Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Freesat & Freeview (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=109)
-   -   Mod tests. (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708009)

cheekyangus 23-08-2019 18:36

Re: Mod tests.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36007192)
I'm assuming that these tests were successful, as i've been told that Freesports HD is now using this standard and that S4C HD is in the process of changing over.

I was amazed when I read about these recent switches, I thought all the HD on satellite was on S2 rather than S. Particularly with Freesports as that's so recent.

I think S2 was part of the Generation 1 specs for HD on Freesat and Sky's HD boxes have always met the spec too, so surprising. I can understand it from the point of view of the satellite operators though, S2 boxes are backwards compatible and S can hold MPEG4 streams as I understand it, so given the cost of satellites (to launch) just keep the status quo for as long as is practical.

jfman 23-08-2019 18:48

Re: Mod tests.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cheekyangus (Post 36007197)
I was amazed when I read about these recent switches, I thought all the HD on satellite was on S2 rather than S. Particularly with Freesports as that's so recent.

I think S2 was part of the Generation 1 specs for HD on Freesat and Sky's HD boxes have always met the spec too, so surprising. I can understand it from the point of view of the satellite operators though, S2 boxes are backwards compatible and S can hold MPEG4 streams as I understand it, so given the cost of satellites (to launch) just keep the status quo for as long as is practical.

It’s not really convenient for the satellite operator (in fact S2 lets them squeeze out more bandwidth to sell) but if you are say Channel 5 it might suit you to just throw an HD channel in with your existing SD channels that are on a DVB-S transponder.

cheekyangus 23-08-2019 18:51

Re: Mod tests.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36007198)
It’s not really convenient for the satellite operator (in fact S2 lets them squeeze out more bandwidth to sell) but if you are say Channel 5 it might suit you to just throw an HD channel in with your existing SD channels that are on a DVB-S transponder.

That's the impression I got when I investigated earlier. Thanks jfman. :)

RichardCoulter 24-08-2019 11:43

Re: Mod tests.
 
By using DVB-S2, (which all HD capable receiving equipment should be able to demodulate*), the total bandwidth of the transponder can be increased by over 10mb, thus fitting another HD service onto the transponder.

In theory, this should be all, but some receivers do seem to have difficulty.

jfman 24-08-2019 20:52

Re: Mod tests.
 
It's probably dish alignment causing the problems rather than the receivers.

RichardCoulter 24-08-2019 21:24

Re: Mod tests.
 
A satellite installer has said that some boxes/tuners don't like DVB-S2 at low FEC's eg certain early Sony Panasonic mvision and spiderbox tuners.

The early Manhatten Plaza boxes (like mine) are having problems with this change, which seems to be worse in warmer weather for some reason, and affects recordings made more than watching live TV.

In case anyone here has any problems, his advice was to increase ventilation or add a fan and that the DVB-S2 issue might be helped by slightly altering the frequency and/or symbol rate or by deleting and blind scanning the channels back in.

jfman 24-08-2019 21:49

Re: Mod tests.
 
I'd be more likely to try and return the hardware as not fit for purpose.

cheekyangus 24-08-2019 23:00

Re: Mod tests.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36007359)
A satellite installer has said that some boxes/tuners don't like DVB-S2 at low FEC's eg certain early Sony Panasonic mvision and spiderbox tuners.

The early Manhatten Plaza boxes (like mine) are having problems with this change, which seems to be worse in warmer weather for some reason, and affects recordings made more than watching live TV.

In case anyone here has any problems, his advice was to increase ventilation or add a fan and that the DVB-S2 issue might be helped by slightly altering the frequency and/or symbol rate or by deleting and blind scanning the channels back in.

Interesting. I've got one of those boxes, wonder if it's affected, I don't use it often enough to know. Any S2 channels particularly susceptible?

RichardCoulter 25-08-2019 15:36

Re: Mod tests.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36007360)
I'd be more likely to try and return the hardware as not fit for purpose.

How far back since you bought the STB can you go though in order to be able to use this remedy?

---------- Post added at 15:36 ---------- Previous post was at 15:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheekyangus (Post 36007366)
Interesting. I've got one of those boxes, wonder if it's affected, I don't use it often enough to know. Any S2 channels particularly susceptible?

AFAIK, it affects all S2 channels. I can't check with my Freesat box either as it's not working due to tree growth or damaged cabling. I'll soon know which it is in the next few weeks as i'm having some of the trees cut down.

jfman 25-08-2019 21:02

Re: Mod tests.
 
I think consumer rights extend to six years, but ultimately if it doesn't adhere to DVB-S2 spec it was mis-sold.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:28.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum