![]() |
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
I wonder how many superhubs it would take to provide wifi to 1k people?
Actually thats an interesting issue. Train chunders into a packed platform and suddenly every device thats in-use tries to connect. Then it chunders off and cuts everyone off until it gets to the next station. Would be a fun project to try and figure out how to spec out the AP's. |
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Pretty easy tbh. Each connected device takes up a fraction of a kilobyte of RAM, and even cheap APs come with several megs - the Superhub has 64MB for example, plenty for a hundred thousand clients.
The bigger issue would be the firmware being designed to handle it properly, and we all know how good the Superhub firmware is at challenging conditions... In all likelyhood they'll probably use some industry standard managed LWAPs from the likes of Cisco, Aruba, or my personal favourite, Ruckus.. Anything less would be simply idiotic. |
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
That's a little disappointing seeing someone use that term of phrase. :( |
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Making up lies to get me off the phone deserves nothing less.
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Ruckus, with its beam forming abilities would be good, but the fact is that Cisco Aironet kit has kept appearing on main stations for several months now. Waterloo is a good example, but look around you will spot loads when you look for them.
Is it odd that Virgin Media managed to secure this contract over the regular people in this field like Cloud (Sky) and BT, and even "new-comers" like O2? I have tried to find another example of a Virgin Media public Wi-fi installation, and have so far failed to find a single example. The London Underground environment will clearly be very challenging, travellers moving through a station will associate and disassociate with APs pretty quickly, and will move between AP domains (stations?) pretty rapidly. I am wondering if Cisco can support these rapid changes in location / IP addresses. There are reasons that Manhattan has 20K Public Wi-fi APs above ground but far less in the NY MTA below ground. A critical parameter will be how they cope with a train load of say 1,000 users with say 20% having Wi-fi enabled devices arriving and passing the first AP on a platform in a 15 second window as the train arrives. |
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
I've had - and continue to have - severe roaming problems on the Cisco Aironet kit, which is why I'm not a fan. Wireless roaming functionality on it, is by admission of Cisco's own senior engineers, a dirty broken hack which is yet to be fixed (though *might* be soon).
I also agree with your point about existing providers. VM have previously stated they are "interested" in providing WiFi in public places but as of yet have no deployments outside of trials that I'm aware of. The Cloud (using Ruckus kit) on the other hand, runs extremely well set up set up simultaneous dual-band 11n (144+300mbps) with beamforming and frankly, are the most advanced APs I'm yet to see on public hotspots. |
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Boris answers WiFi questions http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/london-u...wers/201219804
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media to supply Tube Wi-Fi
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum