Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   50M : Is Super Hub not so Super? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33689193)

progers 21-08-2012 20:08

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
I've had my Superhub now for a few weeks; very pleased with it and wireless performance is good, covers the whole house

jb66 21-08-2012 20:12

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adduxi (Post 35466025)
Maybe the wrong thread, or perhaps I should have started another one, but ......
Reading over on Virgin Community Forums and the number of times VM are sending out replacement SH's is outrageous. I mean not just one, some posters are on number 3 and 4!!
They also seem to send out complete SH kits, when all some people want is a replacement PSU!?!?!?
Really makes you wonder what this is costing VM in real money terms. They should have canned this a long time ago :)

It's embarrassing, virgin talk about saving money with the way tech Indians work then grossly waste money in another area

Peter_ 21-08-2012 21:06

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adduxi (Post 35466025)
They also seem to send out complete SH kits, when all some people want is a replacement PSU!?!?!?
Really makes you wonder what this is costing VM in real money terms. They should have canned this a long time ago

PSU's are not supplied separately and never have been for any modem so you get a complete package including modem, it is probably cheaper than ordering separate PSU's as you would need a large quantity of different types in order to keep up with demand.

kwikbreaks 21-08-2012 21:19

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35466064)
it is probably cheaper than ordering separate PSU's as you would need a large quantity of different types in order to keep up with demand.

Consider VM only have the one CPE which they are currently issuing and swap out modems for it whenever they go wrong I can't see why they don't stock superhub PSUs. The number of installers that leave the old ones in requiring later replacement plus the number that annoy people with a high pitched whistle means there must be many otherwise serviceable Superhubs in landfill because VM ship out hubs and psus when only a psu is needed.

jb66 21-08-2012 21:20

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35466064)
PSU's are not supplied separately and never have been for any modem so you get a complete package including modem, it is probably cheaper than ordering separate PSU's as you would need a large quantity of different types in order to keep up with demand.

No, the psu comes separately, it's virgin folk in the big red shed who put a hub and a psu in one box and send it out. I have to order psus separately and they come into the depot separately. If they came in the same box everyone would have the correct psu.

Peter_ 22-08-2012 05:32

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jb66 (Post 35466071)
No, the psu comes separately, it's virgin folk in the big red shed who put a hub and a psu in one box and send it out. I have to order psus separately and they come into the depot separately. If they came in the same box everyone would have the correct psu.

The has never been an option to order them separately though so regardless of them coming separately no agent can send a PSU out.

jb66 22-08-2012 05:47

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_ (Post 35466113)
The has never been an option to order them separately though so regardless of them coming separately no agent can send a PSU out.

Think out of the box, why doesn't someone create an option to order them separately

General Maximus 22-08-2012 10:14

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
exactly. If they want to flipping cut costs they should stop sending shubs out unneccessarily and all the money they save from that they could re0invest in buying proper routers because they would only need to send them out when someone actually needs one.

jb66 22-08-2012 10:48

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35466154)
exactly. If they want to flipping cut costs they should stop sending shubs out unneccessarily and all the money they save from that they could re0invest in buying proper routers because they would only need to send them out when someone actually needs one.

It's a false economy, they may be saving £5 a hub over a better Cisco model but the replacements, loyalty discounts,wasted engineer visits and folk leaving they'd be in a better financial position to have gone with a decent model, also the reputation would be better.

General Maximus 22-08-2012 11:37

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
you have hit the nail on the head; their whole operation is too costly and inefficient. They need someone to go in and completely re-do it. If they offered better quality cpe they would have less than half the number of calls and faults that they have now and they wouldnt need to throw shubs around like confetti.

Sephiroth 22-08-2012 12:40

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
I volunteer, mon General. And what's more, I could do it. My plan would include:

1. Immediately trial a vanilla DOCSIS 3 cable modem with a view to introducing it

2. Immediately trial a high reputation DOCSIS 3 Gateway with a view to making it a paid-for option

3. Put a drop dead deadline on getting the SH firmware right in stability terms (wireless will never be brilliant - but if they get the firmware right it's a get-you-going device)

4. I'd lobby the VM bosses for keeping it all vanilla - no more vain branding -no more "sylish" uselessisms.

That's a start at least. Won't happen nor anything like it.

Mick Fisher 22-08-2012 14:17

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35466247)
I volunteer, mon General. And what's more, I could do it. My plan would include:

1. Immediately trial a vanilla DOCSIS 3 cable modem with a view to introducing it

2. Immediately trial a high reputation DOCSIS 3 Gateway with a view to making it a paid-for option

3. Put a drop dead deadline on getting the SH firmware right in stability terms (wireless will never be brilliant - but if they get the firmware right it's a get-you-going device)

4. I'd lobby the VM bosses for keeping it all vanilla - no more vain branding -no more "sylish" uselessisms.

That's a start at least. Won't happen nor anything like it.

Virgin Media, and for the last 20 plus years in all it's previous guises, has always suffered from Chronic Short Termism and Bargain Bucket Syndrome.

I cannot see The Leopard changing it's spots anytime soon. :(

jb66 22-08-2012 14:26

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
i can do the posting of attenuators and psus, there we go another few thousand saved

Eeeps 22-08-2012 14:35

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35466247)
I volunteer, mon General. And what's more, I could do it. My plan would include:

...
4. I'd lobby the VM bosses for keeping it all vanilla - no more vain branding -no more "sylish" uselessisms.

So what would you propose to do with the army of marketing consultants - have them all shot? ;)

General Maximus 22-08-2012 15:11

Re: Is Super Hub not so Super?
 
Seph and JB are now on the board of directors for VM. Get is done dudes, we are relying on you.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Eeeps (Post 35466296)
So what would you propose to do with the army of marketing consultants - have them all shot? ;)

considering they do nothing but lie their asses off, yes


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum