![]() |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Quote:
*apologies for the interdental lisp… |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Personally, I think they should retain the existing liveries, even if they do nationalise them. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
It'll soon get an asbo graffiti paint job. Hopefully nothing rude :LOL:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
More fun and games promised later today when the exchanges between Mandelson and government minsters are released!
https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...enoch-12593360 |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Defense secretary resigns
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cgqeg09p3p1t https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2993909.html |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
The wretched government have spent their two years complaining about the Tories having "hollowed out" the armed forces. And then spent the tax money needed to reverse that on welfare.
The height of irresponsibility. Cards still being played by that liar Starmer. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
We can't keep public transport and the NHS working, schools and education in general has fallen into the pit of despair, and the police are damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Not sure if we had far greater armed forces we could arm them with anything better than small rainbow flags with 'welcome' printed across the middle. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
starmer will no doubt spout some drivel about school breakfast clubs and all the houses they're not building
---------- Post added at 13:25 ---------- Previous post was at 13:23 ---------- Quote:
update: ive sticky taped a pen knife to it ready for hand to hand combat |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
The sooner we get Burnham into No 10 the better on the basis that he can't be any worse!
Unfortunately, Starmer's regime seems to have adopted its Conservative predecessors' definitions of "strong and stable" rather than what you and I think this term means. It's a real shame that the reduction in GDP came when we most needed it to increase defence spending. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
They keep spending it on cars, new iPhones, 60" TV's, cookers, washing machines, furniture, clothes, sunglasses :erm: etc. . . which is good, until you realise many of the above are imported and therefore the UK only gets a miserably small amount. Having said that, I highly doubt any manufacturing companies in the UK will get away with paying workers £35 for a 60 hour week ;) |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
They don’t like it up ‘em. ---------- Post added at 14:10 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Just check out what there pals getting for clocking in at the lords . The government knows how to look after themselves.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2026/06/1.jpeg |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
People make me laugh, we have sold our souls in terms of all those public assets that should be making the country money and we are left scratching around hoping inflation will eventually wipe away our debts and now there's no money people still want first rate services except of course they'll have to pay for them, they want this labour government to right the wrongs of the last 50 years, with no extra money and if they don't do it overnight there will be trouble and we'll invite some extremists to show us how shafting everyone who isn't a millionaire donar should be done properly, this country.... :(
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
hehe yep, and there are articles all over the net (and some media) about how people shouldn't fall into the 'buy now pay later' trap of borrowing more than you can afford to pay back . . yet the Government(s) seem to see it as the only fiscal approach there is :D
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
It’s not looking too good is it? |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
It’s almost as if Starmer has a list of Ways In Which I can Screw Up Today on his office wall and is ticking them off one by one. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Starmer just doesn't want to do anything bold or decisive, either. I wonder if anyone told him that a big part of being PM is making decisions. He seems to take the path of least resistance for everything, until he is forced to do something because things have got too bad.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Dan Jarvis has got the job now, but he can’t really *do* the job if the Treasury won’t give out the money he needs and Starmer’s too weak to force them.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Well at least we have a fully trained (and armed) army of farmers and landowners who have extensive experience if they send drones at us . .
https://external-content.duckduckgo....ecf&ipo=images |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Did you see Starmer on the news at the G&? In the mingling, did you notice that Starmer stood there, looking like a right pirrock, everyone else shaking hands and greeting each other whilst Mr. Nobody was completely ignored?
With a bit of luck, Kemi noticed this and can use it at next PMQs. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Funnily enough, there are pictures of Trump being totally ignored, too. If a photographer waits long enough, they can get pictures of any of them standing a
One. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1781647552 |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Caption for that photo above:
"who let these people into MY photo" |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
looks like the war is on for the keys to number 10
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...t-news-updates remember andy is a normal working class bloke who smashes his breakfast avocado with a clog |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
In that war Sir Keir will find himself more impotent than an air traffic controller looking at Iranian drones about to crash into his airport in Dubai.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
It's immensely interesting as we await the Westminster fallout and positioning of the various ministers whose £100+K salaries could go down the pan later this year. Most reasonable folk want to see Starmer squirm out of his job; but they don't want to see more Labour as a result. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Hugh goes to a lot of useless trouble to wield his picador stick.
I think my post correctly hit the right spot. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
You would - you think "reasonable" means "people who agree with you", so at least you're consistent in your delusions... ;)
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Quote:
FWIW I think most people want to see Starmer out - he’s simply not lived up to expectations given the emphatic majority in Westminster (if not among voters). A majority voted for someone else and the minority who voted for him now more than half of them want him out. It’ll be interesting to see if Burnham proves to just be a northern Starmer. Recipe for a ballot box implosion in two or three years time. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Well spotted, John. And - at least we have converged on something.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
(even if you’ve approached the agreement from different directions - Seph thinks Starmer is too left-wing, jf thinks he’s too right-wing… :D ) |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Cards on the table, i want Starmer to go in the most embarrassing way possible.I hate the man and he can take Rachael from accounts with him as well.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
As a pensioner who watched Papa freeze to death, I also wish Starmer an emotionally painful and belittling downfall.
BUT - if Burnham’s current attempt to get support from 200+ MPs runs into trouble, don’t yet write Starmer off. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
So if Burnham becomes Prime Minister will we see Rachael from accounts returned to the accounts dept.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Don't see why a big shift in policies should happen as a one-off result of a by-election in one constituency. Doesn't have the mandate. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
From the little I've bothered reading, it seems Burnham will be making the same 'promises' that Starmer made . . probably followed by the same U-Turns due to the same lack of cash.
Also pushing for HS2 to continue to Manchester . . . a vote loser if ever I saw one :erm: |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
HS2 should have gone to Leeds! Nah - Carth is right; HS2 is an absolute example of what’s wrong with the political class; they are as bats as the bat tunnel. They do not know how to let a contract and the contractors are wise to the governments’ stupidity.
And look at what these projects spawn: huge speeding fines along the A43 where you go through the HS2 works at Brackley.. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Just imagine if all the HS2 money & materials spent to shave 5 minutes off a train journey was instead ploughed into social housing, NHS, dentists (lol) . . in fact anything that would help (rather than decimate) communities
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Apparently there are over 100 MP's calling for starmer to resign, I would love for him to do it but as a middle finger to Labour and those who wanted him out, doing what he always demanded of the conservatives, I hope if he does resign he also calls for a general election!
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Why?
The last four Tory PMs* who resigned didn’t….. *in 2016, 2019, 2022, & 2022… |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
He called for a general election each time the conservatives swapped leader, he called for a general election when Liz Truss was blamed for crashing the economy which she didn't, it was down to bond/gilt yields and the bank of england iirc, since 99% of her policies never actually got implemented. He called for one at every possible opportunity, now he will be his 2 faced spineless self and just allow Burnham the guy who wanted people to pay £18 each way per day to drive in and out of all areas of Greater Manchester, no matter what they drove, to become the PM when the leadership challenge is launched. Burnham is worse than Starmer as difficult as that is to imagine, but hey ho he will be the next PM and just wait, taxes will sky rocket, congestion charges, ULEZ, Clean Air Zones will be put across the whole country, personal transport will be banned if it uses a motor even an electric one. The guy is a clown and will, force the UK without a vote back into the EU, taking the Euro as currency, getting rid of the army, navy and air force in order to solely rely on the EU Army! |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Nicola West has made a very good song about him.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
The key difference is that this will be an orchestrated coup with a vastly different agenda in mind.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Truss's unelected agenda was vastly different from that of her predecessors. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer expected to resign tomorrow it seems.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
as leader i think starmer won 411 seats , king andy has won one seat i can't see why starmer would resign, don't get me wrong i hate the man but why should king andy get an easy ride to the top job
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Quite ridiculous in my view. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Andy "I Am Legend" Burnham is the current flavour of the month in political circles.
To the general public he's probably just another 'wannabe' PM with big promises and grand ideas that will fail to materialise. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Who needs a holiday in Europe these days? With temperatures in the 30s, a football team playing very well* and a new PM every two years, England is becoming more European than ever! :D
* second half v Croatia |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Ultimately, Starmer has largely been a failure and lost all confidence of his MPs. It's slightly surprising how badly he has done, but he seemed to have no plan at all.
---------- Post added at 10:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:09 ---------- Quote:
You can't say she wasn't warned, either. Sunak himself had said her plans would cause this, but she played the 'project fear' card and promptly tanked the economy and her leadership. As for the general election, yes, it will be hypocritical. It always is when a PM resigns. When Brown took over, there were plenty of people demanding an election that didn't demand it when the Tories changed leader. Now there will be people who demanded an election after each Conservative PM changed that will say no election is needed. Happens all the time. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
Also, HS2 was about increasing capacity as well as speed. Taking pressure off regional services by having an additional direct intercity train line. It would have made journeys between cities shorter and increased local services and train capacity. We should have funded such things when interest rates were at rock bottom. More jobs, more spending in the economy and eventually more modern infrastructure. Instead, we just cut everything and wonder why the country is slowly dying. We don't want infrastructure built, we want to make it more difficult to trade with other nations, we want to make it more difficult for even very qualified people to move here and work, and we also don't want to make it easy to start new businesses. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
It’s all double edged stuff. Stornger poiund puts our exports up; weaker poud attracts investors. Presumably they want to buy our companies to make money and again, presumably, through employment here. The “presumablies” are the potential worry. For example if they are raiding intellectual property rights in order to take them away, then we’re stuffed. So, on balance, I think you’re right about a strong pound. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Best friend or not, I’m rather embarrassed to say that Starmer was right not to join in on the Iran war. But ‘join in’ has flexible boundaries. In one interpretation, it ‘not joining in’ means keeping totally clear of any political or tangible assistance; in another interpretation, it could mean not physically engaging but allowing our closest ally to use our sovereign bases for the USA’s purposes. I favoured the latter. Starmer was right because Trump would have wanted to be the senior person who would call all the shots and would have got into the current mess whether or not we were in there with him. Also, even Starmer must have realised that Trump is NOT a trusted partner. All deals/partnerships need a basis for trust. Trump only understands domination. One day, when he is ghone, a trusted alliance can be rebuilt. In the meantime, may Starmer squirm and cry in his bed. May his whatsits turn square and fester at the corners. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:52 ---------- Previous post was at 17:49 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
The more I think it is completely ridiculous a non-MP can stalk a PM out of office.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
That said, it'll be fun watching Burnham getting nowhere and a tragedy for us all as regards what he'll do to the nation. I blame the Tories for screwing up so badly. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Not defending the bloke, but surely he doesn't just 'do stuff' without guidance, research and expert advice from the people he's assigned to head up various departments. Funnily enough (once again) those who led him down the path are those with the knives out :D
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Burnham is a fan of PR, he'll get my vote in perpetuity if he brings that in, imagine everyone's vote actually counting for something and no more of this 30% of the vote and 100% of the power BS
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
---------- Post added at 23:18 ---------- Previous post was at 23:15 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
The lectern is out at no 10
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
he's off :cleader: best birthday present i've had
i'm so emotional,running out of tissues,i can hear the worlds smallest violin playing ... |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
The next week or so could be better entertainment than the bigliest and besterest Trump World Cup :D
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Depends if anyone challenges Burnham
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
I’m coming round to the idea that news channels should be regulated to only have a percentage of Westminster coverage, and a minimum percentage covering news stories from around the UK.
It’s one big Westminster podcast of tittle tattle. |
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
And there we go.
Keir Starmer announces his resignation as prime minister and leader of Labour Party Just not quite yet. Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Can we also ban those reporters and 'correspondents' that speak in a dull flat robotic monotone, and those with the squeaky highly exited voice that cuts like a knife.
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
Re: Starmer’s chronicles
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum