![]() |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
NTL for that matter, you may raise your eyebrows but NTL/IBA where are just as talented in broadcast technology. [also]Also, the licence fee allows the Beeb to "carry" a series that has low ratings, but may improve. Look at "Men Behaving Badly", "Only Fools and Horses" and "Blackadder". The first series of each of those was dreadful, and if they were on a commercial channel, they probably wouldn't have been recommissioned (this actually happened with Men Behaving Badly - it's first series was on ITV and wasn't recommissioned by them).[/QUOTE] The same licence fee also allows the Beeb to turn out crap series after series. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
When I lived in Kenya I was curious to note that every time you bought a radio or tv you would pay the license fee, so that each sale of apparatus raises more money. The more radios and tvs you buy the more licenses you collect! Anyway, such a scheme wouldn't raise the cash here. Actually, the BBC has been practising with its own adverts. Probably might be a good idea for the BBC to start advertising in general once parliament and the government gives the go ahead. :D |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
Well the BBC may well be overstaffed, so staff cuts and cutting back on celebrities and channels may help. Advertising and subscription services would be preferable. :D |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
I would rather the BBC is kept advert and subscription free. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Can somebody please tell me why the BBC broadcasts things like BBC America, BBC World Service and BBC Spain and things like that... what benefit is this to British people, who have paid for the service?
Other than this one minor point, I think the BBC is fine. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
I dread the day BBC loses the licence, fee and the worrying thing is, I reckon it will happen within my lifetime.
For £120 a year, we get so much, the news service is classed as number 1 in the world, along with there output. BBC Three is gaining in the viewer stats, and wrightly so there is some brilliant stuff on there now. I listen to Radio 1, 2, 4 and my local bbc station comercial station in genral are terrible, they have an advert slot every ten minutes, you cant get anything like radio 4 in the comercial arena. There R&D department is one of the most important in the world, without which many advances in broadcasting would probably not ave happened, wait till we can whatch the last 7 days worth of TV like we can with radio on there site that will be great. wehn you wok out howe much you pay for subscription channels, the license costs pennys and gives us the best output... |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
BBC America is not funded by the license fee. Hence the reason it has ad's. |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
BBC World Service,"Dedicated to the friendship of English-speaking peoples" as the inscription says above the Bush House entrance, receives a generous contribution from the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, that is tax money, the FCO used to have a say over content. Certainly, when I lived overseas I valued its World Service radio broadcasts and was always amazed just how many locals would tune in to get an alternative to local state media. :D |
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
The BBC World Service has had significant political and strategic uses over the years and still has.
|
Re: Scrap TV license fees?
Quote:
http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?...=1007029395267 There is a view that the World Service should remain under FO funding and perhaps should be formally separated from the main BBC services. :D |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum