Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   In Defense of the Marriage (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=7273)

Ignition 13-02-2004 20:55

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nor
Been meaning to do that test for a while now. Finally got round to it ....

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Same as Gandhi apparantly.

Not much different here tbh,

The Political Compass

Economic Left/Right: -5.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.28

Slightly more left, slightly more libertarian. :)

Graham 13-02-2004 22:31

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
For those doing the Political Compass test, I'm splitting this off into a new thread to stop it distracting from this one...

I've moved it into the Lifestyle forum:

http://forum.nthellworld.co.uk/showt...948#post137948

downquark1 14-02-2004 11:13

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Apparently allowing gay marriage will promote anarchy::rolleyes:
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...ts&acc&wvx-300

I'm divided on this. I think it is immoral to deny marriage, but I also think democracy must be upheld :(
I've said before: most people are idiots :pp

Russ 14-02-2004 18:12

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Thought I'd post this just in case someone might be interested....

Xaccers 14-02-2004 18:15

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D
Thought I'd post this just in case someone might be interested....


Sorry Russ, I had to smile. :D
Personally I prefer another kind of spooning :naughty:

xaq141175 14-02-2004 21:18

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Left and Right wing are not references to ideologys, but rather thier establishment of them.

Take Hitler for example ... he started out as a leftwinger as his partys policys were considered 'radical', which means new, liberal, experimental etc.

But when Hitler got into power and had his policys passed into legislation, he became right wing. the policys became part of the establishement and he didn't want them to change, so he was a 'conservative' at that point, he wished to conserve his policys.

This is why Hitler is referred to as right-wing by most historians. It was when he got into power that he became relevant to historic events, not before when he was a liberal. and it was when he got to power that he became dangerous.

In facism though i'm not sure the left/right model applies ... left/right indicates some kind of political contrast, an opposition ... there is no opposition in fascism, so no contrast. nothing to distinguish the left from the right.

BBKing 14-02-2004 22:14

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Quote:

Take Hitler for example ... he started out as a leftwinger as his partys policys were considered 'radical', which means new, liberal, experimental etc.
Oh dear. I did a lot of research to back up my claim that Hitler was right wing from day one, backed by the military, industry and the middle classes and ideologically opposed to the left-wingers who were trying to set up Soviet style socialism in post WWI Germany. It's all there in the history books.

Fascism is the tyranny of the strong and powerful and that inequality is built in at a race level, with powerful races permitted to subjugate or eliminate weaker ones.
The opposite of fascism is a philosophy that everyone starts off equal and power should be given, not taken, i.e. a modern multicultural liberal democratic viewpoint.

xaq141175 15-02-2004 00:47

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
i agree that hitler was right wing, but he didn't start out that way. my original point of left/right not being linially linked to ideology's is still valid though, hell, the whole concept of it came from the french revolution to explain the seating arrangments of the bougeois and the prolitariats, just like in the house of commons where the government sits to the right of the speaker, and the opposition, the left side.

as far as the definition of fascism is concerned, i'll use the dictionary thanks :D

Maggy 21-02-2004 14:06

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
I see that the Governer of California has weighed in on this issue.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3508969.stm

'An imminent risk to civil order'. :eek:

Russ 21-02-2004 14:12

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Hmm, maybe I was wrong about Arnie.

Stuart 21-02-2004 14:22

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Incognitas
I see that the Governer of California has weighed in on this issue.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3508969.stm

'An imminent risk to civil order'. :eek:

I am sorry, I don't agree that same sex marriages present an imminent risk to civil order.

Maggy 21-02-2004 14:29

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by scastle
I am sorry, I don't agree that same sex marriages present an imminent risk to civil order.

Niether do I,it was a quote from Arnie. :)

Stuart 21-02-2004 15:49

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Incognitas
Niether do I,it was a quote from Arnie. :)

Sorry, got interrupted before I could finish the post. I didn't think you had said it. I was disagreeing with Arnie. not you Incog..

downquark1 21-02-2004 16:49

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Someone tried to citizen arrest the mayor of san franscico the other day :o

downquark1 24-02-2004 17:39

Re: In Defense of the Marriage
 
Bush calls for constitutional ammendment to prevent gay marriage
video
Fox news article
BBC article


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:27.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum