![]() |
Re: Can young people can afford a home? Move somewhere cheaper!
Definitely agree that something has to give sooner or later, maybe more 'home working' is the start of the something.
The other side is, possibly people moving from the cities to the outer areas will push those house prices up, leaving the 'locals' even worse off. |
Re: Can young people can afford a home? Move somewhere cheaper!
Quote:
|
Re: Is Housing unaffordable for the young?
Is there some point to your post/quote ?
|
Re: Can young people can afford a home? Move somewhere cheaper!
Quote:
Quote:
The other thing is this thread is entitled 'young people' who are more likely to want to live near certain areas such as London. Ideally, you expect people would want to go from renting/owning a small place in a city, to a home in the suburbs when they have a family. The country needs a cultural and political change from seeing houses as an investment rather than homes. At the moment you have the government pursing policies to keep the rises going such as Help To Buy. |
Re: Is Housing unaffordable for the young?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Is Housing unaffordable for the young?
Increasing interest rates by 5% should sort it all out. Borrowing money and mortgages have been too cheap for a long time, which has fuelled the crazy prices. BTL landlords have it coming too, as well as second home owners leaving their holiday houses empty most of the year , whilst locals have to go elsewhere.
|
Re: Can young people can afford a home? Move somewhere cheaper!
Quote:
Parts of 2020/21 - you must support our economy !! Eat avocado toast and drink espresso 2022 - young people can’t afford houses due to eating avocado toast and drinking espresso |
Re: Is Housing unaffordable for the young?
The housing issue in Britain has been a problem for a long time and isn't simple to sort out. Certainly there is (was) a problem in SE and especially London. Covid allowing many to work from home has pushed some out of the city centres. That then pushes up prices and demand elsewhere. It also leaves some areas it trouble as businesses that started to accommodate that population close/relocate then leaves behind a deprived neighbourhood with declining investment and opportunities. Those that can also leave even if not ideal and further decay sets in.
WFH has also changed what people are looking for from focus on flats and maisonettes to houses with gardens (thinks about some developments near here where a large house with large garden is knocked down and 5-6 five bed boxes with little or no garden are erected). It's already been mentioned about "wealthier" people moving in and 2nd homes pricing locals out, especially in rural settings where locals work "on the land" at lowish pay but have always been able to cope because prices were lower too. Higher prices also stop the usually move up the chain as people get more wealthy. It's cheaper and easier to extend. Profit is important for builders and there is more profit in larger houses so that's their focus. But we really can't simply build our way out. If there is empty stock somewhere that somewhere should be filled first before we destroy more countryside and enlarge towns. And simply building large estates around towns/cities may not be the best solution as often infrastructure isn't always there to cope either. And NIMBYism is also valid, I live within 150m of open countryside and I'd like to keep it that way. So instead of a few thousand homes around my home city why not spread it out so a few homes around each of a few hundred villages. Less impact on roads/schools etc. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum