Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   UK & EU Agree Post-Brexit Trade Deal (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708171)

1andrew1 01-05-2020 15:32

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Interesting Tweet from Fabian Zuleeg, Chief Executive & Chief Economist, European Policy Centre
Quote:

Whatever someone's views might be on ECHR & ECJ, fisheries, whether EU is being fair, whether UK-EU relationship is a special case, whether LPF conditions are appropriate, whether Canada should be/is available etc, political reality = deal only if EU's preconditions will be met.
https://twitter.com/FabianZuleeg/sta...94431482560514

I don't see trade deals with the US and China being at all likely at the moment so even less wriggle room for the UK.

jonbxx 01-05-2020 15:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36033521)
Interesting Tweet from Fabian Zuleeg, Chief Executive & Chief Economist, European Policy Centre

https://twitter.com/FabianZuleeg/sta...94431482560514

I don't see trade deals with the US and China being at all likely at the moment so even less wriggle room for the UK.

Strange he should reference ECHR as that's nothing to do with the EU

Chris 01-05-2020 16:10

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36033521)
Interesting Tweet from Fabian Zuleeg, Chief Executive & Chief Economist, European Policy Centre

https://twitter.com/FabianZuleeg/sta...94431482560514

I don't see trade deals with the US and China being at all likely at the moment so even less wriggle room for the UK.

Quite.

Quote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Policy_Centre

The European Policy Centre (EPC) is a Brussels-based not-for-profit think tank on European Union affairs, founded in 1997.

Herman Van Rompuy is President of the European Policy Centre and chairs its Advisory Council, which includes many prominent EU figures
Van Rompuy was the first permanently appointed president of the European Council. He served in that role from 2009-2014. Nigel Farage famously told him, “You have the charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low grade bank clerk.”

So it’s not a place I’d go looking for impartial observations about the U.K.-EU negotiations. Or on anything to do with the EU for that matter.

OLD BOY 02-05-2020 16:52

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
So, trade talks with the US will start next week as the negotiations with Brussels have stalled. At this rate, we will conclude discussions with the States before the EU, which would be an incredible result.

Maybe this will make the EU sit up and take notice at last. Sooner or later, it will dawn on them that we are serious in wanting a trade deal free of the restrictions they are trying to impose on us.

This also shows the naysayers on the forum that negotiations can continue notwithstanding the resources we are throwing into the containment of Covid-19.

jfman 02-05-2020 17:24

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36033637)
So, trade talks with the US will start next week as the negotiations with Brussels have stalled. At this rate, we will conclude discussions with the States before the EU, which would be an incredible result.

Maybe this will make the EU sit up and take notice at last. Sooner or later, it will dawn on them that we are serious in wanting a trade deal free of the restrictions they are trying to impose on us.

This also shows the naysayers on the forum that negotiations can continue notwithstanding the resources we are throwing into the containment of Covid-19.

I admire your optimism Old Boy. It took from negotiations concluding in 2006 until 2012 for a trade deal between the United States and Panama to come into effect.

There's no evidence for your statement starting "at this rate..." at all.

I'm 100% confident that the UK can "start negotiations" over anything it pleases during Covid-19 given the loosest possible definition would constitute one junior Civil Servant on a Zoom call.

Hugh 02-05-2020 17:46

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36033637)
So, trade talks with the US will start next week as the negotiations with Brussels have stalled. At this rate, we will conclude discussions with the States before the EU, which would be an incredible result.

Maybe this will make the EU sit up and take notice at last. Sooner or later, it will dawn on them that we are serious in wanting a trade deal free of the restrictions they are trying to impose on us.

This also shows the naysayers on the forum that negotiations can continue notwithstanding the resources we are throwing into the containment of Covid-19.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-br...-idUKKBN22D69H
Quote:

"Both countries are committed to starting trade negotiations as soon as possible to reach a comprehensive free trade agreement in these unprecedented times,” a spokeswoman for Britain’s Department for International Trade said, but declined to confirm the timeline in The Sun report.
btw, I’m sure this comment in the Sun article will go down well with The Donald...

Quote:

Donald Trump is desperate to do a deal by the Autumn ahead of the November presidential election

Sephiroth 09-05-2020 20:29

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 

"A longer Brexit transition is pointless, dangerous, and plays straight into Mr Barnier’s hands"

So opines Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in the Torygraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...lays-straight/

Some important extracts from this first rate article:

Quote:

The EU’s “future arrangements” proposal is not a trade deal at all. It is an attempt to lock the UK into its legal structure under the ECJ. Michel Barnier insists that the UK must swallow the acquis on competition, state aid, labour, and the environment – and future acquis through “dynamic alignment” – demanding “level playing-field’ clauses of a character quite different from normal FTAs.

In other words, the EU is still refusing to treat Britain as an independent sovereign state. Since our proposal is not so far removed from an “Australian” or WTO settlement that Europe cannot deny, it would be craven to accept these terms.
Quote:

The EU is trying to impose terms appropriate only for a country defeated in war. My presumption is that it cannot take the diplomatic and economic risk of pushing this ideological agenda much further.
The article points out that during the transition period the UK must obey EU law and during any extension must continue to make payments to the EU. It asks to what extent the UK would be sucked into paying more as a result of the 2021-2027 budget (albeit we're not part of that). Ambrose E-P says an extension is exactly what the EU wants because of the money and a degree of trading stability in difficult times.

For what my opinion is worth, the Guvmin would not negotiate an extension that led to us paying more than we would in any previous year.

But it would be very dangerous to seek an extension - it prevents us from doing trade deals elsewhere and jeeps us where the EU wants.


OLD BOY 09-05-2020 20:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36034460)
[COLOR="Blue"]
"A longer Brexit transition is pointless, dangerous, and plays straight into Mr Barnier’s hands"

So opines Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in the Torygraph.

Yes, and if Barnier does any more of his clock impressions, he can take a running jump!

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36034460)


The article points out that during the transition period the UK must obey EU law and during any extension must continue to make payments to the EU. It asks to what extent the UK would be sucked into paying more as a result of the 2021-2027 budget (albeit we're not part of that). Ambrose E-P says an extension is exactly what the EU wants because of the money and a degree of trading stability in difficult times.


Fat chance.

1andrew1 09-05-2020 21:23

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36034460)
Ambrose E-P says an extension is exactly what the EU wants because of the money and a degree of trading stability in difficult times.
For what my opinion is worth, the Guvmin would not negotiate an extension that led to us paying more than we would in any previous year.
But it would be very dangerous to seek an extension - it prevents us from doing trade deals elsewhere and jeeps us where the EU wants.

We would need to be careful on what we paid but trading stability is something that the UK needs at a time when Coronavirus is impacting a lot of the World. If we are currently allowed to negotiate a trade deal with the US then obviously we can continue to do trade deals elsewhere.

Sephiroth 09-05-2020 23:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36034471)
We would need to be careful on what we paid but trading stability is something that the UK needs at a time when Coronavirus is impacting a lot of the World. If we are currently allowed to negotiate a trade deal with the US then obviously we can continue to do trade deals elsewhere.

On your second sentence, what I meant was executing trade with the USA and others.

Your first sentence is the nub of the matter. Economics vs sovereignty.

1andrew1 10-05-2020 00:14

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36034484)
On your second sentence, what I meant was executing trade with the USA and others.

Your first sentence is the nub of the matter. Economics vs sovereignty.

Trade deals take years to negotiate even without the delays resulting from Covid-19. So another year as is won't stop a US one being executed. That's years away, even assuming that it happens.
Not sure there's much lack of sovereignty at the moment in practical terms.

jfman 10-05-2020 03:36

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36034484)
Economics vs sovereignty.

Where was my invite :D

Sephiroth 10-05-2020 08:20

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36034485)
Trade deals take years to negotiate even without the delays resulting from Covid-19. So another year as is won't stop a US one being executed. That's years away, even assuming that it happens.
Not sure there's much lack of sovereignty at the moment in practical terms.

The thrust of the article I quoted is that if we extend, we'll be where they want us: Paying into their coffers and subject to EU law. That is lack of sovereignty.

1andrew1 10-05-2020 11:24

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36034496)
The thrust of the article I quoted is that if we extend, we'll be where they want us: Paying into their coffers and subject to EU law. That is lack of sovereignty.

I've agreed with you on the payment situation and both parties can and should behave pragmatically. With high unemployment across the UK, no vaccination yet for CV-19, demands for higher public spending on healthcare and nursing homes, rapidly increasing Government debt, and business on its knees, the last thing the country needs is another problem just to tick a box that can be delayed for 12 months when we're in a better state to manage it.
I think the Government will acknowledge its priorities and agree an extension in the next couple of months. For now, it's just a waiting game to see what they decide.

Sephiroth 10-05-2020 12:53

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36034505)
I've agreed with you on the payment situation and both parties can and should behave pragmatically. With high unemployment across the UK, no vaccination yet for CV-19, demands for higher public spending on healthcare and nursing homes, rapidly increasing Government debt, and business on its knees, the last thing the country needs is another problem just to tick a box that can be delayed for 12 months when we're in a better state to manage it.
I think the Government will acknowledge its priorities and agree an extension in the next couple of months. For now, it's just a waiting game to see what they decide.

We'll see, as you say.

1andrew1 13-05-2020 23:40

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
On that issue of the border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland that many people convinced themselves was not coming despite there being no easy alternative. It is coming.
Quote:

The government has privately conceded there will be post-Brexit checks on goods crossing the Irish Sea, months after Boris Johnson insisted there would be no such trade barriers.
In a letter to the executive office in Stormont the government confirmed there would be border control posts in three ports, Belfast, Warrenpoint and Larne.
Declan Kearney, one of the two junior ministers in the executive office, the regional equivalent of the Cabinet Office in London, confirmed the details at a select committee session in Belfast on Wednesday.
He told members of the local assembly that officials had briefed the executive on Monday.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...e_iOSApp_Other

ianch99 14-05-2020 20:46

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36034992)
On that issue of the border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland that many people convinced themselves was not coming despite there being no easy alternative. It is coming.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...e_iOSApp_Other

This is an important point. Of course the Brexit advocating press will try and bury this but remember Johnson explicitly ruled this out in in Nov 2019:

Brexit: No checks on goods from NI to UK, says PM

Remember you vote for someone you like not that you trust ..

Sephiroth 14-05-2020 21:03

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36035081)
This is an important point. Of course the Brexit advocating press will try and bury this but remember Johnson explicitly ruled this out in in Nov 2019:

Brexit: No checks on goods from NI to UK, says PM

Remember you vote for someone you like not that you trust ..

Boris may be a liar - but he got us out of the EU.

Mr K 14-05-2020 21:04

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035085)
Boris may be a liar - but he got us out of the EU.

Or has he lied about that too ? ;)

denphone 14-05-2020 21:08

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035085)
Boris may be a liar - but he got us out of the EU.

The trouble with liars is they invariably get found out in the end.

Sephiroth 14-05-2020 21:11

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36035088)
The trouble with liars is they invariably get found out in the end.

Boris was found out long ago. And he currently gets away with it.

OLD BOY 15-05-2020 16:27

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36035086)
Or has he lied about that too ? ;)

We are already out. The issue now is whether we will get a trade deal with the EU.

Sephiroth 15-05-2020 16:31

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36035086)
Or has he lied about that too ? ;)

What OB said.

jfman 15-05-2020 16:39

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36035178)
We are already out. The issue now is whether we will get a trade deal with the EU.

Make your mind up. :rolleyes:

Sephiroth 15-05-2020 16:48

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36035178)
We are already out. The issue now is whether we will get a trade deal with the EU.

Just to remind:

WE are saying:

- A trade deal around quotas and tariffs should be easy enough in its own right;
- A separate fishing deal should be negotiated and not tacked onto the trade deal;
- Other agreements such as aviation, security, etc should be separately negotiated.

THE EU is saying:
- Everything must be in one deal because of our proximity to Europe;
- There must be a 'level playing field' ( see Irish 12½% Corporation tax for details);
- EU law is to govern the agreement.
- The EU is bigger than the UK (we should bow to them).

Unless they blink, there will be no trade deal (tariffs/quotas). If we blink first, I'll be disappointed.



Hugh 15-05-2020 17:00

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Has the EU done this with any other country (multiple separate trade agreements/deals)?
Quote:

- A trade deal around quotas and tariffs should be easy enough in its own right;
- A separate fishing deal should be negotiated and not tacked onto the trade deal;
- Other agreements such as aviation, security, etc should be separately negotiated.

Sephiroth 15-05-2020 17:11

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36035189)
Has the EU done this with any other country (multiple separate trade agreements/deals)?

I'm sorry to say to you that you have posed a very silly question.

The EU's trade deals with other nations do not make the same stipulations as they are trying to foist upon us. That may possibly be because there is no question of fishing rights regarding, e.g. Canada, Japan. But what we have in common with the other countries, is our sovereignty.

Norway has a special deal under its EEA membership and thus acquiesces to some EU law. It retains control of its own fisheries.

Why can't you agree that, having left the EU, we should retain our sovereignty and have a stand alone trade deal?

Btw, I've dited my earlier post to add how they are bullying us. All reproduced below.

Quote:

Just to remind:

WE are saying:

- A trade deal around quotas and tariffs should be easy enough in its own right;
- A separate fishing deal should be negotiated and not tacked onto the trade deal;
- Other agreements such as aviation, security, etc should be separately negotiated.

THE EU is saying:
- Everything must be in one deal because of our proximity to Europe;
- There must be a 'level playing field' ( see Irish 12½% Corporation tax for details);
- EU law is to govern the agreement;
- The EU is bigger than the UK (we should bow to them).

Unless they blink, there will be no trade deal (tariffs/quotas). If we blink first, I'll be disappointed.


ianch99 15-05-2020 18:27

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035085)
Boris may be a liar - but he got us out of the EU.

If that is how you measure your political Leaders, you have a very low bar.

Sephiroth 15-05-2020 18:49

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36035196)
If that is how you measure your political Leaders, you have a very low bar.

But as it's not how I measure then you can .....

jfman 15-05-2020 19:22

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Pierre actually make quite a good post - something few would expect me to ever say - in the Coronavirus thread. He linked to this blog and how it sums up part of the problem.

https://www.effiedeans.com/2020/04/j...d-country.html

Quote:

Journalism is missing the mood the country. We don't want blame, we don't want argument as if this were a General Election, we want a contribution to the national effort to get us out of this crisis. We want hope optimism and faith in our country. We need less negativity.

It became clear from reading their responses that this was usually because they were hostile to the Government either because they voted for someone else at the last election or because they voted Remain in 2016. They too were missing the mood of the country.
I actually found it quite entertaining really. They have, as is often the case, grasped the basics. Yes, Brexit has created a divide. For some this Government will be the party that delivered Brexit - a bitter grudge against Europe some had held since entering the European Economic Area in the 70s. It can do no wrong.

Of course I'm not counting Seph in that group.

Hugh 15-05-2020 19:36

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035192)
I'm sorry to say to you that you have posed a very silly question.

The EU's trade deals with other nations do not make the same stipulations as they are trying to foist upon us. That may possibly be because there is no question of fishing rights regarding, e.g. Canada, Japan. But what we have in common with the other countries, is our sovereignty.

Norway has a special deal under its EEA membership and thus acquiesces to some EU law. It retains control of its own fisheries.

Why can't you agree that, having left the EU, we should retain our sovereignty and have a stand alone trade deal?

Btw, I've dited my earlier post to add how they are bullying us. All reproduced below.





Im sorry to say you’ve misinterpreted/misread my post.

I’ll restate it - has the EU done multiple separate trade agreements/deals with another country (treating fisheries as just one of many deals/treaties)?; you mentioned quite a few different deals - quotas and tariffs, fishing, aviation, security, etc.

Sephiroth 15-05-2020 19:45

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36035198)
Pierre actually make quite a good post - something few would expect me to ever say - in the Coronavirus thread. He linked to this blog and how it sums up part of the problem.

https://www.effiedeans.com/2020/04/j...d-country.html



I actually found it quite entertaining really. They have, as is often the case, grasped the basics. Yes, Brexit has created a divide. For some this Government will be the party that delivered Brexit - a bitter grudge against Europe some had held since entering the European Economic Area in the 70s. It can do no wrong.

Of course I'm not counting Seph in that group.

Paying due respect to your final sentence, I think your "some" is really "few". I and most people of my ilk that I knew were all for the EEC until some politicians over there decided it was time to move towards federalisation. True, we got a number of useful opt-outs and we would never have had to give up our right to stand away from federalisation. But then we'd have been on the rim and not at the centre, chucking our money in to help develop something we did not want.

Also it is worth pointing out that were members of EFTA from 1960 to 1972 when we joined the EEA. EFTA worked very well, especially at London Airport coming from an EFTA country with expensive stuff!

Just putting a bit of filling to your somewhat sweeping statement.


---------- Post added at 19:45 ---------- Previous post was at 19:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36035199)
Im sorry to say you’ve misinterpreted/misread my post.

I’ll restate it - has the EU done multiple separate trade agreements/deals with another country (treating fisheries as just one of many deals/treaties)?; you mentioned quite a few different deals - quotas and tariffs, fishing, aviation, security, etc.

Yours is still a silly question. Fishing rights isn't trade nor are the other matters like level playing field that the EU wants to wrap into a fairly simple trade deal (which can include fish imports/exports whatever the fishing rights might be).

Why do I feel you're trying to trap me into something stupid (like your question)?


jfman 15-05-2020 20:46

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
I'm not claiming it's a huge number, Seph. Some could be few, and still be a vocal 2 per cent on twitter, or the difference in an election. :)

Sephiroth 15-05-2020 20:52

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36035202)
I'm not claiming it's a huge number, Seph. Some could be few, and still be a vocal 2 per cent on twitter, or the difference in an election. :)

Makes sense. The vocal minority.

Hugh 15-05-2020 22:09

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035200)
Paying due respect to your final sentence, I think your "some" is really "few". I and most people of my ilk that I knew were all for the EEC until some politicians over there decided it was time to move towards federalisation. True, we got a number of useful opt-outs and we would never have had to give up our right to stand away from federalisation. But then we'd have been on the rim and not at the centre, chucking our money in to help develop something we did not want.

Also it is worth pointing out that were members of EFTA from 1960 to 1972 when we joined the EEA. EFTA worked very well, especially at London Airport coming from an EFTA country with expensive stuff!

Just putting a bit of filling to your somewhat sweeping statement.


---------- Post added at 19:45 ---------- Previous post was at 19:42 ----------



Yours is still a silly question. Fishing rights isn't trade nor are the other matters like level playing field that the EU wants to wrap into a fairly simple trade deal (which can include fish imports/exports whatever the fishing rights might be).

Why do I feel you're trying to trap me into something stupid (like your question)?


Not trying to trap you into anything (or demean you by calling any of your statements "stupid"); we (the U.K.) are going for a heavily bespoke deal, and your suggestion is that this could be made easier if it were a number of individual deals, rather than a encompassing deal.

If this had been done by the EU with any other country, this would strengthen your proposal, as they couldn’t say "it’s not been done before".

Sephiroth 15-05-2020 22:15

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36035226)
Not trying to trap you into anything (or demean you by calling any of your statements "stupid"); we (the U.K.) are going for a heavily bespoke deal, and your suggestion is that this could be made easier if it were a number of individual deals, rather than a encompassing deal.

If this had been done by the EU with any other country, this would strengthen your proposal, as they couldn’t say "it’s not been done before".

It's not my take that UK is going for a bespoke deal of any sort. We are doing the sensible thing. Tariffs/quotas like Canada has done.
Other matters, pertaining to sovereignty and cooperation are desired by the UK to be held separate; highly logical.

The EU, on the other hand, doesn't want to treat the trade negotiations on a Canada basis unless that falls within their wider agenda of binding us into their rules & laws. Is that what you want?


jfman 15-05-2020 23:51

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-partys-review

Nice of the Lib Dems to finally acknowledge the easy way to stop Brexit.

OLD BOY 16-05-2020 18:24

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36035226)
Not trying to trap you into anything (or demean you by calling any of your statements "stupid"); we (the U.K.) are going for a heavily bespoke deal, and your suggestion is that this could be made easier if it were a number of individual deals, rather than a encompassing deal.

If this had been done by the EU with any other country, this would strengthen your proposal, as they couldn’t say "it’s not been done before".

We would be happy with a Canada-style deal. Hardly bespoke.

Hugh 16-05-2020 18:33

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36035317)
We would be happy with a Canada-style deal. Hardly bespoke.

The provisional Agreement that took 7 years to negotiate, and has not yet been ratified by all the EU Member States?

The one that integrates the EU's and Canada's commitments to apply international rules on workers' rights, environmental protection and climate action (and these obligations are binding)?

The one that does little for the trade in services and in particular almost nothing for the trade in financial services?

jfman 16-05-2020 18:44

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36035319)
The provisional Agreement that took 7 years to negotiate, and has not yet been ratified by all the EU Member States?

The one that integrates the EU's and Canada's commitments to apply international rules on workers' rights, environmental protection and climate action (and these obligations are binding)?

The one that does little for the trade in services and in particular almost nothing for the trade in financial services?

Just believe, Hugh.

1andrew1 17-05-2020 11:26

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
In terms of our future relationship with the EU:
Quote:

Coronavirus: ‘World has changed’ and harsh new immigration rules must be rethought, Tory MPs tell Boris Johnson
Ahead of the plans reaching the Commons on Monday, former ministers have spoken out about their fears for the NHS and social care, as well as tourism, hospitality and farming – one branding the rules “stupid”.
One Tory MP warned of “very serious consequences” if care homes – where a quarter of Covid-19 deaths have taken place – lose more staff, while a second pointed out that many hospital cleaners and porters are EU migrants.
Caroline Nokes, a former Home Office minister, called for urgent changes, telling The Independent: “If the last six weeks have shown us anything, it is that we are dependent upon workers from all round the globe, but in large numbers the EU, for many essential roles.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/coron...cid=spartandhp

Carth 17-05-2020 12:02

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
While thousands of our own sit at home doing naff all, not interested in working, and being paid (benefits) to do so . . .

oh hang on, I forgot they have rights too . . . and a 50" smart TV, the latest smart phone, nice car, holidays, free gas boiler checks, double glazing grants, etc


*oh shut up Carth, you can't change anything* :rolleyes:

denphone 17-05-2020 12:10

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36035401)
While thousands of our own sit at home doing naff all, not interested in working, and being paid (benefits) to do so . . .

oh hang on, I forgot they have rights too . . . and a 50" smart TV, the latest smart phone, nice car, holidays, free gas boiler checks, double glazing grants, etc


*oh shut up Carth, you can't change anything* :rolleyes:

According to your estimates there must be 6.3m of them , still there is nothing like idle talk.;)

Carth 17-05-2020 12:17

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36035405)
According to your estimates there must be 6.3m of them , still there is nothing like idle talk.;)

Excuse me?

Thousands doesn't sound like 6.3 million (unless you're Ms Abbott) ;)

There are the genuine needy, and there are the scroungers, I know which lot I was thinking of :p:

papa smurf 17-05-2020 12:35

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36035408)
Excuse me?

Thousands doesn't sound like 6.3 million (unless you're Ms Abbott) ;)

There are the genuine needy, and there are the scroungers, I know which lot I was thinking of :p:

Labours core voters.

1andrew1 17-05-2020 12:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36035408)
Thousands doesn't sound like 6.3 million (unless you're Ms Abbott) ;)

You're a bit "previous Parliament". The new term is "unless you're Priti Patel" :D.

Quote:

Ms Patel mistakenly said that there had been "three hundred thousand and thirty four, nine hundred and seventy four thousand" coronavirus tests in Britain.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/12...ases-deaths-UK

Sephiroth 17-05-2020 14:14

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36035414)
You're a bit "previous Parliament". The new term is "unless you're Priti Patel" :D.


https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/12...ases-deaths-UK

She was tongue tied (and priti dreadful).

1andrew1 19-05-2020 10:14

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
More comedy gold from David :dunce: Davis. He's just announced that the German car-makers are going to step in and sort out Brexit. Still believes that they need us more than we need them.

Hugh 19-05-2020 10:19

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
That an old article? - wasn’t that said 3 years ago, and the car makers disagreed?

https://www.politico.eu/article/germ...t-over-brexit/

OLD BOY 19-05-2020 10:42

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36035656)
More comedy gold from David :dunce: Davis. He's just announced that the German car-makers are going to step in and sort out Brexit. Still believes that they need us more than we need them.

Well, if the measure relates to who exports more to whom, he's right, isn't he?
Let's not go over that old ground again, it will just end up with the same old bickering.

In the end, the EU is demanding from our government everything the electorate have rejected. It seems pretty obvious that unless the EU climb down, we will end up with no deal.If they genuinely want a deal, the EU will need to stop demanding something we are not prepared to concede. They had better be quick, tempus fugits. Tick, tock.

jfman 19-05-2020 11:10

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
You can't post "let's not go over old ground" then make a series of exactly the same old tiresome arguments.

The key consideration lost is the absence of alternative products to a German car and the fact the average buyer probably wouldn't be put off by duties or taxes. Indeed the slump on the value of the pound would have pushed up the price of a German car yet it didn't cause the Eurozone to devalue the the Euro.

OLD BOY 19-05-2020 11:29

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36035319)
The provisional Agreement that took 7 years to negotiate, and has not yet been ratified by all the EU Member States?

The one that integrates the EU's and Canada's commitments to apply international rules on workers' rights, environmental protection and climate action (and these obligations are binding)?

The one that does little for the trade in services and in particular almost nothing for the trade in financial services?

As we have discussed on many occasions, we are already working to EU standards, so negotiations are far less complicated and should be finalised one way or another before the end of the year.

What is your point about adherence to 'international rules on workers' rights, environmental protection and climate action? Are you implying that the government is not already party to those rules?

The Canada-style deal we are looking for relates to trade in goods. Negotiations on financial services are not included in that and are being negotiated in parallel.

---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36035321)
Just believe, Hugh.

Cynic.

---------- Post added at 11:24 ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36035396)
In terms of our future relationship with the EU:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/coron...cid=spartandhp

If we need foreign workers to support the NHS and caring services, the points based system will reflect that.

As I understand it, the government wants to give hope to people in our country who would like to do this work but are being denied it by foreign workers who are driving down wages.

I cannot see why some people want to carry on with this unfair system.

---------- Post added at 11:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36035671)
You can't post "let's not go over old ground" then make a series of exactly the same old tiresome arguments.

The key consideration lost is the absence of alternative products to a German car and the fact the average buyer probably wouldn't be put off by duties or taxes. Indeed the slump on the value of the pound would have pushed up the price of a German car yet it didn't cause the Eurozone to devalue the the Euro.

The fact that the EU is making demands that the government have rejected is current, not old ground.

If you believe that sales of German cars will not be affected by tariffs, believe on. If that is the case, it works both ways, so what are we worrying about? Trade will continue, and we have the advantage of paying less tariffs to the EU than they are paying to us.

Where's the problem?

Hugh 19-05-2020 12:16

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
"in parallel"?

You obviously missed the EU's stance on "cherry picking" - the EU approach is one single agreement with the UK, with two core parts: one on economic relations, including trade, and energy, fish and transport, and the second part will cover security.

btw, love the way you casually dismiss 41%* of our exports to the EU...

*services worth £121 billion in 2018,

jfman 19-05-2020 12:44

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

If you believe that sales of German cars will not be affected by tariffs, believe on. If that is the case, it works both ways, so what are we worrying about? Trade will continue, and we have the advantage of paying less tariffs to the EU than they are paying to us.

Where's the problem?
Ah the straw man. I didn't say German car sales would be unaffected, I simply said they had proven to hold up despite significant currency fluctuation. A statement of fact.

You erroneously assume all products are like for like in the marketplace (textbook economics) and that Britain's trade to the EU isn't readily replaceable from within the EU.

German cars are very much not like for like with British made cars.

OLD BOY 19-05-2020 12:46

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Goods will be cheaper for our consumers under our own UK tariff deal.

https://www.lbcnews.co.uk/uk-news/go...global-tariff/

jfman 19-05-2020 13:32

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36035688)
Goods will be cheaper for our consumers under our own UK tariff deal.

https://www.lbcnews.co.uk/uk-news/go...global-tariff/

Only those from outside the EU. Else what would German car manufacturers have to worry about?

At a 10% tariff on that schedule I don't see Mercedes or BMW worrying too much in the absence of any meaningful competition on these shores. As stated previously less than the impact of the collapse of the pound on the import price.

Hugh 19-05-2020 14:05

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36035688)
Goods will be cheaper for our consumers under our own UK tariff deal.

https://www.lbcnews.co.uk/uk-news/go...global-tariff/

£30 billion worth of imports out of £718 billion = 4%.

Sephiroth 19-05-2020 16:37

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Am I mistaken? I sense that those in this thread who previously supported remaining in the EU (most of them on economic grounds), have not really engaged on the sovereignty aspects of the UK Guvmin's position.

That position is illogical. It cannot be right that as a sovereign country we should be subject to the laws of another legal entity - and in in shambles mode at that.

Why do these people in this thread rest part of their case on "the EU is only protecting its own position" without acknowledging that it is right for the UK to do the same?

Why do these people in this thread not criticise the EU for its bullying stance (".. we are bigger than the UK")?

The nation has voted for Brexit under our voting rules and that should be respected.

Hugh 19-05-2020 16:59

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
"We can’t get what we want" ≠ "bullying"

Both sides have points they see as "red lines" - you seem to see the U.K. not shifting on points as "sovereignty", the EU not shifting as "bullying".

It is right for both sides to protect their positions, without assigning any emotive phrases.

Sephiroth 19-05-2020 17:02

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36035720)
"We can’t get what we want" ≠ "bullying"

I should be resting my case on that ridiculous reply but, of course, can't lest others believe you.

You completely ignore the sense of what I'm saying which is the EU's bullying stance is "You must do what we want".


jonbxx 19-05-2020 17:04

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035717)
Am I mistaken? I sense that those in this thread who previously supported remaining in the EU (most of them on economic grounds), have not really engaged on the sovereignty aspects of the UK Guvmin's position.

That position is illogical. It cannot be right that as a sovereign country we should be subject to the laws of another legal entity - and in in shambles mode at that.

Why do these people in this thread rest part of their case on "the EU is only protecting its own position" without acknowledging that it is right for the UK to do the same?

Why do these people in this thread not criticise the EU for its bullying stance (".. we are bigger than the UK")?

The nation has voted for Brexit under our voting rules and that should be respected.

I'll play but this run the danger of going over a well worn path...

Here's my view. Not wanting an argument, just answering your questions;

The European Union is a legal entity that we were part of. We had influence, we had MEPs, we had a seat on the European Council. Now if we vote for MEPs and a government/Prime Minister who are, at best, ambivalent to the functioning of the EU, that's on us as the voters, not on the EU.

The EU was not and is not some monolithic 'other' that ran our country without us having any say. It is a union of nations coming to agreement over issues that had impact to the union as a whole. Nations do not trust one another. This is why legally binding treaties between nations and blocs are in place. The depth of relations and interactions between nations require stronger and deeper treaties.

There is a strange dichotomy in many in the UKs view of current relations between the UK and the EU. There is both British exceptionalism (they need us more than we need them) and paranoia (we're being bullied)

In any negotiation, you need to understand the person you negotiate with's position and get a handle on what they can flex on and what are red lines. You will of course have your own red lines and flex points. The EU tends to be quite open in publishing their position (this is part of how the EU works) while the UK government tends to keep its'cards closer to its chest. Whether the UKs policy of not being so open is a paternalistic approach (trust us public, we know best) or hiding things from the ERG types is not clear.

Do I respect the result of the referendum? Yes. Have I changed my mind about how I would vote if I could go back in time? No, Brexit is a silly idea. If we have to leave the EU, then I would like to it be as soft a landing as possible. Instead, we seem to be going headlong into the most nuclear of options of WTO only while antagonising our neighbours along the way.

That's my 2cents, sorry 2p :-)

Hugh 19-05-2020 17:04

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035721)
I should be resting my case on that ridiculous reply but, of course, can't lest others believe you.

You completely ignore the sense of what I'm saying which is the EU's bullying stance is "You must do what we want".


But isn’t that also what the U.K. are saying?

1andrew1 19-05-2020 17:08

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035721)
I should be resting my case on that ridiculous reply but, of course, can't lest others believe you.

You completely ignore the sense of what I'm saying which is the EU's bullying stance is "You must do what we want".


Both parties have set out their red lines as they're entitled to. To permit only one side to do this is illogical. So Hugh is correct.

Sephiroth 19-05-2020 17:16

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36035724)
Both parties have set out their red lines as they're entitled to. To permit only one side to do this is illogical. So Hugh is correct.

Yes - quite so.

But my comments relate to the people in this thread, of Remain persuasion, who cannot bring themselves to respect criticism that the EU wants to keep a degree of sovereignty over the UK. Their red lines are to keep us bound by their laws. That can't be right and why don't you lot acknowledge & accept this?


jfman 19-05-2020 17:46

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035717)
Am I mistaken? I sense that those in this thread who previously supported remaining in the EU (most of them on economic grounds), have not really engaged on the sovereignty aspects of the UK Guvmin's position.

That position is illogical. It cannot be right that as a sovereign country we should be subject to the laws of another legal entity - and in in shambles mode at that.

Why do these people in this thread rest part of their case on "the EU is only protecting its own position" without acknowledging that it is right for the UK to do the same?

Why do these people in this thread not criticise the EU for its bullying stance (".. we are bigger than the UK")?

The nation has voted for Brexit under our voting rules and that should be respected.

If I go along to my bank and ask them for loan of a quarter of a million pounds at a 0.1% interest rate and HSBC bank laugh me out of town do I get to write to trading standards and call them bullies?

No. They’re bigger than me and frankly it’s not worth their while engaging with me on such a preposterous basis. I’m not the biggest fan of uncontrolled and unregulated capitalism (as everyone on the forum knows) but I fail to see why some cry “foul” at capitalism in action.

We did vote for Brexit as is our sovereign right to do so. But nobody owes us a single dime as a result. We chose to carve out our own path. If that’s too challenging then that’s an entirely expected outcome of entering negotiations with an observably unrealistic set of objectives.

1andrew1 19-05-2020 22:28

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035725)
Yes - quite so.

But my comments relate to the people in this thread, of Remain persuasion, who cannot bring themselves to respect criticism that the EU wants to keep a degree of sovereignty over the UK. Their red lines are to keep us bound by their laws. That can't be right and why don't you lot acknowledge & accept this?


My perception is that you're seeing the situation through one filter; that of sovereignty; whereas the central issue is the single market.
Allowing neighbouring countries unfettered access to the single market at no cost and with potential cost advantages through weaker employment rights and environmental standards is not in the EU's interests.
It's so important that such enforcement can't be left to chance and needs to be legally enforceable. So any impact on sovereignty is a side-product, not the key intention.
The differentiation of neighbouring countries is important due to the gravity of trade. The Adam Smith Institute has a good explainer of it here.

Sephiroth 19-05-2020 22:47

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36035727)
If I go along to my bank and ask them for loan of a quarter of a million pounds at a 0.1% interest rate and HSBC bank laugh me out of town do I get to write to trading standards and call them bullies?

No. They’re bigger than me and frankly it’s not worth their while engaging with me on such a preposterous basis. I’m not the biggest fan of uncontrolled and unregulated capitalism (as everyone on the forum knows) but I fail to see why some cry “foul” at capitalism in action.

We did vote for Brexit as is our sovereign right to do so. But nobody owes us a single dime as a result. We chose to carve out our own path. If that’s too challenging then that’s an entirely expected outcome of entering negotiations with an observably unrealistic set of objectives.

You see (or rather everyone else should be able to see) that what you've said exactly makes my point.

You cannot reasonably apply the bank analogy to fundamental issues of national sovereignty. You must know that, jfman but you don't want to run with my logic.

You write of an "unrealistic set of objectives". To recap, those (UK) objectives are to negotiate the trade agreement separately from other matters such as fishing rights. Overarching those objectives is defence of the notion that we must preserve our sovereignty.

If the only thing we can achieve is to protect our sovereignty, then there will be no trade deal.

The matter of bullying arises when the EU (Barnier) tells us directly that the EU is bigger than we are - by corollary the EU's terms or nothing.

A Brit should consider that unreasonable even if that Brit also says, like you, what else would you expect from them.




---------- Post added at 22:47 ---------- Previous post was at 22:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36035747)
My perception is that you're seeing the situation through one filter; that of sovereignty; whereas the central issue is the single market.
Allowing neighbouring countries unfettered access to the single market at no cost and with potential cost advantages through weaker employment rights and environmental standards is not in the EU's interests.
It's so important that such enforcement can't be left to chance and needs to be legally enforceable. So any impact on sovereignty is a side-product, not the key intention.
The differentiation of neighbouring countries is important due to the gravity of trade. The Adam Smith Institute has a good explainer of it here.

Then let me correct your view of my perspective.

It seems to me that Remain supporting people see this through the lens of regret that economic matters trump sovereignty.

I'm sure there is economic downside to leaving the EU. The British public who voted for it know that. To them, sovereignty is the key point and a trust that the UK will build on its skills and abilities to rise above any economic downturn.

Your second paragraph defends the EU's position.

No Brit should be doing this.

jfman 19-05-2020 22:50

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Sovereignty doesn’t truly exist under capitalism.

He who pays the piper calls the tune.

Fishing rights has a monetary or strategic value just like US Air Force bases in the UK. Literally everything is a commodity.

Sephiroth 19-05-2020 22:51

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36035752)
Sovereignty doesn’t truly exist under capitalism.

He who pays the piper calls the tune.

Fishing rights has a monetary or strategic value just like US Air Force bases in the UK. Literally everything is a commodity.

What can I say (rhetorical)?

jfman 19-05-2020 23:00

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035753)
What can I say (rhetorical)?

“You’re right, jfman, thanks for converting me.” ;)

Pierre 19-05-2020 23:05

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
It will be interesting because we, and Europe probably, will be in a depression (not recession).

Home schooling won’t be issue as most of the parents will be unemployed.

1andrew1 19-05-2020 23:07

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035749)
Then let me correct your view of my perspective.

It seems to me that Remain supporting people see this through the lens of regret that economic matters trump sovereignty.

I'm sure there is economic downside to leaving the EU. The British public who voted for it know that. To them, sovereignty is the key point and a trust that the UK will build on its skills and abilities to rise above any economic downturn.

Your second paragraph defends the EU's position.

No Brit should be doing this.

I've just described the situation in plain and unemotional language, in response to your request.
By stating that something is not in one party's interests in the second paragraph is neither defending nor condemning one side or the other, it's an observation.
Although I've not defended any side's position, I believe every Brit is entitled to do so.

Sephiroth 19-05-2020 23:23

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36035756)
It will be interesting because we, and Europe probably, will be in a depression (not recession).

Home schooling won’t be issue as most of the parents will be unemployed.

Actually that's an excellent point.

We would walk away from them in roughly equal terms and we can independently plough our own furrow.

There's no advantage in being in the EU right now.



---------- Post added at 23:23 ---------- Previous post was at 23:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36035758)
I've just described the situation in plain and unemotional language, in response to your request.
By stating that something is not in one party's interests in the second paragraph is neither defending nor condemning one side or the other, it's an observation.
Although I've not defended any side's position, I believe every Brit is entitled to do so.

You're entirely missing the point. Your observations and thinking come from a Remain perspective, which is a completely passé notion.

That every Brit is entitled to argue in the way you are has nothing to do with what should be their duty to acknowledge the bleedin' obvious that the EU is bulklying us into relinquishing sovereignty back to them.

1andrew1 19-05-2020 23:51

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035760)
You're entirely missing the point. Your observations and thinking come from a Remain perspective, which is a completely passé notion.

That every Brit is entitled to argue in the way you are has nothing to do with what should be their duty to acknowledge the bleedin' obvious that the EU is bulklying us into relinquishing sovereignty back to them.

You asked me to explain the situation which I did.
You said that no Brit should be able to defend either side's position and I said that they could, although I have chosen not to.
Those are the facts.

Your next point - which I've paraphrased as: is the EU compelling the UK to relinquish its sovereignty?
The answer to this is of course not. The UK can choose not to strike a deal. I've explained why sovereignty might be impacted - it's a side-effect as oppose to the main intent.

To further confirm:
- The EU will use all its bargaining chips to try and strike a deal in its members' interests and not the UK's.
- The UK will use all its bargaining chips to try and strike a deal in its own interests and not the EU's.

Whether a player with a better hand is bullying a player with a weaker one - sorry Seph, that's life.

Sephiroth 20-05-2020 00:01

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
We are going round in circles. My point in post #2958 has been completely proved.

1andrew1 20-05-2020 00:27

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36035764)
We are going round in circles. My point in post #2958 has been completely proved.

#2959 has - let's agree on that. ;)
I accept that I have failed in my objective to convince you that the EU does not have some dastardly plan to try and restrict our sovereignty for the sake of it and instead is just trying to ensure a level playing field for the single market.

Moving on, some interesting comments about Johnson's proposals.

Quote:

David Henig, director of the UK trade policy project and a former trade negotiator, said: “[The UK is] looking for more than Canada, Korea or Japan in exchange for the same — or probably even less — in terms of level playing field provisions.”
..Talks between the two sides are deadlocked on the question of the level playing field, with Brussels insisting that if Britain wants privileged access to the single market after Brexit it must be prevented from undercutting the EU social and environmental model.
A separate dispute concerns EU demands for continued access to British fishing waters on similar terms to now, while London objects to any role for the European Court of Justice in enforcing any eventual deal.
...EU officials also say British attempts to agree mutual recognition deals for professional qualifications — for lawyers in particular — and for industrial products reflected London’s attempt to keep the same access to the single market.
“The British request to have British qualifications recognised by default, subject to terms and conditions, goes far beyond the EU-Japan deal, or the Ceta deal with Canada,” said Sam Lowe of the Centre for European Reform.
Source: https://www.ft.com/content/134d5e8f-...8-897f7ca51326

1andrew1 03-06-2020 11:10

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
More pressure on Johnson to step up and do a deal. With a chastised Cummings, there may be more of an opportunity to do so.
Quote:

Japanese carmaker Nissan has warned that a no-deal Brexit could make its European business model unsustainable.
Nissan's European chairman, Gianluca de Ficchy, said if a 10% export tariff was introduced after the UK left the EU it would put its operations "in jeopardy".
This would be the case if the UK moved to World Trade Organization (WTO) rules after Brexit, he said.
He was speaking at Nissan's plant in Sunderland, where work on a new model of the Juke is due to start.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50000530

nomadking 03-06-2020 11:18

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
How many EU-made cars does the EU sell in the UK? The tariffs work both ways.

1andrew1 03-06-2020 11:34

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36038156)
How many EU-made cars does the EU sell in the UK? The tariffs work both ways.

The respective market sizes are somewhat different. 68m people UK v 445m EU.

Carth 03-06-2020 11:38

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Nissan are quite welcome to move all their production to Romania if they so wish, no skin off my nose if their quality reputation plunges further :D

Just more crap from manufacturers that want a sweet deal, hope Boris tells them to bugger off :p:

Mr K 03-06-2020 12:49

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36038160)
Nissan are quite welcome to move all their production to Romania if they so wish, no skin off my nose if their quality reputation plunges further :D

Just more crap from manufacturers that want a sweet deal, hope Boris tells them to bugger off :p:

I'm guessing, like Boris, you don't live in the NE? Those that do and voted for Brexit, may sadly have to pause to reflect over the coming years...

Sephiroth 03-06-2020 12:53

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36038166)
I'm guessing, like Boris, you don't live in the NE? Those that do and voted for Brexit, may sadly have to pause to reflect over the coming years...

I hope I'm right here and not being too OB-ish, the Guvmin will find a way of sweetening Nissan if only to keep faith with their voters.

That said, CV might well reduce demand which may cause its own set of difficulties.

Mr K 03-06-2020 12:57

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36038167)
I hope I'm right here and not being too OB-ish, the Guvmin will find a way of sweetening Nissan if only to keep faith with their voters.

That said, CV might well reduce demand which may cause its own set of difficulties.

I really don't think they'll bother now the election is over.

Carth 03-06-2020 14:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36038166)
I'm guessing, like Boris, you don't live in the NE? Those that do and voted for Brexit, may sadly have to pause to reflect over the coming years...


Not quite the NE, but near enough :p:

Have another guess at this then, where do you think Nissan will move to . . . France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia? . . and how much of a 'financial package' will Countries be willing to throw at them under the present (and possibly future) economic uncertainties?

1andrew1 03-06-2020 15:31

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36038188)
Not quite the NE, but near enough :p:

Have another guess at this then, where do you think Nissan will move to . . . France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia? . . and how much of a 'financial package' will Countries be willing to throw at them under the present (and possibly future) economic uncertainties?

Nissan is part of an alliance with Mitsubishi and Renault. They have recently agreed to head up specific markets: Renault will have Europe and Russia, Nissan China, the US and Japan and Mitsubishi south-east Asia.
So, if Sunderland is uneconomic then Nissan could export to the EU directly from Japan (no tariffs), get Renault to manufacture its models or withdraw from Europe altogether. Renault currently makes the Micra for Nissan.
I have considerable sympathy for the workers in Sunderland who were promised "the easiest deal in history".

ianch99 03-06-2020 16:21

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Nissan is clearly positioning itself for another bung from the UK Government if the inevitable No Deal plays out. Not sure the model is sustainable though, lots of companies will be following in an orderly line :)

1andrew1 11-06-2020 21:28

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Good news for importers.

Quote:

UK in U-turn on full post-Brexit border controls
Temporary light-touch customs regime planned with pressure from business not to compound Covid-19 chaos
In a significant policy U-turn, Michael Gove, the Cabinet Office minister, has accepted that businesses cannot be expected to cope with Covid-19 and simultaneously face the prospect of disruption at the border at the end of the post-Brexit transition period.
Instead of full checks, the government will now introduce a temporary light-touch regime at UK ports like Dover for incoming EU goods, under both a deal and “no-deal” scenario.
However, officials concede that goods flowing to the EU from the UK are likely to face full checks as they enter France.
https://www.ft.com/content/37fad070-...3-940b843a0daf

papa smurf 12-06-2020 15:15

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Brexit: UK 'formally confirms' to EU that it won't extend transition period


Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove says he has told Brussels that "the moment for an extension has now passed".

https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk...eriod-12005296

jfman 12-06-2020 16:02

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
"Formally confirming" - is that legally binding? :D

papa smurf 12-06-2020 16:15

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36039584)
"Formally confirming" - is that legally binding? :D

It's the diplomatic way of saying stick it up..............;)

1andrew1 17-06-2020 18:19

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Not really a surprise.
Quote:

A UK-US trade deal is highly unlikely to be approved before the US election in November, according to Donald Trump’s chief trade representative.
Speaking before the House Ways and Means Committee, United States Trade Representative Ambassador Robert Lighthizer said that such an agreement is “almost impossible” by the 2020 election.
This raises the prospect that the president, who was supportive of Brexit and Britain forging new trade deals, could be out of office before any agreement is signed.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...rtan-ntp-feeds

Carth 17-06-2020 18:48

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Good news to some I guess :shrug:

Pierre 17-06-2020 19:01

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040174)

I wouldn’t bet against him still being there.

1andrew1 18-06-2020 00:08

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36040182)
I wouldn’t bet against him still being there.

Today's revelations might make reduce the odds of that.

1andrew1 23-06-2020 10:09

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
We have just six weeks to strike a deal with Japan!
Unlike the current extensive one we enjoy due to the EU, this one if achieved will be severely limited in nature. Expect Agriculture to be thrown under the bus.
https://twitter.com/grahambsi/status...170434/photo/1

OLD BOY 23-06-2020 11:15

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040849)
We have just six weeks to strike a deal with Japan!
Unlike the current extensive one we enjoy due to the EU, this one if achieved will be severely limited in nature. Expect Agriculture to be thrown under the bus.
https://twitter.com/grahambsi/status...170434/photo/1

Typical sensationalism.

Is there any reason why we can't negotiate this deal in stages? Or why we cannot protect our current position while negotiations continue over a slightly longer period?

Obstacles there may be, but obstacles are there to be overcome.

1andrew1 23-06-2020 12:08

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040873)
Typical sensationalism.

The FT is many things but I'm not sure that's a label I would attach to it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040873)
Is there any reason why we can't negotiate this deal in stages?

Japan is in a stronger position than us so is calling the shots. It has a range of trade deals across the world including the EU. And of course it's a bigger country.

Japan also feels that we have reneged on the gentleman's agreement it made with Margaret Thatcher's government which secured the Japanese car factories, so its goodwill is diminished.

The trouble with doing it in stages is that there would be an inevitable gap from 1st January to when the next bit of the deal is concluded. This could mean that Japanese buyers go elsewhere and don't return to the UK suppliers when the deal is done.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36040873)
Or why we cannot protect our current position while negotiations continue over a slightly longer period?

Our current position with Japan is only there by virtue of the EU and ends on 31 December. Boris has said he won't entertain an extension past this date which would protect our position.

nomadking 23-06-2020 13:15

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040221)
Today's revelations might make reduce the odds of that.

Wanting to promote US goods, how evil.:rolleyes:

1andrew1 23-06-2020 15:07

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36040892)
Wanting to promote US goods, how evil.:rolleyes:

I can only conclude you're viewing that link from China as it actually links to "John Bolton: Trump sought Xi's help to win re-election" ;)

nomadking 23-06-2020 15:16

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36040906)
I can only conclude you're viewing that link from China as it actually links to "John Bolton: Trump sought Xi's help to win re-election" ;)

Quote:

Mr Bolton says Mr Trump wanted China to buy agricultural produce from US farmers, according to details of the forthcoming book previewed by US media.
No different to just about every other world leader about their country.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:34.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum