| GrimUpNorth |
15-06-2015 21:09 |
Re: Bliar for hire...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
(Post 35783173)
So that needn't necessarily be right of very much then - right.
Obsessed? Oh really... How many quotes out of over 16,000 posts makes an 'obsession'. :rolleyes:
|
I don't think it's the number as much as the constasnt banging on about how bad anything realted to labour is. :zzz: I think your signatures over the months sort of says all there is to say about 'obsession'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
(Post 35783173)
Missing the point that it isn't the amount or the entitlement but the fact that he's a hypocrite which was the original point. Do try and keep up.
|
But ignoring someone costing nearly twice as much (10 years ago) to protect their 3 houses (1 rumoured to have cost £3 million) does seem a strange way to point out hypocrisy. I would say if someone can afford that sort of property then they could well cover the security costs.
Oh and no chip on my shoulder - I think paying for the protection of Tony Blair is wrong but only about half as wrong as paying for John Major ;)
Cheers
Grim |
