![]() |
Re: Port blocking
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Port blocking
Quote:
As I mentioned I have had absolutely no 135 scans since they started blocking until this morning, now they are flooding in just as before blocking. http://forum.nthellworld.co.uk/showt...light=Port+135 EDIT, Thanks Fawkes, was just about to post that link but you saved me the trouble. I just find it weird that no one else in the N/West has reported anything similar yet, but the night is young.:) As you can see from attached jpeg, I am also getting 139 & 445 scans as well, even though these are supposed to be blocked. |
Re: Port blocking
Quote:
cheers for that - I missed the first bit - sorry :dunce: |
Re: Port blocking
I can confirm that nothing is getting to me on port 135. :D
|
Re: Port blocking
I'm not surprised, they are all attacking me. Over 600 hits in the past 5 hours, ports 135/139/445 mainly, and these are supposed to be blocked.
I am going to shut down now and see what tomorrow brings. |
Re: Port blocking
Quote:
iadom... Please check with Neil who I am, and then please pm me your details, we would like to investigate why you are getting these hits on your firewall. Thanks UTT |
Are Isp's Right To Block Mail From Dynamic IP's ??
Hi All.
I know that you are not suposed to run your own mail servers on a broadband connection with NTL but many people do. I do as I simply can not rely on NTL'S poor mail servers (when they are actualy up that is ! ) I am now finding that a large number of mail servers are rejecting mail from dynamic ip's that are sent directly. I can understand why they are doing this as there must be a huge number or servers that are completely insecure or set up as open relays. This is purely down to ignorant people that simply slap on a mail server package with no knowlege of how to secure it. These users should have there cable modems inserted where the sun doesn't shine as they are giving people that do run proper mail servers a bad rep. There sulution to this is to use the NTL smtp as a smart host !!!!!! :-( NOT GOOD !!! There are users out there that do know what they are doing and dont pose a risk as open relays or spam portals. If you are a small company like we are a leased line is out of the question. Looks like the average home or small company has no choice but to rely on there ISP'S mail servers even though they are often unstable and usualy a bigger relay of spam than most home servers. Does any one know if NTL have multiple mail servers in diferent parts of the U.K. or do they just have the one ? |
Re: Are Isp's Right To Block Mail From Dynamic IP's ??
Quote:
|
Re: Are Isp's Right To Block Mail From Dynamic IP's ??
Im self employed so a business connection is simply out of my budget. I need web mail access to the server and I also need to send digitaly sig. mail out.
|
Re: Port blocking
Will do ,thanks for that. Have just booted up and the firewall was hit within seconds.
jim. |
Re: Port blocking
Quote:
|
Re: Port blocking
Quote:
Strange why I have just suddenly started to get these, PS, my memory is a bit vague this morning, I was out on my first call at 7.30 and it was b***** cold. How do I obtain my MAC address. EDIT: Cancel that ,good old Robin Walker pages, I knew I had seen MAC info somewhere. |
Re: Are Isp's Right To Block Mail From Dynamic IP's ??
Quote:
I agree with you that NTL's SMTP servers can't be trusted (nor can their POP3 servers for that matter), so the only real solution is to buy email services from a reliable third party. I happen to use UK Web Solutions Direct, who have been very reliable (20 quid a year for POP3, SMTP, webmail, and 100MB of web space), but I'm sure there are plenty of other suitable providers. |
Re: Port blocking
Quote:
|
Re: Merged - Port blocking
For attention of utt.
Here is the screen grab you requested from first bootup this morning. Still flooding in, over 400 today up to now. Jim. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum