![]() |
Re: GB News
Quote:
|
Re: GB News
Quote:
|
Re: GB News
Quote:
Nigel's use of their brand and reputation, and implication he had gone through their volunteer process to be able to help fundraise as their representative when he hadn't was the problem. ---------- Post added at 09:33 ---------- Previous post was at 09:29 ---------- If you want to be involved with any organisation, you have to follow their rules or you don't get to take part in their activities. |
Re: GB News
Quote:
|
Re: GB News
Quote:
|
Re: GB News
I'm afraid GB News has lost credibility in most people's eyes tonight. Donald Trump declared the election was rigged several times in his interview but he was not challenged by the interviewer, Nigel Farage.
How does this fit with: Quote:
|
Re: GB News
Quote:
Farage brought off a major coup for GB News. A gripping 2 hours. BBC et al cannot compete with his style of objective journalism. So what Farage didn't challenge Trump's claims of a rigged election? Farage is the interviewer not the Democrat candidate. How do you justify "... in most people's eyes"? |
Re: GB News
Quote:
I doubt tonight’s interview will have had any impact on “most people” because most people didn’t see it. I doubt it changed the opinion of most people who did see it, because I suspect by now GB News’ audience is fairly self-selecting, notwithstanding the handful of lefties who seem to get a fetish-like kick out of getting triggered by it on a nightly basis. All that said, your claim that Farage is producing objective journalism is absurd, as is your suggestion that for an interviewer to adopt a politically contrary position for the purposes of debate means they might as well be a member of the rival political party. Nigel Farage makes good TV because he’s opinionated, but he doesn’t make good political interviews when his views are fairly well aligned with the person he’s interviewing, because he isn’t a journalist and he lacks the skill to probe, challenge or extract new insight from his subject. If David Frost had approached his interviews with Richard Nixon in the manner you seem to approve of, the series would have been nothing more than the soft historical footnote Nixon’s team had desperately hoped for, rather than something so significant, Nixon sympathisers continue to try to play it down to this day. |
Re: GB News
Quote:
I expect most people would want to see a politician called out when they repeat the same lie. I'm disappointed that your admiration of Farage might prevent you from wanting the same. ---------- Post added 02-12-2021 at 00:03 ---------- Previous post was 01-12-2021 at 23:56 ---------- Quote:
But I think it's fair to assume that a politician repeating a lie on multiple occasions should be expected to be called out by an interviewer and most people would expect this to happen. ---------- Post added at 00:08 ---------- Previous post was at 00:03 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: GB News
I watched it and Farage did actually challenge Trump’s obsession with the 2020 election being rigged. He said continuing with this rhetoric, isn’t helpful because it turns off a sizeable selection of his own base of voters, that Trump should move forward and not keep looking backwards, Trump rebuffed him saying he should do both.
President Joe Biden’s approval ratings are dire, he won’t run again and he’s looking very old and frail every day. Now who to turn to for 2024 ticket, Cackling Harris? This would be the joke of the century, her approval ratings are worse than his. Democrats are a pathetic party, everything always goes tits up when they get a sniff of power, Bay of Pigs, under President Kennedy, the economy tanking under President Carter, to President Clinton, being impeached for alleged sexual antics under a certain Resolute desk, and then lying about them. President Obama, setting a red line with Syria and then doing nothing when it’s crossed and now President Biden and Afghanistan withdrawal. All Democrat disasters. They’re a crap disorganised and disgraceful party. Trump could become the 47th President of the United States in 2024, or he could remain a one term president, he’s not in power now, but even today, 11 months after leaving office, his legacies are still pissing off the left, big fight to be had with the Roe vs. Wade, abortion rights quite possibly being overturned soon. |
Re: GB News
Quote:
No idea who the next President will be. Not been an abundance of talent vying for the role for a long time. |
Re: GB News
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: GB News
Quote:
---------- Post added at 12:15 ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 12:31 ---------- Previous post was at 12:15 ---------- To add, if Roe falls in the U.S Supreme Court, it doesn’t automatically mean abortion rights are revoked in the U.S. It will just fall back to pre-Roe days of each State deciding it’s own abortion rights and laws. Lots of women getting eat up about losing their rights if Roe falls, they won’t. |
Re: GB News
Quote:
|
Re: GB News
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum