastrous no-deal could well see some form of referendum. It also serves the purpose of being a dead cat. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/s...tice-82mqs6zm9

NI - won't happen under BoJo's government but I think the Irish sea border will gradually pull NI away from GB until it makes more sense to join with Eire.

Sephiroth 23-07-2020 23:56

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044469)
Scotland - I don't think it can happen for the reason I stated but there is a big increase in support for independence - now up to 54%. My key point is this will pressure BoJo to get an EU deal. A disastrous no-deal could well see some form of referendum. It also serves the purpose of being a dead cat. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/s...tice-82mqs6zm9

NI - won't happen under BoJo's government but I think the Irish sea border will gradually pull NI away from GB until it makes more sense to join with Eire.

I've done your research for you!

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/poli...orth-1.3891032

Hugh 24-07-2020 09:44

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044470)

What can I say?

We Irish Catholics like sharing our love, whilst the NI Protestants love themselves... :D

1andrew1 24-07-2020 09:54

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044470)

I think religion is far less important an issue in today's island of Ireland than it once was. It's more about getting on and opportunities. In a small country, it's another factor why freedom of movement is more important than in a larger one.

Sephiroth 24-07-2020 11:46

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044497)
I think religion is far less important an issue in today's island of Ireland than it once was. It's more about getting on and opportunities. In a small country, it's another factor why freedom of movement is more important than in a larger one.

I spend a lot of time in NI and sense what's going on.

It's obvious to me that once those of Catholic background gain numerical superiority then ultimately a Border Poll will be called and the steps to unification of the two Irelands will be made. But yes, the factors you mention will obviously be taken into account and that is why there may be fraying of the Protestant edges.

Scotland, on the other hand, is not similarly aligned along specific backgrounds. Frankly to hell with them if they back Sturgeon's view of Scotland. I would expect that the then UK Guvmin will be strict and do no more than what is legally necessary.




1andrew1 24-07-2020 12:43

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044508)
I
Scotland, on the other hand, is not similarly aligned along specific backgrounds. Frankly to hell with them if they back Sturgeon's view of Scotland. I would expect that the then UK Guvmin will be strict and do no more than what is legally necessary.

Agreed. My underlying point is that the growth of Scottish nationalism is yet another reason to drive Boris to a deal with the EU. he wouldn't want to go down in history as being the cause of Scotland leaving the UK and a no-deal Brexit on top of Scotland's perceived stronger approach to Covid-19 could see a referendum in the future, albeit more likely than not outside the term of the current government.

Sephiroth 24-07-2020 13:31

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044509)
Agreed. My underlying point is that the growth of Scottish nationalism is yet another reason to drive Boris to a deal with the EU. he wouldn't want to go down in history as being the cause of Scotland leaving the UK and a no-deal Brexit on top of Scotland's perceived stronger approach to Covid-19 could see a referendum in the future, albeit more likely than not outside the term of the current government.

An interesting point that prolly underlines the difference between us. Which is more important? The Union or standing up to the EU? This is the classic rock/hard place situation. There is no point in acceding to the EU's red line that the ECJ should have a decisive role in our affairs. Fishing - a matter of allocation (reviewed annually with UK deciding); Level playing field - as long as that isn't policed by the ECJ, there's negotiating room.

Also, I don't see Scottish nationalism as particularly aligned to the EU situation. It's prolly more aligned to the same sort of prejudices as between Spurs/Arsenal.

1andrew1 24-07-2020 14:38

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044516)
An interesting point that prolly underlines the difference between us. Which is more important? The Union or standing up to the EU? This is the classic rock/hard place situation. There is no point in acceding to the EU's red line that the ECJ should have a decisive role in our affairs. Fishing - a matter of allocation (reviewed annually with UK deciding); Level playing field - as long as that isn't policed by the ECJ, there's negotiating room.

Also, I don't see Scottish nationalism as particularly aligned to the EU situation. It's prolly more aligned to the same sort of prejudices as between Spurs/Arsenal.

This is all about why we pay politicians to make difficult decisions for us.

A bad deal with the EU - one with bags of friction that erodes our competitiveness - will go down badly in Scotland. The country is already in favour of devolution thanks to its handling of Covid-19 and a bad UK deal with the EU will only increase this. Given the limited time we have, Boris has again backed himself into a negotiating corner and will do as he did with Ireland - concede, deny, move on.

How will Brexit impact your trade with NI?

OLD BOY 24-07-2020 19:11

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044454)
Trouble is side deals are far, far harder if there is no trade deal in the first place.

The fishing deal should be relatively unimportant to each side (I believe Harrods employs more people and adds more to UK GDP) but the UK does seem keen to want to end the current arrangements.

Tell that to our fishermen. :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 19:11 ---------- Previous post was at 19:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044391)
Another good reason to extend our existing deal with the EU.

https://www.cityam.com/uk-abandons-h...e-end-of-year/

Not. Going. To. Happen.

pip08456 25-07-2020 00:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044526)
This is all about why we pay politicians to make difficult decisions for us.

A bad deal with the EU - one with bags of friction that erodes our competitiveness - will go down badly in Scotland. The country is already in favour of devolution thanks to its handling of Covid-19 and a bad UK deal with the EU will only increase this. Given the limited time we have, Boris has again backed himself into a negotiating corner and will do as he did with Ireland - concede, deny, move on.

How will Brexit impact your trade with NI?

OK I grant that will not go down well with those who want independence. What do they expect when/if they get it? Do they expect the EU to welcome them with open arms? If they do they'll be sorely disappointed. Scotland would have to apply like any other european country, it would take years. They'd also have to get a bank to guarantee their currency as well as many other hurdles.

1andrew1 25-07-2020 10:34

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36044610)
OK I grant that will not go down well with those who want independence.

It will go down badly with those who don't currently want independence too and might well sway them towards voting for independence.

Carth 25-07-2020 11:48

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
I think a few will consider "what do we have to offer the EU . . . fish?" :D

1andrew1 25-07-2020 16:12

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044637)
I think a few will consider "what do we have to offer the EU . . . fish?" :D

But surely they need us more than we need them? We just need to remind them of this again, only slower and louder. :D

Sephiroth 25-07-2020 17:27

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044660)
But surely they need us more than we need them? We just need to remind them of this again, only slower and louder. :D

We don't need them at all. We don't need:

1. Their bullying;
2. Their unreasonable trade deal demands;
3. Their poxy ECJ;
4. Their poxy plans to federalise;
5. To be part of their squabbling fractious member countries;
6. To become subordinate to the European Parliament;
7. Etc.


Carth 25-07-2020 18:03

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044660)
But surely they need us more than we need them? We just need to remind them of this again, only slower and louder. :D

I was talking about Scotland, not sure what else (if anything) they've got to smooth a possible introduction into the EU gang . . . . Irn-Bru? ;) :D

1andrew1 25-07-2020 18:22

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044668)
I was talking about Scotland, not sure what else (if anything) they've got to smooth a possible introduction into the EU gang . . . . Irn-Bru? ;) :D

Keep the haggis hidden and a fine malt to hand and the world's your lobster. :D

Sephiroth 25-07-2020 19:30

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044674)
Keep the haggis hidden and a fine malt to hand and the world's your lobster. :D

I think I would wish the Scotish Nats on the poxy EU. Let them suffer doses of Ian Blackford.

On a more serious note,what divides us is your priority for the economy and mine for sovereignty combined with the belief that the UK can forge its wn path. Whenever the break, the challenge is the same so an extension serves no ultimate purpose.

If the EU can just agree to the Canada type deal, we can all get on with it. The fact they're not agreeing is the proof of their "I'm bigger than you" bullying method. Or to put it in Barnier's words "The UK must be realistic".

jfman 25-07-2020 19:58

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044668)
I was talking about Scotland, not sure what else (if anything) they've got to smooth a possible introduction into the EU gang . . . . Irn-Bru? ;) :D

The old Irn Bru maybe. The post sugar tax one though... just isn't the same.

1andrew1 26-07-2020 10:50

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044678)

On a more serious note,what divides us is your priority for the economy and mine for sovereignty combined with the belief that the UK can forge its wn path. Whenever the break, the challenge is the same so an extension serves no ultimate purpose. Memebership of NATO, United Nations, WTO etc all impege on UK sovereignty.

If the EU can just agree to the Canada type deal, we can all get on with it. The fact they're not agreeing is the proof of their "I'm bigger than you" bullying method. Or to put it in Barnier's words "The UK must be realistic".

When the UK has exerted the most power politically, it has been as part of a coalition or alliance. In these alliances, compromises are made but the end justifies the means and overall, greater power is gained. Membership of the UN, NATO etc all reduce the UK's sovereignty but the end is seen to justify the means.

If a country like the UK is going to have any power economically then against a backdrop of China and the USA, it needs to be part of a larger trading bloc. No country apart from North Korea trades on WTO trade terms and so is not an option. Accepting a level playing field is not an onerous condition to me as we do not have high state intervention in industry and we have a high minimum wage. Canada is thousands of miles away so of course is not such a competitive threat as the UK is. Distance does matter in trade, as has oft been noted on this thread.

This is a small price to pay for the long-term drop in the wealth of the country no deal or a bad deal brings - wealth that could be put to good use - our nursing homes are crying out for more money, local councils' services in many parts of the country have been severely cut back since the Global Financial Crisis, a big question mark hangs over UK high streets and we are entering a big economic downturn that should not be worsened.

The EU replaced the Commonwealth as the UK's main trading partner and like the Commonwealth, the larger market helped create wealth. The difference with the EU was that it was a more competitive market. The UK could no longer force compliant nations to take ships full of Austin Allegros with square steering wheels made by people on strike every month. It had to raise its game and productivity and finally compete with its peers. It has stepped up to this challenge and many British services, products and companies are now once again world class.

There is no pipeline of deals that will replace the EU and the deals it has brought us. If such deals existed, the EU would have signed them already. And the basic rule of trade is that most trade is done with your neighbouring countries.

It's unrealistic to blame a larger organisation for having more negotiating clout than a smaller one. I think if you read the threads from 2016, there are warnings a plenty on this. I believe we even suggested that the Government would be rushing to blame the EU for not giving them what they promised the British electorate, although this was unlikely as the German car companies would force the EU to concede to our demands! Instead, you need to put this to those who knowingly or unknowingly mislead the country when they said "easiest trade deal ever."

Sephiroth 26-07-2020 11:52

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044714)
When the UK has exerted the most power politically, it has been as part of a coalition or alliance. In these alliances, compromises are made but the end justifies the means and overall, greater power is gained. Membership of the UN, NATO etc all reduce the UK's sovereignty but the end is seen to justify the means.

If a country like the UK is going to have any power economically then against a backdrop of China and the USA, it needs to be part of a larger trading bloc. No country apart from North Korea trades on WTO trade terms and so is not an option. Accepting a level playing field is not an onerous condition to me as we do not have high state intervention in industry and we have a high minimum wage. Canada is thousands of miles away so of course is not such a competitive threat as the UK is. Distance does matter in trade, as has oft been noted on this thread.

This is a small price to pay for the long-term drop in the wealth of the country no deal or a bad deal brings - wealth that could be put to good use - our nursing homes are crying out for more money, local councils' services in many parts of the country have been severely cut back since the Global Financial Crisis, a big question mark hangs over UK high streets and we are entering a big economic downturn that should not be worsened.

The EU replaced the Commonwealth as the UK's main trading partner and like the Commonwealth, the larger market helped create wealth. The difference with the EU was that it was a more competitive market. The UK could no longer force compliant nations to take ships full of Austin Allegros with square steering wheels made by people on strike every month. It had to raise its game and productivity and finally compete with its peers. It has stepped up to this challenge and many British services, products and companies are now once again world class.

There is no pipeline of deals that will replace the EU and the deals it has brought us. If such deals existed, the EU would have signed them already. And the basic rule of trade is that most trade is done with your neighbouring countries.

It's unrealistic to blame a larger organisation for having more negotiating clout than a smaller one. I think if you read the threads from 2016, there are warnings a plenty on this. I believe we even suggested that the Government would be rushing to blame the EU for not giving them what they promised the British electorate, although this was unlikely as the German car companies would force the EU to concede to our demands! Instead, you need to put this to those who knowingly or unknowingly mislead the country when they said "easiest trade deal ever."

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth

On a more serious note,what divides us is your priority for the economy and mine for sovereignty combined with the belief that the UK can forge its wn path. Whenever the break, the challenge is the same so an extension serves no ultimate purpose. Memebership of NATO, United Nations, WTO etc all impege on UK sovereignty.

If the EU can just agree to the Canada type deal, we can all get on with it. The fact they're not agreeing is the proof of their "I'm bigger than you" bullying method. Or to put it in Barnier's words "The UK must be realistic".
The piece in red above is text not written by me. I have been misquoted.

I can respond to your other points once that has been cleared up.

Carth 26-07-2020 12:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044714)
When the UK has exerted the most power politically, it has been as part of a coalition or alliance. In these alliances, compromises are made but the end justifies the means and overall, greater power is gained. Membership of the UN, NATO etc all reduce the UK's sovereignty but the end is seen to justify the means.

If a country like the UK is going to have any power economically then against a backdrop of China and the USA, it needs to be part of a larger trading bloc. No country apart from North Korea trades on WTO trade terms and so is not an option. Accepting a level playing field is not an onerous condition to me as we do not have high state intervention in industry and we have a high minimum wage. Canada is thousands of miles away so of course is not such a competitive threat as the UK is. Distance does matter in trade, as has oft been noted on this thread.

This is a small price to pay for the long-term drop in the wealth of the country no deal or a bad deal brings - wealth that could be put to good use - our nursing homes are crying out for more money, local councils' services in many parts of the country have been severely cut back since the Global Financial Crisis, a big question mark hangs over UK high streets and we are entering a big economic downturn that should not be worsened.

The EU replaced the Commonwealth as the UK's main trading partner and like the Commonwealth, the larger market helped create wealth. The difference with the EU was that it was a more competitive market. The UK could no longer force compliant nations to take ships full of Austin Allegros with square steering wheels made by people on strike every month. It had to raise its game and productivity and finally compete with its peers. It has stepped up to this challenge and many British services, products and companies are now once again world class.

There is no pipeline of deals that will replace the EU and the deals it has brought us. If such deals existed, the EU would have signed them already. And the basic rule of trade is that most trade is done with your neighbouring countries.

It's unrealistic to blame a larger organisation for having more negotiating clout than a smaller one. I think if you read the threads from 2016, there are warnings a plenty on this. I believe we even suggested that the Government would be rushing to blame the EU for not giving them what they promised the British electorate, although this was unlikely as the German car companies would force the EU to concede to our demands! Instead, you need to put this to those who knowingly or unknowingly mislead the country when they said "easiest trade deal ever."


Nursing homes* and Local Council' Services are the same thing, and, along with UK high streets, have been feeling the pinch long before we 'left' the EU.

I remember reading a few months ago that even the Germans were putting the boot (no pun intended) into their own car companies.

I see once again you're concerned about the 'British services' being hit . . . job on the line mate? ;)



*unless you mean private nursing homes are badly run ;)

OLD BOY 26-07-2020 13:47

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044714)
When the UK has exerted the most power politically, it has been as part of a coalition or alliance. In these alliances, compromises are made but the end justifies the means and overall, greater power is gained. Membership of the UN, NATO etc all reduce the UK's sovereignty but the end is seen to justify the means.

If a country like the UK is going to have any power economically then against a backdrop of China and the USA, it needs to be part of a larger trading bloc. No country apart from North Korea trades on WTO trade terms and so is not an option. Accepting a level playing field is not an onerous condition to me as we do not have high state intervention in industry and we have a high minimum wage. Canada is thousands of miles away so of course is not such a competitive threat as the UK is. Distance does matter in trade, as has oft been noted on this thread.

This is a small price to pay for the long-term drop in the wealth of the country no deal or a bad deal brings - wealth that could be put to good use - our nursing homes are crying out for more money, local councils' services in many parts of the country have been severely cut back since the Global Financial Crisis, a big question mark hangs over UK high streets and we are entering a big economic downturn that should not be worsened.

The EU replaced the Commonwealth as the UK's main trading partner and like the Commonwealth, the larger market helped create wealth. The difference with the EU was that it was a more competitive market. The UK could no longer force compliant nations to take ships full of Austin Allegros with square steering wheels made by people on strike every month. It had to raise its game and productivity and finally compete with its peers. It has stepped up to this challenge and many British services, products and companies are now once again world class.

There is no pipeline of deals that will replace the EU and the deals it has brought us. If such deals existed, the EU would have signed them already. And the basic rule of trade is that most trade is done with your neighbouring countries.

It's unrealistic to blame a larger organisation for having more negotiating clout than a smaller one. I think if you read the threads from 2016, there are warnings a plenty on this. I believe we even suggested that the Government would be rushing to blame the EU for not giving them what they promised the British electorate, although this was unlikely as the German car companies would force the EU to concede to our demands! Instead, you need to put this to those who knowingly or unknowingly mislead the country when they said "easiest trade deal ever."

Your big mistake, Andrew, is assuming that the EU is the only solution to be part of a bigger market, and you completely fail to understand that the EU is making unreasonable demands of us to get a no-tariff trade deal. To accept these demands would undermine our sovereignty and undermine the benefits of Brexit.

There are other trading blocs we could join. The most obvious to me is the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Prtnership (CPTPP), which already comprises 11 countries including Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Mexico and Peru. If Britain joined, this would comprise 16% of global commerce. That's bigger than the EU, and it is fast growing as a productive group of nations, whereas the EU is expected to decline.

The CPTPP is expected to generate about 25% of trade by 2050, whereas the poorly performing EU will manage only 10%. If we want a tariff-free deal, we could do a lot worse than joining the CPTPP. Why are posters on this forum not talking about opportunities such as these instead of bemoaning our departure of the failing EU? GB is not a one-trick pony and Liz Truss is already forging ahead with negotiations to join the much more promising CPTPP while continuing to seek trade deals with the US and others.

1andrew1 26-07-2020 13:54

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044720)
The piece in red above is text not written by me. I have been misquoted.

I can respond to your other points once that has been cleared up.

Sorry, I edited my post to include this and indavertently put it in your post. I couldn't see it in my post when I checked so added it to my post.

jfman 26-07-2020 13:56

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36044734)
Your big mistake, Andrew, is assuming that the EU is the only solution to be part of a bigger market, and you completely fail to understand that the EU is making unreasonable demands of us to get a no-tariff trade deal. To accept these demands would undermine our sovereignty and undermine the benefits of Brexit.

There are other trading blocs we could join. The most obvious to me is the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Prtnership (CPTPP), which already comprises 11 countries including Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Mexico and Peru. If Britain joined, this would comprise 16% of global commerce. That's bigger than the EU, and it is fast growing as a productive group of nations, whereas the EU is expected to decline.

The CPTPP is expected to generate about 25% of trade by 2050, whereas the poorly performing EU will manage only 10%. If we want a tariff-free deal, we could do a lot worse than joining the CPTPP. Why are posters on this forum not talking about opportunities such as these instead of bemoaning our departure of the failing EU? GB is not a one-trick pony and Liz Truss is already forging ahead with negotiations to join the much more promising CPTPP while continuing to seek trade deals with the US and others.

Is this the new one after China and the US deals look in peril?

Carth 26-07-2020 13:58

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044736)
Sorry, I edited my post to include this and indavertently put it in your post. I couldn't see it in my post when I checked so added it to my post.

You need a couple of fence panels between those posts, stops things slipping through :D

1andrew1 26-07-2020 14:21

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044726)
Nursing homes* and Local Council' Services are the same thing, and, along with UK high streets, have been feeling the pinch long before we 'left' the EU.

I remember reading a few months ago that even the Germans were putting the boot (no pun intended) into their own car companies.

I see once again you're concerned about the 'British services' being hit . . . job on the line mate? ;)

*unless you mean private nursing homes are badly run ;)

Nursing homes aren't run by councils are they hence my including it though I appreciate some of their funding may come via councils. I did not link the high street decline to leaving the EU, I linked it to where we could be spending money.

I don't work in the service sector but I think in the current situation many jobs aren't safe, something a no-deal Brexit will only add to. But I hasten to add that's theoretical - Boris will agree to the EU's position when the time is right. As he's done to date.

---------- Post added at 14:00 ---------- Previous post was at 14:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044738)
You need a couple of fence panels between those posts, stops things slipping through :D

More post there than the Royal Mail! Well spotted. :D

---------- Post added at 14:10 ---------- Previous post was at 14:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36044734)
Your big mistake, Andrew, is assuming that the EU is the only solution to be part of a bigger market, and you completely fail to understand that the EU is making unreasonable demands of us to get a no-tariff trade deal. To accept these demands would undermine our sovereignty and undermine the benefits of Brexit.

There are other trading blocs we could join. The most obvious to me is the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Prtnership (CPTPP), which already comprises 11 countries including Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Mexico and Peru. If Britain joined, this would comprise 16% of global commerce. That's bigger than the EU, and it is fast growing as a productive group of nations, whereas the EU is expected to decline.

The CPTPP is expected to generate about 25% of trade by 2050, whereas the poorly performing EU will manage only 10%. If we want a tariff-free deal, we could do a lot worse than joining the CPTPP. Why are posters on this forum not talking about opportunities such as these instead of bemoaning our departure of the failing EU? GB is not a one-trick pony and Liz Truss is already forging ahead with negotiations to join the much more promising CPTPP while continuing to seek trade deals with the US and others.

Old Boy, the EU has free trade deals with many of those countries anyway plus lots, lots more so a deal with that bloc is just trying to retain a little of what we have already.

Your big opportunity is to understand the economic gravity of trade which explains why most trade takes place with neighbouring countries. https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/to-in...model-of-trade

---------- Post added at 14:21 ---------- Previous post was at 14:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36044737)
Is this the new one after China and the US deals look in peril?

:D

Do you also remember when people were confidently lining up to predict that other countries were about to leave the EU? I think I noted Ireland, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands tipped at one time or the other. :D

Carth 26-07-2020 14:24

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Apologies, it does seem as though all (or the majority of) nursing homes/care homes are private and not council funded.

Which makes me wonder why the very clever entrepreneurial people, who own them or invest in them and charge astronomical fees for their use, are crying out for more money . . . from us the tax payers probably :rolleyes:

jfman 26-07-2020 14:29

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044746)
Apologies, it does seem as though all (or the majority of) nursing homes/care homes are private and not council funded.

Which makes me wonder why the very clever entrepreneurial people, who own them or invest in them and charge astronomical fees for their use, are crying out for more money . . . from us the tax payers probably :rolleyes:

Natural though. Invest heavily in sectors too big/important to fail. Extract profits squeezing as much as you can between delaying your creditors.

The taxpayer carries the can.

papa smurf 26-07-2020 17:22

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36044747)
Natural though. Invest heavily in sectors too big/important to fail. Extract profits squeezing as much as you can between delaying your creditors.

The taxpayer carries the can.

Sounds like the labour manifesto.

jfman 26-07-2020 18:04

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36044750)
Sounds like the labour manifesto.

At least it’s transparent.

I’ll tee up Carth/Seph with “well the public did see right through it”.

Sephiroth 26-07-2020 18:13

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36044751)
At least it’s transparent.

I’ll tee up Carth/Seph with “well the public did see right through it”.

Don't remember!

Carth 26-07-2020 19:47

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Don't look at me . . . I couldn't even name twelvty labour people on the fingers of both hands :D

Sephiroth 26-07-2020 20:12

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044714)
When the UK has exerted the most power politically, it has been as part of a coalition or alliance. In these alliances, compromises are made but the end justifies the means and overall, greater power is gained. Membership of the UN, NATO etc all reduce the UK's sovereignty but the end is seen to justify the means.

If a country like the UK is going to have any power economically then against a backdrop of China and the USA, it needs to be part of a larger trading bloc. No country apart from North Korea trades on WTO trade terms and so is not an option. Accepting a level playing field is not an onerous condition to me as we do not have high state intervention in industry and we have a high minimum wage. Canada is thousands of miles away so of course is not such a competitive threat as the UK is. Distance does matter in trade, as has oft been noted on this thread.

This is a small price to pay for the long-term drop in the wealth of the country no deal or a bad deal brings - wealth that could be put to good use - our nursing homes are crying out for more money, local councils' services in many parts of the country have been severely cut back since the Global Financial Crisis, a big question mark hangs over UK high streets and we are entering a big economic downturn that should not be worsened.

The EU replaced the Commonwealth as the UK's main trading partner and like the Commonwealth, the larger market helped create wealth. The difference with the EU was that it was a more competitive market. The UK could no longer force compliant nations to take ships full of Austin Allegros with square steering wheels made by people on strike every month. It had to raise its game and productivity and finally compete with its peers. It has stepped up to this challenge and many British services, products and companies are now once again world class.

There is no pipeline of deals that will replace the EU and the deals it has brought us. If such deals existed, the EU would have signed them already. And the basic rule of trade is that most trade is done with your neighbouring countries.

It's unrealistic to blame a larger organisation for having more negotiating clout than a smaller one. I think if you read the threads from 2016, there are warnings a plenty on this. I believe we even suggested that the Government would be rushing to blame the EU for not giving them what they promised the British electorate, although this was unlikely as the German car companies would force the EU to concede to our demands! Instead, you need to put this to those who knowingly or unknowingly mislead the country when they said "easiest trade deal ever."

Quote:

When the UK has exerted the most power politically, it has been as part of a coalition or alliance. In these alliances, compromises are made but the end justifies the means and overall, greater power is gained. Membership of the UN, NATO etc all reduce the UK's sovereignty but the end is seen to justify the means.
I think that's an answer for convenience to set up the remainder of your arguments. As a member of NATO, the UK yielded no sovereignty; it merely participated in a mutual defence pact with no such matters as fishing rights, judicial superiority etc.

Quote:

If a country like the UK is going to have any power economically then against a backdrop of China and the USA, it needs to be part of a larger trading bloc. No country apart from North Korea trades on WTO trade terms and so is not an option. Accepting a level playing field is not an onerous condition to me as we do not have high state intervention in industry and we have a high minimum wage. Canada is thousands of miles away so of course is not such a competitive threat as the UK is. Distance does matter in trade, as has oft been noted on this thread.
If we do a deal with the EU, and they drop their bullying approach, then we will be able to roll over agreements the EU made with other countries. But my real point here is that had the EEC remained as a pure trading bloc without all this federalisation crap, I'd have been perfectly happy. Your point is not entirely without merit.


Quote:

This is a small price to pay for the long-term drop in the wealth of the country no deal or a bad deal brings - wealth that could be put to good use - our nursing homes are crying out for more money, local councils' services in many parts of the country have been severely cut back since the Global Financial Crisis, a big question mark hangs over UK high streets and we are entering a big economic downturn that should not be worsened.
That's where Remainers and Leavers differ. It is not a small price to pay if, by remaining, we remain under the Brussels heel and the ECJ.
If we can't forge our own path, then all we could have done in the EU is to hang onto their coat tails. There is nothing the EU can do about their High Street and they'd be no help in dealing with ours had we remained. Yours is highly spurious argument, I'm sorry to say.


Quote:

The EU replaced the Commonwealth as the UK's main trading partner and like the Commonwealth, the larger market helped create wealth. The difference with the EU was that it was a more competitive market. The UK could no longer force compliant nations to take ships full of Austin Allegros with square steering wheels made by people on strike every month. It had to raise its game and productivity and finally compete with its peers. It has stepped up to this challenge and many British services, products and companies are now once again world class.
I really do despair of the plummet in the quality of your argument in the above paragraph. "Force compliant nations"? Utter rubbish and tosh. Very disappointing.

Quote:

There is no pipeline of deals that will replace the EU and the deals it has brought us. If such deals existed, the EU would have signed them already. And the basic rule of trade is that most trade is done with your neighbouring countries.
I wasn't aware of that. Isn't that the problem with the EU?
Artificially high internal process because they're a tariff laden bloc with a few trade deals?


Quote:

It's unrealistic to blame a larger organisation for having more negotiating clout than a smaller one. I think if you read the threads from 2016, there are warnings a plenty on this. I believe we even suggested that the Government would be rushing to blame the EU for not giving them what they promised the British electorate, although this was unlikely as the German car companies would force the EU to concede to our demands! Instead, you need to put this to those who knowingly or unknowingly mislead the country when they said "easiest trade deal ever."
That's what Barnier said - we had to be realistic. The EU are bullies, plain and simple. They accused us of wanting our cake and eating it; now, as exemplified by the fishing rights and level playing field, they want exactly the same. We really must shed ourself of the EU yoke. If we caved in with extensions and giving way on our sovereignty, they'll be pssing all over us laughing their heads off for years to come.

---------- Post added at 20:12 ---------- Previous post was at 20:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36044755)
Don't look at me . . . I couldn't even name twelvty labour people on the fingers of both hands :D

I can name (but won't) eleventyeight rabid Remainers, and defo most of them lefties.

Anyway, it's all hotting up. Yesterday's Torygraph surmises that Merkel, President of the European something, will ride to the rescue and broker something sensible. I do hope so but am not holding my breath and I want to be shot of the EU yoke.

1andrew1 26-07-2020 20:52

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044757)
I think that's an answer for convenience to set up the remainder of your arguments. As a member of NATO, the UK yielded no sovereignty; it merely participated in a mutual defence pact with no such matters as fishing rights, judicial superiority etc.

No, it's the addition of valid examples to move it from the purely theoretical to the practical. Membership of those organisations may not impact fishing rights but it can lead to loss of sovereignty in other areas. We can't for example, go out and buy arms from Russia or China. And in missions, UK troops may end up reporting to superiors from other countries, and vice versa.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044757)
If we do a deal with the EU, and they drop their bullying approach, then we will be able to roll over agreements the EU made with other countries. But my real point here is that had the EEC remained as a pure trading bloc without all this federalisation crap, I'd have been perfectly happy. Your point is not entirely without merit.

I obviously disagree with you on the bullying label. I think that's a slightly weak description of negotiations where people are now finally accepting that the UK is holding a weaker hand than that decribed by Farage et al four years ago.
I do understand your point about the EU and its closer relationships between states than that between those of other trading blocs. But I understand the reasons for this - the need to prevent wars recurring and the need to be strong against the CIS.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044757)
[That's where Remainers and Leavers differ. It is not a small price to pay if, by remaining, we remain under the Brussels heel and the ECJ.
If we can't forge our own path, then all we could have done in the EU is to hang onto their coat tails. There is nothing the EU can do about their High Street and they'd be no help in dealing with ours had we remained. Yours is highly spurious argument, I'm sorry to say.

You misunderstand the high street reference. I brought it up as one example amongst a few of areas that we can spend the that greater wealth we will get with a close relationship on. Enhanced economic performance is not an abstract concept and it can help address the problems the country faces.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044757)
I really do despair of the plummet in the quality of your argument in the above paragraph. "Force compliant nations"? Utter rubbish and tosh. Very disappointing.

That was how it worked with the Commonwealth - it had a monopoly and there were high tariffs on selling into Commonwealth countries from outside. Old-fashioned protectionism which aided strikes and low productivity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044757)
I wasn't aware of that. Isn't that the problem with the EU?
Artificially high internal process because they're a tariff laden bloc with a few trade deals?

The UK employs far more civil servants than the EU. They have far more trade deals with other blocs than anyone else so the average external tariffs are very low.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044757)
That's what Barnier said - we had to be realistic. The EU are bullies, plain and simple. They accused us of wanting our cake and eating it; now, as exemplified by the fishing rights and level playing field, they want exactly the same. We really must shed ourself of the EU yoke. If we caved in with extensions and giving way on our sovereignty, they'll be pssing all over us laughing their heads off for years to come.

It wasn't the EU who asked us to leave, it was the other way round. They're just reacting to the situation. You must know now negotiations work and so to label this as bullying is unhelpful to anyone trying to understand the real dynamics of the situation.

The EU is not asking for an extension so it would not be a case of caving in. It would give us a reasonable chance to negotiate something closer to what you want rather than the caving-in which Boris will do without an extension. I'm confident this will indeed happen as our Brexit plans are not sufficiently in place but I would like us to have a stronger stab at negotiating with the EU and wearing them down for an extra 12 months to see if we can improve on the deal.

Sephiroth 26-07-2020 21:05

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
@1Andrew1

Any detailed reply that I may have given would take us round in circles as per jfman and OB.

We've set out our positions and that's that.

Next thing to look for is Boris caving in!


1andrew1 26-07-2020 21:12

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36044761)
@1Andrew1

Any detailed reply that I may have given would take us round in circles as per jfman and OB.

We've set out our positions and that's that.

Next thing to look for is Boris caving in!


Absolutely. :handshake
(Apologies for the lack of social distancing in the above emoji.)

OLD BOY 27-07-2020 09:44

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36044737)
Is this the new one after China and the US deals look in peril?

The US deal is delayed, partially due to the US election - it is not in peril. China is a big unknown at present, but a change in the US administration following the election may calm everything down.

No such problems with the bloc I highlighted - all seems pretty stable there.

1andrew1 27-07-2020 11:12

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Johnson straight-talking about the EU.
https://twitter.com/RichardGCorbett/...34736421249024

papa smurf 27-07-2020 11:24

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044788)
Johnson straight-talking about the EU.
https://twitter.com/RichardGCorbett/...34736421249024

Sometime after you were abducted by aliens and lost a huge lump of time things changed here on earth and we actually voted to leave the EU with boris taking a leading role in that process, just give your self time to catch up with the reality of the world as it is today ;)

jfman 27-07-2020 11:27

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36044777)
The US deal is delayed, partially due to the US election - it is not in peril. China is a big unknown at present, but a change in the US administration following the election may calm everything down.

No such problems with the bloc I highlighted - all seems pretty stable there.

Is there even a commitment from Biden to negotiate a deal?

China is a “big unknown”‘ that’s almost as much of an understatement as the claim Coronavirus is a mild flu.

papa smurf 27-07-2020 11:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36044791)
Is there even a commitment from Biden to negotiate a deal?

China is a “big unknown”‘ that’s almost as much of an understatement as the claim Coronavirus is a mild flu.

I doubt he is capable of remembering what commitments he has made.

1andrew1 28-07-2020 12:23

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Are Brexiters really blaming the Conservative Party? The timing seems a bit odd to me. https://twitter.com/2Tone4Real/statu...403458/photo/1

Sephiroth 28-07-2020 12:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Posted by 1Andrew1 in the Cornavirus thread:
Exactly, that's the nub of the fishing dilemma, a sector that accounts for 0.01% of UK GDP but seems to take up about 50% of negotiations.
On their side too. It's highly important to them; sod'em.

1andrew1 28-07-2020 18:34

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

A Brexit hit is looming for sectors that have emerged relatively unscathed from the Covid-19 pandemic, analysis by the London School of Economics suggests.

The LSE report says Brexit will deliver a double shock to the economy – with business conditions worsening for those sectors that have survived the impact of coronavirus and lockdown measures – whether Boris Johnson secures a deal with the EU or not.

The analysis, seen by the Guardian before its publication on Wednesday, includes information from a monthly survey of Confederation of British Industry members....

Dhingra said the coronavirus pandemic had “reduced the capacity of the UK economy to take further shocks”, and “rushing Brexit through” would “broaden the set of sectors” that experienced worsening business conditions.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ds-coronavirus

Pierre 28-07-2020 19:20

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044892)
Are Brexiters really blaming the Conservative Party? The timing seems a bit odd to me. https://twitter.com/2Tone4Real/statu...403458/photo/1

No......it’s on Twitter.

OLD BOY 28-07-2020 19:42

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36044791)
Is there even a commitment from Biden to negotiate a deal?

China is a “big unknown”‘ that’s almost as much of an understatement as the claim Coronavirus is a mild flu.

Biden isn't President yet, and besides, if he gave the thumbs up now, my understanding is that he would have forgotten about it before January.:D

UPDATE: I see Papa beat me to it!!




---------- Post added at 19:42 ---------- Previous post was at 19:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36044947)

The LSE.... :p:

1andrew1 28-07-2020 20:10

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36044953)
Biden isn't President yet, and besides, if he gave the thumbs up now, my understanding is that he would have forgotten about it before January.:D

UPDATE: I see Papa beat me to it!!



---------- Post added at 19:42 ---------- Previous post was at 19:41 ----------



The LSE.... :p:

The LSE knows more about economics than your average forum poster and by collaborating with the CBI you have a comprehensive picture. As unfortunate as it may be.

jfman 29-07-2020 22:37

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Old Boy and economics are distant acquaintances at best. There's years of discussion on streaming services to prove that!

1andrew1 03-08-2020 09:52

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
The FT has some good examples of the new costly red tape being inflicted on small British manufacturers

Quote:

Even without new testing, the basic cost of registering each chemical will be about £5,000, with the additional cost of “letters of access” varying from £33,000 for an emollient used in a face cream, for example, to £150,000 for a shea butter used as a base for sunscreen. In one case a letter of access cost nearly £300,000.

“Our EU competitors are licking their lips, and that is deeply frustrating,” Ms Loughran said of the mounting costs. “We’ve spent 30 years growing from nothing, now all these barriers are being forced upon us.

“It is enormously wasteful and uncompetitive for UK companies like us to have to spend time, money and resources to repeat all of these registrations for no additional benefit to anyone.”

...He added that there were widespread concerns in the industry that the cost of UK registration risked making some chemicals commercially non-viable in the UK market, with knock-on effects for supply chains and UK jobs.

https://www.ft.com/content/a1c4a5dc-...e-909d4aaf6162

OLD BOY 03-08-2020 13:47

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36045059)
Old Boy and economics are distant acquaintances at best. There's years of discussion on streaming services to prove that!

Says the man who believes that we don't need to worry about ruining our economy with constant lockdowns and doesn't acknowledge that small audiences for TV channels will ultimately lead to their closure.

Good luck with these perverse views you hold, jfman. I guess we will see who's right over time. Starting with how well we do with Brexit!

---------- Post added at 13:47 ---------- Previous post was at 13:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045487)
The FT has some good examples of the new costly red tape being inflicted on small British manufacturers




https://www.ft.com/content/a1c4a5dc-...e-909d4aaf6162

I can't read the whole article as I don't subscribe, but I'm not clear whether any assumptions have been made here or whether the government has confirmed that this will be the process.

It would have been easier simply to transfer existing permissions to the new system, I would have thought.

jfman 03-08-2020 14:09

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36045521)
Says the man who believes that we don't need to worry about ruining our economy with constant lockdowns and doesn't acknowledge that small audiences for TV channels will ultimately lead to their closure.

Good luck with these perverse views you hold, jfman. I guess we will see who's right over time. Starting with how well we do with Brexit!

It’s your flawed view that the economy doesn’t tank either way that is flawed. The question is whether you want to control it or not. However that’s for another thread.

The forum is well versed on your views on streaming from the 6-7 threads you’ve opened over the years and are welcome to use the search facility to see you deny reality over there too.

Quote:

I can't read the whole article as I don't subscribe, but I'm not clear whether any assumptions have been made here or whether the government has confirmed that this will be the process.

It would have been easier simply to transfer existing permissions to the new system, I would have thought.
That’s the danger of though Old Boy. Anyone can speculate and make judgements in ignorance of material facts. I’ll trust the salt of the earth entrepreneurs quoted by the Financial Times before I trust your ideological speculation.

1andrew1 03-08-2020 14:50

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36045521)
Good luck with these perverse views you hold, jfman. I guess we will see who's right over time. Starting with how well we do with Brexit!

I'm not sure that's the wisest of starting places Old Boy as the GB-NI border means that JFMan is 1-0 up already! Maybe you should have selected another topic like the rugby. :D

Sephiroth 03-08-2020 15:53

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045531)
I'm not sure that's the wisest of starting places Old Boy as the GB-NI border means that JFMan is 1-0 up already! Maybe you should have selected another topic like the rugby. :D

Prolly so, but when the Catholics gain an electoral majority in a few years' time (and not so far away), there'll be a border poll and then one Ireland.

OLD BOY 03-08-2020 17:44

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36045526)
It’s your flawed view that the economy doesn’t tank either way that is flawed. The question is whether you want to control it or not. However that’s for another thread.

That's not what the Chancellor thinks.

---------- Post added at 17:44 ---------- Previous post was at 17:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36045526)


That’s the danger of though Old Boy. Anyone can speculate and make judgements in ignorance of material facts. I’ll trust the salt of the earth entrepreneurs quoted by the Financial Times before I trust your ideological speculation.

You certainly seem to take maximum advantage of that, jfman.

jfman 03-08-2020 17:49

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36045548)
That's not what the Chancellor thinks.

---------- Post added at 17:44 ---------- Previous post was at 17:42 ----------



You certainly seem to take maximum advantage of that, jfman.

Where has the Chancellor proposed that the economy will recover quickly? I certainly missed it.

jfman 03-08-2020 20:17

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-53642923

He wasn’t sending sensitive papers to a web based email account, was he? Tut tut if so.

Hugh 03-08-2020 20:18

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045535)
Prolly so, but when the Catholics gain an electoral majority in a few years' time (and not so far away), there'll be a border poll and then one Ireland.

Not sure that’s so cut and dried - I have family over there, and the younger generations are more secular, and have less time for the Prods vs Kaffliks bullshine, and equally are less fervent about a ‘United Ireland’...

Pierre 03-08-2020 20:40

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045575)
Not sure that’s so cut and dried - I have family over there, and the younger generations are more secular, and have less time for the Prods vs Kaffliks bullshine, and equally are less fervent about a ‘United Ireland’...

Indeed, the young generation in N.I. Have the best of both worlds, equally citizens of the R.o.I the EU and the U.K.

If I was Northern Irish I’d vote for the status quo.

1andrew1 03-08-2020 21:36

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36045579)
Indeed, the young generation in N.I. Have the best of both worlds, equally citizens of the R.o.I the EU and the U.K.

If I was Northern Irish I’d vote for the status quo.

Voting for the status quo is indeed what the majority of Northern Irish did in 2016. ;)
Do the Northern Irish enjoy freedom of movement in the EU? I don't think they automatically do, but if they select a Republic of Ireland passport then would this mean they would?

RichardCoulter 03-08-2020 21:56

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045575)
Not sure that’s so cut and dried - I have family over there, and the younger generations are more secular, and have less time for the Prods vs Kaffliks bullshine, and equally are less fervent about a ‘United Ireland’...

That's certainly the impression that I got when i've visited both NI & the ROI.

AFAIK, NI costs more to run than it makes, so from a purely financial point of view, the cash strapped ROI is unlikely to want to take on NI.

1andrew1 03-08-2020 22:27

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36045591)
That's certainly the impression that I got when i've visited both NI & the ROI.

AFAIK, NI costs more to run than it makes, so from a purely financial point of view, the cash strapped ROI is unlikely to want to take on NI.

Not sure RoI is any more cash-strapped than the UK but it's not an investment decision, it's a constitutional one which has been made.

Hugh 03-08-2020 23:31

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36045591)
That's certainly the impression that I got when i've visited both NI & the ROI.

AFAIK, NI costs more to run than it makes, so from a purely financial point of view, the cash strapped ROI is unlikely to want to take on NI.

Didn't stop the re-unification of Germany, and the old DDR is still a money pit for the rest of Germany...

Hugh 03-08-2020 23:59

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
4 Attachment(s)
Apparently Ian Duncan-Smith doesn’t like the thing he voted for...

Mr K 04-08-2020 07:07

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045598)
Apparently Ian Duncan-Smith doesn’t like the thing he voted for...

Well that's understandable really.

papa smurf 04-08-2020 08:01

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_pUgkECn9s


Let's all sing along ;)

1andrew1 04-08-2020 09:13

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36045598)
Apparently Ian Duncan-Smith doesn’t like the thing he voted for...

He sums up the entitled cake-and-eat-it brigade.

Pierre 04-08-2020 10:32

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045588)
automatically do, but if they select a Republic of Ireland passport then would this mean they would?

That's what I meant, they would need to get an Irish passport, which they are entitled to do. So it's semantics really.

Sephiroth 04-08-2020 12:36

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045606)
He [IDS] sums up the entitled cake-and-eat-it brigade.

Is that right? Surely it is the EU now that are the cake-and-eat-it brigade?

1. They want to keep our fish;

2. They want to eat our competivity (!) cake by tying our hands behind our backs;

3. They want the ECJ to govern us in certain respects.

All we want is a free trade agreement and sovereignty over what's ours.


1andrew1 04-08-2020 13:15

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045614)
Is that right? Surely it is the EU now that are the cake-and-eat-it brigade?

1. They want to keep our fish;

2. They want to eat our competivity (!) cake by tying our hands behind our backs;

3. They want the ECJ to govern us in certain respects.

All we want is a free trade agreement and sovereignty over what's ours.


Nope. Its we who left the EU and not the other way round. We knew what we voted for, that is unless our name was Iain Duncan Smith. ;)

1. They're happy to accept a phased withdrawal from British waters, not a sudden one that would lead to livelihoods being lost overnight. 2/3 of fish UK fishermen catch is sold to the EU so a no-deal Brexit would result in many of our own fishermen losing their livelihoods too.

2. We lost our competitivity when we said we would leave the EEA. Now, our manufacturers have to battle with increased red tape. The EU just wants to stop unfair state socialist subsidies such as those favoured by the terrible two Cs - Corbyn and Cummings. Canada signed up to this for its trade deal and I encourage the UK to step up and do the same.

3. Any agreement needs to be enforceable. If you've got an established means in place then it makes sense to use it and start building costly alternatives.

Sephiroth 04-08-2020 13:43

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045616)
Nope. Its we who left the EU and not the other way round. We knew what we voted for, that is unless our name was Iain Duncan Smith. ;)

1. They're happy to accept a phased withdrawal from British waters, not a sudden one that would lead to livelihoods being lost overnight. 2/3 of fish UK fishermen catch is sold to the EU so a no-deal Brexit would result in many of our own fishermen losing their livelihoods too.

2. We lost our competitivity when we said we would leave the EEA. Now, our manufacturers have to battle with increased red tape. The EU just wants to stop unfair state socialist subsidies such as those favoured by the terrible two Cs - Corbyn and Cummings. Canada signed up to this for its trade deal and I encourage the UK to step up and do the same.

3. Any agreement needs to be enforceable. If you've got an established means in place then it makes sense to use it and start building costly alternatives.

What I've highlighted is the fundamental difference between Remainers and the rest of the population. We cannot divorce the reasons of the majority of voters who supported Brexit from the expectation that we will control our own affairs.

You, and Remainers on the other hand, do not accept that a sovereign UK should be fully in control of its laws, waters and behaviours. And you Remainers seem to dodge addressing this aspect, possibly for fear of being accused of being happy to let the EU govern us in part.

Quote:

1. They're happy to accept a phased withdrawal from British waters, not a sudden one that would lead to livelihoods being lost overnight. 2/3 of fish UK fishermen catch is sold to the EU so a no-deal Brexit would result in many of our own fishermen losing their livelihoods too.
I'm sure a phased withdrawal would be acceptable - but where has that been published? Au contraire, see https://www.theguardian.com/politics...s-to-uk-waters - they want our cake.

Quote:

2. We lost our competitivity when we said we would leave the EEA. Now, our manufacturers have to battle with increased red tape. The EU just wants to stop unfair state socialist subsidies such as those favoured by the terrible two Cs - Corbyn and Cummings. Canada signed up to this for its trade deal and I encourage the UK to step up and do the same.
Why are you are you siding with the EU? You pray in aid to your argument the CETA treaty. I might stand corrected, but from my research (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compre...perty%20rights.) CETA's level playing field only extends to intellectual property rights. If you are wrong, where does that leave your argument?

Quote:

3. Any agreement needs to be enforceable. If you've got an established means in place then it makes sense to use it and start building costly alternatives.
What? What does that mean, especially in the cake-and-it-it context?

I'm really disappointed as you normally have something sensible to put forward.


1andrew1 04-08-2020 14:02

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045618)
What I've highlighted is the fundamental difference between Remainers and the rest of the population. We cannot divorce the reasons of the majority of voters who supported Brexit from the expectation that we will control our own affairs.

You, and Remainers on the other hand, do not accept that a sovereign UK should be fully in control of its laws, waters and behaviours. And you Remainers seem to dodge addressing this aspect, possibly for fear of being accused of being happy to let the EU govern us in part.

I'm sure a phased withdrawal would be acceptable - but where has that been published? Au contraire, see https://www.theguardian.com/politics...s-to-uk-waters - they want our cake.

Why are you are you siding with the EU? You pray in aid to your argument the CETA treaty. I might stand corrected, but from my research (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compre...perty%20rights.) CETA's level playing field only extends to intellectual property rights. If you are wrong, where does that leave your argument?

What? What does that mean, especially in the cake-and-it-it context?

I'm really disappointed as you normally have something sensible to put forward.


I will try and clarify the other aspects later when I have more time. In the meantime, here's how CETA helps level the playing field. https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in...eta-explained/

Sephiroth 04-08-2020 14:16

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36045619)
I will try and clarify the other aspects later when I have more time. In the meantime, here's how CETA helps level the playing field. https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in...eta-explained/

So as to assist your fuller response, the level-playing field provision only applies to IPR whereas your claim was much wider (see below).

Quote:

The EU just wants to stop unfair state socialist subsidies such as those favoured by the terrible two Cs - Corbyn and Cummings. Canada signed up to this for its trade deal and I encourage the UK to step up and do the same
Best to back out of that one quickly so we can forget about it.



Kushan 04-08-2020 23:08

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
You voted for the agreement, you can't ask to change the terms now. Tough do-do.

You'll get zero sympathy from any remoaners because we absolutely told you it was a crap deal and you still wanted it.

Sephiroth 04-08-2020 23:42

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Kush - we are not talking about the Withdrawal Agreement. Some of its terms do survive 31-12-20 but that has little to do with the trade talks.

Or have I misunderstood you?

Kushan 04-08-2020 23:56

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045660)
Kush - we are not talking about the Withdrawal Agreement. Some of its terms do survive 31-12-20 but that has little to do with the trade talks.

Or have I misunderstood you?

That's what IDS is talking about, isn't it? He wants the EU to change the terms of the WA that Parliament signed.

Hugh 05-08-2020 00:00

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045660)
Kush - we are not talking about the Withdrawal Agreement. Some of its terms do survive 31-12-20 but that has little to do with the trade talks.

Or have I misunderstood you?

The items IDS isn’t happy about are part of the Withdrawal Agreement (according to him).

btw, this is what he said previously, which kind of negates his point about "small print"...

1andrew1 05-08-2020 00:52

Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36045620)
So as to assist your fuller response, the level-playing field provision only applies to IPR whereas your claim was much wider (see below).

Best to back out of that one quickly so we can forget about it.


Seph, I'm afaid that link slips below your usual standards. I can only attribute this to be shock at Iain Duncan Smith feigning ignorance of a withdrawal agreement he was praising to the high horses before! He showed contempt for voters and he has rightly been called out on this.

My previous link to the original document demonstrates the Canadian deal was more than IP. This is a pertinent extract: https://twitter.com/DavidHenigUK/sta...454401/photo/1
I think it's logical that the EU wouldn't want a heavily subsidised socialist state on its doorstep with easy entry into the single market or a highly de-regulated one with very low standards. Thanks to such tight negotiating deadlines, the EU can afford to push for an even stronger level playing field. You may recall that the Canadian deal took some seven years to arrange.

I'm more interested in the now and what you think about Iain Duncan Smith's apparent change of heart or memory loss?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:44.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum