![]() |
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Same old discussion.Nothing changes.
However as an educator I do want the younger generation under 16 to be protected from those that will always be ready to prey on them. So let's keep the BBC and all the protections from every public broadcaster. |
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Well next March I'm seriously thinking about dropping the VM TV package..
I have enough DVDs, Blu-Rays & 4K to last me many many years, plus Amazon Prime and NetFlix. |
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
I ditched VM after an absurdly expensive renewal offer and went with Hyperoptic for Ł21 a month for two years. I was going to supplement that with Sky Steam but actually am just going with Now TV that I can turn off and on when needed.
|
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Quote:
There are those who are starry eyed about the Beeb, simply because it's been there since TV in this country started. The reason you don’t want to see payments by voluntary subscription is that you know very well that many would choose not to pay it. The point you raise about private ownership is easily negated by keeping the BBC as a public body, but ensuring that it operates within the money it earns from subscriptions and from making its programmes available to other providers after one year or two of broadcast. That way it will keep to the standards set by the government because it is not a private company. Itis inherently unfair to expect people to pay compulsorily for an entertainment and news service they don’t want. Their public service remit could be preserved by government funding for programmes they want broadcast which otherwise would not be commercially viable. That could be available also to the other ‘designated public service’ broadcasters and funded by taxation - a more sensible use of public money. |
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Quote:
|
Re: TV Licence Unenforceable
Quote:
|
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Why doesn't installing receiving equipment come with a warning :confused:
|
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Quote:
---------- Post added at 20:20 ---------- Previous post was at 20:18 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Quote:
|
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
There must have been 156 different versions of this thread whilst I've been on CF !
The BBC is continuing and needed. Even the last inept Govt agreed on that. Just a matter of how to fund it. The licence fee might be not be the fairest way any longer. Advertising and subscription are non starters, it would lose all the things that make it essential and unique as a public service broadcaster ( and take it downmarket like the hundreds of other channels repeating crap and producing nothing new/unique). Making programmes that only attract advertisers is a downward spiral. We'll pay one way or another just like we do for everything else. Some might pay more, others less , if that's done fairly then its an improvement on the licence fee. General taxation, and/or taxing the extra streaming services. You don't get something for nothing. (And those that say they never use any BBC services:- tv channels, national radio, local radio, news, weather, apps, iplayer , website - I don't believe you !) |
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Quote:
---------- Post added at 21:54 ---------- Previous post was at 21:51 ---------- Quote:
I have a 32" TV as a monitor, I don't watch TV on it. |
Re: TV Licence Unenforceable
Quote:
You can install TV equipment to watch on demand through a service just not iplayer and you can not watch live tv Now here is another crux . You can have sky and never watch or record live TV only ever on demand but if you are silly enough to let the Capita "Enforcement" officers in they will want to access your TV and the very fact your Sky puck or whatever can receive Live TV they assume you actually watch it and will prosecute you . Just having it does not mean you watch. Any PC Laptop Tablet or phone can access live tv but does it mean it use it too? It is a joke. They never getting in my house without a warrant a police officer and a signed document from a judge . An ink signature too |
Quote:
They drive around in vans looking for certain freqs to be emitted... For instance if someone had a CRT set on,you can check for 550am and if you heard a certain tone,etc on that frequency,than a CRT was most likely on in that house.... Im not sure about CRT monitors,I think the 550 thing only applies to reg TV sets where the tubes gives off a certain freq when its on...... Im amazed after all these years they are still trying to collect a licence fee....... Why not just put more spam ads on and call it a day? (Im sure there are alot already) |
Re: TV Licence “Unenforceable”?
Quote:
|
You guys are lucky if there are no ads...... I wonder if thats why they are so persistant about the fee?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum