![]() |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Interesting Tweet from Fabian Zuleeg, Chief Executive & Chief Economist, European Policy Centre
Quote:
I don't see trade deals with the US and China being at all likely at the moment so even less wriggle room for the UK. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Quote:
So it’s not a place I’d go looking for impartial observations about the U.K.-EU negotiations. Or on anything to do with the EU for that matter. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
So, trade talks with the US will start next week as the negotiations with Brussels have stalled. At this rate, we will conclude discussions with the States before the EU, which would be an incredible result.
Maybe this will make the EU sit up and take notice at last. Sooner or later, it will dawn on them that we are serious in wanting a trade deal free of the restrictions they are trying to impose on us. This also shows the naysayers on the forum that negotiations can continue notwithstanding the resources we are throwing into the containment of Covid-19. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
There's no evidence for your statement starting "at this rate..." at all. I'm 100% confident that the UK can "start negotiations" over anything it pleases during Covid-19 given the loosest possible definition would constitute one junior Civil Servant on a Zoom call. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
"A longer Brexit transition is pointless, dangerous, and plays straight into Mr Barnier’s hands" So opines Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in the Torygraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...lays-straight/ Some important extracts from this first rate article: Quote:
Quote:
For what my opinion is worth, the Guvmin would not negotiate an extension that led to us paying more than we would in any previous year. But it would be very dangerous to seek an extension - it prevents us from doing trade deals elsewhere and jeeps us where the EU wants. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:39 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Your first sentence is the nub of the matter. Economics vs sovereignty. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Not sure there's much lack of sovereignty at the moment in practical terms. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
I think the Government will acknowledge its priorities and agree an extension in the next couple of months. For now, it's just a waiting game to see what they decide. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
On that issue of the border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland that many people convinced themselves was not coming despite there being no easy alternative. It is coming.
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Brexit: No checks on goods from NI to UK, says PM Remember you vote for someone you like not that you trust .. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
WE are saying: - A trade deal around quotas and tariffs should be easy enough in its own right; - A separate fishing deal should be negotiated and not tacked onto the trade deal; - Other agreements such as aviation, security, etc should be separately negotiated. THE EU is saying: - Everything must be in one deal because of our proximity to Europe; - There must be a 'level playing field' ( see Irish 12½% Corporation tax for details); - EU law is to govern the agreement. - The EU is bigger than the UK (we should bow to them). Unless they blink, there will be no trade deal (tariffs/quotas). If we blink first, I'll be disappointed. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Has the EU done this with any other country (multiple separate trade agreements/deals)?
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
The EU's trade deals with other nations do not make the same stipulations as they are trying to foist upon us. That may possibly be because there is no question of fishing rights regarding, e.g. Canada, Japan. But what we have in common with the other countries, is our sovereignty. Norway has a special deal under its EEA membership and thus acquiesces to some EU law. It retains control of its own fisheries. Why can't you agree that, having left the EU, we should retain our sovereignty and have a stand alone trade deal? Btw, I've dited my earlier post to add how they are bullying us. All reproduced below. Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Pierre actually make quite a good post - something few would expect me to ever say - in the Coronavirus thread. He linked to this blog and how it sums up part of the problem.
https://www.effiedeans.com/2020/04/j...d-country.html Quote:
Of course I'm not counting Seph in that group. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
I’ll restate it - has the EU done multiple separate trade agreements/deals with another country (treating fisheries as just one of many deals/treaties)?; you mentioned quite a few different deals - quotas and tariffs, fishing, aviation, security, etc. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Also it is worth pointing out that were members of EFTA from 1960 to 1972 when we joined the EEA. EFTA worked very well, especially at London Airport coming from an EFTA country with expensive stuff! Just putting a bit of filling to your somewhat sweeping statement. ---------- Post added at 19:45 ---------- Previous post was at 19:42 ---------- Quote:
Why do I feel you're trying to trap me into something stupid (like your question)? |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
I'm not claiming it's a huge number, Seph. Some could be few, and still be a vocal 2 per cent on twitter, or the difference in an election. :)
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
If this had been done by the EU with any other country, this would strengthen your proposal, as they couldn’t say "it’s not been done before". |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Other matters, pertaining to sovereignty and cooperation are desired by the UK to be held separate; highly logical. The EU, on the other hand, doesn't want to treat the trade negotiations on a Canada basis unless that falls within their wider agenda of binding us into their rules & laws. Is that what you want? |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-partys-review
Nice of the Lib Dems to finally acknowledge the easy way to stop Brexit. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
The one that integrates the EU's and Canada's commitments to apply international rules on workers' rights, environmental protection and climate action (and these obligations are binding)? The one that does little for the trade in services and in particular almost nothing for the trade in financial services? |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
In terms of our future relationship with the EU:
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
While thousands of our own sit at home doing naff all, not interested in working, and being paid (benefits) to do so . . .
oh hang on, I forgot they have rights too . . . and a 50" smart TV, the latest smart phone, nice car, holidays, free gas boiler checks, double glazing grants, etc *oh shut up Carth, you can't change anything* :rolleyes: |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Thousands doesn't sound like 6.3 million (unless you're Ms Abbott) ;) There are the genuine needy, and there are the scroungers, I know which lot I was thinking of :p: |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
More comedy gold from David :dunce: Davis. He's just announced that the German car-makers are going to step in and sort out Brexit. Still believes that they need us more than we need them.
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
That an old article? - wasn’t that said 3 years ago, and the car makers disagreed?
https://www.politico.eu/article/germ...t-over-brexit/ |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Let's not go over that old ground again, it will just end up with the same old bickering. In the end, the EU is demanding from our government everything the electorate have rejected. It seems pretty obvious that unless the EU climb down, we will end up with no deal.If they genuinely want a deal, the EU will need to stop demanding something we are not prepared to concede. They had better be quick, tempus fugits. Tick, tock. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
You can't post "let's not go over old ground" then make a series of exactly the same old tiresome arguments.
The key consideration lost is the absence of alternative products to a German car and the fact the average buyer probably wouldn't be put off by duties or taxes. Indeed the slump on the value of the pound would have pushed up the price of a German car yet it didn't cause the Eurozone to devalue the the Euro. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
What is your point about adherence to 'international rules on workers' rights, environmental protection and climate action? Are you implying that the government is not already party to those rules? The Canada-style deal we are looking for relates to trade in goods. Negotiations on financial services are not included in that and are being negotiated in parallel. ---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:24 ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 ---------- Quote:
As I understand it, the government wants to give hope to people in our country who would like to do this work but are being denied it by foreign workers who are driving down wages. I cannot see why some people want to carry on with this unfair system. ---------- Post added at 11:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 ---------- Quote:
If you believe that sales of German cars will not be affected by tariffs, believe on. If that is the case, it works both ways, so what are we worrying about? Trade will continue, and we have the advantage of paying less tariffs to the EU than they are paying to us. Where's the problem? |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
"in parallel"?
You obviously missed the EU's stance on "cherry picking" - the EU approach is one single agreement with the UK, with two core parts: one on economic relations, including trade, and energy, fish and transport, and the second part will cover security. btw, love the way you casually dismiss 41%* of our exports to the EU... *services worth £121 billion in 2018, |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
You erroneously assume all products are like for like in the marketplace (textbook economics) and that Britain's trade to the EU isn't readily replaceable from within the EU. German cars are very much not like for like with British made cars. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Goods will be cheaper for our consumers under our own UK tariff deal.
https://www.lbcnews.co.uk/uk-news/go...global-tariff/ |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
At a 10% tariff on that schedule I don't see Mercedes or BMW worrying too much in the absence of any meaningful competition on these shores. As stated previously less than the impact of the collapse of the pound on the import price. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Am I mistaken? I sense that those in this thread who previously supported remaining in the EU (most of them on economic grounds), have not really engaged on the sovereignty aspects of the UK Guvmin's position.
That position is illogical. It cannot be right that as a sovereign country we should be subject to the laws of another legal entity - and in in shambles mode at that. Why do these people in this thread rest part of their case on "the EU is only protecting its own position" without acknowledging that it is right for the UK to do the same? Why do these people in this thread not criticise the EU for its bullying stance (".. we are bigger than the UK")? The nation has voted for Brexit under our voting rules and that should be respected. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
"We can’t get what we want" ≠ "bullying"
Both sides have points they see as "red lines" - you seem to see the U.K. not shifting on points as "sovereignty", the EU not shifting as "bullying". It is right for both sides to protect their positions, without assigning any emotive phrases. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
You completely ignore the sense of what I'm saying which is the EU's bullying stance is "You must do what we want". |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Here's my view. Not wanting an argument, just answering your questions; The European Union is a legal entity that we were part of. We had influence, we had MEPs, we had a seat on the European Council. Now if we vote for MEPs and a government/Prime Minister who are, at best, ambivalent to the functioning of the EU, that's on us as the voters, not on the EU. The EU was not and is not some monolithic 'other' that ran our country without us having any say. It is a union of nations coming to agreement over issues that had impact to the union as a whole. Nations do not trust one another. This is why legally binding treaties between nations and blocs are in place. The depth of relations and interactions between nations require stronger and deeper treaties. There is a strange dichotomy in many in the UKs view of current relations between the UK and the EU. There is both British exceptionalism (they need us more than we need them) and paranoia (we're being bullied) In any negotiation, you need to understand the person you negotiate with's position and get a handle on what they can flex on and what are red lines. You will of course have your own red lines and flex points. The EU tends to be quite open in publishing their position (this is part of how the EU works) while the UK government tends to keep its'cards closer to its chest. Whether the UKs policy of not being so open is a paternalistic approach (trust us public, we know best) or hiding things from the ERG types is not clear. Do I respect the result of the referendum? Yes. Have I changed my mind about how I would vote if I could go back in time? No, Brexit is a silly idea. If we have to leave the EU, then I would like to it be as soft a landing as possible. Instead, we seem to be going headlong into the most nuclear of options of WTO only while antagonising our neighbours along the way. That's my 2cents, sorry 2p :-) |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
But my comments relate to the people in this thread, of Remain persuasion, who cannot bring themselves to respect criticism that the EU wants to keep a degree of sovereignty over the UK. Their red lines are to keep us bound by their laws. That can't be right and why don't you lot acknowledge & accept this? |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
No. They’re bigger than me and frankly it’s not worth their while engaging with me on such a preposterous basis. I’m not the biggest fan of uncontrolled and unregulated capitalism (as everyone on the forum knows) but I fail to see why some cry “foul” at capitalism in action. We did vote for Brexit as is our sovereign right to do so. But nobody owes us a single dime as a result. We chose to carve out our own path. If that’s too challenging then that’s an entirely expected outcome of entering negotiations with an observably unrealistic set of objectives. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Allowing neighbouring countries unfettered access to the single market at no cost and with potential cost advantages through weaker employment rights and environmental standards is not in the EU's interests. It's so important that such enforcement can't be left to chance and needs to be legally enforceable. So any impact on sovereignty is a side-product, not the key intention. The differentiation of neighbouring countries is important due to the gravity of trade. The Adam Smith Institute has a good explainer of it here. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
You cannot reasonably apply the bank analogy to fundamental issues of national sovereignty. You must know that, jfman but you don't want to run with my logic. You write of an "unrealistic set of objectives". To recap, those (UK) objectives are to negotiate the trade agreement separately from other matters such as fishing rights. Overarching those objectives is defence of the notion that we must preserve our sovereignty. If the only thing we can achieve is to protect our sovereignty, then there will be no trade deal. The matter of bullying arises when the EU (Barnier) tells us directly that the EU is bigger than we are - by corollary the EU's terms or nothing. A Brit should consider that unreasonable even if that Brit also says, like you, what else would you expect from them. ---------- Post added at 22:47 ---------- Previous post was at 22:42 ---------- Quote:
It seems to me that Remain supporting people see this through the lens of regret that economic matters trump sovereignty. I'm sure there is economic downside to leaving the EU. The British public who voted for it know that. To them, sovereignty is the key point and a trust that the UK will build on its skills and abilities to rise above any economic downturn. Your second paragraph defends the EU's position. No Brit should be doing this. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Sovereignty doesn’t truly exist under capitalism.
He who pays the piper calls the tune. Fishing rights has a monetary or strategic value just like US Air Force bases in the UK. Literally everything is a commodity. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
It will be interesting because we, and Europe probably, will be in a depression (not recession).
Home schooling won’t be issue as most of the parents will be unemployed. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
By stating that something is not in one party's interests in the second paragraph is neither defending nor condemning one side or the other, it's an observation. Although I've not defended any side's position, I believe every Brit is entitled to do so. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
We would walk away from them in roughly equal terms and we can independently plough our own furrow. There's no advantage in being in the EU right now. ---------- Post added at 23:23 ---------- Previous post was at 23:13 ---------- Quote:
That every Brit is entitled to argue in the way you are has nothing to do with what should be their duty to acknowledge the bleedin' obvious that the EU is bulklying us into relinquishing sovereignty back to them. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
You said that no Brit should be able to defend either side's position and I said that they could, although I have chosen not to. Those are the facts. Your next point - which I've paraphrased as: is the EU compelling the UK to relinquish its sovereignty? The answer to this is of course not. The UK can choose not to strike a deal. I've explained why sovereignty might be impacted - it's a side-effect as oppose to the main intent. To further confirm: - The EU will use all its bargaining chips to try and strike a deal in its members' interests and not the UK's. - The UK will use all its bargaining chips to try and strike a deal in its own interests and not the EU's. Whether a player with a better hand is bullying a player with a weaker one - sorry Seph, that's life. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
We are going round in circles. My point in post #2958 has been completely proved.
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
I accept that I have failed in my objective to convince you that the EU does not have some dastardly plan to try and restrict our sovereignty for the sake of it and instead is just trying to ensure a level playing field for the single market. Moving on, some interesting comments about Johnson's proposals. Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
More pressure on Johnson to step up and do a deal. With a chastised Cummings, there may be more of an opportunity to do so.
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
How many EU-made cars does the EU sell in the UK? The tariffs work both ways.
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Nissan are quite welcome to move all their production to Romania if they so wish, no skin off my nose if their quality reputation plunges further :D
Just more crap from manufacturers that want a sweet deal, hope Boris tells them to bugger off :p: |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
That said, CV might well reduce demand which may cause its own set of difficulties. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Not quite the NE, but near enough :p: Have another guess at this then, where do you think Nissan will move to . . . France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia? . . and how much of a 'financial package' will Countries be willing to throw at them under the present (and possibly future) economic uncertainties? |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
So, if Sunderland is uneconomic then Nissan could export to the EU directly from Japan (no tariffs), get Renault to manufacture its models or withdraw from Europe altogether. Renault currently makes the Micra for Nissan. I have considerable sympathy for the workers in Sunderland who were promised "the easiest deal in history". |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Nissan is clearly positioning itself for another bung from the UK Government if the inevitable No Deal plays out. Not sure the model is sustainable though, lots of companies will be following in an orderly line :)
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Good news for importers.
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Brexit: UK 'formally confirms' to EU that it won't extend transition period
Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove says he has told Brussels that "the moment for an extension has now passed". https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-uk...eriod-12005296 |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
"Formally confirming" - is that legally binding? :D
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Not really a surprise.
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Good news to some I guess :shrug:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
We have just six weeks to strike a deal with Japan!
Unlike the current extensive one we enjoy due to the EU, this one if achieved will be severely limited in nature. Expect Agriculture to be thrown under the bus. https://twitter.com/grahambsi/status...170434/photo/1 |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Is there any reason why we can't negotiate this deal in stages? Or why we cannot protect our current position while negotiations continue over a slightly longer period? Obstacles there may be, but obstacles are there to be overcome. |
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Quote:
Japan also feels that we have reneged on the gentleman's agreement it made with Margaret Thatcher's government which secured the Japanese car factories, so its goodwill is diminished. The trouble with doing it in stages is that there would be an inevitable gap from 1st January to when the next bit of the deal is concluded. This could mean that Japanese buyers go elsewhere and don't return to the UK suppliers when the deal is done. Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
|
Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum