![]() |
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Oh look now the ruddy Germans are sticking there great big noses in. Not like the Germans to try and control other nations is it :rolleyes:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20974666 Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
And now Miliband jumps on the bandwagon :rolleyes:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21002984 Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
So in other words the public are too stupid to be given a choice so the politicians should make their minds up for them.
Nice. Reminds me why political types are so loved and respected by everyone! |
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
What happens to the car companies that depend on the smooth and tariff-free trade between us and the mainland when their factories are here? What happens to the start-up community the government is trying to build at the Silicon Roundabout in Old Street? I can tell you now that there is an abundance of people that use the right to work as members of the EU there. Do we cede that to Berlin who also want that industry? People point to Norway and Switzerland as examples of being able to stay out of the EU but they do still have to deal with some EU edicts only they have no power to sway them. Norway still trades with the EU but they get given the rules and they cannot influence or veto them. Of course we don't know that the alternative is exactly. As Heseltine said: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...on-Europe.html Quote:
|
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
And let's not forget, more Euro-denominated financial dealings take place in London -I.e. outside of the Eurozone - than in all the rest of the EU combined. Which leads neatly on to ... Quote:
In the long run, lack of autonomous economic control is a far bigger disadvantage for a nation state than any of the supposed short-term advantages of having an unelected politburo in Belgium arranging affairs for you. |
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/e...er-the-EU.html |
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Quote:
No one is saying it will be a trade war but what exactly are the terms in which will we continue to do business with Europe? Even if we have it all our own way, which is unlikely, we will still be subject to some EU regulations. We still won't be export products which do not meet EU standards to the EU. We just won't be able to shape those regulations. If we end up like Norway, part of the European Economic Area (which is the likely concession the EU would make to us) then we're subject to all sorts of trade and business regulations only we have no veto and no power to sway them. We, like Norway, would simply have to say 'fine'. The global nature of financial services also means that London's banks will still have to abide by regulations and reports required of them by the EBA. Although the financial sector is occasionally upset with Europe our membership of the EU is a benefit, not a hindrance, to them setting up here. http://www.thecityuk.com/research/ou...he-eu-economy/ http://www.thecityuk.com/blog/why-ou...opportunities/ Quote:
It seems to me that in the bast case scenario we'll have no hit at all in our trade but we'll have to abide by EU regulation, ala Norway, with no power to shape them. The worst case scenario is that we are hit, especially in manufacturing. The holy grail of complete access to the European Market with no strings attached looks a pipe dream. Maybe it isn't. However as Heseltine points out, we're talking about a referendum and we know nothing of what it will be about. |
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Damien, the EEA was created mostly as a waiting room for States whose governments anticipated full EU membership would follow. That's why it carries a heavy regulatory burden, a la Norway, where despite many years of fierce campaigning the political class has never persuaded the citizens to vote 'yes' in a referendum. The Norwegian government has always enthusiatsically implemented EU directives because it has always believed that it would soon enough be a full member and would have to implement the directives anyway. Unfortunately for the Norwegian government, the democratic voice of the Norwegian people keeps getting in the way. The Norwegian people deserve better than the grubby political consensus that exists ove there, which is still pro-EU even though there is now a growing realisation that accession is a more distant prospect than ever.
There is no reason - absolutely no reason whatsoever - to presume that Britiain outside the EU would have to deal with the EU on EEA or Norwegian terms. This is simply yet more Europhile scaremongering. |
re: [Update] Cameron promises EU referendum by October 2017
Political grandstanding and rhetoric aside, I bet the EU would be a lot less worried about the UK leaving if we had a trade surplus with them and were net beneficiaries. At the moment the only thing keeping the Eurozone afloat is the German economy and, IIRC, that shows signs of stalling.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum