![]() |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Nothing at all if you squint and look at the left half.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
---------- Post added at 09:57 ---------- Previous post was at 09:53 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
I guess you're referring to dual token on upstream. Easy enough - I defer to this Google site: https://sites.google.com/site/amitsc...affic-policing Though of course the CIR on VM's tiers is zero - dual token is more built with services like VoIP in mind where the cable modem has to implement DTB to ensure it behaves well with a UGS VoIP service flow rather than allowing buffers to be overwhelmed by high bandwidth BE service flow traffic :) ---------- Post added at 18:39 ---------- Previous post was at 18:38 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I am suffering from high utilisation in the evening when my download speed drops from 100mbit to 28mbit, when this happens i notice that part of my upstream power levels are different on each channel when i believe they're normally the same.
For example my current power levels are 39.75, 39.75 after a reboot which i think looks normal but last night they were reading 40.25, 41.75. What is the significance of the numbers being different after the decimal point as i thought the reason was mentioned here by someone but i can't find the post? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
There is no significance. Having slightly differing power levels on any channel is normal. Different frequencies experience different levels of attenuation and interference.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I have noticed over the last few days I am getting a little bit of packet loss it appears
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/02/12.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
It seems our long lost friend is back. I notice a hump across my graph that perfectly coincides with midnight and appears on a few local CMTS graphs also:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...10-03-2015.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
This isn’t what we have seen previously, this isn’t a link becoming congested… Instead it looks like Virgin Media or a third party are shutting down a link, traffic is then taking an alternative route, which happens to have a higher latency. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
There isn't a transit provider sitting between Virgin Media and Think Broadband. Not as far as I know anyway.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
No hump in Abingdon
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Well, whoever else NetConnex peer with is rather irrelevant given they have public peering directly with VM anyway.
And technically LINX is not a global tier 1 provider, it's an exchange that providers interconnect at. Neither is LONAP. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Getting really annoying witt this crap now.
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum