Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Starmer’s chronicles (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712992)

Hugh 21-05-2026 20:23

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36215935)
were you a navi in a former life,cos you sure like digging up shyte

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36215938)
i have guessed ww1 trench warfare tech ;)

It’s as if Oscar Wilde was reincarnated in North Lincolnshire, but with more polydactyly and less pithy* wit…

*apologies for the interdental lisp…

1andrew1 21-05-2026 20:27

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36215948)


Those trains are like southern which are old now. The seats need replacing. The carriages the driver sits in have tables. This is exciting. :D

That looks like GB News on wheels. Let's hope it's more reliable! :D

Personally, I think they should retain the existing liveries, even if they do nationalise them.

thenry 21-05-2026 20:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
It'll soon get an asbo graffiti paint job. Hopefully nothing rude :LOL:

papa smurf 22-05-2026 05:54

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36215949)
It’s as if Oscar Wilde was reincarnated in North Lincolnshire, but with more polydactyly and less pithy* wit…

*apologies for the interdental lisp…

North east Lincolnshire, do ya dig me ;)

1andrew1 01-06-2026 08:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
More fun and games promised later today when the exchanges between Mandelson and government minsters are released!
https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...enoch-12593360

papa smurf 11-06-2026 11:17

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Defense secretary resigns


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cgqeg09p3p1t


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2993909.html

Sephiroth 11-06-2026 11:51

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
The wretched government have spent their two years complaining about the Tories having "hollowed out" the armed forces. And then spent the tax money needed to reverse that on welfare.

The height of irresponsibility. Cards still being played by that liar Starmer.

Carth 11-06-2026 12:21

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
We can't keep public transport and the NHS working, schools and education in general has fallen into the pit of despair, and the police are damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Not sure if we had far greater armed forces we could arm them with anything better than small rainbow flags with 'welcome' printed across the middle.

papa smurf 11-06-2026 12:25

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
starmer will no doubt spout some drivel about school breakfast clubs and all the houses they're not building

---------- Post added at 13:25 ---------- Previous post was at 13:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217102)
We can't keep public transport and the NHS working, schools and education in general has fallen into the pit of despair, and the police are damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Not sure if we had far greater armed forces we could arm them with anything better than small rainbow flags with 'welcome' printed across the middle.

i've taken the head off my yard brush ready to do my dads army bit :)

update: ive sticky taped a pen knife to it ready for hand to hand combat

1andrew1 11-06-2026 12:25

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
The sooner we get Burnham into No 10 the better on the basis that he can't be any worse!

Unfortunately, Starmer's regime seems to have adopted its Conservative predecessors' definitions of "strong and stable" rather than what you and I think this term means.

It's a real shame that the reduction in GDP came when we most needed it to increase defence spending.

Carth 11-06-2026 12:52

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36217103)
starmer will no doubt spout some drivel about school breakfast clubs and all the houses they're not building

---------- Post added at 13:25 ---------- Previous post was at 13:23 ----------



i've taken the head off my yard brush ready to do my dads army bit :)

update: ive sticky taped a pen knife to it ready for hand to hand combat

I'm now looking to trade the car in, but there doesn't seem to be any of those 4x4 pickups with a 50mm mounted in the rear available.

Damien 11-06-2026 13:01

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217102)
We can't keep public transport and the NHS working, schools and education in general has fallen into the pit of despair, and the police are damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Not sure if we had far greater armed forces we could arm them with anything better than small rainbow flags with 'welcome' printed across the middle.

We don't have money, and we hollowed out big aspects of the state so we need even more money than we had before.

Carth 11-06-2026 13:36

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36217107)
We don't have money, and we hollowed out big aspects of the state so we need even more money than we had before.

We (the UK) don't seem to have any money, but the people seem to.

They keep spending it on cars, new iPhones, 60" TV's, cookers, washing machines, furniture, clothes, sunglasses :erm: etc. . . which is good, until you realise many of the above are imported and therefore the UK only gets a miserably small amount.

Having said that, I highly doubt any manufacturing companies in the UK will get away with paying workers £35 for a 60 hour week ;)

Sephiroth 11-06-2026 14:10

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36217103)
starmer will no doubt spout some drivel about school breakfast clubs and all the houses they're not building

---------- Post added at 13:25 ---------- Previous post was at 13:23 ----------



i've taken the head off my yard brush ready to do my dads army bit :)

update: ive sticky taped a pen knife to it ready for hand to hand combat


They don’t like it up ‘em.


---------- Post added at 14:10 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217108)
We (the UK) don't seem to have any money, but the people seem to.

They keep spending it on cars, new iPhones, 60" TV's, cookers, washing machines, furniture, clothes, sunglasses :erm: etc. . . which is good, until you realise many of the above are imported and therefore the UK only gets a miserably small amount.

Having said that, I highly doubt any manufacturing companies in the UK will get away with paying workers £35 for a 60 hour week ;)

If the people have money, the bustards will tax it.

Carth 11-06-2026 14:22

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217111)

They don’t like it up ‘em.


---------- Post added at 14:10 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ----------



If the people have money, the bustards will tax it.

It's taxed when you earn it, taxed when you spend it, even taxed when you peg it. Maybe we could go back to bartering?

Sephiroth 11-06-2026 14:44

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217114)
It's taxed when you earn it, taxed when you spend it, even taxed when you peg it. Maybe we could go back to bartering?

They’ll tax that too

Itshim 11-06-2026 16:34

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Just check out what there pals getting for clocking in at the lords . The government knows how to look after themselves.

Paul 11-06-2026 17:18

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36217105)
The sooner we get Burnham into No 10 the better on the basis that he can't be any worse!

However, he also could be worse.

Hugh 11-06-2026 17:46

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36217120)
Just check out what there pals getting for clocking in at the lords . The government knows how to look after themselves.

I agree

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2026/06/1.jpeg

TheDaddy 11-06-2026 18:12

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
People make me laugh, we have sold our souls in terms of all those public assets that should be making the country money and we are left scratching around hoping inflation will eventually wipe away our debts and now there's no money people still want first rate services except of course they'll have to pay for them, they want this labour government to right the wrongs of the last 50 years, with no extra money and if they don't do it overnight there will be trouble and we'll invite some extremists to show us how shafting everyone who isn't a millionaire donar should be done properly, this country.... :(

Carth 11-06-2026 18:36

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
hehe yep, and there are articles all over the net (and some media) about how people shouldn't fall into the 'buy now pay later' trap of borrowing more than you can afford to pay back . . yet the Government(s) seem to see it as the only fiscal approach there is :D

jem 11-06-2026 20:08

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217136)
hehe yep, and there are articles all over the net (and some media) about how people shouldn't fall into the 'buy now pay later' trap of borrowing more than you can afford to pay back . . yet the Government(s) seem to see it as the only fiscal approach there is :D

And now Al Carnes (the former armed forces minister) has resigned for the same reason, and this is someone who served four tours in Afghanistan.

It’s not looking too good is it?

Chris 11-06-2026 20:27

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36217094)

It absolutely beggars belief that Russia is actively harrying Nato borders, charting every undersea cable surrounding our islands, and laughing at the widely-known fact that we more or less don’t have a functioning navy, and yet No.10 and the Treasury are determined to keep making the same mistakes that every government has made for the last 30 years to get us in this position.

It’s almost as if Starmer has a list of Ways In Which I can Screw Up Today on his office wall and is ticking them off one by one.

Damien 11-06-2026 20:46

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Starmer just doesn't want to do anything bold or decisive, either. I wonder if anyone told him that a big part of being PM is making decisions. He seems to take the path of least resistance for everything, until he is forced to do something because things have got too bad.

Chris 11-06-2026 21:02

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Dan Jarvis has got the job now, but he can’t really *do* the job if the Treasury won’t give out the money he needs and Starmer’s too weak to force them.

Carth 11-06-2026 21:09

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Well at least we have a fully trained (and armed) army of farmers and landowners who have extensive experience if they send drones at us . .

https://external-content.duckduckgo....ecf&ipo=images

Sephiroth 16-06-2026 19:14

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Did you see Starmer on the news at the G&? In the mingling, did you notice that Starmer stood there, looking like a right pirrock, everyone else shaking hands and greeting each other whilst Mr. Nobody was completely ignored?

With a bit of luck, Kemi noticed this and can use it at next PMQs.

Dingbat 16-06-2026 19:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Funnily enough, there are pictures of Trump being totally ignored, too. If a photographer waits long enough, they can get pictures of any of them standing a
One.

Sephiroth 16-06-2026 19:41

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dingbat (Post 36217512)
Funnily enough, there are pictures of Trump being totally ignored, too. If a photographer waits long enough, they can get pictures of any of them standing a
One.

I'm happy with that!

Hugh 16-06-2026 22:06

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dingbat (Post 36217512)
Funnily enough, there are pictures of Trump being totally ignored, too. If a photographer waits long enough, they can get pictures of any of them standing a
One.

As you say…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1781647552

Carth 16-06-2026 22:59

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Caption for that photo above:

"who let these people into MY photo"

Dingbat 16-06-2026 23:09

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217525)
Caption for that photo above:

"who let these people into MY photo"

Alternatively, everyone in the background are trying to get away from the odour of ordure.

papa smurf 19-06-2026 05:58

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
looks like the war is on for the keys to number 10

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...t-news-updates



remember andy is a normal working class bloke who smashes his breakfast avocado with a clog

jfman 19-06-2026 06:26

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
In that war Sir Keir will find himself more impotent than an air traffic controller looking at Iranian drones about to crash into his airport in Dubai.

Sephiroth 19-06-2026 08:10

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36217692)
In that war Sir Keir will find himself more impotent than an air traffic controller looking at Iranian drones about to crash into his airport in Dubai.

In that war, Sir Keir will find himself more impotent than all fools who think that Israel is a terrorist state.

It's immensely interesting as we await the Westminster fallout and positioning of the various ministers whose £100+K salaries could go down the pan later this year.

Most reasonable folk want to see Starmer squirm out of his job; but they don't want to see more Labour as a result.

Hugh 19-06-2026 09:04

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217695)
In that war, Sir Keir will find himself more impotent than all fools who think that Israel is a terrorist state.

It's immensely interesting as we await the Westminster fallout and positioning of the various ministers whose £100+K salaries could go down the pan later this year.

Most reasonable folk want to see Starmer squirm out of his job; but they don't want to see more Labour as a result.

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2026/06/7.gif

Sephiroth 19-06-2026 10:26

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Hugh goes to a lot of useless trouble to wield his picador stick.

I think my post correctly hit the right spot.

Hugh 19-06-2026 10:35

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
You would - you think "reasonable" means "people who agree with you", so at least you're consistent in your delusions... ;)

Sephiroth 19-06-2026 10:47

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36217708)
You would - you think "reasonable" means "people who agree with you", so at least you're consistent in your delusions... ;)

Insults won’t make you right. Of course most reasonable people want Starmer to squirm out of his job. Do you disagree with the message or is targeting the messenger your priority?

jfman 19-06-2026 11:09

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217709)
In that war, Sir Keir will find himself more impotent than all fools who think that Israel is a terrorist state.

Quote:

Insults won’t make you right.
Quite.

FWIW I think most people want to see Starmer out - he’s simply not lived up to expectations given the emphatic majority in Westminster (if not among voters). A majority voted for someone else and the minority who voted for him now more than half of them want him out.

It’ll be interesting to see if Burnham proves to just be a northern Starmer. Recipe for a ballot box implosion in two or three years time.

Sephiroth 19-06-2026 11:13

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Well spotted, John. And - at least we have converged on something.

Hugh 19-06-2026 15:44

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217712)
Well spotted, John. And - at least we have converged on something.

Not often you see a Tankie and a Farage-supporting Berks Conservative agree - congratulations… ;)

(even if you’ve approached the agreement from different directions - Seph thinks Starmer is too left-wing, jf thinks he’s too right-wing… :D )

Sephiroth 19-06-2026 16:01

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36217735)
Not often you see a Tankie and a Farage-supporting Berks Conservative agree - congratulations… ;)

(even if you’ve approached the agreement from different directions - Seph thinks Starmer is too left-wing, jf thinks he’s too right-wing… :D )

One of your better posts, Hugh.

Sirius 19-06-2026 17:08

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Cards on the table, i want Starmer to go in the most embarrassing way possible.I hate the man and he can take Rachael from accounts with him as well.

papa smurf 19-06-2026 17:50

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 36217742)
Cards on the table, i want Starmer to go in the most embarrassing way possible.I hate the man and he can take Rachael from accounts with him as well.

as one of the pensioners he was happy to freeze to death,i hope it's as painful and belittling as possible

Sephiroth 19-06-2026 18:00

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
As a pensioner who watched Papa freeze to death, I also wish Starmer an emotionally painful and belittling downfall.

BUT - if Burnham’s current attempt to get support from 200+ MPs runs into trouble, don’t yet write Starmer off.

papa smurf 19-06-2026 18:04

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217749)
As a pensioner who watched Papa freeze to death, I also wish Starmer an emotionally painful and belittling downfall.

BUT - if Burnham’s current attempt to get support from 200+ MPs runs into trouble, don’t yet write Starmer off.

i didn't freeze to death but starmer didn't care if i did he just cut off funds to 10 million pensioners,and stuck two fingers up at the disabled

Sirius 20-06-2026 06:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
So if Burnham becomes Prime Minister will we see Rachael from accounts returned to the accounts dept.

papa smurf 20-06-2026 06:36

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 36217767)
So if Burnham becomes Prime Minister will we see Rachael from accounts returned to the accounts dept.

only to be replaced by loony ed.he'll pick your pocket to fund labour lunacy :(

nomadking 20-06-2026 06:56

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 36217767)
So if Burnham becomes Prime Minister will we see Rachael from accounts returned to the accounts dept.

The "from accounts" reference is from the TV series "Colin[a dog] From Accounts". She was never in accounts.


Don't see why a big shift in policies should happen as a one-off result of a by-election in one constituency. Doesn't have the mandate.

Carth 20-06-2026 07:36

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
From the little I've bothered reading, it seems Burnham will be making the same 'promises' that Starmer made . . probably followed by the same U-Turns due to the same lack of cash.

Also pushing for HS2 to continue to Manchester . . . a vote loser if ever I saw one :erm:

Sephiroth 20-06-2026 08:09

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
HS2 should have gone to Leeds! Nah - Carth is right; HS2 is an absolute example of what’s wrong with the political class; they are as bats as the bat tunnel. They do not know how to let a contract and the contractors are wise to the governments’ stupidity.

And look at what these projects spawn: huge speeding fines along the A43 where you go through the HS2 works at Brackley..



Carth 20-06-2026 08:23

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Just imagine if all the HS2 money & materials spent to shave 5 minutes off a train journey was instead ploughed into social housing, NHS, dentists (lol) . . in fact anything that would help (rather than decimate) communities

nomadking 20-06-2026 08:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217783)
Just imagine if all the HS2 money & materials spent to shave 5 minutes off a train journey was instead ploughed into social housing, NHS, dentists (lol) . . in fact anything that would help (rather than decimate) communities

Not about reducing the times. It's about reducing the traffic on the existing lines.

Carth 20-06-2026 08:37

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36217785)
Not about reducing the times. It's about reducing the traffic on the existing lines.

Didn't all the strikes and cancellations go far enough then? :D

damien c 20-06-2026 11:50

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Apparently there are over 100 MP's calling for starmer to resign, I would love for him to do it but as a middle finger to Labour and those who wanted him out, doing what he always demanded of the conservatives, I hope if he does resign he also calls for a general election!

Hugh 20-06-2026 13:26

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Why?

The last four Tory PMs* who resigned didn’t…..

*in 2016, 2019, 2022, & 2022…

OLD BOY 20-06-2026 15:08

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36217799)
Why?

The last four Tory PMs* who resigned didn’t…..

*in 2016, 2019, 2022, & 2022…

Yes, Hugh, but he criticised the Conservatives for not calling an election when they changed their leader and said it would be different under Labour.

damien c 20-06-2026 15:22

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36217799)
Why?

The last four Tory PMs* who resigned didn’t…..

*in 2016, 2019, 2022, & 2022…

He won't because he is a multi faced liar.

He called for a general election each time the conservatives swapped leader, he called for a general election when Liz Truss was blamed for crashing the economy which she didn't, it was down to bond/gilt yields and the bank of england iirc, since 99% of her policies never actually got implemented.

He called for one at every possible opportunity, now he will be his 2 faced spineless self and just allow Burnham the guy who wanted people to pay £18 each way per day to drive in and out of all areas of Greater Manchester, no matter what they drove, to become the PM when the leadership challenge is launched.

Burnham is worse than Starmer as difficult as that is to imagine, but hey ho he will be the next PM and just wait, taxes will sky rocket, congestion charges, ULEZ, Clean Air Zones will be put across the whole country, personal transport will be banned if it uses a motor even an electric one.

The guy is a clown and will, force the UK without a vote back into the EU, taking the Euro as currency, getting rid of the army, navy and air force in order to solely rely on the EU Army!

Jaymoss 20-06-2026 17:56

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Nicola West has made a very good song about him.

jem 20-06-2026 18:32

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by damien c (Post 36217812)
He won't because he is a multi faced liar.

He called for a general election each time the conservatives swapped leader, he called for a general election when Liz Truss was blamed for crashing the economy which she didn't, it was down to bond/gilt yields and the bank of england iirc, since 99% of her policies never actually got implemented.

He called for one at every possible opportunity, now he will be his 2 faced spineless self and just allow Burnham the guy who wanted people to pay £18 each way per day to drive in and out of all areas of Greater Manchester, no matter what they drove, to become the PM when the leadership challenge is launched.

Burnham is worse than Starmer as difficult as that is to imagine, but hey ho he will be the next PM and just wait, taxes will sky rocket, congestion charges, ULEZ, Clean Air Zones will be put across the whole country, personal transport will be banned if it uses a motor even an electric one.

The guy is a clown and will, force the UK without a vote back into the EU, taking the Euro as currency, getting rid of the army, navy and air force in order to solely rely on the EU Army!

To be fair, every time a current PM has been ousted, the opposition has called for an immediate General Election on the grounds that xyz has ’no mandate’. It’s expected, it’s just a part of the political process, even though everyone understands that this is not how our (unwritten) Constitution works.

nomadking 20-06-2026 18:39

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
The key difference is that this will be an orchestrated coup with a vastly different agenda in mind.

1andrew1 20-06-2026 21:58

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36217831)
The key difference is that this will be an orchestrated coup with a vastly different agenda in mind.

Burnham has pledged not to raise taxes so his plans can't vary too much economically. Socially he's more conservative than Starmer but that probably puts him closer to the views of the electorate.
Truss's unelected agenda was vastly different from that of her predecessors.

denphone 21-06-2026 07:59

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer expected to resign tomorrow it seems.

papa smurf 21-06-2026 08:08

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
as leader i think starmer won 411 seats , king andy has won one seat i can't see why starmer would resign, don't get me wrong i hate the man but why should king andy get an easy ride to the top job

denphone 21-06-2026 08:38

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36217845)
as leader i think starmer won 411 seats , king andy has won one seat i can't see why starmer would resign, don't get me wrong i hate the man but why should king andy get an easy ride to the top job

We could say that about the six previous prime ministers in the last 10 years with Burnham very likely to be the seventh.


Quite ridiculous in my view.

Carth 21-06-2026 08:45

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Andy "I Am Legend" Burnham is the current flavour of the month in political circles.

To the general public he's probably just another 'wannabe' PM with big promises and grand ideas that will fail to materialise.

1andrew1 21-06-2026 09:02

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Who needs a holiday in Europe these days? With temperatures in the 30s, a football team playing very well* and a new PM every two years, England is becoming more European than ever! :D

* second half v Croatia

Damien 21-06-2026 09:14

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Ultimately, Starmer has largely been a failure and lost all confidence of his MPs. It's slightly surprising how badly he has done, but he seemed to have no plan at all.

---------- Post added at 10:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by damien c (Post 36217812)
He won't because he is a multi faced liar.

He called for a general election each time the conservatives swapped leader, he called for a general election when Liz Truss was blamed for crashing the economy which she didn't, it was down to bond/gilt yields and the bank of england iirc, since 99% of her policies never actually got implemented.

It was the cost of borrowing that spiked after she announced large tax cuts with no plan to pay for them. She lost the confidence of the bond markets, which spiked everyone's mortgages, and the Tories had to get rid of her. It was her fault.

You can't say she wasn't warned, either. Sunak himself had said her plans would cause this, but she played the 'project fear' card and promptly tanked the economy and her leadership.

As for the general election, yes, it will be hypocritical. It always is when a PM resigns. When Brown took over, there were plenty of people demanding an election that didn't demand it when the Tories changed leader. Now there will be people who demanded an election after each Conservative PM changed that will say no election is needed. Happens all the time.

jfman 21-06-2026 09:17

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36217831)
The key difference is that this will be an orchestrated coup with a vastly different agenda in mind.

Is it?

Damien 21-06-2026 09:23

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217783)
Just imagine if all the HS2 money & materials spent to shave 5 minutes off a train journey was instead ploughed into social housing, NHS, dentists (lol) . . in fact anything that would help (rather than decimate) communities

This is silly, though. Investment in infrastructure can help further growth, which in turn would help pay for more day-to-day spending. Housing would also be a good target for such spending. There is a difference between one-off large expenditures in things like HS2 and the yearly spending commitment you make when putting more money into the NHS.

Also, HS2 was about increasing capacity as well as speed. Taking pressure off regional services by having an additional direct intercity train line. It would have made journeys between cities shorter and increased local services and train capacity.

We should have funded such things when interest rates were at rock bottom. More jobs, more spending in the economy and eventually more modern infrastructure. Instead, we just cut everything and wonder why the country is slowly dying. We don't want infrastructure built, we want to make it more difficult to trade with other nations, we want to make it more difficult for even very qualified people to move here and work, and we also don't want to make it easy to start new businesses.

nomadking 21-06-2026 09:24

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36217853)
Is it?

How is it not an orchestrated coup?

jfman 21-06-2026 09:25

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36217855)
How is it not an orchestrated coup?

Oh I’m with you on the orchestrated coup. It”s the belief his policies will be any different.

Sephiroth 21-06-2026 09:55

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36217848)
Who needs a holiday in Europe these days? With temperatures in the 30s, a football team playing very well* and a new PM every two years, England is becoming more European than ever! :D

* second half v Croatia

Then perhaps we should keep things as they are (forgetting Starmer for a moment).

1andrew1 21-06-2026 11:05

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217859)
Then perhaps we should keep things as they are (forgetting Starmer for a moment).

We need to get back to more stable times, economic growth, higher productivity and a stronger Pound that deters UK companies from being snapped up at cheap prices.

Sephiroth 21-06-2026 11:25

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36217864)
We need to get back to more stable times, economic growth, higher productivity and a stronger Pound that deters UK companies from being snapped up at cheap prices.


It’s all double edged stuff. Stornger poiund puts our exports up; weaker poud attracts investors. Presumably they want to buy our companies to make money and again, presumably, through employment here.

The “presumablies” are the potential worry. For example if they are raiding intellectual property rights in order to take them away, then we’re stuffed.

So, on balance, I think you’re right about a strong pound.



thenry 21-06-2026 16:01

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Trump claims Starmer 'will resign' as PM - and wishes him well

https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...#liveblog-body
Is he his best friend or something :shrug:

Carth 21-06-2026 16:15

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36217875)
Is he his best friend or something :shrug:

Trump just noticed something going on that he wasn't named in. If Starmer doesn't resign Trump will claim he never said it, then spitefully declare war on the Isle of Wight and start intercepting ferries between Liverpool & Dublin

Sephiroth 21-06-2026 16:23

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Best friend or not, I’m rather embarrassed to say that Starmer was right not to join in on the Iran war.

But ‘join in’ has flexible boundaries. In one interpretation, it ‘not joining in’ means keeping totally clear of any political or tangible assistance; in another interpretation, it could mean not physically engaging but allowing our closest ally to use our sovereign bases for the USA’s purposes. I favoured the latter.

Starmer was right because Trump would have wanted to be the senior person who would call all the shots and would have got into the current mess whether or not we were in there with him.

Also, even Starmer must have realised that Trump is NOT a trusted partner. All deals/partnerships need a basis for trust. Trump only understands domination. One day, when he is ghone, a trusted alliance can be rebuilt.

In the meantime, may Starmer squirm and cry in his bed. May his whatsits turn square and fester at the corners.



1andrew1 21-06-2026 16:52

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217877)

Best friend or not, I’m rather embarrassed to say that Starmer was right not to join in on the Iran war.

Yes, to his credit Starmer had the courage to say no whereas Badenoch and Farage would have pandered to Trump and dumped us in it. History shows they're not to be trusted in positions of real power.

---------- Post added at 17:52 ---------- Previous post was at 17:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217876)
Trump just noticed something going on that he wasn't named in. If Starmer doesn't resign Trump will claim he never said it, then spitefully declare war on the Isle of Wight and start intercepting ferries between Liverpool & Dublin

Lol very true except you probably mean the Isle of Man?

Carth 21-06-2026 17:01

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36217878)
Yes, to his credit Starmer had the courage to say no whereas Badenoch and Farage would have pandered to Trump and dumped us in it. History shows they're not to be trusted in positions of real power.

---------- Post added at 17:52 ---------- Previous post was at 17:49 ----------


Lol very true except you probably mean the Isle of Man?

Nope definitely Isle of Wight, the Isle of Man is too near to Scotland, he doesn't want to start a golf war :D

jfman 21-06-2026 19:06

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
The more I think it is completely ridiculous a non-MP can stalk a PM out of office.

Sephiroth 21-06-2026 19:15

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36217889)
The more I think it is completely ridiculous a non-MP can stalk a PM out of office.

The PM should have done better. That's what it boils down to. The vegetables in Starmer's cabinet would not be up to the job.

That said, it'll be fun watching Burnham getting nowhere and a tragedy for us all as regards what he'll do to the nation.

I blame the Tories for screwing up so badly.

Carth 21-06-2026 19:34

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Not defending the bloke, but surely he doesn't just 'do stuff' without guidance, research and expert advice from the people he's assigned to head up various departments. Funnily enough (once again) those who led him down the path are those with the knives out :D

papa smurf 21-06-2026 20:10

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217892)
Not defending the bloke, but surely he doesn't just 'do stuff' without guidance, research and expert advice from the people he's assigned to head up various departments. Funnily enough (once again) those who led him down the path are those with the knives out :D

to be fair they are all incompetent,no one in the real world would entertain them.

TheDaddy 21-06-2026 20:34

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Burnham is a fan of PR, he'll get my vote in perpetuity if he brings that in, imagine everyone's vote actually counting for something and no more of this 30% of the vote and 100% of the power BS

Sephiroth 21-06-2026 20:59

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217892)
Not defending the bloke, but surely he doesn't just 'do stuff' without guidance, research and expert advice from the people he's assigned to head up various departments. Funnily enough (once again) those who led him down the path are those with the knives out :D

Well said.

1andrew1 21-06-2026 22:18

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36217890)

I blame the Tories for screwing up so badly.

Well said, the NHS waiting lists that Starmer inherited were a global embarrassment.

---------- Post added at 23:18 ---------- Previous post was at 23:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36217892)
Not defending the bloke, but surely he doesn't just 'do stuff' without guidance, research and expert advice from the people he's assigned to head up various departments. Funnily enough (once again) those who led him down the path are those with the knives out :D

Yes, but ultimately you don't have to do what they recommend. A few resignations in the Cabinet over the last couple of years suggests this has happened.

TheDaddy 22-06-2026 00:39

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36217905)
Well said, the NHS waiting lists that Starmer inherited were a global embarrassment.

Well said, especially as when they inherited it there was 70% public satisfaction with it

papa smurf 22-06-2026 08:23

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
The lectern is out at no 10

Carth 22-06-2026 08:27

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36217917)
The lectern is out at no 10

aah . . I mistakenly thought 'lectern' was a new silly name for Starmer :D

papa smurf 22-06-2026 08:37

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
he's off :cleader: best birthday present i've had


i'm so emotional,running out of tissues,i can hear the worlds smallest violin playing ...

Carth 22-06-2026 08:46

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
The next week or so could be better entertainment than the bigliest and besterest Trump World Cup :D

Damien 22-06-2026 08:47

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Depends if anyone challenges Burnham

jfman 22-06-2026 08:49

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
I’m coming round to the idea that news channels should be regulated to only have a percentage of Westminster coverage, and a minimum percentage covering news stories from around the UK.

It’s one big Westminster podcast of tittle tattle.

nomadking 22-06-2026 08:50

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
And there we go.
Keir Starmer announces his resignation as prime minister and leader of Labour Party
Just not quite yet.
Quote:

This will mean a new leader is in place before parliament returns in September.
Until then he will remain in post as prime minister, he says.

GrimUpNorth 22-06-2026 09:01

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36217922)
I’m coming round to the idea that news channels should be regulated to only have a percentage of Westminster coverage, and a minimum percentage covering news stories from around the UK.

It’s one big Westminster podcast of tittle tattle.

And a minimum for covering items from none english speaking countries.

Carth 22-06-2026 09:10

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Can we also ban those reporters and 'correspondents' that speak in a dull flat robotic monotone, and those with the squeaky highly exited voice that cuts like a knife.

1andrew1 22-06-2026 09:16

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36217921)
Depends if anyone challenges Burnham

From what I've heard, that's extremely unlikely.

Carth 22-06-2026 09:20

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36217928)
From what I've heard, that's extremely unlikely.

Nobody else wants to sip from the poisoned chalice, much easier to let the next stooge take the seat, then snipe from the background ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum