Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Chilcot Inquiry Released (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33703248)

heero_yuy 09-07-2016 13:12

Re: Chilcot Inquiry Released
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35848931)
lift carpet sweep ;)

Surely a spike in traitors cloister? And while we're at it dig up Heath behead the corpse and put the skull on a spike for the EU betrayal.

Mr K 09-07-2016 15:51

Re: Chilcot Inquiry Released
 
At least we've sort of bought Tony to account. Meanwhile over the pond, George W. goes unquestioned and continues to lead a war hero's life of luxury in that mad bloody country.

denphone 09-07-2016 16:09

Re: Chilcot Inquiry Released
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35848934)
Surely a spike in traitors cloister? And while we're at it dig up Heath behead the corpse and put the skull on a spike for the EU betrayal.

Very blood thirsty today l see.;)

TheDaddy 11-07-2016 21:23

Re: Chilcot Inquiry Released
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35848957)
Very blood thirsty today l see.;)

He might be thirsty but at least his hands aren't covered in blood like bliars, I hope all the talk of him being charged with misleading parliament comes to something, he needs to face justice but I won't hold my breath.

RizzyKing 11-07-2016 22:07

Re: Chilcot Inquiry Released
 
If Blair gets off Scot free it sets a dangerous precedent and must not be allowed it's rare for people and politicians to agree on something but we do agree Tony Blair has to face consequences for what he did and I don't mean making more millions off the suffering he caused. George bush is as bad but a t least he isn't jumping into everything giving his wisdom Blair can't bugger off no matter how hard the message is given.

Damien 11-07-2016 22:16

Re: Chilcot Inquiry Released
 
What can people actually get Blair for? It isn't clear. First of all any international organisation is probably out of the question so it would be a domestic charge. Even then it's hard to see what you could convict him of. The report didn't say he lied and the best evidence we have is the 'i'll be with you whatever' which, considering the following context of that letter, isn't a smoking gun.

There is a sense he should be held accountable and the common's doing some sort of motion seems the best avenue for that but in terms of the legal system I haven't seen what it could be. Not a lawyer though obviously.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum