![]() |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...04-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
sorry bad wording. its happening to a lot of VM customers at different times. VMs network is at fault. ive got feeling its come about since route work was done.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
It started on the 22nd of December for me before that i had a great graph.
21st December http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...21-12-2012.png 22nd December http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...22-12-2012.png 23rd December http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...23-12-2012.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Any ideas what i can do? im suddenly getting wooped in black ops so check out think bb and its awful.
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] [img]Download Failed (1)[/img] [img]Download Failed (1)[/img] [img]Download Failed (1)[/img] |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
post it up on the VM forum. whats the double ETA you get from bolt?
try rebooting the SH and router (if you have one). wait 30seconds to 1 minutes in between off and on. it may not make a difference or it might putting you on another upstream channel. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
It's a huge statement to make that it's VM's network at fault (even if you're right). That's a huge estate and it's not happened to me at any time other than a few months ago when they were upgrading my area and squeezing me onto a swing UBR. I think that these sort of sweeping statements (other than how crud the SH is in router mode) should be avoided unless they can be substantiated. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
yes sorry. what i meant in my head wasnt typed out in full.
lucky you Seph. ive noticed a fair few play up since the route work annoucement. im guessing it must be widespread across the network if its happening in different parts of the country? or it could be anything else. i have no proof. just guessing. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
ok. my guess its got to do with route work VM done. what do you think it is?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
We are considering Snoopz' almost unique set of TBBs presented in http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35...-post3098.html
Because it's somewhat unique and varied in itself, I wouldn't even attempt a guess. Indeed, I didn't! His data needs to be posted on the VM forum where there is a path for some of us to badger people who might actually be able to say what was happening in Snoopz' area. It helps if people posting their TBBs also say what's happening to their real stuff, particularly live streaming. Correlation helps to reduce uncertainty. I also ask peops what their upstream is doing, although the slope in one of Snoopz' TBBs is beginning to look like what Rashboots posted in http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35...-post3038.html But we haven't heard from Rashboots (Teesside) as to what it was all about .... |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
mines looking better since upstream bonding kicked in...
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...05-01-2013.png http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...06-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Good to hear it thenry, long may it last :)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Mines the best it's been in months since they finished the upgrades in my area, not that Ive got my speed upgrade yet - every time I phone up I get called Mrs so and so despite obviously being Mr so and so, one time the indian guy even gave himself the same first name as me and still called me Mrs :confused:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...06-01-2013.png Its been more like this : http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...02-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
call retentions/thinking of leaving instead before 8pm on Monday.
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
---------- Post added at 08:29 ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 ---------- ok VM yesterday http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...05-01-2013.png BT yesterday http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...05-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Apparently there's still an issue in my area (Since early October) but things have got sooooo much better.
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...05-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Been going since thursday night doing just under 8GB/Hour and is due to finish in about 12 hours. Here are the stats for today and the last 24 hours.. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/67.png Chrysalis, your poor VM connection, is it sat in the corner feeling ashamed of itself hehe. My FTTC line looks like yours when it's idle but with less blue and yellow, I've not seen a thickish blue line like that before on anyones FTTC line. Do you know why it's like that? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I dont know why the blue is as thick as it is, I suspect its due to how BT have setup their network, as there is multiple gateways used so the route changes a lot meaning a slight variance of latency. Thats my theory anyway. I havent really seen it on other infinity graphs except my own, but its like that regardless of router/modem used, and it is fast path.
In reality tho its nothing noticeable eg. here is 20 pings to the bbc. C:\windows\system32>ping -n 20 bbc.co.uk Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.241.131] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=241 Ping statistics for 212.58.241.131: Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 14ms, Average = 13ms and the VM connection ouch!! these from the router as pc is routed via infinity now. root@DD-WRT:~# ping -c 20 bbc.co.uk PING bbc.co.uk (212.58.241.131): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=0 ttl=243 time=53.757 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=1 ttl=243 time=47.533 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=2 ttl=243 time=70.545 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=3 ttl=243 time=63.817 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=4 ttl=243 time=46.166 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=5 ttl=243 time=60.768 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=6 ttl=243 time=56.487 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=7 ttl=243 time=51.291 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=8 ttl=243 time=67.092 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=9 ttl=243 time=62.213 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=10 ttl=243 time=62.377 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=11 ttl=243 time=72.610 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=12 ttl=243 time=87.686 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=13 ttl=243 time=44.083 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=14 ttl=243 time=60.484 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=15 ttl=243 time=39.236 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=16 ttl=243 time=50.586 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=17 ttl=243 time=52.222 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=18 ttl=243 time=60.116 ms 64 bytes from 212.58.241.131: seq=19 ttl=243 time=51.516 ms --- bbc.co.uk ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 39.236/58.029/87.686 ms I honestly believe VM have area's for whatever reason they dont upgrade unless they really have to, clearly the pattern I have seen on websites such as this is some areas getting upgrades semi regurly whilst others once every 5 years or so. The only time I remember a proper upgrade done in my area in almost 8 years of using ntl/VM is when the upstream work was done to make the service 10:1 which was 2 years ago. Also a reseg around the same time period which was probably part of the same work. Other then that in 8 years I cannot remember a single outage followed by a noticeable improvement that lasted more than a month or 2. Ignition has eg. commented in the past also that VM may stick to just customer numbers so if a port doesnt have many customers but a lot of them are heavy torrent users pushing utilisation high, it doesnt get an upgrade. I dont know the exact specifics except in the past a few times I couldnt connect the modem because too many modems were connected and that this utilisation issue has plagued my area for nearly 10 years at 2 different address's. With one good spell of 6 months or so following that one bit of upgrade work I mentioned. I honestly would not be surprised one bit if its like this next year and even worse if they bump the upload speeds back to 10:1 without any upgrade work, wouldnt surprise me one bit. Whats funny is last week my area was supposed to have 2nd set of major upgrades finished with a 3rd set at end of this month, the first 2 sets made no appparent difference and caused no outage, invisible upgrades :) ---------- Post added at 16:45 ---------- Previous post was at 16:28 ---------- here is a graph to go with those pings. todays http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...06-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I don't know, I recon your latency could be a couple lower, I'm in wolverhamptom and get 10-11ms when interleving is off.
Damn, it's something when an idle VM connection is poorer than a FTTC connection which has it's upload saturated. The average is over twice as much on VM. Code:
ping.exe -n 20 bbc.co.uk Code:
ping.exe -n 20 bbc.co.uk |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Glad to see the hump has not come back for a good few weeks :)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/66.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Typical,
Had a power outage earlier today and now I cannot get back on the Upstream channel I had. Ah well had a couple of days of good service :mad: |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
BT's WBC has no node in my city I either go via peterborough (my shortest route) or via birmingham. Both require going north before south. However 2ms latency isnt going to be a big deal, whats most important is jitter and if latency is not insanely high, I would be unhappy with 30ms but not unhappy with 13ms. ---------- Post added at 02:29 ---------- Previous post was at 02:20 ---------- Quote:
Basically it took BT 11 months to rollout FTTC in my area after the decision made to enable the area, whilst it takes VM longer then that just to upgrade existing services. The former would have required far more physical work. I have a dedicated 20mbit/sec upstream path on my vdsl2 connection up to the backhaul level at the exchange, my VM connection is shared with 100s of users on its 18mbit upstream path. I would hazard a guess my area requires the level of work that was required to fix brighton, but there is not the level of fuss been created by media and users on VM's own forums that brighton had so it probably wont get done. Even then in brighton it took them years to fix due to the sheer size of the task having not done proper upgrades for so long. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Openreach installing a new FTTC cab would as far as possible blow fibre down existing ducts to the existing cab. VM adding capacity via a new optical node would do the same. Openreach installing a new FTTC cab would dig up the road to obtain power from the nearest available source. VM adding capacity via a new optical node wouldn't necessarily have to do that, but if they did, the would do the same. Openreach would then have to install cross-connects from the existing cab to the new cab. VM adding capacity via a new optical node would do the same. If existing VM infrastructure is at capacity, then they have to go through all the same routine as Openreach do installing a new cab - including planning permissions, civil works, road closures, etc. Course if there's existing capacity available that's not being used, bringing it online is fairly trivial in comparison. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Looking good in my part of Crawley, probably the best its ever been.
Another upstream channel was added recently, which seems to have smoothed things out. The two spikes are, I think, when I was downloading. http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...07-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Can I remind members that there is a thread for non-VM TBB charts and that they should be using it to post such charts. Last 2 posts moved
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
This is a representative sample of the results I get.
[IMG]http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...05-01-2013.png[/IMG] The green blocks correspond exactly with the times I've been running uTorrent - not even downloading and upload speeds strictly limited, except between about 0130 and 1000 when I forgot to restart the program. Without uTorrent, I get the following speeds: https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/61.png If I restart uTorrent, after only a few minutes, I get: https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/62.png I'm on the 100Mb service, Do these results seem reasonable? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/60.png
Can someone tell me what this means and if is is bad!!! |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
it means after 11pm something good happened and you had a huge improvement on your service,
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...08-01-2013.png
Been bumped (early) to 60mbit End of January is when its official, i hope there is at least another 2 up stream channels: this is garbage again. VM fail so hard when it comes to upgrade time and having any kind of usable for games service. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
It might well fix itself one day and untill then it's not impacting you like you say. I don't think there is any need to show how bad VM are, it's all already there to see and is what happens when you don't invest sufficiently. Branson does the same with his F1 team, selling most of it off and relying solely on CFD so he doesn't have to splash out on a wind tunnel. As a result their still at the back of the grid and scored no points last season. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
routing obviously affects latency. I dont think branson has any significant input on VM's investment decisions, he basically sold his brand name for a royalty payment. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
What are these spikes? They don't look accidental.
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...08-01-2013.png BTW. I'm on 6 bonded down and only one up. ---------- Post added at 08:02 ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
This has already happened on mine a few times... Guessing it will be finished soon.. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
rebooting sorts out the instability.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
I wish it would work. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
If Efour & Rashboots (whom we know from last month) had the same TBB efect which cleared at 4 pm it won't have been rebooting the SH that sorted things out.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
haha ok ill give it 5 mins and come back :) get a nice red line on the graph.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
:D :LOL:
---------- Post added at 21:00 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ---------- Efour have you checked if your IP has changed? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
left it off for 30+ mins dunno if that will get me a new IP -- checked no same IP
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
the monitor you posted doesnt show packet loss for down time suggesting your IP has changed prior to your power down/up just now.
open this tools.virginmedia.com/ check IP matches the one set to ping |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
What monitor he posted?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
But that isn't the one from when he just said he'd rebooted a few minutes ago. What have I misunderstood?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
did he say that?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
yeah some confusion here the ip had changed previously (few days +) its still monitoring the old one... Silly me didnt change the monitor.
This might explain a few things... :P Ill give this new one a few hours to fill up. https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/54.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
enable ping response within your router settings.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...08-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]
Random question - How often would the IP change of a UBR? Or is this just been taken offline? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Port Scan Detection
IP Flood Detection Both on... dunno whats going on. That is correct yes ? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
no. on the advanced settings page scroll all the way down to the bottom and youll see Ping, click on it then enable ping response then apply.
what have you been doing if ping response has been disabled. how did you manage to set up the previous monitor? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Had a tech guy here on the 4th installing a Tivo box and he did say he had fiddled with the hub too. No idea if anything was changed.
Thanks its on now, that confused the hell out of me :) lets hope its actually working now. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Hub change?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...09-01-2013.png :shocked: |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
A Cat C resegmentation is good news if you can wait. They split a network segment at least into two at the local optical node. They add fibre for the downstream and upstream and then jiggle it all about at the head end by adding line cards. They usually add a couple of powered street cabinets and all this requires planning permission and civil works.
Hope that answers your question. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
ALOT better than before Jem :D
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
spoke too soon its seems. what happened from around 11:30pm
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
it seems was its own use?this time of the night can not be so much traffic
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Big red line of stability?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
minimum latency was starting to rise again prior to the reboot
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
yeah because it has to become incredibly shot for it to be logical to you.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
this is mine started been a pain again, been told its over-utilisation, fix date they give me was mid-January
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...10-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Ugh, what's going on tonight then..
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...11-01-2013.png Seen quite a few blips across the country. EDIT: Seen a few cores have 100% packet loss, so I'm guessing the higher load across the others cores due to this would have increased the latency? (I'm learning here so if anyone knows it would be nice ^_^) |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
same here ... i think thats it & done for tonight
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I thought it was just me, but always check this thread... seems not!
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...11-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Yup, same here -
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...11-01-2013.png Plus a lovely bit of downtime at about 6ish. Probably me just downloading crap, though. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Probably a routing configuration at NCUK/TBB. Nothing to do with VM.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Well I said probably. As it affected several different ISPs in several different countries, it certainly isn't a VM issue. Nothwithstanding the fact there could easily have been multiple isolated issues occurring on the same night and what you're seeing is an entirely different problem to what I'm seeing.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Going work now so may find out later...maybe a nice suprise :) |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
back now & nothing happened,same upstream (not bonded yet) same downstream,same power levels and snr
perhaps was a local problem No complains ;) mistakes or problems always happens with every isp ;) |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Lovely :( And Im not even doing anything online, just checked emails whilst watching the NFL on SKY.
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] So much for my 60mb upgrade https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/36.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Could be worse Dwarven, could live near my area
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img] |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
QTX you stole my limelight :(
here is mine not quite as bad as yours but sitll nasty, for yesterday. http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...13-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Yeah but packet loss is worse. An average latency of 50-150ms is normal on 3G and still perfectly usable.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
What amazed me was about 2 years ago someone in the CEO office at virgin trying to tell me that 15% packet loss was a perfectly acceptable amount for a home connection. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I was actually quite able to game online, even FPS games that didn't have lag compensation on a ~60ms 3G line. It's inconsistency that's the problem.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Out of interest was it xbox gaming? Seems different games and platforms deal with latency in different ways. Virgins jitter caused a lot of warping in some games fps like QuakeLive but I only had experience of some PC titles. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
After a few weeks of having a terrible connection like the ones just posted. At midnight last night my modem when down lost sync then came back up with 2 upstream channels :D
Finnally http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...14-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
No, it was PC gaming. Team Fortress 2. Recent (well, 2009?) OFCOM tests showed 3G had a lower average jitter than VM. Latency around my area has always been good - we were, at the time, always the first area for new tech to be rolled out, and often I get lower pings to London servers on 3G in Edinburgh than I do in central London.
With 4G I suspect latency will become on-par with VM "fibre optic" meaning mobile gaming may become indistinguishable. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Also have a feeling that more speed with mean more latency issues with 4G too. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
4G will be far lower latency than 3G.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum