![]() |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
I'd love to see how ill this kid really is. :erm: |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
I'm not for a moment suggesting any blame is taken away from her for this but perhaps the benefits agency make it too easy to get away with fraud? Some local councils certainly do.
|
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
and having to home educate him out of my own pocket, i'll apply for a grant, and i didnt know i could get holidays :tu: cheers for the info;) __________________ Oh and dla is awarded in 2 parts with 3 levels in each ;) |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(And, the 'meal ticket' is a meal ticket, in that case. I grant that there are many serious cases of ADHD that do deserve Carers' as well as the mobility (can travel on public transport) and care components of DLA, but in a lot of cases, the kids are living on normal kids - when they take their medication. I can't see the point of compensating people for being who they are - there has to be a good medical reason for them needing that money!) |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
|
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
I think about my poor dad who has worked all his life, never had a day off work really and slogged his bloody guts out to look after us all, who had major surgery 3 months ago and all he is entitled to is about £70 per week. Makes me so mad to see this flippin woman scrounging and scrounging and getting. Just heard a quote on the radio from her "i can't do right for doing wrong" Yes love, do the right thing and get a "proper" job :fit:
|
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
The DLA they get for one kid is £97.50 per week. Let's say half of that is the care component, leaving the other half (£48.58 ) as the mobility component. How many docs and hospital appointments can one kid have in a week? :erm: Quote:
If some of these kids really are that bad, not only will they take away funds from the others, I'm sure they'll be dragging down the overall behaviour of the school. Perhaps it's time to consider some sort of special eduction, for the worst? (I'd extend this to others with behavioural problems of one sort or another, too. Having said that, if there was to be such a school around here, they'd leave a couple of the schools with half the amount of pupils they started with...) Quote:
Again, I refer to the latter part of what I just previously said. |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
I wonder how attractive the benefits would be if they were paid as vouchers to be used for food etc. and not cigs etc..... |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Just been reading this thread, and I have a few thoughts..
First. I do find the Bardsley's offensive. They *are* (IMO) spongers who should be stopped. It sounds like they might be now. Second, we (I include myself in that) are making judgments based on a few news reports (which may be biased) and a few hours of entertainment television (after all, Wife Swap *is* light entertainment, it is not a documentary and is not researched as thoroughly as a documentary should be). They also try to inject a certain "shock" value into the programme*. The programme may also be biased. Third, and before I say this, I will say I don't have much experience with depression. AFAIK depression comes in cycles. It's entirely possible that the times we have seen the father, he was just having a good day. Fourth , I am suprised they got DLA initially. It is not easy to get . Fifth, how stupid are they? Do they think the DWP staff (& fraud department staff) don't watch TV? Yet they still claimed despite being on TV.. Sixth, Assuming both are well enough to work, they should get jobs. * Before you think I am slagging Wife Swap off, I am not.. I like the programme and am actually friends with a lady that started off as researcher (and has apologised for the Bardsleys) and is currently production co-ordinator. I liked the programme and was friends with the lady long before she started work on it. |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
I'm out of work and have bills to pay out of about £500 per month, and I'm only entitled to £54 PW in jobseekers and that expires in March, and F**k all else. Because I have to live at home.
This really the the %^$%$£ |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
And i was joking about that good luck in trying to find a job :tu: |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
|
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Heres a story about spongers, real spongers not someone who may be claiming entitlement and been slipped a few K for one or 2 events that was not likley to continue.
My wife worked at an old peoples home some time ago, there the residents were subjected to abuse you would find hard to believe. Left overs were served up the next day. Unqualified personal were dealing with the medication, medication was not allways reordered on time so other residents medication was borrowed. Doctors are suposed to visit patients every so many prescriptions, this rarely happened, a qualified nurse is suposed to be present during the nightshift. Invariably all these positions/jobs are performed by unqualified school leavers because they are cheap labour, yet the home owners are getting a good £1000+ per week per resident, many small homes take a good 6 to 12 residents. Having worked in one myself for a while I knew what was occuring at my wifes place of employment was not right. The whistle was blown to the council, who then informed the home that they were coming out for an examination in 2 days time as there has been alegations made about the running of the home. Of course the council who is in charge of giving out licences also recieves reasonable financial sums for them. Nothing was found against the owners but they then went on a war hunt to victimise the person they believed informed on them out of their job. Thats £52,000 .00 at least per year per resident sponging, and they get to sell on at the end either a business or a large and expensive house. Of course there are some very well run homes but theres a huge amount that is run like this, as my wife found out when she got in touch with some one who wrote regularly for care weekly and got my wifes story published in it. |
Re: Ha ah aha ha. Bloody spongers.
Quote:
Quote:
Infact if they do police checks on some of these people on benefits they could help the shortfall in watching the children at lunchtimes, become before and after school carers with a member of perminant staff. The Hospitals would benifit from extra help at no extra costs on funds. These people could be palced in areas that have shortfall in staff helping those already there to ease the pressure. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum