![]() |
Re: Cancelation charges
went to cab and they said put evrything in writing whitch i will do and the cable forum contact has been talking to me and said we have reached deadlock refered me to oftello so i contact them and they said as the 12 weeks are not up yet i need a letter of deadlock from ntl , phone up ask for the letter and i get Oh sorry cant have that 12 weeks have mnot passed ..
U refered me to them urgggg:mad:. BEst address to write to would be helpfully anybody? |
Re: Cancelation charges
you didnt say how long your contract had to run btw ?
i found this SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST FOR COMMUNICATIONS DATA its got addresses in there , i wouldnt sent the SARS though as it might tigh up the data conroller in knots for a few weeks lol http://www.privacyinternational.org/...e/sar_isp.html 12 weeks to even begin sorting it out, thats outragous, you could have sent an LBA,filling in an N1 county court order,placed an injunction, had it served,and probably been sorted by then, you would probably even had time to cc the OFT http://www.oft.gov.uk/Search+Results and had them initiate an investigation and perhaps even got them to get an undertaking from NTL:tw to not to profit from unfair terms. just as OFT will seek a court injunction to prevent their continued use Using the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994, so can you or anyone. http://www.oft.gov.uk/News/Press+rel...8/PN+48-98.htm |
Re: Cancelation charges
Quote:
Yes. Schedule 2 1.(c) making an agreement binding on the consumer whereas provision of services by the seller or supplier is subject to a condition whose realisation depends on his own will alone; If NTL can't provide services because they decided not to service an area then the consumer is not at fault. |
Re: Cancelation charges
So yep the area is not serviced, and the is a weakness on the cableco's part.
But it isn't ntl's fault that the customer is moving before the contract minimum term. On that basis ntl only partly fail the above clause. |
Re: Cancelation charges
I have 5 months to run on my contract so was with tthem for a fair bit also when i could not get ntl cable i got virgin net owned by ntl so i still used ntl just a diffrent part of the same firm,
|
Re: Cancelation charges
Davey2006... I think that you may find if you are able to phone up and give your virgin account details the charge may not be held... no guarantees but I think it may swing things.
|
Re: Cancelation charges
Quote:
What I quoted above was only one element of the "unfair terms" legislation. There are others which apply equally - should the OP wish to research them. NTL are neither estate agents nor landlords. As such they have no right to determine, restrict, or attempt to restrict someones right to elect to move address. If you (the OP) wanted to be truly pedantic you could point out the fact that there is nothing in the T&C's that says a customer must live at a particular address and not move house. The services, according to the T&C's, are provided to a particular address and there is no mention anywhere that customers may not move house / address. Moving address does not, therefore, constitute a part of or breach of the contract on your part. If you are still keen to receive the services but they cannot supply them than they are in breach of the contract, not you. Again the OP would need to research this. Do they also do "student deals" for term time students? Assuming they do then if they can facilitate contract terms which have negotiable timeframes outside of the oft referred 12 month contract on the basis of a temporary occupancy one would have to question why they can't waive the remainder of any 12 month contact where occupancy of a particular address is the issue. The key is in the word "may". If someone were to stick to their guns and cite consumer contract law I suspect, once NTL determined that they were serious and aware of their rights, that NTL would be very reticent to try and force the issue. *Trust that bitch to butt in with a one sentence sensible answer!! |
Re: Cancelation charges
:D Just because I'm not a gasbag and quoting all this fancy brainy stuff ;)
|
Re: Cancelation charges
Quote:
|
Re: Cancelation charges
Quote:
http://www.home.ntl.com/content/ebiz.../b3365_cop.pdf NTL Code of Practice "16. Dispute Resolution – the Telecoms Ombudsman OTELO 16.1 What is Dispute Resolution? Because legal actions can be lengthy and expensive, ntl offers a straight forward alternative to court action in the form of a dispute resolution process for most claims relating to services covered by this Code. This is done through the Office of the Telecommunications Ombudsman, known as OTELO. If you have a claim that may be legally enforceable, you may wish to seek your remedy against ntl through the courts or choose to resolve it through the OTELO dispute resolution process. Dispute Resolution involves the use of an Ombudsman who is independent of ntl. The service is free to consumers. Otelo investigates customers’ complaints about communication services." it would seem the NTL:tw othered OTELO isnt really a werthwhile or indeed an effective option other that to give NTL:tw far more time than any court or even a DPA notice.... its also rather misleading (after reading up on CAG) to say "legal actions can be lengthy and expensive" given most people will/can use the N1 form and go through the small claims (upto £5000), its almost as if NTL:tw are trying to put you off the real courts !, for instance if your on a low income it might not cost anything (after filling in a simple court form) other than a few stamps and price of recorded delivery letter. it would appear best not to even waste your time with that OTELO option and just take the direct route, you have asked over on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/ i assume ?. it might be fun to start a spot the unfair terms thread game:p: (yes i know stuart, but its a related comment i cant let it pass without comment, it needs telling) OB made me giggle when she said Quote:
after finding out the BB was down, not hard as i was posting here at the time,after the usual what the F*&*&* are you doing mate, and he told me he's from NTL:tw and been sent to recover box etc, i asked why he didnt ring my NTL:tw phonline to confirm what he was about to do and enquire as to weather i was infact in arrears etc, he tells me he rang my mobile, he couldnt give me the mobile No he had just rang though, funny that as i dont have a mobile and even if i did i woudnt give it to NTL:tw,he did then ring NTL:tw credit control and they confirm i am infact NOT in arrears but in CREDIT,so he can put back the splitter. i asked how much they get per job, he replyed £150 , we have a talk about wasting users time, taking away service without confirmation and so on, i asked so your firm is getting £150 per job so now they have lost time and the cost of this job?, hes reply ohh no we will book it as 2 jobs, once for comeing out and removing the splitter and again as re-fittiing it, as credit control said i could put it back........ so the crux of it is, even though the OP and others are being told theres always a cost to it, it is infact the NTL:tw staff and agents of them that is infact costing far in excess of any cost anyone might assign to the users. to put into perspective, i beleave the standard callout charge for fitting or moveing a phone socket (far more work than the above)is £25., the user not being in when an NTL:tw turns up at a booked time is £10. Quote:
if an employee or and agent of theirs makes an agreement then its binding to NTL:tw under the T&Cs just like the user is bound to the T&Cs, unless their unlawful, and you wouldnt want to imply NTL:tw are knowingly ignoring the agreements as they think they are unlawful in their opinion.... after re-reading the ntl contracted agents Qnet you might think its a conman, WRONG, i can confirm for myself that infact that call he made is showing on the CS screens system as being made, so it is an official sanctioned agent and action. thanks and respects to the new 3 months recrute Cris in CS for spending the time and entering all relevent facts about my case onto the notes system and chaising up not one, but 4 seperate, but linked problems coursed by some NTL:tw employed Credit Control person or people, and even confirming they(CC) had placed a £150 charge on my account without caurse, and he had now removed that and placed a note telling the next operator all about it incase of problems later (i know there will be, even after his great help, and thats no reflection on him or his work, just so thats clear). |
Re: Cancelation charges
as a side note, i wonder how many people are coming home and finding their payed up BB is disconnected and having to wait 3 days+ to have the guy come back and reconnect?, thats what the Qnet guy said, after 3days+ ring NTL:tw to get it reconnected...
|
Re: Cancelation charges
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
At least some people are getting disconnected. I've been trying for months to get disconnected and each time I ring CS they tell me a different one of the services are still connected each time. Yesterday it was broadband still connected. Why would anyone want to reconnect to NTL once they have cut you off? Just use the opportunity to move to a company that do reply to letters or emails and dont tell blatant lies every time you talk to them. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum