Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

Hehehe

The BBC Interview was conducted in a private room so unlikely there is any loose footage lying around on CCTV or Camcorders.

I don't expect they would be willing to release the unedited footage, although it would indeed be interesting and synonymous with Smokey and Bandit out takes ;)

Alexander Hanff

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

Couldnt you put a DPA request in for the footage, even the unedited stuff?

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

ohh what a shame, a private room and so no footage and no fancy IT backdrops looking over your shoulder ;(


just a reminder, is there any small claim and named person's injunction advice in them books we might use to our advantage!

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

I've now had a reply to my email to Nick Clegg,

His office have stated that the Lib Dems are fully aware of Phorm and believe if it is introduced it should be opt-in only.

They included a link to the early day motion.

They also claim that they are seeking other ways to attack Gordon Brown's surveillance society, and that strongly comitted to protecting privacy and civil liberties.

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDe...px?EDMID=35552

Signatory counts so far:

Conservative Party 1
Democratic Unionist Party 4
INDEPENDENT LABOUR 1
Labour Party 10
Liberal Democrats 20

Does this suggest that members of a particular group have conflicting intereests, or that senior members of that party have conflicting interests and instructions have been issued?:(

(Not heard back from my MP yet)

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

Thanks for the update, jelv. :)

I don't know about the conflicting interests or instructions, but I can tell you that the number of signatories has gone up 7 since I posted the link to this EDM on here yesterday, so that's a good thing, at least.

Keep writing to your MPs and MEPs, folks.

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

Peter Bottomley seems to be the only Tory, and he's always been his own man.

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Cleaned it up a little.

Alexander Hanff

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

just a reminder about RIPA, perhaps Rolands officer contacts might be of some use getting good solid advice/feedback.

i wonder what their personal view of being intercepted is too, if they have an ISP phorming them in the office or at home.

the Stanford case being the prosecution under RIPA and the subsequent loss of appeal by the ISP Executive involved case law as per Alexander and my finding earlyer in this thread so the board and executive managers can be Prosecuted, dont forget that.

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pi...il/084400.html
"
Police, Home Office, and Phorm

Roland Perry ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:42:42 +0100
Previous message: Police, Home Office, and Phorm
Next message: Police, Home Office, and Phorm
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <MBELJPEGAMOKEHHLKHHOMEKACCAA.pjohn at blueyonder.co.uk>, Pete
John <pjohn at blueyonder.co.uk> writes
>The Police declined to investigate, and told me responsibility
>for enforcing RIPA belongs to the Home Office.

The police investigated the Stanford case (I know some of the officers
involved).

Perhaps the police you talked to are confused, and think your complaint
relates to the oversight of Pt1 Ch2 (as experienced by the police),
which isn't the Home Office either (but the Interception Commissioner).
--
Roland Perry

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

I've had another reply from my MEP Liz Lynne, she has sent me a scanned copy of a letter she has received from the ICo, which is the same as the 1.3 version we have seen on the ICO site. I am pleased with her response as it shows she has been asking questions about the issue and she has said she will contact me again if anything else arises.

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

It's an excellent logo Alexander, well done! is there no end to your talents?

Ali.

P.s. Vector Graphics? :eh: Never heard of it!

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

Not bad considering you don't know that much about graphics, I like the man in the middle. ;)

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

Is he 20 and from Sheffield.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...ndid=144831302

---------- Post added at 15:07 ---------- Previous post was at 15:05 ----------

Or
Brett Munckton

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]
and
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Its way to similar! don't want to be done for Passing Off now. Not trying to be too critical - because I love what you are doing Alex - but we should reconsider this logo.

Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
 

its a way to create a graphic that scales to any size without loss of detail blockness as you might see on ordinary graphics apps when using the zoom option.

much the same as vector f(ph)onts :)

perhaps a smaller version is required, thinking about when news stories want to quote some PO text ect, does it fit on screen or paper well as a sidebar GFX!