![]() |
Re: Mod tests.
Quote:
I think S2 was part of the Generation 1 specs for HD on Freesat and Sky's HD boxes have always met the spec too, so surprising. I can understand it from the point of view of the satellite operators though, S2 boxes are backwards compatible and S can hold MPEG4 streams as I understand it, so given the cost of satellites (to launch) just keep the status quo for as long as is practical. |
Re: Mod tests.
Quote:
|
Re: Mod tests.
Quote:
|
Re: Mod tests.
By using DVB-S2, (which all HD capable receiving equipment should be able to demodulate*), the total bandwidth of the transponder can be increased by over 10mb, thus fitting another HD service onto the transponder.
In theory, this should be all, but some receivers do seem to have difficulty. |
Re: Mod tests.
It's probably dish alignment causing the problems rather than the receivers.
|
Re: Mod tests.
A satellite installer has said that some boxes/tuners don't like DVB-S2 at low FEC's eg certain early Sony Panasonic mvision and spiderbox tuners.
The early Manhatten Plaza boxes (like mine) are having problems with this change, which seems to be worse in warmer weather for some reason, and affects recordings made more than watching live TV. In case anyone here has any problems, his advice was to increase ventilation or add a fan and that the DVB-S2 issue might be helped by slightly altering the frequency and/or symbol rate or by deleting and blind scanning the channels back in. |
Re: Mod tests.
I'd be more likely to try and return the hardware as not fit for purpose.
|
Re: Mod tests.
Quote:
|
Re: Mod tests.
Quote:
---------- Post added at 15:36 ---------- Previous post was at 15:34 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Mod tests.
I think consumer rights extend to six years, but ultimately if it doesn't adhere to DVB-S2 spec it was mis-sold.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum