Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

I am sure Sunak is deeply worried about losing three MPs who want him gone

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

were you not one of the ones that supporting the right wing media witch hunt of Starmer when he had a curry lunch break done nothing wrong

but Johnson breaking rules all fine as rules dont apply to tories right ?

---------- Post added at 16:50 ---------- Previous post was at 16:49 ----------

exactly let them go and lose the tories the 3 seats ;)

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

A great bit of whataboutery MM.

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

:D:D

---------- Post added at 19:29 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ----------

No idea what you're on about, or was that the one where he had a beer?

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

I’m no fan of Johnson, but a witch hunt is exactly what it is.

Snivel servants need to be sacked, who leak stuff to the pathetic liberal media, like the ultra gutter & lefty rag, guardian.

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

The story came from The Times but I think the cabinet office was obligated to refer to the police if they find evidence of a crime?

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

Boris should have eaten all the cake instead of leaving it behind as evidence. :rolleyes:

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

I think it’s the inviting folk who aren’t colleagues round to Chequers that’s the problem this time, OB.

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

has nothing to do with the cake as you well know OB it the gatherings that broke the rules

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

Are you sure about that, Dave? There are a lot of people who think that eating cake or drinking alcohol are proof of a party.

Clearly, that is not the case, but it appears to have swayed the Met. If there hadn’t been cake, Boris would not have been fined. Ridiculous, I know, but true.

It’s also true that Kier attended a function with curry and alcohol at a party member’s house. Police reaction? Move on, nothing to see here….

The ONLY difference apart from the fact that Kier was at a social event and Boris was at a work event was that Boris had cake.

Think about it. If it wasn’t so glaringly obvious and tragic, it would make a hilarious comedy. How to make something out of nothing, and do it so inconsistently, citing cake as the final arbiter when cake isn’t even mentioned in the rules. Yet a social event is OK, when it really isn’t!

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

No one, except you (repeatedly) is "citing cake"…

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

Thank you, Hugh. Glad I nailed that one first. :D

It’s the logical conclusion. If there hadn’t been cake, Boris would not have been fined. Why else was he fined?

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

he was fined because of the gathering OB man why do you think he in trouble again he admitted to more gatherings in his diary nothing to do with the cake

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

OB you are even more tiresome than the failed leader, proven liar and soon to be former MP you defend so much.