Originally Posted by Tharrick

Dear sir or madam,

In our last communication you assured me that the Phorm/Webwise 'service' was not a foregone conclusion - you stated that 'we have not yet decided on if and, in particular, how the Webwise
system will be incorporated into our network'.

However, in a recent press statement, Phorm have stated not only that there is no question that you, along with talktalk and BT, will be going along with their system, but also that all three ISPs have already carried out 'extensive trialling'.

Somebody here is lying to me.
I have been a loyal customer for the last two years, and both years have been on your highest broadband package. I'd like to think that it's not you that's doing the lying - I'd prefer to believe it of the 'ex'-spyware company that's trying to get into bed with you. Nevertheless, I must ask for a definitive statement of whether or not you have carried out public tests of this technology. In addition, you will be receiving a DPA notice from me, sent straight to your data controller (given that several acquaintances of mine have sent them in to customer services, where they have been treated merely as complaints and responded to with stock replies), refusing my consent for any such system. I do hope you realise that a lack of response to this notice constitutes a criminal offence under the DPA.
And finally, if you have not trialled this system, and if you have not given a definitive statement that you WILL be going ahead with Phorm, I would recommend that you contact them and request that they stop using your name in their spin.

Thank you,

xxxxxx xxxxxxxx

Originally Posted by NTLVictim (Post 34537789)

On a tangent, how come Sky haven't waded in with a "phorm free" sales campaign? Not like them to miss a trick.

Originally Posted by 3x2 (Post 34537809)

From the report :


Perhaps someone at Stanley can see the irony here. I saw nothing that prevents access straight from either a direct link or from Google.

Originally Posted by mark777 (Post 34537816)

But is the link we have to the original document location or to an unauthorised copy?

Mods may have a view?

Originally Posted by R Jones (Post 34537826)

One question that comes to mind - if I had been logged into Webwise when I accessed that document, presumably its contents would have been profiled? And if it is actually a protected docuement, available theoretically only to logged in customers of the site, the owners wouldn't have given consent for it to be profiled?

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34537868)

I didn't see PhormUKPRteam log on to here at all yesterday or so far today. I am wondering if Kent has fired them all and has decided the best phorm of PR he can push is his own personal agenda laden with insults and personal attacks.

Alexander Hanff

Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff (Post 34537868)

I didn't see PhormUKPRteam log on to here at all yesterday or so far today. I am wondering if Kent has fired them all and has decided the best phorm of PR he can push is his own personal agenda laden with insults and personal attacks.

Alexander Hanff