Cable Forum
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn aid (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702767)

Osem 16-04-2016 21:16
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35832815)
Is not technically true the same as not true? ;)
Only technically. :D

Maggy 16-04-2016 21:23
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35832795)
Maggy.,
If you thought that l don't know about poverty. I was brought up in poverty, admittedly, like in foreign countries.

BUT, I grew up in Hammersmith, And l knew what poverty was like. Getting food from the rubbish tips of markets, having to sell rags, to get money. Wearing holes in my trousers that you could see me underwear.

Washing in freezing cold water, having to go to the local baths, to have a decent wash.

Going to school wearing wellington boots, because my parents couldn't afford shoes.

I can fully understand that this country has foreign aid. And DC is proud to increase it each year.

BUT, we have problems at home. And he should sort those problems out, before giving our money freely abroad.

Just think ONE countries AID, could solve the NHS problems. And give the staff decent wages. And stop the Junior Doctors strike

And another countries AID, could be given to FOOD BANK charities.

There is other worthy areas that this could be done.

I am talking about ONE YEARS AID, could solve these

So yes, l do know what poverty is like
Just how old are you Arthur?

Kursk 16-04-2016 22:44
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35832821)
Just how old are you Arthur?
I would hazard a guess that he was born in the early 1950's. About 1952?

TheDaddy 17-04-2016 02:26
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35832812)
You are doing their dirty work for them. When they've managed to extract all they can from the legally avoided tax monies of the rich and then set their sights on your money, don't say that I didn't warn you.

---------- Post added at 22:02 ---------- Previous post was at 22:01 ----------

I know. It seems that it's not technically true but it still isn't right, imo.
Mate, you were moaning just the other day that you were going to get rid of half your property and pay of debts because of the amount of tax you were expected to pay, part of the reason for that is because certain people and companies won't pay the tax what's due and embroil themselves in all sorts of shenanigans and aggressive schemes to avoid or evade at everyone else including yourselves expense

---------- Post added at 03:26 ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35832833)
I would hazard a guess that he was born in the early 1950's. About 1952?
Looking at his user name and join date I'd say 1955...

Maggy 17-04-2016 08:28
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35832833)
I would hazard a guess that he was born in the early 1950's. About 1952?
Well so was I and I don't recall seeing that sort of poverty in England...That's from pre welfare system that is..

papa smurf 17-04-2016 08:35
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35832865)
Well so was I and I don't recall seeing that sort of poverty in England...That's from pre welfare system that is..
he accurately described my memories of childhood some people had nothing
i remember collecting rags to sell so my friends mum could buy food etc,
1 tap cold water only
2 tin bath hung up in the yard [bath on sunday ]same water for whole family dad first then mum followed by the kids in order of age.
3 washing clothes in a copper boiler then a dolly tub
4 no arse in your pants was the norm
the good old days :)

Ramrod 17-04-2016 13:21
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35832837)
Mate, you were moaning just the other day that you were going to get rid of half your property and pay of debts because of the amount of tax you were expected to pay, part of the reason for that is because certain people and companies won't pay the tax what's due and embroil themselves in all sorts of shenanigans and aggressive schemes to avoid or evade at everyone else including yourselves expense
You really think that if governments managed to extract all the tax they feel they are owed from corporations that they would stop hounding the rest of us for what they feel we owe? Get real! Governments are a bottomless pit with regards to tax. :D

Taf 17-04-2016 14:16
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
This "aid" is often, I think we should admit it, bribes to keep certain governments on our side and buying UK products and services.

Some of it gets to where, and whom, "we" intended. But a lot doesn't. And "we" are not consulted on it's distribution.

Until the misuse is stopped, so should aid.

And to set a specific percentage of income to it does tie the hands of future governments who may have worse financial problems than we have at the moment.

Cuts in budgets and services at the same time as BORROWING money to send abroad does seem rather crass to me.

TheDaddy 17-04-2016 15:17
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35832934)
You really think that if governments managed to extract all the tax they feel they are owed from corporations that they would stop hounding the rest of us for what they feel we owe? Get real! Governments are a bottomless pit with regards to tax. :D
There's only one way to find out...

ianch99 17-04-2016 16:02
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
It is depressing that when the Government has cut public spending on local government to such a point that it is less that the 0.7% GBP that we spend on helping the world poor, the outcry isn't that the Government has made such drastic cuts to our public services, it is that we should be spending the 0.7% on foreign aid!

How selfish and self-centred has this country become? The 5th largest economy in the world, an economic system that facilitates and encourages tax evasion & avoidance to the tune of tens of billions and we begrudge helping those who have nothing .. shame ..

mrmistoffelees 17-04-2016 17:19
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35832795)
Maggy.,
If you thought that l don't know about poverty. I was brought up in poverty, admittedly, like in foreign countries.

BUT, I grew up in Hammersmith, And l knew what poverty was like. Getting food from the rubbish tips of markets, having to sell rags, to get money. Wearing holes in my trousers that you could see me underwear.

Washing in freezing cold water, having to go to the local baths, to have a decent wash.

Going to school wearing wellington boots, because my parents couldn't afford shoes.

I can fully understand that this country has foreign aid. And DC is proud to increase it each year.

BUT, we have problems at home. And he should sort those problems out, before giving our money freely abroad.

Just think ONE countries AID, could solve the NHS problems. And give the staff decent wages. And stop the Junior Doctors strike

And another countries AID, could be given to FOOD BANK charities.

There is other worthy areas that this could be done.

I am talking about ONE YEARS AID, could solve these

So yes, l do know what poverty is like
Were you forced to be a child soldier?
Did you have to walk for four hours a day just to get water? (not neccasarily clean)
Were you subject to torture ?
Were you subject to famine ?


You (as per usual have absoloutely) no clue what poverty is , yes you had it hard but what you allegedly experienced is nothing compared to what people are currently experiencing in some countries

It amazes me that as someone who claims to have experienced some aspects of poverty you would wish to see anyone in that situation regardless of ethnicity or nationality

Or, could it be that your usual motives that lurk under the surface of every post you make be the real reason........

Arthurgray50@blu 17-04-2016 19:21
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Just to give you my date of birth - its 28/12/1951 - which makes me 64 (65 in December).

When l was born, there was 2 TV channels, l used to pay money into our TV - coin slot telly.

Poverty, was big when l was brought up. Shops closed on a Sunday. When l grew up, we had to buy patches for trousers, the house l was brought up in. We had to boile the water, as the pipes were dirty.

Phone was a luxury, We got most of food from the waste of Hammersmith Market. We would go down on a Saturday night, when they threw all the food onto a pile. And had to push people out of the way to get the good stuff.
Plus there is more.

Yes, poverty was real and l made a vow to my Scottish wife, that l would NEVER go back to those days.

Sadly, those times are coming back.

---------- Post added at 20:21 ---------- Previous post was at 19:30 ----------

http://www.itv.com/news/border/updat...record-levels/

This is my main argument, DC spending millions on overseas aid.

There should be more to solve this problem

ianch99 17-04-2016 19:27
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35832982)
http://www.itv.com/news/border/updat...record-levels/

This is my main argument, DC spending millions on overseas aid.

There should be more to solve this problem
so you would take money from the poor of the world to solve the problem of food banks? Is that the only recourse available?

Maggy 17-04-2016 19:39
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35832982)
Just to give you my date of birth - its 28/12/1951 - which makes me 64 (65 in December).

When l was born, there was 2 TV channels, l used to pay money into our TV - coin slot telly.

Poverty, was big when l was brought up. Shops closed on a Sunday. When l grew up, we had to buy patches for trousers, the house l was brought up in. We had to boile the water, as the pipes were dirty.

Phone was a luxury, We got most of food from the waste of Hammersmith Market. We would go down on a Saturday night, when they threw all the food onto a pile. And had to push people out of the way to get the good stuff.
Plus there is more.

Yes, poverty was real and l made a vow to my Scottish wife, that l would NEVER go back to those days.

Sadly, those times are coming back.

---------- Post added at 20:21 ---------- Previous post was at 19:30 ----------

http://www.itv.com/news/border/updat...record-levels/

This is my main argument, DC spending millions on overseas aid.

There should be more to solve this problem
Just two TV channels does not add up to poverty..At least you has a TV. The rest of it was the leftover attitude of may do and recycle. I had clothes that my mother remodelled from her old clothes on her old electric sowing machine.It wasn't that we were poor it was just what people did in the 40s,50s and 60s..She used cheaper cuts of meat because having lived through the war that's what lots of people did and not because we were poor.

Sorry Arthur Maybe you were poor but I saw what real poverty was back then.I spent the first 6 years of my life in Nigeria where my father worked for the Colonial Service as a Medic. He went out into the bush to give medical aid such as vaccinations,give help to pregnant native women,deal with some pretty exotic diseases such as sleeping sickness,malaria,elephantiasis so and so forth.No NHS,no running water,no way to keep food fresh..and in some parts of the world such poverty still exists.

papa smurf 17-04-2016 19:39
Re: Just one in four support David Cameron over decision to spend billions on foriegn
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35832998)
so you would take money from the poor of the world to solve the problem of food banks? Is that the only recourse available?
we send money to poor country's who put satellites into orbit ,country's where every one owns a Kalashnikov ak47 , country's with huge military's and huge military budgets ,all art is saying is look after our own first is that such a crime ? .


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:49.
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum